These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Intergalactic Summit

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Slavery, Blessing or curse: The account of an Amarrian who truly cares for those under his charge.

First post
Author
Nicoletta Mithra
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#41 - 2013-11-23 04:45:43 UTC  |  Edited by: Nicoletta Mithra
Why should there be the need of responding to a show of ignorance and vile disdain with something like an argument? But sure: Even though slavery is an religious institution, it is regulated by laws. It's a department of correction based entirely on law and order. Both can be the case, logically and oftentimes - even usually - are in the Empire.

You don't like that? So you as a Caldari want to meddle in our cultural sphere, while denying us to meddle in yours? Not very reasonable by any stretch.
Jinari Otsito
Otsito Mining and Manufacture
#42 - 2013-11-23 04:57:58 UTC
Meddle? The thought wouldn't even begin to ponder the idea of the possibility of crossing my mind. There's things in New Eden that's tainted to the touch and this is one of them. Criticizing ideas on the other hand is pretty much the duty of anyone willing to embrace a set of ideals or virtues. I don't think even you will be able to avoid blushing furiously if you claim not to have done so throughout your life.

I suppose the slaves that wait to be shown a more divine path towards god and redemption don't exist in your world of law and order, though. Entire tribes in some cases, subjugated and hobbled in the name of an idea of divinity. The "superiority" of the True Amarrians, as proclaimed time and time again. No, no arrogance there. Merely criminals of some sort.

Prime Node. Ask me about augmentation.

Lady Katherine Devonshire
Royal Ammatar Engineering Corps
#43 - 2013-11-23 05:27:58 UTC  |  Edited by: Lady Katherine Devonshire
As I have mentioned before, one of the maids on my household staff - a slave in all legal definitions - suffers from a rather unfortunate & severe mental deficiency caused by the drugs that the Bloody Hands pumped into her when they strapped that bomb to her so many years ago.

Were this girl to find herself a free citizen in the Republic, depending on which tribe got their hands on her, she would end up either left out in some forsaken desert to be eaten by animals or used as cheap "breeding stock" for some arrogant warlord.

Were she to end up a free citizen in the Federation she would most likely find herself employed on a sidewalk wearing scandalous clothing, performing sexual favors to strangers in order to eat.

Even in the State it is likely that her "productivity quotient" would be considered far too low to allow her to achieve anything more than the most minimal standard of living. No offense meant to our allies, but I must be honest in expressing my doubt that a somewhat clumsy chambermaid is going to draw much of a salary over there.

However, instead of any of these ignoble fates she is a slave in the Empire. She is well fed, well clothed, and shares generous accommodations with her husband (who is also our head of security, no less). Not to brag, but even the "servants quarters" in a well-off Amarrian Holder's estates often boast a level of comfort and luxury rivaling that of the average middle classes of some other nations. Her medical expenses? Paid for. Her children's education? Paid for. If she is not the definition of happy and well-off ... well, she has certainly been doing a fine job of fooling everyone in her life, then.

It is precisely because of this that I am always so saddened to know that there are those out there who would, without a moment's hesitation, happily kill her in some horrible manner simply to prove some point about "freedom" - the sick, twisted irony of which is not lost upon me, either. After all, that is how I came to meet her in the first place ...
Vulxanis Viceroy
Vicarius Vitae
Khimi Harar
#44 - 2013-11-23 05:34:58 UTC
Lady Katherine Devonshire wrote:
As I have mentioned before, one of the maids on my household staff - a slave in all legal definitions - suffers from a rather unfortunate & severe mental deficiency caused by the drugs that the Bloody Hands pumped into her when they strapped that bomb to her so many years ago.

Were this girl to find herself a free citizen in the Republic, depending on which tribe got their hands on her, she would end up either left out in some forsaken desert to be eaten by animals or used as cheap "breeding stock" for some arrogant warlord.

