These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
12Next page
 

Tier 3 Destroyers like the Battlecruiser bigger brothers

Author
Elisk Skyforge
State War Academy
#1 - 2013-12-04 00:21:39 UTC
I was thinking for sometime now, the only possible alternative to Tier 3 Battlecruisers (Naga, Oracle, Tornado, Talos) taking into account the adjacent classes seems to be the "Destroyers", so basically destroyers with frigate hulls and medium size cruiser weapons, these things will have lots of application in both PVP and PVE.
What do you guys think?
Zarek Moesia
The Mobius Project
#2 - 2013-12-04 00:28:46 UTC
I for see more gankers if this happens
Naomi Anthar
#3 - 2013-12-04 00:51:42 UTC
it's not like thrashers are not good enough already.

But i would love to see more dessies. It's just 3 dessies per faction now , needless to say no pirate or navy variants aswell. Could use some more love to dessie class.
Arthur Aihaken
CODE.d
#4 - 2013-12-04 04:41:29 UTC
I think it's kind of an interesting idea, actually. And seeing as how both destroyers and battlecruisers were afterthoughts to the original frigate-cruiser-battleship lineup, it's still in-line with that concept. I'd rather see four new destroyer hulls than another "command" or "assault" destroyer. Haven't we just about done these to death? They could even do another EVE spaceship contest (plenty of talent on Deviant Art).

So yeah, +1 to the concept of a medium weapon-based destroyer class ship. We could even call them "submarines".

I am currently away, traveling through time and will be returning last week.

Gigan Amilupar
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#5 - 2013-12-04 06:27:23 UTC
I don't really like the idea. As much as I like the idea of more dessies in game I think that adding something like this, or an "assault destroyer" as suggested previously, would completely overshadow current destroyers uses in game, and it would tread on the toes of cruisers a bit as well. Eventually CCP is going to push boosts on grid, and for that I think we should get, yes, a new "command destroyer" to provide boosts to small gangs. That's a role that currently wouldn't be provided for in a game of on grid boosts so I think it is reasonable. And as much as I would LOVE to see faction destroyers, I think they would have the same problem overstepping roles. I would be particularly concerned about their overlap with faction frigs.
Arthur Aihaken
CODE.d
#6 - 2013-12-04 07:39:51 UTC
Gigan Amilupar wrote:
I don't really like the idea. As much as I like the idea of more dessies in game I think that adding something like this, or an "assault destroyer" as suggested previously, would completely overshadow current destroyers uses in game, and it would tread on the toes of cruisers a bit as well. Eventually CCP is going to push boosts on grid, and for that I think we should get, yes, a new "command destroyer" to provide boosts to small gangs. That's a role that currently wouldn't be provided for in a game of on grid boosts so I think it is reasonable. And as much as I would LOVE to see faction destroyers, I think they would have the same problem overstepping roles. I would be particularly concerned about their overlap with faction frigs.

Command Destroyer = T3.

I am currently away, traveling through time and will be returning last week.

Endovior
PFU Consortium
#7 - 2013-12-04 10:12:09 UTC
Tiericide is a thing. You should expect less power-based differentiation in ships of a given category, not more... that's true of old ships as the rebalance rolls around, and will certainly be true of new ones as they get introduced.

As such, you shouldn't be thinking about 'Tier 3' anything. Instead, think "What new roles might be appropriate for a Destroyer-sized hull?" I've seen a few floating around, reposting for consideration:

-Heavy Destroyer (Destroyer w/ Medium Weapons): Possible, but ugly. It's been done before (with Battlecruisers), and so it's not really very creative... and besides, it'd step on a lot of toes. I suspect that implementing them would make Cruisers a lot less viable, and suicide ganking a lot easier... neither of these being especially healthy or needed changes.
-Command Destroyer (Destroyer w/ Command Links): Possible, and somewhat more plausible, assuming fleets and boosting get dramatically reworked at some point (which is probably a safe assumption, though the 'when' is an open question). Tricky to get them to be useful in that role without them being instantly primaried and vollied off the field, though.
-Fleet Escort (Destroyer w/ Defensive Modules): Basically, a destroyer that does something to protect other ships in the fleet. Suggestions have included remote resist boosters (reasonable, if dubiously useful in most cases due to stacking penalty), sacrificial bodyguards (taking hits for allied ships; an interesting role for normally paper-thin destroyers), or specialized anti-drone platforms (this last is probably most appropriate for the hull; I'd like to, for instance, see FOF missiles that could specifically and usefully be instructed to murder enemy drones, though that kind of thing would require a bit of work).
-Hunter-Killer (Destroyer w/Probing Bonuses): Personally, the kind of thing I'd rather see; a ship that can provide intelligence to a small gang on the move while still being useful in combat. Destroyers tend to have the free hislots to handle such utility tasks... so destroyer hulls dedicated to the task of finding targets, with the potential to actually tackle something or otherwise be useful on the scene after doing so, would be useful.
Kane Fenris
NWP
#8 - 2013-12-04 13:34:37 UTC
if dessies don't need something its more damage
Lyra Gerie
Garoun Investment Bank
Gallente Federation
#9 - 2013-12-04 15:04:43 UTC
I would LOVE a hunter killer dessy. Even more so if they were given advanced ship probing equipment that allowed them two things.

