These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Jita Park Speakers Corner

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 
Author
J'Poll
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#41 - 2013-11-25 19:18:17 UTC
Solstice Project wrote:
Mike Azariah wrote:
... run in the CSM9 election and win.
haha ....


.... hahahahahahaha .....


... *cough* ...




....




... haha ... hahahahaha ....


... HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Keep breathing Solst...keep breathing.

And maybe a cup of water / wiskey helps.

Personal channel: Crazy Dutch Guy

Help channel: Help chat - Reloaded

Public roams channels: RvB Ganked / Redemption Road / Spectre Fleet / Bombers bar / The Content Club

Alduin666 Shikkoken
Doomheim
#42 - 2013-11-25 19:23:30 UTC
Kara Trix wrote:
Been playing this game since May 2011

I remember the little CCP president rant issue.

But can't see why we need to give any gamer or small group of gamers any influence over this games design.

They absolutely don't speak for me.

I would rather have a REAL customer service relationship with the publishers that I have a voice rather than an Over the Top gamer who is far too interested in their own personal agenda than to promote mine.

REMOVE THIS FEATURE and fix the relationship... Give each player a voice, be it small...it's still their voice!




I might agree with you if this was truely what you are after but the only reason you made this thread is because a CSM said something about rapid heavy/light missile launchers and then they got balanced (read: not nerfed). If a CSM candidate didn't post anything in your (now locked) rapid launcher rant thread then you wouldn't be here.

Honor is a fools prize. [I]Glory is of no use to the dead.[/I]

Be a man! Post with your main! ~Vas'Avi Community Manager

Dasola
New Edens Freeports
#43 - 2013-11-25 19:30:39 UTC
Sadly CSM is there just to act as buffer between players and CCP. ANd as we have seen CCP does walk over CSM when ever they feel like it. Too bad CCP is not publicly traded corp, i would buy few shares and after that they would have to answer my questions in shareholder meetings. :P

Yes CSM has raised many good issues and got some fixes. Sadly they have also turned 90% of nullsec into wasteland. Instead of being living vibrating space full of life. Its mostly just empty and sandbox for wannabe warlords with their armies locked in newer ending conflict. And even levels of conflict has gone done a lot... Good moons are too valuable to be lost, so they are not fight over because of gentleman's agreement. Only times areas and moons really change hands is when alliance collapses from inside.

Yes i have voted in CSM elections. Sadly my candidates have newer made it. Not even once. So i can conclude CSM does not represent me. Acording to CSM meeting minutes, things i consider important havent ben addressed so far in any tangible way. CCP replays: were thinking about it... And results newer come.

Nullsec power blocks steamrolls their people in CSM and as result best nullsec systems gets buffed again and again. Rest of nullsec has been nerfed to highlight the difference even more. Talk about having power. Power to change the game to your agenda.

Personally i would divide seats in CSM evely between highsec, lowsec, nullsec and wh-space. And im sure CCP can figure out how to detect where candidates play, after all they have all the data about this game. YEs some will now cry: Buts its not fair... Indeed its not fair to those that wish to grab the power. It would be fair to everyone else.

We are Minmatar, Our ship are made of scraps, but look what our scraps can do...

Seven Koskanaiken
Shadow Legions.
Two Vargurs one Hole
#44 - 2013-11-25 19:34:10 UTC
Midnight Firestarter wrote:
The CSM in its current format is a crock of ****

70% of the people elected simply send out a Alliance mail and they vote. Its has nothing
to do with policies and what 's good they can bring to the game, its all about numbers.

Anyone who says it represents the gaming community, try Biomassing yourself as you are deluded.

CCP would be better to pick 10 Random Active corp CEO's.


Well they are there to represent the blocks who vote for them.

You can tell this by such buffs to nullsec in the last 2 expansions like..... ... ...
and nerfs to highsec income like......................... ...... ....


Dasola
New Edens Freeports
#45 - 2013-11-25 19:35:38 UTC
Josef Djugashvilis wrote:
Crumplecorn wrote:
The CSM speaks for the majority so what you are essentially saying is that CCP should listen to you over the majority.

Unless you are a game designer at CCP, this does not hold true.