Were she to end up a free citizen in the Federation she would most likely find herself employed on a sidewalk wearing scandalous clothing, performing sexual favors to strangers in order to eat.

Even in the State it is likely that her "productivity quotient" would be considered far too low to allow her to achieve anything more than the most minimal standard of living. No offense meant to our allies, but I must be honest in expressing my doubt that a somewhat clumsy chambermaid is going to draw much of a salary over there.

However, instead of any of these ignoble fates she is a slave in the Empire. She is well fed, well clothed, and shares generous accommodations with her husband (who is also our head of security, no less). Not to brag, but even the "servants quarters" in a well-off Amarrian Holder's estates often boast a level of comfort and luxury rivaling that of the average middle classes of some other nations. Her medical expenses? Paid for. Her children's education? Paid for. If she is not the definition of happy and well-off ... well, she has certainly been doing a fine job of fooling everyone in her life, then.

It is precisely because of this that I am always so saddened to know that there are those out there who would, without a moment's hesitation, happily kill her in some horrible manner simply to prove some point about "freedom" - the sick, twisted irony of which is not lost upon me, either. After all, that is how I came to meet her in the first place ...



The before mentioned results of her living in another state is exactly what I aim to prevent for those under my charge. And that is exactly the kind of conditions I wish to have for all of my slaves. I want them to feel happy and secure.

And if they want their freedom? I shall arrange for it when they are ready(they will be required to take an official test that has yet to be determined. I shall not be regulating it.) but not before.

In Character: Only responds to "Lord Draconis"

Pronounced "Vulzanis"

Reddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/Eve/comments/4fanm8/eve_in_a_nutshell_and_how_to_crack_it/

Public channel: VXV EVE

Twitter: https://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/Vulxanis_Viceroy

Cuci Cairi
#45 - 2013-11-23 06:49:20 UTC
This all seems rather simple. Slavery is literal ownership of another human being. Either you are fine with that, not fine with that, or you don't care. Any other detail must follow one of those choices; those details are not likely to matter to someone who chose a different position.
Vulxanis Viceroy
Vicarius Vitae
Khimi Harar
#46 - 2013-11-23 07:12:08 UTC
Cuci Cairi wrote:
This all seems rather simple. Slavery is literal ownership of another human being. Either you are fine with that, not fine with that, or you don't care. Any other detail must follow one of those choices; those details are not likely to matter to someone who chose a different position.


Very true. And yet, at the same time, this is far more complex than that.

In Character: Only responds to "Lord Draconis"

Pronounced "Vulzanis"

Reddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/Eve/comments/4fanm8/eve_in_a_nutshell_and_how_to_crack_it/

Public channel: VXV EVE

Twitter: https://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/Vulxanis_Viceroy

Saya Ishikari
Ishukone-Raata Technological Research Institute
Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
#47 - 2013-11-23 07:43:03 UTC
Nicoletta Mithra wrote:
Why should there be the need of responding to a show of ignorance and vile disdain with something like an argument? But sure: Even though slavery is an religious institution, it is regulated by laws. It's a department of correction based entirely on law and order. Both can be the case, logically and oftentimes - even usually - are in the Empire.

You don't like that? So you as a Caldari want to meddle in our cultural sphere, while denying us to meddle in yours? Not very reasonable by any stretch.

The forum asked for opinions. That's what was given. If you don't agree with them, for whatever reason, the fact remains... They were given in the spirit of debate, only given weight by how much the readers attribute to them. If you don't want to see opinions given, it's possible you might be able to convince the author of this thread to have those that differ from an 'educated' perspective removed. Doubtful, but possible. Personally, I'm happy to leave your Empire to it's own devices, but open debates on the IGS that have no real bearing on the course of the Empire as a whole?... Passersby will put their opinions forth if the mood strikes them. You'll live, and do the same, I suspect, when the roles are reversed.

