These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

The Marmite Collective Wardeccing... for a good cause ? Really ?

First post First post
Author
Lady Areola Fappington
#21 - 2013-11-27 11:07:53 UTC
Wow, OP makes a solid case representing people who cannot keep RL and EVE seperate.

Donating for a good cause should be encouraged. If the donations come about via activities in a video game, even better.

Ain't nobody forcing you to donate for good cause. Just deal with the wardec, as countless EVE denizens have done before.

7.2 CAN I AVOID PVP COMPLETELY? No; there are no systems or locations in New Eden where PvP may be completely avoided. --Eve New Player Guide

Danalee
A Blessed Bean
Pandemic Horde
#22 - 2013-11-27 11:09:36 UTC  |  Edited by: Danalee
Obmud wrote:

Care to read what i wrote ? Its a difference if you chose to do it yourself or get blackmailed into it. If the marmites are so good and generous why dont they just gather the money and THEN use that money to donate it ? Why even mention it ?


Hello there,

Don't you worry! We naturally have an internal gathering of isk and assets among our members coupled to some hilarious prizes. Next to that, we are also giving one of our main income sources (surrender fee) to charity, mind you the fee is even lowered for the purpose; Only one plex!?! We kill that in minutes sometimes.

We never put our eggs in one basket.

D.

Bear

Proud member of the Somalian Coast Guard Authority

Member and Juror of the Court of Crime and Punishment

RAW23
#23 - 2013-11-27 11:11:57 UTC
CCP has answered petitions on similar questions discouraging this type of behaviour, and rightly so as it runs the risk of tainting the pool of EvE donations to the RC. As far as I'm aware, a couple of pirates have asked if they can ransom people with the condition that the ransom be sent to PLEX for Good and have been told not to do this but to collect the ransom as normal and to donate it themselves. There is absolutely no need for MC to bring PLEX for Good into their wardecs - they can simply demand isk as normal and make the donations themselves. By coercing people into making donations they risk souring people on the whole idea of using EvE for charitable projects without providing any benefit at all for the charity. It would really be best if they stopped this.

Also, consider how the RC might feel if someone contacted them and informed them that they had been blackmailed into making a donation. That kind of thing might well lead them to be unwilling to associate with CCP in the future. Again, there is absolutely no charitable upside to this and significant potential downsides, so it would be good if they stopped ASAP.

There are two types of EVE player:

those who believe there are two types of EVE player and those who do not.

Riot Girl
You'll Cowards Don't Even Smoke Crack
#24 - 2013-11-27 11:14:25 UTC  |  Edited by: Riot Girl
It's not blackmail. All they are doing is offering terms of peace and part of those terms is that you donate to PFG. You can refuse the terms if you're not happy with them.
Moneta Curran
Federal Defense Union
Gallente Federation
#25 - 2013-11-27 11:18:26 UTC

This thread alone justifies the concept.

You'd rather pay them off directly to drop the war dec, so they maybe could buy a plex with the spoils?
What difference does it make? However they frame their conditions, it's up to you to deal with it.

They're perfectly entitled to wardeccing you for whatever reason they choose.
Whatever they do with whatever you give them is not up to you.

If you don't want to give in to their demands, just go to low sec.. no need to post a whiny thread.

Pap Uhotih
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#26 - 2013-11-27 11:19:30 UTC
It certainly seems wrong and I think at least risks bringing the scheme into disrepute.
I seriously doubt the red cross or any charity would appreciate being associated with extortion in any way, even if it is only in game items. Charities can be extremely sensitive to protecting their image and without the co-operation of a charity Plex for Good can not happen. It is a matter of common sense that charitable donations must be voluntary and it is bizarre that they would abuse the scheme in this way.

I think that they should have their assets converted to plex and donated to the scheme by way of apology for using the scheme for their own entertainment and for simply not considering that there could be broader implications.
RAW23
#27 - 2013-11-27 11:20:34 UTC
Riot Girl wrote:
It's not blackmail. All they are doing is offering terms of peace and part of those terms is that you donate to PFG. You can refuse the terms if you're not happy with them.


There's just no reason to bring PFG into it at all though. If they want to contribute then they can just charge whatever they like and make the donation themselves. Nothing at all positive comes for the charity drive from this approach and that should really be the primary consideration.

And it is, of course, blackmail. Do x or you will suffer negative consequences y is just what blackmail is. Now, that's absolutely fine in EvE but this the PFG initiative has one foot in EvE and one foot in the real world so particular care has to be taken with associating behaviours that are unacceptable in the real world but fine in EvE with it. There just seems no good reason to link the ransoms to PFG in this case as no benefit accrues to the charity over MC simply making the donation themselves from the isk they take.

There are two types of EVE player:

those who believe there are two types of EVE player and those who do not.

RAW23
#28 - 2013-11-27 11:23:56 UTC
Moneta Curran wrote:

This thread alone justifies the concept.

You'd rather pay them off directly to drop the war dec, so they maybe could buy a plex with the spoils?
What difference does it make? However they frame their conditions, it's up to you to deal with it.

