These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Warfare & Tactics

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Attention New GalMil Pilots - The Gallente Elite Have Forgotten About You

First post
Author
Rinai Vero
Blades of Liberty
#41 - 2013-11-21 04:33:04 UTC
Crosi Wesdo wrote:


WOW, test finally admitted they lack the experience to train new EVE players in PVP because they are mostly newbros and bad at EVE.

Who would have thunk it?


Hah, why should they have any of that when they have us to conduct that training for them? : )
Zah Damaja
Reveka.
Bad-Touch
#42 - 2013-11-21 04:33:49 UTC
Crosi Wesdo wrote:
Zah Damaja wrote:
Dread Operative wrote:
If faction war is for training newbros, what exactly is TEST training them to do? Obviously not PVP, read "killboard stats", because that doesn't matter to them. Are you training them to fly cloaky stabbed frigs? How to structure grind in stealth bombers and warp off at the first sign of trouble? How to whelp fleets? I am curious, since PVP doesn't matter to you, what are you training them to do?


I don't actually have to explain why higher percentages of newbros in fleets would not make them as effective as more experienced PVP'ers right? I don't actually have to explain why us not caring about kbstats doesn't mean we don't PVP right? I don't actually have to explain why the fact that Gallente's our deaths on their killboards is because we PVP right?


WOW, test finally admitted they lack the experience to train new EVE players in PVP because they are mostly newbros and bad at EVE.

Who would have thunk it?


"Higher percentages of newbros in fleets" doesn't translate to "TEST is ran by inexperienced newbros" in the English language but yes we are pretty bad at Eve. But that doesn't say much about the entirety of the Gallente militia considering we impose our will wherever we choose to and there's nothing you can do about it. If there was something you can do about it you wouldn't be losing systems daily while we sit at T4 making ISK.

Those were questions you quoted by the way, I mean it, you don't ACTUALLY need me to explain those things to you do I?

[b]Zah Damaja Official TEST Alliance Please Ignore Sun Tzu Quoter[/b] _“A leader leads by example, not by force” -_Sun Tzu, The Art of War

Crosi Wesdo
War and Order
#43 - 2013-11-21 04:37:14 UTC  |  Edited by: Crosi Wesdo
Zah Damaja wrote:
Crosi Wesdo wrote:
Zah Damaja wrote:
Dread Operative wrote:
If faction war is for training newbros, what exactly is TEST training them to do? Obviously not PVP, read "killboard stats", because that doesn't matter to them. Are you training them to fly cloaky stabbed frigs? How to structure grind in stealth bombers and warp off at the first sign of trouble? How to whelp fleets? I am curious, since PVP doesn't matter to you, what are you training them to do?


I don't actually have to explain why higher percentages of newbros in fleets would not make them as effective as more experienced PVP'ers right? I don't actually have to explain why us not caring about kbstats doesn't mean we don't PVP right? I don't actually have to explain why the fact that Gallente's our deaths on their killboards is because we PVP right?


WOW, test finally admitted they lack the experience to train new EVE players in PVP because they are mostly newbros and bad at EVE.

Who would have thunk it?


"Higher percentages of newbros in fleets" doesn't translate to "TEST is ran by inexperienced newbros" in the English language but yes we are pretty bad at Eve. But that doesn't say much about the entirety of the Gallente militia considering we impose our will wherever we choose to and there's nothing you can do about it. If there was something you can do about it you wouldn't be losing systems daily while we sit at T4 making ISK.

Those were questions you quoted by the way, I mean it, you don't ACTUALLY need me to explain those things to you do I?


We are only interested in home systems. Ive not seen any evidence of TEST imposing will on those places. We still have more systems right now than we did during the last caldari push. Im not sure how this is a win for test when it was predicted well before test joined FW.

Even if you did strike us down in one place, we would only become more powerful than you could possibly imagine.

Prove me wrong.
X Gallentius
Black Eagle1
#44 - 2013-11-21 04:38:54 UTC
What exactly has TEST accomplished than countless other Caldari entities haven't done in the past? If you set the bar low enough, you might even trip over it. +1 fellas.
Zah Damaja
Reveka.
Bad-Touch
#45 - 2013-11-21 04:40:37 UTC
Crosi Wesdo wrote:
We are only interested in home systems.