"At the end of it all, we have only what we've left in our wake to be remembered by." -Kyoko Ishikari, YC 95 - YC 117

Cuci Cairi
#48 - 2013-11-23 07:58:21 UTC
Vulxanis Viceroy wrote:
Cuci Cairi wrote:
This all seems rather simple. Slavery is literal ownership of another human being. Either you are fine with that, not fine with that, or you don't care. Any other detail must follow one of those choices; those details are not likely to matter to someone who chose a different position.


Very true. And yet, at the same time, this is far more complex than that.


All the complexity comes after that initial step, was my point. To try to mix and match the complexities from the different initial positions seems silly, as it is just people talking past each other.
Vulxanis Viceroy
Vicarius Vitae
Khimi Harar
#49 - 2013-11-23 08:32:20 UTC
Cuci Cairi wrote:
Vulxanis Viceroy wrote:
Cuci Cairi wrote:
This all seems rather simple. Slavery is literal ownership of another human being. Either you are fine with that, not fine with that, or you don't care. Any other detail must follow one of those choices; those details are not likely to matter to someone who chose a different position.


Very true. And yet, at the same time, this is far more complex than that.


All the complexity comes after that initial step, was my point. To try to mix and match the complexities from the different initial positions seems silly, as it is just people talking past each other.


Ah.

In Character: Only responds to "Lord Draconis"

Pronounced "Vulzanis"

Reddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/Eve/comments/4fanm8/eve_in_a_nutshell_and_how_to_crack_it/

Public channel: VXV EVE

Twitter: https://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/Vulxanis_Viceroy

Kazha Cavin-Guang
Doomheim
#50 - 2013-11-23 14:17:56 UTC
It seems the Holders have little faith in the "lower classes" of society. Do you think that keeping generations of people away from freedom is less damaging than allowing them to grow and learn on their own?
Through decades, history has shown us that one of the only ways to truly understanding life and the world around us is to suffer hardship, and to evolve and enlighten ourselves, despite hardship. This point that, you, are taking greater care of your lower class population, the down and outs, as some may call them, by forcing them into servitude, seems selfish. To claim that only through the service of those not truly needing help, is a path to a greater way, seems selfish.
In the words of Rao Jumen - ]"No one saves us but ourselves, no one can, and no one may, we ourselves must walk the path." How can you expect one to change and to grow if kept burdened by another man's fortunes and misfortunes, his vision clouded by the hammer and sickle in front of his eyes. Perhaps a form of guidance which is less forced may be beneficial.

I find it strange to say, but I agree with Ms. Kim here earlier in the thread, forced servitude is inefficient. I understand that many have put across their views, and I am adding, possibly to what will be a long and circular discussion. I merely hope that one day, as humanity as a whole finds enlightenment, that this act will give way, and no longer be needed, but we will never know that until those in forced servitude become free of mind, body and spirit.

Peace be upon you, Kazha Cavin-Guang.

Anabella Rella
Gradient
Electus Matari
#51 - 2013-11-23 15:29:37 UTC
Vulxanis Viceroy wrote:


You fail to understand. I am not only coming from a religious point of view, but a practical one as well. I have seen slaves ruin their lives without proper guidance. They are no different than any wayward youth that wishes to prove themselves, only to find that they were unprepared. And because I respect them as human beings, I do my best to provide for them. They are not social equals, and they cannot ever be. But that doesn't mean I should treat them with contempt, nor treat them like animals.

I am not a slaver. I am a Holder. They are two different things.


I have seen many a life ruined by slavers and holders alike. I personally know liberated slaves who run the gamut from Kameiras to sex-workers to janitors. The one thing they had in common was they were "owned" and had their lives directed at the whim of another. While some may find comfort in knowing from childhood that one will be a ditch digger or priest or farmer, I see it as an unnecessary limitation of the possibilities of the human spirit. Who could have known that Karin Midular, the orphaned child of slaves, would one day rise to become the Prime Minister of the Republic? Had she been held back from politics and instead directed into say, becoming a seamstress, would the cluster be the same? What if Jacus Roden, Kolvil Eifyr or Haatakan Oiritsuu had been forced into lives of manual labor?

