These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Test Server Feedback

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Total Training Time now under Prereqs for all items

First post
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Dalloway Jones
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#1 - 2011-11-20 08:10:33 UTC
Hot.

That is all I have to say about that.

Thanks whoever at CCP was responsible for this!
Dalloway Jones
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#2 - 2011-11-20 19:08:14 UTC
No comments on this? If you go to the prereq tab for any item in the market it tells you how many days of training it will take you to be able to use that item if you aren't already trained for it.

For example I am 71 days away from being able to use tech 2 large lasers. Pretty awesome feature.
CCP Kepler
C C P
C C P Alliance
#3 - 2011-11-20 20:17:16 UTC
Dalloway Jones wrote:
Hot.

That is all I have to say about that.

Thanks whoever at CCP was responsible for this!

Team Papercuts strikes again. Glad you like it. Big smile

Engineering Manager CCP NA
Ohh Yeah
Jerkasaurus Wrecks Inc.
Sedition.
#4 - 2011-11-20 20:59:02 UTC
Team Papercuts is too effective to be working on the Team Edward game
Ariane VoxDei
#5 - 2011-11-20 21:10:58 UTC
CCP Kepler wrote:
Dalloway Jones wrote:
Hot.

That is all I have to say about that.

Thanks whoever at CCP was responsible for this!

Team Papercuts strikes again. Glad you like it. Big smile

Sorry for the lack of enthusiasm, we are so used to relying on EveMon that we've gone blind to even notice when it finally showed up in eve.
Big up for all the new people though, who are almost certainly not using sisi or this section of the forum.
Hiram Alexander
State Reprisal
#6 - 2011-11-20 21:28:56 UTC
Dalloway Jones wrote:
No comments on this? If you go to the prereq tab for any item in the market it tells you how many days of training it will take you to be able to use that item if you aren't already trained for it.

For example I am 71 days away from being able to use tech 2 large lasers. Pretty awesome feature.

I hadn't noticed actually, but thanks for pointing it out... That's a superb addition.
M1AU
Zappenduster Inc.
#7 - 2011-11-20 22:00:31 UTC
Holy cow!
Your team accomplished things that makes EVE oh so much better in just 3 weeks!
Imagine they had a team doing stuff like this 52 weeks (or 47 more likely) a year, EVE could be super uber awesome already!
Please CCP consider a team doing awesome papercuts like this all the year.
Desmont McCallock
#8 - 2011-11-21 14:32:39 UTC  |  Edited by: Desmont McCallock
The sad part is that the feature is buggy. Training times are off compared to time shown in skill queue.

Edit: Added screenshot for confirmation. Also crossed checked with EVEMon.
Tonto Auri
Vhero' Multipurpose Corp
#9 - 2011-11-21 14:46:06 UTC
Desmont McCallock wrote:
The sad part is that the feature is buggy. Training times are off compared to time shown in skill queue.

Edit: Added screenshot for confirmation. Also crossed checked with EVEMon.

Tried pausing and restarting queue? ;)

Two most common elements in the universe are hydrogen and stupidity. -- Harlan Ellison
Desmont McCallock
#10 - 2011-11-21 14:56:23 UTC
You know better Tonto that I have double checked my finding. Training was stopped and skill queue was empty before I added the skill levels and lvl 2 is partially trained.
CCP Kepler
C C P
C C P Alliance
#11 - 2011-11-21 15:05:00 UTC  |  Edited by: CCP Kepler
Desmont McCallock wrote:
The sad part is that the feature is buggy. Training times are off compared to time shown in skill queue.

Edit: Added screenshot for confirmation. Also crossed checked with EVEMon.

Thanks for the head's up. Looking at this now.

EDIT: The defect has been isolated and we're working on a fix. Thanks again for the head's up!

Engineering Manager CCP NA
Tonto Auri
Vhero' Multipurpose Corp
#12 - 2011-11-21 15:29:08 UTC
Desmont McCallock wrote:
You know better Tonto that I have double checked my finding. Training was stopped and skill queue was empty before I added the skill levels and lvl 2 is partially trained.

I know :) That was more of a joke.
But sometimes, people do make silly mistakes... It never hurts to double-check.