The CSM speaks for and represents the majority of those who voted, to infer from this that they speak for the majority of players is pure speculation on your part.



Good point, those that voted. Witch is what? Less then 10% of subscriptions of this game.

In any democracy that low vote turnout would mean re-election in a month. Yeah, really democratically chosen representation.

No wonder they drive just power blocks interest to be richer and more in power. They don't need to care of those 90% that did int vote. 90% that their message did int appeal.

We are Minmatar, Our ship are made of scraps, but look what our scraps can do...

Pap Uhotih
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#46 - 2013-11-25 19:44:45 UTC
J'Poll wrote:

The CSM is VOTED by ALL EVE PLAYERS.


No, all players are eligible to vote.

The turnout for CSM election is never going to be 100% but it did move in the wrong direction last time, more so if the player base had grown since the previous year. That is a problem and the OP is right to question if the CSM is representative as it is useless to all the player base if it isn't - irrelevant of whether they voted or not.
It does seem that some members of this CSM do want to take the attitude that it is them vs the players. There was already a thread questioning the conduct of one the CSM members and then in this thread mynnna at one point seeks to discredit the OP and whilst 'care bear' isn't highly offensive it is name calling.
It doesn't seem that the CSM is taking an interest in the bigger picture and improving the turn out next year. A primary concern of some is playing to the crowd on the forums, fair enough perhaps in the run up to an election but there is no obvious purpose for it at the moment.


Josef Djugashvilis
#47 - 2013-11-25 19:46:33 UTC
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:
Josef Djugashvilis wrote:
The CSM speaks for and represents the majority of those who voted, to infer from this that they speak for the majority of players is pure speculation on your part.

If somebody can't be arsed to vote, the only person at fault is them. To be brutally honest they shouldn't complain about the result, they had an opportunity to make their voices heard, and decided not to use it.


I was making a statement of fact.

I have always voted in every CSM election in which I could vote.

The plain unvarnished truth is that the vast majority of players just do not vote in the CSM elections for whatever reason.

The CSM as a mechanism is by no means perfect, but it is the best we have and we should make the most of it.

Remove the CSM and I would suggest that even those who bad mouth the CSM and do not vote would soon be wailing on the forums.

This is not a signature.

Gizznitt Malikite
Agony Unleashed
Agony Empire
#48 - 2013-11-25 19:52:27 UTC

I'd personally like to say "thank you" to the CSM.

I find their communication with both the player base and the Dev's to be an invaluable resource for CCP, and feel they've played a major role in improving our beloved EvE. Even when I find their stance contradictory with my own, I see the value they add, and genuinely believe they advocate changes to improve EvE for all players.

Op, you're simply out of line, and frankly, I'm not sure I want a Dev directly communicating with you. Can you please explain why you're a better person to communicate with than one of our fellow CSM members?
Jenn aSide
Soul Machines
The Initiative.
#49 - 2013-11-25 19:54:25 UTC
Josef Djugashvilis wrote:
Crumplecorn wrote:
The CSM speaks for the majority so what you are essentially saying is that CCP should listen to you over the majority.

Unless you are a game designer at CCP, this does not hold true.


The CSM speaks for and represents the majority of those who voted, to infer from this that they speak for the majority of players is pure speculation on your part.


A person with the right to vote who elects not to is handing their power over to those who do. The CSM does represent the players of EVE, the "majority" can't hide behind that "I didn't vote" excuse here any more than in real life.

Same goes for people who lose the vote, the CSM represents you too, because by voting (and subbing to EVE online) you are directly consenting to abide by the will of the voting majority. I simply despise the people who win a vote and everything is great but if they lose they shout "that guy doesn't represent me/he isn't my president/PM/MP/whatever!".
Desivo Delta Visseroff
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#50 - 2013-11-25 20:01:58 UTC
Yay!!!! Another Garbage ThreadRoll

I was hunting for sick loot, but all I could get my hands on were 50 corpses[:|]..............[:=d]

Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
Vae. Victis.
#51 - 2013-11-25 20:07:47 UTC
The key people I voted for were, for the most part, elected... and I got no EVE mail telling me how to vote (not that I would have paid attention to it).