As for the assertion that slaves are children to be "guided"; I say who appointed you to be the parent? Your answer is, of course, your deity. I, however, as a free Minmatar and citizen of the Gallente Federation do not recognize that particular "authority". I say your deity is a mythological construct designed to instill the populace with fear in order to keep them in line. Which of us is correct?

Further, how can you ever respect one who you consider to be beneath you? I love and care for my dog and would never abuse him but, I can't say that I respect him. Respect is something that flows from equality. There can never be respect in a situation where one party is superior or inferior.

Again, please do not take this as a personal attack on either Pilot Draconis or Baracca. They are clearly both thoughtful men of goodwill. These thoughts are simply mine regarding the logical flaws I find with the institution of slavery.

When the world is running down, you make the best of what's still around.

Stitcher
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#52 - 2013-11-23 16:50:48 UTC  |  Edited by: Stitcher
1: Arrest and imprisonment in the State never involves the incarceration of the prisoner's family and close associates into the bargain, whereas it is routine in the Empire for the guilty be sentenced that they and their family be enslaved. For the innocent to be imprisoned for the crimes of another, even if the guilty is close to them personally and profesionally, is not justice.

2: The children of prisoners in the State are not prisoners. They are turned over to a megacorporate creche and raised as citizens, and are even free to associate with their parent through familial visits and once the prisoner has been rehabilitated and released back into society they may mingle freely with their offspring. The child of a slave in the Empire is also a slave.

3: Prisoners are not purchased and sold. Administrative contracts for penal facilities are traded, yes, but the actual prisoner is not a commodity. Slavery, meanwhile, is big business, and while dedicated slave markets exist in the heartlands of the Empire, in the provinces you see slaves brought and sold in the same livestock markets used to trade in cattle or sheep.

4: In keeping with the livestock theme, prisoners are not "bred" - their are no programs of mandatory procreation in a Caldari penal facility. Slaves of Amarr on the other hand, do, and one of the many results of these programs have been the Kameiras.

5: The penal arrangement in Caldari society is a contract that binds prisoner and corporation both. The prisoner is informed that their freedom of movement and association has now been curtailed by order of the Corporation, and that this condition will persist for the duration of time dictated by the judge. Work credits, education credits and good behaviour can earn reductions in this term - further criminal behaviour while imprisoned can lead to new sentences, to be added on to the existing one. The duration of a sentence is proportionate to the crime involved and dictated by law - citizens subject to incarceration which illegally exceeds the length of their sentence are entitled to compensation, a precedent established by a case that made it to the Caldari Business Tribunal in BYC 26, Luyo vs. CBD Corporation. Imperial Slaves are freed solely at the indulgence of their owner, if it is ever granted, and are covered by no objective law dictating the terms of their slavery. In short: a sentence of incarceration in the State has a fixed duration, while a sentence of slavery in the Empire has an indefinite one.

6: The families of Caldari prisoners who are wounded or killed not by natural causes are entitled to compensation, as established by Setseki vs. Hyasyoda, YC 04. The families of Imperial slaves who are wounded or killed receive such consideration again solely at the discretion of their owner, which does not have to be given.

7: The status of a prisoner in Caldari society is that they are a citizen who has been temporarily stripped of some - but not all - of their rights and privileges as due repayment for their wrongdoing. The status of a slave in Amarr society is that they are not citizens, but property.

8: Caldari prisoners only ever enter the penal system through one method - they are convicted of a crime. Amarrian slaves may become slaves through that method also - it may even be the most common method - but they are also prisoners of war, the children of existing slaves, the relatives of convicted criminals, and most damning of all: abductees. The entire Minmatar population of slaves are the descendants of those captured in a mass abduction event.