Two most common elements in the universe are hydrogen and stupidity. -- Harlan Ellison
CCP Anthelios
C C P
C C P Alliance
#13 - 2011-11-21 15:37:43 UTC  |  Edited by: CCP Anthelios
We're tracking this down right now, should have a fix soon
Desmont McCallock
#14 - 2011-11-21 15:38:06 UTC  |  Edited by: Desmont McCallock
Just to reply to Kepler. After the restart of the server training times synced (with a one sec offset).
Edit: Spoke to soon. Issue still persists.
CCP Booster
C C P
C C P Alliance
#15 - 2011-11-21 20:05:00 UTC
Just checked in a fix for this, it is going through the QA process now. Thanks very much for the bug report! I am very glad this was found before this feature hit TQ :-)
CCP Kepler
C C P
C C P Alliance
#16 - 2011-11-21 21:49:01 UTC
Desmont McCallock wrote:
Just to reply to Kepler. After the restart of the server training times synced (with a one sec offset).
Edit: Spoke to soon. Issue still persists.

A fix has been checked in. The change may not make it into the next SiSi update, but you should see it there before the end of the week.

Thanks again for pointing out this issue! Very much appreciated!

Engineering Manager CCP NA
Dr Mercy
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
#17 - 2011-11-22 15:06:53 UTC
I bug reporting this (ID 119411) and it was immediately filtered as 'working as intended'. I know this isn't your fault, but it's still a little frustrating to bother reporting a bug (nice new tool btw) and be told that is this is a design feature and not an oversight.

Make isk with PI: http://failheap-challenge.com/showthread.php?1207-What-to-do-PI-Processor-only-planets
Desmont McCallock
#18 - 2011-11-22 15:45:00 UTC
Dr Mercy wrote:
I bug reporting this (ID 119411) and it was immediately filtered as 'working as intended'. I know this isn't your fault, but it's still a little frustrating to bother reporting a bug (nice new tool btw) and be told that is this is a design feature and not an oversight.
CCP Booster wrote:
Just checked in a fix for this, it is going through the QA process now. Thanks very much for the bug report! I am very glad this was found before this feature hit TQ :-)
What of CCP Booster post didn't you got?
CCP Kepler
C C P
C C P Alliance
#19 - 2011-11-22 15:49:33 UTC  |  Edited by: CCP Kepler
Dr Mercy wrote:
I bug reporting this (ID 119411) and it was immediately filtered as 'working as intended'. I know this isn't your fault, but it's still a little frustrating to bother reporting a bug (nice new tool btw) and be told that is this is a design feature and not an oversight.

When I look at that report, I see it as unfiltered and still a valid report. However, I can understand how that would be frustrating if it was marked as "working as intended." To be fair to the guys doing the filtering, it can be a subtle defect and the right circumstances need to be in place to reproduce it. Regardless, I have now marked at as "Defect Already Fixed," and you will see this once the change makes its way to SiSI (which may be a few days).

We do appreciate your help with reporting defects. Sorry it seemed like you were being brushed off. That wasn't the intent.

Engineering Manager CCP NA
Dr Mercy
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
#20 - 2011-11-22 17:14:48 UTC
CCP Kepler wrote:
Dr Mercy wrote:
I bug reporting this (ID 119411) and it was immediately filtered as 'working as intended'. I know this isn't your fault, but it's still a little frustrating to bother reporting a bug (nice new tool btw) and be told that is this is a design feature and not an oversight.

When I look at that report, I see it as unfiltered and still a valid report. However, I can understand how that would be frustrating if it was marked as "working as intended." To be fair to the guys doing the filtering, it can be a subtle defect and the right circumstances need to be in place to reproduce it. Regardless, I have now marked at as "Defect Already Fixed," and you will see this once the change makes its way to SiSI (which may be a few days).

We do appreciate your help with reporting defects. Sorry it seemed like you were being brushed off. That wasn't the intent.


Maybe because I tried to re-open it to add a comment :/. But thank you for your personal response :).

Make isk with PI: http://failheap-challenge.com/showthread.php?1207-What-to-do-PI-Processor-only-planets