Test Server Feedback

This is an interesting point, but I'd rather go up against a ship that can rep a LOT within an area I can get out of (relying on my ability to dictate range) than a ship that can rep a large amount within a huge area I'm going to have more trouble avoiding.

57km radius is a huge volume of space covered by massive reps as it is. decreasing the cap use of RR's in triage would be a significant increase in capability but, it would not be overpowered. the gangs backed up by triage are still fairly limited in their offensive capacity because that rep radius is not changing but once every 6-7 minutes or so ( i say 6-7 minutes because at best a carrier could go in and out of triage in 5 and with webs be moved about the field via warp ins)
the gang backed up by logi's however can move around a much larger area on grid and rep a larger area on said grid and never have to worry about moving out of rep range (assuming the logis and dps dealers arent derp)

that being said. range would give the group too many possibilities offensively while cap would simply allow for longer straight up brawl. a couple of dreads or enough sub caps are still going to overwhelm the local tank

yea...
give a little love to miners here at least... please...
Boost T2 gang links for miners...

Not only mining links, have a look at all links... give some more love for T2 links. Not asking for imbalanced things, just a little bit so you can feel that you are getting T2 link boosts instead of T1. For example, vaga with T1 speed link, reaches ~3600m/s from ~2900m/s, a 700m/s inrease, it would nice if T2 module added another 400m/s, or maybe 350m/s.



Point is that T2 modules improve T1 versions. Adding cap reduction to T2 triage is something that the T1 doesn't offer, it contradicts with the whole T2 approach. It will make an entirely different module. Even if that is done, there should be caution not to become cap stable. RRing in triage should still be cap hungry and you should still have to watch out. Well you can make triage stable even today but that cripples the ship a little.
Btw cap reduction is almost exactly the same as giving rep amount bonus. Having the ability to rep more for less cap, means more reps. Short-term you might not notice difference, but long-term it does make a huge difference. And will also make the carrier way harder to kill as it can run its local reps more, maybe even fit 3 instead of 2. If its underpowered atm it should be fixed, but not make it overpowered... (like SCs).
On a side note they can reduce cycle time and fuel reqs for T2 triage, and thats something that wont make it overpowered but also make triage more flexible in its use.
Range bonus is also a possibility, 57km is not enough in every fight. Not every fight is done by blobing around the carrier. Some fights, especially big ones, are done moving and a stationary carrier will become obsolete soon. Increasing your effective range is not bad.

Well, it's not surprising that you're cap stable when you're spending this much on fits:

[Archon, Robert Hudson's Archon]
Capital Inefficient Armor Repair Unit
Capital Inefficient Armor Repair Unit
Centum A-Type Energized Adaptive Nano Membrane
Tairei's Modified Capacitor Power Relay
Tairei's Modified Capacitor Power Relay
Tairei's Modified Capacitor Power Relay
Tairei's Modified Capacitor Power Relay

True Sansha Cap Recharger
True Sansha Cap Recharger
True Sansha Cap Recharger
True Sansha Cap Recharger

Capital Murky Energy Transmitter I
Capital Coaxial Regenerative Projector
Capital Coaxial Regenerative Projector
Capital Coaxial Regenerative Projector
Triage Module I

Large Capacitor Control Circuit I
Large Capacitor Control Circuit II
Large Capacitor Control Circuit II

+ (presumably, as it's not stable without them as you claim) strong mindflood, cc4+, cr4+.

The T2 triage with cap usage bonus would allow you to get closer to cap stability on T2 fits, or cap-stable on much much much cheaper fits. Fuckit, you could take the fit above and swap a Tairei's for another A-Type EANM, which will give another ~10% boost to all resists. Sure, it's not a third repper, but good luck with that.

Well then range is out of the picture also i guess.
Looks like the only thing that remains is either rep amount bonus which CCP they dont want, or changes to cycle time and fuel amount. Does it worth the training having a cycle time bonus?

You might be using triage carriers a lot in wormholes but you are using them in a very specific way. You repairing BSs and you counter them with bhaalgorns and you are using only archons. We are talking here not only about archons but also about other situations for example bhaalgorns are not always available. If the carrier has so much cap stability that can rep its mate then switch to local repping if it gets targeted then switch again to remote and all that with plenty of cap and with way better fit (since it will need less cap rechargers) then we have a problem here. Triage carrier atm cant be cap stable unless its crippled and has minimal tank capability. Paste me a fit with t2 modules for a triage carrier that has tank and is cap stable.
Dont get me wrong cap bonus might be good for T2 triage but it needs to be tested, it shouldn't make the carrier able to fit stronger tank or have infinite cap, able to fit 3 or more local reppers without problem.

Anyway i just dont want to see the SC story all over again and we end up with very difficult to kill triage carriers that are the next fotm.

what happens if with T2 triage even bhaalgorns cant counter your triage?

Can you link this fit, for science?

Support!

How about a repping increase for the T2 triage module but also an cap use increase. Make it a double edged sword, some pro but also a bit of a con on top of the fitting, which to be honest PG is never an issue on caps due to the fact there are so few capital sized modules.