They're perfectly entitled to wardeccing you for whatever reason they choose.
Whatever they do with whatever you give them is not up to you.

If you don't want to give in to their demands, just go to low sec.. no need to post a whiny thread.



How they frame their conditions in precisely the point. As you say, what they do with the ransom they collect is nobody's business, so why even bring PFG into the conversation since they can make their donations without making a public link between ransoms and PFG. There is no benefit to the charity and a significant possibility of a downside, so if they have the initiative's best interests at heart they should not pursue this approach any further. There is a reason that CCP has told pirates not to demand PFG donations as ransoms and exactly the same set of reasons apply in this case.

There are two types of EVE player:

those who believe there are two types of EVE player and those who do not.

Iudicium Vastus
Doomheim
#29 - 2013-11-27 11:25:57 UTC  |  Edited by: Iudicium Vastus
What else should we expect from hisec mercs.

But yeah, it's not a really good intentioned thing. It's other people's isk/plex getting coerced into it. If they did care then they'd use their own isk/plex they are paid in their normal business to wardec people to put towards the campaign.

Or depending on their rates put out a deal or something like wardecc'ing for you, for a donation to it. I'm sure that could even drum up more wardecs than usual. Or an "all new wardec contracts during x time go towards PLEX for Good".

[u]Nerf stabs/cloaks in FW?[/u] No, just.. -Fit more points -Fit faction points -Bring a friend or two with points (an alt is fine too)

Riot Girl
You'll Cowards Don't Even Smoke Crack
#30 - 2013-11-27 11:26:36 UTC  |  Edited by: Riot Girl
RAW23 wrote:
Nothing at all positive comes for the charity drive from this approach

Except for donations for the charity.

Quote:
And it is, of course, blackmail. Do x or you will suffer negative consequences y is just what blackmail is.

No it isn't lol. If that were the case, pretty much everything in the world is blackmail.

Quote:
Now, that's absolutely fine in EvE but this the PFG initiative has one foot in EvE and one foot in the real world so particular care has to be taken with associating behaviours that are unacceptable in the real world but fine in EvE with it.
It's up to the Red Cross to do their research and I'm sure they did. If they were concerned about this kind of thing happening, they wouldn't have agreed to it.
Mhax Arthie
Doomheim
#31 - 2013-11-27 11:27:38 UTC
I would like to see what the marmites have to say about this as I don;t really trust in npc corp alts. Maybe there is a misunderstanding, maybe the marmites will use the isk gained from wardecs to donate it to the Plex for Good cause, which is a whole different story.

Forcing people into charity actions is wrong, no matter what. You should donate because you understand the tragedy and want to help those poor kinds and families whom lost everything they just had, including their beloved ones. And we have this great and unique opportunity where we can transform our space pixels into real money and help people in need, thank you CCP for doing this! And we help because we care, not because badges, shirts, fame or any rewards... and most of all, not because somebody is forcing us to do it.
dexington
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#32 - 2013-11-27 11:27:45 UTC
Obmud wrote:
How much and if i donated something to the philippines is my personal matter, i dont want to talk about it in eve, i dont even want to lay out how much i sent, it's none of your guys business and i certainly don't want to be blackmailed into a RL activity by anyone nomatter how "good" it is. You can dec me all day long just to be a ****, thats completely fine, this is eve in the end.


Then don't surrender, or leave/disband the corp/alliance.

Stop being such a whiny carebear, trying to make up excuses for ccp to help you get out of a wardec.

I'm a relatively respectable citizen. Multiple felon perhaps, but certainly not dangerous.

Tauranon
Weeesearch
CAStabouts
#33 - 2013-11-27 11:31:14 UTC
Iudicium Vastus wrote:
What else should we expect from hisec mercs.

But yeah, it's not a really good intentioned thing. It's other people's isk/plex getting coerced into it. If they did care then they'd use their own isk/plex they are paid in their normal business to wardec people to put towards the campaign.



The point to CCP writing surrender into the game IS SO THAT SOME PEOPLE CAN BE MADE TO USE IT.
RAW23
#34 - 2013-11-27 11:32:28 UTC
Riot Girl wrote:

Except for donations for the charity.

No. The donations to the chairty do NOT depend on linking the ransoms to PFG. They can just ransom normally and then donate the isk themselves. Their is NO benefit to PFG in publicly bringing PFG into the equation.

Quote:

Quote:
And it is, of course, blackmail. Do x or you will suffer negative consequences y is just what blackmail is.

No it isn't lol. If that were the case, pretty much everything in the world is blackmail.

What? You're not making much sense here. Extorting a protection payment is pretty much the definition of blackmail. Plenty of other things are not but this example is pretty much the distilled essence of the notion. And there is no problem with that as long as it stays entirely in EvE. But the PFG drive crosses the boundary into the real world as well.