9: The crimes for which a Caldari may be imprisoned involve harming persons other than themselves, or the mistreatment of property that is not theirs to mistreat. There is no such crime as Heresy in the State, nor blasphemy. A citizen holding fringe, unpopular views may find himself socially ostracized and struggling with their career should he express those views, but will not be imprisoned for them, and certainly not for being suspected of holding them. In the Empire, meanwhile, it is an offense punishable by slavery for a person to merely hold certain opinions, to have read certain books (regardless of the conclusions they drew about said book) or for them to feel certain emotions. The term for this is thought crime, and the last time any thought crime existed in Caldari law was before we co-founded the Federation.

10: Caldari prisoners never serve in hazardous environments, conditions or roles. Slaves, meanwhile, are present on most Amarrian starships, and form the bulk of Amarrian Dangerous Environment work teams - just look at that situation with the collapsed asteroid mine a few years back. The life of a slave is considered more expendable than the life of a freedman. In Caldari society, the life of a prisoner is equal to the life of any other citizen, despite their imprisonment.

Those are just off the top of my head. I'm sure somebody better-versed than I in State, Region and Corporate law would be able to triple the length of that list as to why the Caldari penal system is in no way alike to the the Amarrian institution of slavery.

I won't be surprised if you continue to suggest that they're the same thing though, Mithra. You've never let little things like facts get in your way before...

AKA Hambone

Author of The Deathworlders

Gosakumori Noh
Coven of One
#53 - 2013-11-23 17:10:23 UTC
"Freedom" is just another word for nothing left to lose.

What would my poor boys do without their allowances? They'd have to get "jobs" at oh, I don't know, some giant food processing warehouse making not quite enough to feed themselves for one of those "freedom" celebration days. A fine bit of delusional collective masturbation, all the pretty, empty words written about "freedom" down through the ages.
Vulxanis Viceroy
Vicarius Vitae
Khimi Harar
#54 - 2013-11-23 18:37:54 UTC
Anabella Rella wrote:
Vulxanis Viceroy wrote:


You fail to understand. I am not only coming from a religious point of view, but a practical one as well. I have seen slaves ruin their lives without proper guidance. They are no different than any wayward youth that wishes to prove themselves, only to find that they were unprepared. And because I respect them as human beings, I do my best to provide for them. They are not social equals, and they cannot ever be. But that doesn't mean I should treat them with contempt, nor treat them like animals.

I am not a slaver. I am a Holder. They are two different things.


I have seen many a life ruined by slavers and holders alike. I personally know liberated slaves who run the gamut from Kameiras to sex-workers to janitors. The one thing they had in common was they were "owned" and had their lives directed at the whim of another. While some may find comfort in knowing from childhood that one will be a ditch digger or priest or farmer, I see it as an unnecessary limitation of the possibilities of the human spirit. Who could have known that Karin Midular, the orphaned child of slaves, would one day rise to become the Prime Minister of the Republic? Had she been held back from politics and instead directed into say, becoming a seamstress, would the cluster be the same? What if Jacus Roden, Kolvil Eifyr or Haatakan Oiritsuu had been forced into lives of manual labor?

As for the assertion that slaves are children to be "guided"; I say who appointed you to be the parent? Your answer is, of course, your deity. I, however, as a free Minmatar and citizen of the Gallente Federation do not recognize that particular "authority". I say your deity is a mythological construct designed to instill the populace with fear in order to keep them in line. Which of us is correct?

Further, how can you ever respect one who you consider to be beneath you? I love and care for my dog and would never abuse him but, I can't say that I respect him. Respect is something that flows from equality. There can never be respect in a situation where one party is superior or inferior.

Again, please do not take this as a personal attack on either Pilot Draconis or Baracca. They are clearly both thoughtful men of goodwill. These thoughts are simply mine regarding the logical flaws I find with the institution of slavery.