1. To be the only ship capable of scouting out cloaked ships via new probes (only locates the grid of the cloaker)
2. A new bubble launcher that pulses every dozen ticks or so and decloaks all ships in range. Bubble range 25km T1 30km T2 The bubble also boosters sig radius of everyone inside by an amount as a drawback.
Xindi Kraid
Itsukame-Zainou Hyperspatial Inquiries Ltd.
Arataka Research Consortium
#10 - 2013-12-04 15:10:33 UTC
As I mentioned in the T2 assault destroyers suggestion thread; currently the way the lineup is designed, both ships for each race are designed as Attack ships, that means they were balanced around the idea they are fast and hard hitting but don't have much in the way of defenses or staying power (though your milage may vary on how true that is for each individual ship). That also happens to be the role of the tier 3 BCs, so mimicing them isn't really the best thing.

What the destroyer lineup is lacking is a set of combat ships (and other stuff like EWAR, support, etc that only seem to appear in cruiser and frigate sizes). I'd rather see CCP make some destroyers that are designed to have more staying power than to just have them copy some glass cannons 2 sizes up.
Endovior
PFU Consortium
#11 - 2013-12-04 22:59:48 UTC
Lyra Gerie wrote:
I would LOVE a hunter killer dessy. Even more so if they were given advanced ship probing equipment that allowed them two things.

1. To be the only ship capable of scouting out cloaked ships via new probes (only locates the grid of the cloaker)
2. A new bubble launcher that pulses every dozen ticks or so and decloaks all ships in range. Bubble range 25km T1 30km T2 The bubble also boosters sig radius of everyone inside by an amount as a drawback.


I don't support anti-cloaking systems... largely, because it's really difficult to balance an anti-"AFK Cloaking" fix that doesn't stomp on the legitimate use of cloaking. For instance, you wouldn't want your bubbled gatecamps to be able to perfectly spot and kill Blockade Runners, just because they've got a Hunter-Killer orbiting the gate AFK with his decloaker on; manual decloaking is a real skill requiring effort, and any fix shouldn't trivialize that... or make it too easy for a gatecamp to murder everyone that arrives.
Seranova Farreach
Biomass Negative
#12 - 2013-12-04 23:13:09 UTC
i would love tier 3 dessy with medium weapons. make it glasstank like tier 3 BCs, but fast and powerful but since they are medium weapons they shouldnt get any tracking bonuses on the hull, just cpu and pg use bonuses and for weapon systems that use energy a energy use bonus for fireing the guns.

[u]___________________ http://i.imgur.com/d9Ee2ik.jpg[/u]

Saeger1737
Habitual Euthanasia
Pandemic Legion
#13 - 2013-12-05 00:32:00 UTC
Corvettes would and should be the next in line ships. In between cruiser size hulls and dessies making them nibble fast hard hitting, troop transporting ships.

MERC WITH A MOUTH, Send me DPS and my fleet will double it back! Special offer!

Alvatore DiMarco
Capricious Endeavours Ltd
#14 - 2013-12-05 00:37:07 UTC
But we don't have troops.
Saeger1737
Habitual Euthanasia
Pandemic Legion
#15 - 2013-12-05 00:39:19 UTC
Alvatore DiMarco wrote:
But we don't have troops.

That's where dust comes into play

MERC WITH A MOUTH, Send me DPS and my fleet will double it back! Special offer!

Markku Laaksonen
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#16 - 2013-12-05 00:41:04 UTC
Wouldn't corvettes fit between fighters and frigates?

DUST 514 Recruit Code - https://dust514.com/recruit/zluCyb/

EVE Buddy Invite - https://secure.eveonline.com/trial/?invc=047203f1-4124-42a1-b36f-39ca8ae5d6e2&action=buddy

Arthur Aihaken
CODE.d
#17 - 2013-12-05 00:41:53 UTC
Markku Laaksonen wrote:
Wouldn't corvettes fit between fighters and frigates?

I was just going to say... corvettes are smaller than destroyers.

I am currently away, traveling through time and will be returning last week.

Markku Laaksonen
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#18 - 2013-12-05 00:46:33 UTC
I mean, there's no reason CCP can't introduce a ship line between destroyers and and cruisers and call them corvettes like Saeger suggests. To my knowledge, EVE does a good job of matching modern naval class terminology with the size of their space ships, but it's just that. There's no 'standard' that a sci-fi internet spaceship game has to follow modern naval convention.

But like I said, EVE already does a decent job of doing that anyway, except for the fact that fighters can't hit anything smaller than your mom. OH! BURN! (They have a hard time hitting anything smaller than BSs, right?)

DUST 514 Recruit Code - https://dust514.com/recruit/zluCyb/

EVE Buddy Invite - https://secure.eveonline.com/trial/?invc=047203f1-4124-42a1-b36f-39ca8ae5d6e2&action=buddy

Saeger1737
Habitual Euthanasia
Pandemic Legion
#19 - 2013-12-05 01:21:41 UTC
I was thinking more like corelian corvettes from star wars. A ship similar could be used to drop dust players off at contested factional warfare stations to fight for dominance of the system.

MERC WITH A MOUTH, Send me DPS and my fleet will double it back! Special offer!

Arthur Aihaken
CODE.d
#20 - 2013-12-05 01:24:49 UTC
Saeger1737 wrote:
I was thinking more like corelian corvettes from star wars. A ship similar could be used to drop dust players off at contested factional warfare stations to fight for dominance of the system.

Can we choose to vent them into space as an option? Twisted

I am currently away, traveling through time and will be returning last week.

12Next page