My views are being fairly well represented as well.

Of course this is only one of the lines of communication that I have available to me. i post frequently (and in the right places) on the forum, and I do the polls that occasionally DO come out on various issues.

My voice is apparently heard, as at least one of my idea's made it into the expansion before Rubicon pretty much word for word. Then again they ignored (probably wisely) many other suggestions I made because they didn't fit well with the over all direction of the game.

Point being, you have many way's to be heard... but often the answer will be a firm "NO".

View the latest EVE Online developments and other game related news and gameplay by visiting Ranger 1 Presents: Virtual Realms.

Hra Neuvosto
Party Cat Enterprises
#52 - 2013-11-25 20:08:24 UTC
Kara Trix wrote:
Yes, this corp player is a PVE account. I have 7 accounts with 16 active characters, 4 of which are PVP Low Sec only, 3 in Null.

How unfair, you get more votes than I do!

Is this the kind of game eve has become? Pay more to have your voice heard more?
Winchester Steele
#53 - 2013-11-25 20:12:51 UTC
Kara Trix wrote:
Been playing this game since May 2011

I remember the little CCP president rant issue.

But can't see why we need to give any gamer or small group of gamers any influence over this games design.

They absolutely don't speak for me.

I would rather have a REAL customer service relationship with the publishers that I have a voice rather than an Over the Top gamer who is far too interested in their own personal agenda than to promote mine.

REMOVE THIS FEATURE and fix the relationship... Give each player a voice, be it small...it's still their voice!





Your nuckin' futs son. As a 15 year plus veteran of online gaming communities, I can tell you with some surety that CCP listens to their player base far more than any other game company I've ever seen. Almost to a fault, I'd say. Sometimes they seem to get so bogged down trying to appease their fickle fan base that I feel they lose sight of their own artistic integrity.

One of the things I love about CCP, is that they are so inclusive of their community. Hell, they even hire their devs from the playerbase. What more do you want?

...

Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
Vae. Victis.
#54 - 2013-11-25 20:13:01 UTC
Hra Neuvosto wrote:
Kara Trix wrote:
Yes, this corp player is a PVE account. I have 7 accounts with 16 active characters, 4 of which are PVP Low Sec only, 3 in Null.

How unfair, you get more votes than I do!

Is this the kind of game eve has become? Pay more to have your voice heard more?

The power of more accounts is insignificant compared with the power of the force. Smile

In this case "the force" being well reasoned threads/arguments that influence thousands of votes, instead of the handful that you pay for.

View the latest EVE Online developments and other game related news and gameplay by visiting Ranger 1 Presents: Virtual Realms.

Crumplecorn
Eve Cluster Explorations
#55 - 2013-11-25 20:15:28 UTC
Kara Trix wrote:
They should listen to each player account, not a small group of players.

[...]

CSM players are not game designers and only voice their personal opinions of the game as I do. If you think for one second that ANY CSM member speaks for the majority you are delusional at best. They ONLY speak for their personal interests and the very small group of people they play with and their interests if at all.
CSM members are elected by popular vote. People vote for candidates who think the same as themselves. Ergo the personal opinions that end up on the CSM are those which align with the majority of the voters.

This is literally just a popularity contest, and yet you seem to be having trouble following how it works.


Josef Djugashvilis wrote:
The CSM speaks for and represents the majority of those who voted, to infer from this that they speak for the majority of players is pure speculation on your part.
They speak for the majority of players who have something to say. You don't actually need a representative to represent a lack of opinion.

Witty Image - Stream

Not Liking this post hurts my RL feelings and will be considered harassment

Jenn aSide
Soul Machines
The Initiative.
#56 - 2013-11-25 20:18:46 UTC
Winchester Steele wrote:
Kara Trix wrote:
Been playing this game since May 2011

I remember the little CCP president rant issue.

But can't see why we need to give any gamer or small group of gamers any influence over this games design.

They absolutely don't speak for me.

I would rather have a REAL customer service relationship with the publishers that I have a voice rather than an Over the Top gamer who is far too interested in their own personal agenda than to promote mine.

REMOVE THIS FEATURE and fix the relationship... Give each player a voice, be it small...it's still their voice!