What part of "I am letting them choose what they want to be and making it happen" do you not understand?! And I personally do not consider them beneath me! I am simply in the position to help them, and am making use of it!

And my dear, it is rather hard NOT to take that as a personal attack.

In Character: Only responds to "Lord Draconis"

Pronounced "Vulzanis"

Reddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/Eve/comments/4fanm8/eve_in_a_nutshell_and_how_to_crack_it/

Public channel: VXV EVE

Twitter: https://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/Vulxanis_Viceroy

Vulxanis Viceroy
Vicarius Vitae
Khimi Harar
#55 - 2013-11-23 20:16:59 UTC
Gosakumori Noh wrote:
"Freedom" is just another word for nothing left to lose.

What would my poor boys do without their allowances? They'd have to get "jobs" at oh, I don't know, some giant food processing warehouse making not quite enough to feed themselves for one of those "freedom" celebration days. A fine bit of delusional collective ************, all the pretty, empty words written about "freedom" down through the ages.


Exactly what I wish to prevent for those leaving my care. I want better for them.

In Character: Only responds to "Lord Draconis"

Pronounced "Vulzanis"

Reddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/Eve/comments/4fanm8/eve_in_a_nutshell_and_how_to_crack_it/

Public channel: VXV EVE

Twitter: https://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/Vulxanis_Viceroy

Vulxanis Viceroy
Vicarius Vitae
Khimi Harar
#56 - 2013-11-23 20:21:12 UTC  |  Edited by: Vulxanis Viceroy
Stitcher wrote:
1: Arrest and imprisonment in the State never involves the incarceration of the prisoner's family and close associates into the bargain, whereas it is routine in the Empire for the guilty be sentenced that they and their family be enslaved. For the innocent to be imprisoned for the crimes of another, even if the guilty is close to them personally and profesionally, is not justice.

2: The children of prisoners in the State are not prisoners. They are turned over to a megacorporate creche and raised as citizens, and are even free to associate with their parent through familial visits and once the prisoner has been rehabilitated and released back into society they may mingle freely with their offspring. The child of a slave in the Empire is also a slave.

3: Prisoners are not purchased and sold. Administrative contracts for penal facilities are traded, yes, but the actual prisoner is not a commodity. Slavery, meanwhile, is big business, and while dedicated slave markets exist in the heartlands of the Empire, in the provinces you see slaves brought and sold in the same livestock markets used to trade in cattle or sheep.

4: In keeping with the livestock theme, prisoners are not "bred" - their are no programs of mandatory procreation in a Caldari penal facility. Slaves of Amarr on the other hand, do, and one of the many results of these programs have been the Kameiras.

5: The penal arrangement in Caldari society is a contract that binds prisoner and corporation both. The prisoner is informed that their freedom of movement and association has now been curtailed by order of the Corporation, and that this condition will persist for the duration of time dictated by the judge. Work credits, education credits and good behaviour can earn reductions in this term - further criminal behaviour while imprisoned can lead to new sentences, to be added on to the existing one. The duration of a sentence is proportionate to the crime involved and dictated by law - citizens subject to incarceration which illegally exceeds the length of their sentence are entitled to compensation, a precedent established by a case that made it to the Caldari Business Tribunal in BYC 26, Luyo vs. CBD Corporation. Imperial Slaves are freed solely at the indulgence of their owner, if it is ever granted, and are covered by no objective law dictating the terms of their slavery. In short: a sentence of incarceration in the State has a fixed duration, while a sentence of slavery in the Empire has an indefinite one.

6: The families of Caldari prisoners who are wounded or killed not by natural causes are entitled to compensation, as established by Setseki vs. Hyasyoda, YC 04. The families of Imperial slaves who are wounded or killed receive such consideration again solely at the discretion of their owner, which does not have to be given.

