These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page123
 

The Stratios

Author
Eko Fromtv
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#41 - 2013-11-22 09:10:02 UTC
The delay is by no means detrimental for the explorers, which is the main purpose of the vessel. Now if you are a wannabe ganker that's something else.

I for one LOVE the Stratios. It is excellent in its capabilities and I can;t even remember the last ship that I actually looked at while doing something in EVE. Usually I'm in tactical or the screen is covered in chat windows. The Strat is so beautiful ad pleasing to the eye it made me actually play the game by looking at my ship.

A couple of points tho:

1. The drone nerf was completely unnecessary. The dps is not high enough for 4/10 now. Same goes for sleepers.

2. Capacitor is VERY bad. It's the main cause for warping out.

Still, it;s an excellent ship and I owe the designer and artists a beer or two next fanfest.

(Ice) Miner for life.

Janna Sway
Ember Inc.
Curatores Veritatis Alliance
#42 - 2013-11-22 11:56:41 UTC  |  Edited by: Janna Sway
Eko Fromtv wrote:
The delay is by no means detrimental for the explorers, which is the main purpose of the vessel. Now if you are a wannabe ganker that's something else.

I for one LOVE the Stratios. It is excellent in its capabilities and I can;t even remember the last ship that I actually looked at while doing something in EVE. Usually I'm in tactical or the screen is covered in chat windows. The Strat is so beautiful ad pleasing to the eye it made me actually play the game by looking at my ship.

A couple of points tho:

1. The drone nerf was completely unnecessary. The dps is not high enough for 4/10 now. Same goes for sleepers.

2. Capacitor is VERY bad. It's the main cause for warping out.

Still, it;s an excellent ship and I owe the designer and artists a beer or two next fanfest.


to 1. Well, I would also not complain about 5 shiphull bonused sentries in a cruiser, offering 800 DPS, plus laser turrets, pushing it to 1000+ DPS with CovOps cloak. :D
DPS is not enough for 4/10 DEDs??? That is strange...
Well, believe me, the drone mbit/s nerf was more than necessary. :)
Eko Fromtv
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#43 - 2013-11-22 12:00:54 UTC
Janna Sway wrote:
Eko Fromtv wrote:
The delay is by no means detrimental for the explorers, which is the main purpose of the vessel. Now if you are a wannabe ganker that's something else.

I for one LOVE the Stratios. It is excellent in its capabilities and I can;t even remember the last ship that I actually looked at while doing something in EVE. Usually I'm in tactical or the screen is covered in chat windows. The Strat is so beautiful ad pleasing to the eye it made me actually play the game by looking at my ship.

A couple of points tho:

1. The drone nerf was completely unnecessary. The dps is not high enough for 4/10 now. Same goes for sleepers.

2. Capacitor is VERY bad. It's the main cause for warping out.

Still, it;s an excellent ship and I owe the designer and artists a beer or two next fanfest.


to 1. Well, I would also not complain about 5 shiphull bonused sentries in a cruiser, offering 800 DPS, plus laser turrets, pushing it to 1000+ DPS with CovOps cloak. :D
Well, believe me, the drone mbit/s nerf was more than necessary. :)


We covered that in the SoE ships announcement thread. No one will fly a 400 mil ship like that. EFT warrioring =/= real life EVE.

(Ice) Miner for life.

Celeste Taylor
Ruby Dynasty
#44 - 2013-11-22 12:22:42 UTC  |  Edited by: Celeste Taylor
I love the Stratios, but agree that CCP probably should have specialized it a bit more to be an exploration ship at the cost of being a combat ship. The recloaking bonus would serve it better than the energy turrets bonus (and 4 hardpoints?) in my opinion, especially since I notice that many people are already creating fittings that don't use them. Maybe it should have had better agility or a smaller sig as well, although the large cargo hold is nice for the role. I also think that a swift cloaky ship would have been better with shield bonuses over armor bonuses, especially with a 5/5/5 layout. Armor tanking doesn't leave much room for drone damage amps, and gives us an extra mid that I ended up using a web on. I would easily take a 4/4/6 over a 5/5/5.