If you were wondering what we talk about when we say "pushing back the goalposts" this is an example of it.

[b]Zah Damaja Official TEST Alliance Please Ignore Sun Tzu Quoter[/b] _“A leader leads by example, not by force” -_Sun Tzu, The Art of War

Zah Damaja
Reveka.
Bad-Touch
#46 - 2013-11-21 04:41:54 UTC  |  Edited by: Zah Damaja
For those of you keeping score at home X Gallentius makes it 6 Gallente Militia now running damage control.

Edit: His post can be filed under P for "pendulum."

[b]Zah Damaja Official TEST Alliance Please Ignore Sun Tzu Quoter[/b] _“A leader leads by example, not by force” -_Sun Tzu, The Art of War

Crosi Wesdo
War and Order
#47 - 2013-11-21 04:43:59 UTC  |  Edited by: Crosi Wesdo
Zah Damaja wrote:
For those of you keeping score at home X Gallentius makes it 6 Gallente Militia now running damage control.

Edit: His post can be filed under P for "pendulum."


What?

I dont think this guy appreciates how low and how long gallente has been at the short end of the FW stick in the past.

I dont want to take away the accomplishment that TEST and countless farmers before them have reached, but i would ask them to recognise that they are nothing more than farmers.
X Gallentius
Black Eagle1
#48 - 2013-11-21 04:44:37 UTC  |  Edited by: X Gallentius
Zah Damaja wrote:
For those of you keeping score at home X Gallentius now makes it 6 Gallente Militia now running damage control.
I think it's funny that the initial TEST FW audio clip had you guys taking Nennamaila in a short amount of time.

You guys have been in FW for quite a long time now and haven't accomplished your stated goal.

Just lots of posting on the forums trying to hide the fact that you haven't done what you set out to do. +1 fellas. You win.
Zah Damaja
Reveka.
Bad-Touch
#49 - 2013-11-21 04:46:47 UTC
X Gallentius wrote:
~goalpost~


This one is filed under G, for goalpost.

[b]Zah Damaja Official TEST Alliance Please Ignore Sun Tzu Quoter[/b] _“A leader leads by example, not by force” -_Sun Tzu, The Art of War

Crosi Wesdo
War and Order
#50 - 2013-11-21 05:13:54 UTC  |  Edited by: Crosi Wesdo
Zah Damaja wrote:
X Gallentius wrote:
~goalpost~


This one is filed under G, for goalpost.


This one is filed under D, for damage control.
Zah Damaja
Reveka.
Bad-Touch
#51 - 2013-11-21 05:23:26 UTC
Crosi Wesdo wrote:
Zah Damaja wrote:
X Gallentius wrote:
~goalpost~


This one is filed under G, for goalpost.


This one is filed under D, for damage control.


This is literally the equivalent of "I know you are but what am I?" You're above that type of retort, I'm sure of it.

[b]Zah Damaja Official TEST Alliance Please Ignore Sun Tzu Quoter[/b] _“A leader leads by example, not by force” -_Sun Tzu, The Art of War

Crosi Wesdo
War and Order
#52 - 2013-11-21 05:25:26 UTC  |  Edited by: Crosi Wesdo
Zah Damaja wrote:
Crosi Wesdo wrote:
Zah Damaja wrote:
X Gallentius wrote:
~goalpost~


This one is filed under G, for goalpost.


This one is filed under D, for damage control.


This is literally the equivalent of "I know you are but what am I?" You're above that type of retort, I'm sure of it.


Im not sure i recognise any narrative constancy in your post so ... uh, what?

Please elaborate, or dont if it was a mistake. No pressure.
Zah Damaja
Reveka.
Bad-Touch
#53 - 2013-11-21 05:28:37 UTC
Crosi Wesdo wrote:
Zah Damaja wrote:
Crosi Wesdo wrote:
Zah Damaja wrote:
X Gallentius wrote:
~goalpost~


This one is filed under G, for goalpost.