7: The status of a prisoner in Caldari society is that they are a citizen who has been temporarily stripped of some - but not all - of their rights and privileges as due repayment for their wrongdoing. The status of a slave in Amarr society is that they are not citizens, but property.

8: Caldari prisoners only ever enter the penal system through one method - they are convicted of a crime. Amarrian slaves may become slaves through that method also - it may even be the most common method - but they are also prisoners of war, the children of existing slaves, the relatives of convicted criminals, and most damning of all: abductees. The entire Minmatar population of slaves are the descendants of those captured in a mass abduction event.

9: The crimes for which a Caldari may be imprisoned involve harming persons other than themselves, or the mistreatment of property that is not theirs to mistreat. There is no such crime as Heresy in the State, nor blasphemy. A citizen holding fringe, unpopular views may find himself socially ostracized and struggling with their career should he express those views, but will not be imprisoned for them, and certainly not for being suspected of holding them. In the Empire, meanwhile, it is an offense punishable by slavery for a person to merely hold certain opinions, to have read certain books (regardless of the conclusions they drew about said book) or for them to feel certain emotions. The term for this is thought crime, and the last time any thought crime existed in Caldari law was before we co-founded the Federation.

10: Caldari prisoners never serve in hazardous environments, conditions or roles. Slaves, meanwhile, are present on most Amarrian starships, and form the bulk of Amarrian Dangerous Environment work teams - just look at that situation with the collapsed asteroid mine a few years back. The life of a slave is considered more expendable than the life of a freedman. In Caldari society, the life of a prisoner is equal to the life of any other citizen, despite their imprisonment.

Those are just off the top of my head. I'm sure somebody better-versed than I in State, Region and Corporate law would be able to triple the length of that list as to why the Caldari penal system is in no way alike to the the Amarrian institution of slavery.

I won't be surprised if you continue to suggest that they're the same thing though, Mithra. You've never let little things like facts get in your way before...


Neither have you sticher. You continue to generalize without giving any possibilities for exceptions. Might I remind you the purpose of my post in the first place was to give insight on the actual positive form of the Amarrian system.

Both have flaws.

Just because you dislike how we do things, does not mean you get to choose for us. Our cultures are different.

And you will respect that. As I respect your culture.

In Character: Only responds to "Lord Draconis"

Pronounced "Vulzanis"

Reddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/Eve/comments/4fanm8/eve_in_a_nutshell_and_how_to_crack_it/

Public channel: VXV EVE

Twitter: https://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/Vulxanis_Viceroy

Stitcher
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#57 - 2013-11-23 21:12:21 UTC  |  Edited by: Stitcher
Vulxanis Viceroy wrote:
Neither have you sticher. You continue to generalize without giving any possibilities for exceptions. Might I remind you the purpose of my post in the first place was to give insight on the actual positive form of the Amarrian system.

Both have flaws.

Just because you dislike how we do things, does not mean you get to choose for us. Our cultures are different.

And you will respect that. As I respect your culture.


My respect is not given automatically, to any person, idea, object, anything. It is earned, on merit.

Does the Caldari penal system have flaws? Undoubtedly. is it inherently flawed in its conception? No: Unlike slavery, it is not.

I always strive to acknowledge exceptions where they exist. In the case of slavery, I refuse to acknowledge any, because there are none. It's a backwards system that makes it a laughable farce every time the Amarr accuse anybody else of being the uncivilized ones. I reject outright the notion that there is ANY positive form possible in a system dependent upon such barbarism

This is not choosing for you: This is, in a public forum, in response to your expressing your opinion, expressing my own opinion. It is not "choosing for you" to disagree with you and tell you that the choices you have made were wrong. I don't give a damn if my doing so discomforts you - I very much hope that it does, discomfort is the alarm signal that something is wrong and that you need to re-evaluate.

"Choosing for you" would be if I enslaved you and then used coercion, torture, indoctrination and drugs to convert you to my way of thinking. Sound familiar?