Your nuckin' futs son. As a 15 year plus veteran of online gaming communities, I can tell you with some surety that CCP listens to their player base far more than any other game company I've ever seen. Almost to a fault, I'd say. Sometimes they seem to get so bogged down trying to appease their fickle fan base that I feel they lose sight of their own artistic integrity.

One of the things I love about CCP, is that they are so inclusive of their community. Hell, they even hire their devs from the playerbase. What more do you want?


Total and absolute control!

It's not enough that they listen, bring in player representatives, hire devs from the community and all that stuff, ti's just not enough. NO, they must listen to me and only me, while paying me a salary in both U.S. Dollars, PLEX and certain "favors" from one of those wimins who work at CCP. Thus shall i then be satisfied with CCP customer service, not before.
Ghost Phius
Tribal Liberation Force
Minmatar Republic
#57 - 2013-11-25 20:33:48 UTC
CCP does do a ton more interaction with it's community than other devs for sure. That however, does not erase T20, Greed is Good, SOMER etc...ignoring those incidents might shade the lens towards the rose colored spectrum.Cool
Winchester Steele
#58 - 2013-11-25 20:51:47 UTC
Ghost Phius wrote:
CCP does do a ton more interaction with it's community than other devs for sure. That however, does not erase T20, Greed is Good, SOMER etc...ignoring those incidents might shade the lens towards the rose colored spectrum.Cool



Am I the only one who really doesn't give a rats arse about this SOMER shite? Not saying it wasn't a little dodgy, but they stopped the process AT THE COMMUNITIES REQUEST. It's over, problem solved. Frankly, it is their game and had they been so inclined they could have told all the detractors to stick their complaints where the sun don't shine. But they didn't, instead they bowed to the will of the community and killed SOMER's RMT operation. I fail to see how that equates to a black mark against them.

On another note: T20 was a rogue dev who got dealt with internally (i.e. no longer any of our business) and frankly, greed IS not only good, but also totally natural, so whatever. P2W isn't however, and I think CCP learned that lesson pretty quickly.

Not trying to crap on you specifically, but it appears to me that at the end of the day CCP has a pretty awesome track record when it comes to dealing with these "scandals". Just because they don't immediately say "how high?" when the forum whiners say "jump" doesn't make them an irresponsible company, no matter how hard the sperglords on Eve-o try to convince us otherwise.

...

ISD Tyrozan
ISD Community Communications Liaisons
ISD Alliance
#59 - 2013-11-25 23:21:10 UTC  |  Edited by: ISD Tyrozan
Two off-topic posts have been removed.
Personal attack post removed.

Forum rule 4. Personal attacks are prohibited.
Forum rule 26. Off-topic posting is prohibited.

ISD Tyrozan

Captain

Community Communication Liaisons (CCLs)

Interstellar Services Department

@ISDTyrozan | @ISD_CCL

J'Poll
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#60 - 2013-11-26 00:14:36 UTC
Pap Uhotih wrote:
J'Poll wrote:

The CSM is VOTED by ALL EVE PLAYERS.


No, all players are eligible to vote.

The turnout for CSM election is never going to be 100% but it did move in the wrong direction last time, more so if the player base had grown since the previous year. That is a problem and the OP is right to question if the CSM is representative as it is useless to all the player base if it isn't - irrelevant of whether they voted or not.
It does seem that some members of this CSM do want to take the attitude that it is them vs the players. There was already a thread questioning the conduct of one the CSM members and then in this thread mynnna at one point seeks to discredit the OP and whilst 'care bear' isn't highly offensive it is name calling.
It doesn't seem that the CSM is taking an interest in the bigger picture and improving the turn out next year. A primary concern of some is playing to the crowd on the forums, fair enough perhaps in the run up to an election but there is no obvious purpose for it at the moment.




People that don't vote, also forfeit their right to complain about the CSM

And those that complain about the bias of the CSM, run for CSM next year and see if you can get on it to change it...

Personal channel: Crazy Dutch Guy

Help channel: Help chat - Reloaded

Public roams channels: RvB Ganked / Redemption Road / Spectre Fleet / Bombers bar / The Content Club