I actually have one of my lower SP alts using it like a cloaky Sentry PVE Vexor and it does a decent job.

For now it would seem like a great rookie cruiser and maybe even an alternate for a Vexor, especially with the 920 PWG and 400 CPU and low skills to pilot. It will obviously not perform as well as an Ishtar for PVE or a T3 cruiser but is much easier to pilot and fit.
Janna Sway
Ember Inc.
Curatores Veritatis Alliance
#45 - 2013-11-22 13:37:56 UTC  |  Edited by: Janna Sway
Eko Fromtv wrote:
Janna Sway wrote:
Eko Fromtv wrote:
The delay is by no means detrimental for the explorers, which is the main purpose of the vessel. Now if you are a wannabe ganker that's something else.

I for one LOVE the Stratios. It is excellent in its capabilities and I can;t even remember the last ship that I actually looked at while doing something in EVE. Usually I'm in tactical or the screen is covered in chat windows. The Strat is so beautiful ad pleasing to the eye it made me actually play the game by looking at my ship.

A couple of points tho:

1. The drone nerf was completely unnecessary. The dps is not high enough for 4/10 now. Same goes for sleepers.

2. Capacitor is VERY bad. It's the main cause for warping out.

Still, it;s an excellent ship and I owe the designer and artists a beer or two next fanfest.


to 1. Well, I would also not complain about 5 shiphull bonused sentries in a cruiser, offering 800 DPS, plus laser turrets, pushing it to 1000+ DPS with CovOps cloak. :D
Well, believe me, the drone mbit/s nerf was more than necessary. :)


We covered that in the SoE ships announcement thread. No one will fly a 400 mil ship like that. EFT warrioring =/= real life EVE.


Do you assume that the Stratios' cost of 400M ISK will not drop?
Furthermore, with 5 sentries I would fly the Stratios exactly the way how I pointed out above. 400M ISK or not...400M ISK would not really bother me, if I could fly an OP-ship. Roll
Solstice Project
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#46 - 2013-11-22 13:48:00 UTC
Only members of the future RvB Universal Police Force will be allowed cloaks without targetting delays.
Eko Fromtv
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#47 - 2013-11-22 13:50:33 UTC
Janna Sway wrote:
Eko Fromtv wrote:
Janna Sway wrote:
Eko Fromtv wrote:
The delay is by no means detrimental for the explorers, which is the main purpose of the vessel. Now if you are a wannabe ganker that's something else.

I for one LOVE the Stratios. It is excellent in its capabilities and I can;t even remember the last ship that I actually looked at while doing something in EVE. Usually I'm in tactical or the screen is covered in chat windows. The Strat is so beautiful ad pleasing to the eye it made me actually play the game by looking at my ship.

A couple of points tho:

1. The drone nerf was completely unnecessary. The dps is not high enough for 4/10 now. Same goes for sleepers.

2. Capacitor is VERY bad. It's the main cause for warping out.

Still, it;s an excellent ship and I owe the designer and artists a beer or two next fanfest.


to 1. Well, I would also not complain about 5 shiphull bonused sentries in a cruiser, offering 800 DPS, plus laser turrets, pushing it to 1000+ DPS with CovOps cloak. :D
Well, believe me, the drone mbit/s nerf was more than necessary. :)


We covered that in the SoE ships announcement thread. No one will fly a 400 mil ship like that. EFT warrioring =/= real life EVE.


Do you assume that the Stratios' cost of 400M ISK will not drop?
Furthermore, with 5 sentries I would fly the Stratios exactly the way how I pointed out above. 400M ISK or not...400M ISK would not really bother me, if I could fly an OP-ship. Roll


I wonder why would anyone do such a thing when you can fly something cheaper that is actually made for pvp and can do as much dps as the eft warrior-paper only Statios fits.

(Ice) Miner for life.

Janna Sway
Ember Inc.
Curatores Veritatis Alliance
#48 - 2013-11-22 13:53:34 UTC
Eko Fromtv wrote:
Janna Sway wrote:
Eko Fromtv wrote:
Janna Sway wrote:
Eko Fromtv wrote:
The delay is by no means detrimental for the explorers, which is the main purpose of the vessel. Now if you are a wannabe ganker that's something else.