I agree, I don't have the right to force change upon the Amarr. but do not say your piece in a public forum of international discourse and then complain when others do the same and don't share your world view. Don't you dare.

AKA Hambone

Author of The Deathworlders

Vulxanis Viceroy
Vicarius Vitae
Khimi Harar
#58 - 2013-11-23 22:16:10 UTC  |  Edited by: Vulxanis Viceroy
Stitcher wrote:
Vulxanis Viceroy wrote:
Neither have you sticher. You continue to generalize without giving any possibilities for exceptions. Might I remind you the purpose of my post in the first place was to give insight on the actual positive form of the Amarrian system.

Both have flaws.

Just because you dislike how we do things, does not mean you get to choose for us. Our cultures are different.

And you will respect that. As I respect your culture.


My respect is not given automatically, to any person, idea, object, anything. It is earned, on merit.

Does the Caldari penal system have flaws? Undoubtedly. is it inherently flawed in its conception? No: Unlike slavery, it is not.

I always strive to acknowledge exceptions where they exist. In the case of slavery, I refuse to acknowledge any, because there are none. It's a backwards system that makes it a laughable farce every time the Amarr accuse anybody else of being the uncivilized ones. I reject outright the notion that there is ANY positive form possible in a system dependent upon such barbarism

This is not choosing for you: This is, in a public forum, in response to your expressing your opinion, expressing my own opinion. It is not "choosing for you" to disagree with you and tell you that the choices you have made were wrong. I don't give a damn if my doing so discomforts you - I very much hope that it does, discomfort is the alarm signal that something is wrong and that you need to re-evaluate.

"Choosing for you" would be if I enslaved you and then used coercion, torture, indoctrination and drugs to convert you to my way of thinking. Sound familiar?

I agree, I don't have the right to force change upon the Amarr. but do not say your piece in a public forum of international discourse and then complain when others do the same and don't share your world view. Don't you dare.


I shall dare as I like.

You obviously have not been truly reading what I have been saying. If you cannot accept the exception to the rule, than you cannot accept anything anyone says that disagrees with your preconceived notions.

Truly read what I have said. Truly. Read. What. I. Have. Said.

Explain to me how what I am doing is wrong other than the fact that the institution of the method offends you. It means just as much as my saying that your penal system is offensive, because I disagree with your methods. I have never used coercion, torture, indoctrination, or drugs to convert them. They are given the choice to believe and think what they wish.

Unfortunately, fiends such as yourself that are not even worthy of kissing my excrement are also given that freedom.

Every one of my slaves, including being in their current uneducated state, are more worthy to give an opinion on this than the likes of you. You need to read what I have said before you continue.

I. Shall. Dare. For I have said my piece, and explained it quite well, and the swine still squeals at me.

And you call us bigots.

In Character: Only responds to "Lord Draconis"

Pronounced "Vulzanis"

Reddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/Eve/comments/4fanm8/eve_in_a_nutshell_and_how_to_crack_it/

Public channel: VXV EVE

Twitter: https://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/Vulxanis_Viceroy

Synthetic Cultist
Church of The Crimson Saviour
#59 - 2013-11-23 22:20:59 UTC
I have begun Reform of the Laws of Slavery within the Empire of Kaztropol.

Synthia 1, Empress of Kaztropol.

It is Written.

Stitcher
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#60 - 2013-11-23 22:27:49 UTC  |  Edited by: Stitcher
Vulxanis Viceroy wrote:
And you call us bigots.


Indeed I do. Arrogant, immoral, condescending, myopic, and foolish ones. Your pride in your "rescue" efforts blinds you to the reality of what you're doing. You've brainwashed yourself, pilot. Very effectively, I might add.

You weep for the horrors those people have endured even as you lay another one upon them. You can't be surprised at the contempt I'm expressing: I reserve it for all people whose faculties of self-analysis are so atrophied.

AKA Hambone

Author of The Deathworlders