This one is filed under D, for damage control.


This is literally the equivalent of "I know you are but what am I?" You're above that type of retort, I'm sure of it.


Im no sure i recognise any narrative constancy in your post so ... uh, what?

Please elaborate, or dont if it was a mistake. No pressure.


I'm assuming you mean "consistency"? Please clarify, or don't if that was a mistake. No pressure.

[b]Zah Damaja Official TEST Alliance Please Ignore Sun Tzu Quoter[/b] _“A leader leads by example, not by force” -_Sun Tzu, The Art of War

X Gallentius
Black Eagle1
#54 - 2013-11-21 05:34:46 UTC
Zah Damaja wrote:
X Gallentius wrote:
~goalpost~
This one is filed under G, for goalpost.

Your post is filed under A for "Avoidance".
Crosi Wesdo
War and Order
#55 - 2013-11-21 05:35:57 UTC
Zah Damaja wrote:


I'm assuming you mean "consistency"? Please clarify, or don't if that was a mistake. No pressure.


I think i made my point.
Zah Damaja
Reveka.
Bad-Touch
#56 - 2013-11-21 05:37:37 UTC
X Gallentius wrote:
Zah Damaja wrote:
X Gallentius wrote:
~goalpost~
This one is filed under G, for goalpost.

Your post is filed under A for "Avoidance".


I'm not addressing replies that involve "pendulums, pushed goalposts or kbstats" as these 3 things have been addressed countless times in this thread and others.

[b]Zah Damaja Official TEST Alliance Please Ignore Sun Tzu Quoter[/b] _“A leader leads by example, not by force” -_Sun Tzu, The Art of War

Zah Damaja
Reveka.
Bad-Touch
#57 - 2013-11-21 05:39:24 UTC
Crosi Wesdo wrote:
Zah Damaja wrote:


I'm assuming you mean "consistency"? Please clarify, or don't if that was a mistake. No pressure.


I think i made my point.


I honestly don't know what a "constancy" is though.

[b]Zah Damaja Official TEST Alliance Please Ignore Sun Tzu Quoter[/b] _“A leader leads by example, not by force” -_Sun Tzu, The Art of War

Crosi Wesdo
War and Order
#58 - 2013-11-21 05:40:55 UTC
Zah Damaja wrote:
Crosi Wesdo wrote:
Zah Damaja wrote:


I'm assuming you mean "consistency"? Please clarify, or don't if that was a mistake. No pressure.


I think i made my point.


I honestly don't know what a "constancy" is though.


No matter, you havent been here long enough for that. We dont judge.
Rinai Vero
Blades of Liberty
#59 - 2013-11-21 05:41:49 UTC
Zah Damaja wrote:
Crosi Wesdo wrote:
Zah Damaja wrote:
X Gallentius wrote:
~goalpost~


This one is filed under G, for goalpost.


This one is filed under D, for damage control.


This is literally the equivalent of "I know you are but what am I?" You're above that type of retort, I'm sure of it.


You do realize that every Militia repeats the same set of conversations every time the warzone changes hands? You seem to think its clever to point to cliches like "kbstats" or "goalposts," but srsly we have had this conversation with the Squids like 17 just in the little more than a year that I've followed FW.

Maybe its the difference between high turnover in CalMil contrasted against the stability of longtime GalMil Corps/Alliances that encourages every new Caldari entity to think they are blazing new trails while Gallente pilots see it as all more of the same. I dunno.

To continue the theme of scifi lines: "All of this has happened before, and all of it will happen again."

Unless you kick us out of Fortress Nenna. That'd be new. You should give it a shot. You may have a better chance of succeeding than your predecessors.

inb4 file under P for Pendulum.
Zah Damaja
Reveka.
Bad-Touch
#60 - 2013-11-21 05:42:44 UTC
None of this hurf blurf matters of course because GalMil has already agreed with me that they don't really need nor want newbros which was my original point in this thread.

[b]Zah Damaja Official TEST Alliance Please Ignore Sun Tzu Quoter[/b] _“A leader leads by example, not by force” -_Sun Tzu, The Art of War