I for one LOVE the Stratios. It is excellent in its capabilities and I can;t even remember the last ship that I actually looked at while doing something in EVE. Usually I'm in tactical or the screen is covered in chat windows. The Strat is so beautiful ad pleasing to the eye it made me actually play the game by looking at my ship.

A couple of points tho:

1. The drone nerf was completely unnecessary. The dps is not high enough for 4/10 now. Same goes for sleepers.

2. Capacitor is VERY bad. It's the main cause for warping out.

Still, it;s an excellent ship and I owe the designer and artists a beer or two next fanfest.


to 1. Well, I would also not complain about 5 shiphull bonused sentries in a cruiser, offering 800 DPS, plus laser turrets, pushing it to 1000+ DPS with CovOps cloak. :D
Well, believe me, the drone mbit/s nerf was more than necessary. :)


We covered that in the SoE ships announcement thread. No one will fly a 400 mil ship like that. EFT warrioring =/= real life EVE.


Do you assume that the Stratios' cost of 400M ISK will not drop?
Furthermore, with 5 sentries I would fly the Stratios exactly the way how I pointed out above. 400M ISK or not...400M ISK would not really bother me, if I could fly an OP-ship. Roll


I wonder why would anyone do such a thing when you can fly something cheaper that is actually made for pvp and can do as much dps as the eft warrior-paper only Statios fits.


Because the CovOps cloak with that crapload of DPS would allow me to chose my targets more efficiently, position myself much better, plainly win much more fights... :)
Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
Vae. Victis.
#49 - 2013-11-22 17:15:23 UTC  |  Edited by: Ranger 1
I was in Amarr last night and if memory serves the cruiser was going for less than half that amount.

185mil sticks in my mind, but I wasn't paying that close of attention... so take that with a grain of salt.

LOL, maybe I'm thinking of the frigate.

View the latest EVE Online developments and other game related news and gameplay by visiting Ranger 1 Presents: Virtual Realms.

Janna Sway
Ember Inc.
Curatores Veritatis Alliance
#50 - 2013-11-23 02:24:12 UTC
Ranger 1 wrote:
I was in Amarr last night and if memory serves the cruiser was going for less than half that amount.

185mil sticks in my mind, but I wasn't paying that close of attention... so take that with a grain of salt.

LOL, maybe I'm thinking of the frigate.


Stratios goes for 482M in Amarr, 500M in average.
Eko Fromtv
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#51 - 2013-11-23 02:46:13 UTC
Janna Sway wrote:

Because the CovOps cloak with that crapload of DPS would allow me to chose my targets more efficiently, position myself much better, plainly win much more fights... :)


What is targeting delay? What is squishy ship? What is EFT warrioring with no real world application? What is big ass price that few can afford to pay daily for replacement ships?

Thanks to eft warrior tears the ship lost some if its exploration abilities. It can no longer do some DED sites, for example.

eft - good
eft warriors = bad

(Ice) Miner for life.

Sura Sadiva
Entropic Tactical Crew
#52 - 2013-11-23 02:47:56 UTC
To me the Stratios seems already slightly overpowered as is now, considering the lower skills requirements in respect of Recon (and prices will drop soon). Remving the delay would make better (as recon) than a "true" recon.

Shalashaska Adam
Snakes and Lasers
#53 - 2013-11-23 03:02:09 UTC
As others have said, the ships flaws are hindering it's worthwhile use in it's primary role.

Reduce the cloak reactivation delay to 15 seconds to facilitate uninterrupted travel.

Increase the sensor recalibration time to compensate.

The ship is not meant to be a hunter, it is however meant to be a traveller.

Right now it is incredibly frustrating to stealthily travel in.
Janna Sway
Ember Inc.
Curatores Veritatis Alliance
#54 - 2013-11-23 04:21:26 UTC  |  Edited by: Janna Sway
Shalashaska Adam wrote:
As others have said, the ships flaws are hindering it's worthwhile use in it's primary role.

Reduce the cloak reactivation delay to 15 seconds to facilitate uninterrupted travel.

Increase the sensor recalibration time to compensate.

