These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page123
 

the forgotten "bookmarks in overview" feature

First post
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
non judgement
Without Fear
Flying Burning Ships Alliance
#41 - 2011-11-04 02:52:33 UTC  |  Edited by: non judgement
Mistress Lilu wrote:
This feature would be awesome...make it happen CCP, what do I pay your for.

Why are you asking what do you pay their for? If you paid their for something, I'd think you'd know what you paid.


You pay a private company for game time. They use the money for lots of things. One of those things happens to be developing things for you. If I remember correctly the money that you gave them went to CCP people who moderate the forums.
Algathas
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#42 - 2011-11-04 05:46:22 UTC
Yes please! I was in a situation just the other day where I was thinking "what happened to that proposed bookmarks on overview feature".
Razin
The Scope
#43 - 2011-11-13 19:49:10 UTC
Sill no word from CCP... How about it Sounwave, it was your promise.
Shaera Taam
Khanid Prime Free Irregulars
#44 - 2011-11-20 02:42:16 UTC
yeah, it would be nice to hear /something/
esp after guard's remarks back in september
sigh...

Thus Spake the Frigate Goddess!
Terminal Insanity
KarmaFleet
Goonswarm Federation
#45 - 2011-11-20 04:14:28 UTC
I would like to have bookmarks show up as HUD icons, like other celestials/stations/etc

"War declarations are never officially considered griefing and are not a bannable offense, and it has been repeatedly stated by the developers that the possibility for non-consensual PvP is an intended feature." - CCP
Komen
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#46 - 2011-11-20 14:20:28 UTC
Not empty bumpin'.

Ranger1, I agree, a lot of people conflate 'proposed features' with 'promises'. The trouble is that CCP has had the bad habit of giving out a list of features in development early on, then some drop, then some more, then more still. What we end up with at the end, in the published expansion, seems like pretty thin gruel.

Crucible, on the other hand, is an expansion with excellent advertising. A couple of features haven't made the final cut (assault frigs being the one I can think of) but lots, and lots, and lots of stuff appears to be on Sisi right now, and even in functional, working condition.

Anyways...CCP Guard! I summon thee! Go fishing please! We hunger for updates!
Zagdul
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#47 - 2011-11-20 15:37:45 UTC
Komen wrote:
KaarBaak wrote:
CCP Guard wrote:
Razin wrote:
How was the fishing?


It was pleasant thank you.

We are going to finish this feature and put it on TQ, the only question right now is "when".

I spoke to Team BFF who own this feature and as I suspected, an ETA is hard to get right now for the exact same reason that ETAs on other feature have been hard to come by in the last couple of weeks. You see....we're planning. BIG time! And we basically can't wait to tell you more about all that. But right now it's hard to give substantial information about specific features so I'm just gonna bite my tongue and keep you all in suspense for just a LITTLE while longer. Sorry about that :P

*bites tongue*


You guys say this ALL the time. It has yet to live up to the hype.

EDIT: 50% of the BIG things get pulled prior to patch. 30% make it ti Sisi, but not TQ. 15% make it to patch notes, but then get pushed off for unforeseen problems (eg this thread) never to be seen again. 5% make it to TQ bugged. Leaving us with maybe 10% of the original plan making it into the game. Not to mention the things that break as a result of that implementation.

Stop talking, start doing.


This. Well said. The list of 'promised vs. delivered features' is really, at this point, appalling. CCP could make entire expansions of the 'left on the drawing board features' that never made it in. Stuff that the playerbase was really, REALLY eager for (and some not so much, but still).

Also I'd like to re-iterate my position now, which I might just make into a sig, that the proposed null-sec revamp is fine, dandy, great, whatever. But within that re-vamp, low-sec should be included and have distinct characteristics/activities assigned as well. Otherwise it will be left as it currently is - a broken area of the game with the worst attributes of null-sec and high-sec combined.


I agree, and they should name the patch Crucible.

Dual Pane idea: Click!

CCP Please Implement
Komen
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#48 - 2011-11-22 15:44:06 UTC
Zagdul wrote:
I agree, and they should name the patch Crucible.


I see what you did thar. Cool
Previous page123