Quote:
Now, that's absolutely fine in EvE but this the PFG initiative has one foot in EvE and one foot in the real world so particular care has to be taken with associating behaviours that are unacceptable in the real world but fine in EvE with it.
It's up to the Red Cross to do their research and I'm sure they did. If they were concerned about this kind of thing happening, they wouldn't have agreed to it.[/quote]

You're making a huge assumption based on facts not in evidence. CCP's response to petitions about whether or not pirates can demand PFG donations as their ransoms points in entirely the opposite direction. CCP do not want this kind of thing associated with the drive.

There are two types of EVE player:

those who believe there are two types of EVE player and those who do not.

Moneta Curran
Federal Defense Union
Gallente Federation
#35 - 2013-11-27 11:32:33 UTC  |  Edited by: Moneta Curran
RAW23 wrote:
How they frame their conditions in precisely the point. As you say, what they do with the ransom they collect is nobody's business, so why even bring PFG into the conversation since they can make their donations without making a public link between ransoms and PFG. There is no benefit to the charity and a significant possibility of a downside, so if they have the initiative's best interests at heart they should not pursue this approach any further. There is a reason that CCP has told pirates not to demand PFG donations as ransoms and exactly the same set of reasons apply in this case.


Perhaps their victims are more likely to cough up when they are donating to a good cause, thus raising a bit of extra money for said good cause, that wouldn't have been available otherwise?

I'm sure none of the rl victims will mind that their food and shelter were paid for in part due to the actions of *ebil piwates* in a video game.
Obmud
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#36 - 2013-11-27 11:37:50 UTC
I find it absolutely hillarious and sad at the same time how people justify this blackmailing by saying it's not blackmailing. And how some argue that the cause justifies all means.

It's not your business how much i donate and i don't let myself bully into it, end of line.

To the person who said i want the wardec lifted... right, Because the Viziam get wardecced so much. -.-

Obmud wrote: I just thrive on forum drama. - by Riot Girl - at 2013.11.28 04:46:00

You should sig that, it will look good on you.

Obmud
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#37 - 2013-11-27 11:40:17 UTC
Moneta Curran wrote:
RAW23 wrote:
How they frame their conditions in precisely the point. As you say, what they do with the ransom they collect is nobody's business, so why even bring PFG into the conversation since they can make their donations without making a public link between ransoms and PFG. There is no benefit to the charity and a significant possibility of a downside, so if they have the initiative's best interests at heart they should not pursue this approach any further. There is a reason that CCP has told pirates not to demand PFG donations as ransoms and exactly the same set of reasons apply in this case.


Perhaps their victims are more likely to cough up when they are donating to a good cause, thus raising a bit of extra money for said good cause, that wouldn't have been available otherwise?

I'm sure none of the rl victims will mind that their food and shelter were paid for in part due to the actions of *ebil piwates* in a video game.


So it's ok to squeeze it out of people as long as you the agressor thinks it's for a good cause ? Got some news for you, noone does anything in this world without thinking in his mind that it's a good thing for one reason or another after weighing in the positives and negatives. Still we have wars in the real world over all kinds of stupid crap. Stop imposing what you think is good on others nomatter how clear it might be. Do and keep it ingame.

Obmud wrote: I just thrive on forum drama. - by Riot Girl - at 2013.11.28 04:46:00

You should sig that, it will look good on you.

Moneta Curran
Federal Defense Union
Gallente Federation
#38 - 2013-11-27 11:41:41 UTC
Obmud wrote:
I find it absolutely hillarious and sad at the same time how people justify this blackmailing by saying it's not blackmailing. And how some argue that the cause justifies all means.

It's not your business how much i donate and i don't let myself bully into it, end of line.

To the person who said i want the wardec lifted... right, Because the Viziam get wardecced so much. -.-


What's sad is that you would place hoarding your internet space riches above the well-being of others in real life.
If this is causing you sleepless nights, you may need to recalibrate your personal scale of atrocities..
"all means" indeed.. lmao.

If you're not inclined to pay, don't.
Obmud
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#39 - 2013-11-27 11:42:04 UTC  |  Edited by: Obmud
Quote:
And it is, of course, blackmail. Do x or you will suffer negative consequences y is just what blackmail is.

Quote:
No it isn't lol. If that were the case, pretty much everything in the world is blackmail.


You are being serious, are you ?

Blackmail is an act, often a crime, involving unjustified threats to make a gain or cause loss to another unless a demand is met.[1][2] It may be defined as coercion involving threats of physical harm, threat of criminal prosecution, or threats for the purposes of taking the person's money or property.

source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blackmail

Obmud wrote: I just thrive on forum drama. - by Riot Girl - at 2013.11.28 04:46:00

You should sig that, it will look good on you.

Moneta Curran
Federal Defense Union
Gallente Federation
#40 - 2013-11-27 11:44:46 UTC
Obmud wrote:
So it's ok to squeeze it out of people as long as you the agressor thinks it's for a good cause ? Got some news for you, noone does anything in this world without thinking in his mind that it's a good thing for one reason or another after weighing in the positives and negatives. Still we have wars in the real world over all kinds of stupid crap. Stop imposing what you think is good on others nomatter how clear it might be. Do and keep it ingame.


It's ok to ransom people in eve.
You are imposing what you think is good on others by denying this simple fact.