The ship is not meant to be a hunter, it is however meant to be a traveller.

Right now it is incredibly frustrating to stealthily travel in.


Don't spam the cloak needlessly. Cloaking as a functionality is meant to be used for "defensive" purposes.
The SOE cloaking device is an upate of the T2 Improved Cloaking Device which in addition only allows full functionality of the warp- and impulse drives. It uses the CovOps module, but the technology is not that far advanced.

SOE ships are TECH-ONE ships.
A cloaking reactivation delay of 15 seconds is reserved for TECH-TWO CovOps ships, the stealth bombers...!!!


There is no module that forces a cloaked ship out of cloak, it has no counters.
I personally find it pretty annoying already that CCP released a DPS ship with even armor resistances (free unpenalized EANM) and overall short training time (no racial ship level 5 required) with almost CovOps cloaking functionality, which is just overpowered and annoying already.

The subject "cloaking" is the cause of ENDLESS "nerf cloaking cry cry" threads, that pop up almost daily on the forums for years and years, and years to come...

Unbelievable that these "buff cloaking" threads pop up since the advent of the annoying SOE-ships, all wishing for a overpowered cloaky all-in-one ship that just can do everything...

If you wish to just travel, then use a Shuttle, CovOps, Interceptor, or just ANY SHIP, properly travel fitted to get from system A to B in low/null sec.

Again, you spam the cloak too much.
Once you entered warp, then there is no need to keep the cloaking activated, especially if you are not in nullsec where you might run into bubbles. VERY rarely you find gatecamps with HIC's and seriously, one hardly warps from gate to gate anyway, except one is in highsec.

Every pilot, traveling though low/null should spend definitely more than 30 seconds to scout out the system, before jumping into the next system, lol.
Hm, I just smell a highsec pilot who is not familiar with the low/null-sec life and wants to keep hold to his easy-going-highsec mentalities and wants to apply them in the entire EVE-universe...right?
I really hope that this is not gonna happen...The game is getting dumbed down way too much already, eliminating challenges, and making it getting boring more and more quickly.

Off-topic, this dumb-down-policy-horse, CCP is riding, conflicts with the long-term concept that you find in the extended skill training functionality...The game needs to be "difficult and challenging" because of the nature of its years-long-character developments, or else no sane person will stick to the game because of boredom. Some inexperienced people are corrupting the first planted roots of EVE in the development section and are leaving the path, leading towards the wilderness...
Most of us come from other easy-going-MMO's or at least know other MMO's and play EVE because we seek to play a mature and intentionally "difficult and somewhat challenging and a bit frustrating" game. Other easy MMO's are already present en masse, available and even free to download...
We even intentionally pay for the game in order to escape the current trash-MMO market and to have some challenge and experience some difficulty and consequences to our actions.

The majority of my EVE-life I spent in low- and nullsec, being an occasional highsec visitor for a couple of minutes per week/month or so.
Once you learn the "basics and tricks" of getting your ships from system to system, then you will see that the SOE-cloaking is ALL you could EVER possibly wish for.

Just start there, practice how to get any ship through low/null camps with a T1 Prototype cloaking device and learn from experiences.
I got all kind of ships, ranging from Shuttles to Battleships through all sorts of gatecamps, ranging from 1-30+ ships in all space security levels. That's what I do day in and out...A standard T1 prototype cloaking is more than enough.
Even a cloaking reactivation delay of one minute would be absolutely sufficient for the SOE ships.

The annoying SOE ships are plainly overpowered, especially in the hands of an experienced pilot.
Enjoy your time with the SOE ships, for I can hardly imagine that they stay the way they currently are.
Nerfhammer incoming - unfortunately in the next 5 years or so, as we all know how much time CCP needs for rebalancing and bugfixes.
Xearal
Dead's Prostitutes
The Initiative.
#55 - 2013-11-23 07:06:36 UTC
What the stratios really needs is proper ENGINE TRAILS!

Unlike the many other awesome ships in this game, the stratios doesn't have any decent engine trails... GIVE US ENGINE TRAILS!

Does railgun ammunition come in Hollow Point?

Previous page123