These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

I scared a new corp member and he ragequited EVE

First post
Author
Leonardo Diom
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#101 - 2013-11-18 19:57:00 UTC
Jythier Smith wrote:


I am able to take a very mechanical approach to gaming. Gaming is a chance for me to be completely self-centered with no real-world consequences for it. The point of a game is for me to have an outlet to be completely selfish within. IE, the idea of a game is to win, so whatever goal I set for myself, it is my task to get to that goal utilizing all available methods.

This works a lot better for board games where the idea is to accumulate some sort of victory points in order to win the game (my favorite is money). I transferred some of this over to this game - my goal is not outright collection of ISK, but to set up profitable industry and mining opportunities involving other players as primaries. In order to achieve that goal I need trust from other players, or at least relationships with them, so I build those relationships and do my best to make sure they're well maintained. If, within playing the game, I also make some friends, so much the better. And maybe I do have other more secret goals that involve impacting people in real life, but that is how I live life, not play EVE.

So I play EVE selfishly and I give no credence to whether you succeed in your goals or not - in business, it's obviously relevant as far as a non-profitable partner becomes no partner soon enough. But my purpose isn't for you to succeed as such, it only is my purpose so far as it suits my own purposes.

I expect the same from other players as I respect them enough to expect them to maximize their own goal-reaching potential. The problems only come up when I do not realize what the other's goal is - then it is very difficult to predict what they would do.

At least in board games, everyone has the same goal (most of the time). So I know what actions to expect from people. EVE is a lot closer to life in that way.


While that is all very well, that is your approach to this game. I would say the noob player probably had another, possibly more altruistic one. This approach to the game is what makes your reaction to an event in the game different when compared to another player who has a different approach.

Now that I think it's clear why the noob reacted the way he did, I would like to ask a question: Do you think there are wrong approaches to games? If so, was the noob's approach an incorrect one?

I would say there are no wrong approaches to games as long as you accept the consequences your approach might have.
Following that thought I'd say that the noob did no wrong when he abandoned the player who attacked him. While his probable loss of money might not have been the greatest thing to happen to him, he did not get on the forums (as far as I know) to complain about what happened. In not doing so, I'd say he took responsibility for the consequences of his approach to the game.
Naydra Adni
Doomheim
#102 - 2013-11-18 19:58:22 UTC
""I also like the part where you say that people shouldn't say someone has a mentall illness, and then proceed to say people who might not like being backstabbed in a game they play for fun, with other people, are mentally ill.""

ohhhh burn!!
but yeah Remiel, that was kind of insensitive of you to say someone that gets upset over pixels had "problems to sort out" I mean with your first hand experience in these matters... that's kinda messed up dude.
Rekkr Nordgard
Steelforge Heavy Industries
#103 - 2013-11-18 20:00:21 UTC
Self-proclaimed as in self-described.

Remiel Pollard wrote:
As a diagnosed sociopath myself


If I were one of your corpmates, I would be extremely concerned with your statements in this thread.
Remiel Pollard
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#104 - 2013-11-18 20:00:33 UTC
You know, yes, I've been a bit upset about this "you're a sociopath if you gank" nonsense, but I'm coming down from it now and remembering why I keep ganking. I haven't done it in a while, though, so I'm going to have to come out of low sec and go on a bit of a spree to make up for it, just because of all the people who are clearly irritated enough by gankers to reach for the most spiteful thing they can possibly throw at gankers. Unless you can learn to defend yourself with more than a few nasty words, you're open season.

“Some capsuleers claim that ECM is 'dishonorable' and 'unfair'. Jam those ones first, and kill them last.” - Jirai 'Fatal' Laitanen, Pithum Nullifier Training Manual c. YC104

Jythier Smith
BGG Wolves
#105 - 2013-11-18 20:00:38 UTC
To put it more succinctly and in better words:

"In competitive games, I get to approximate the platonic ideal of an entirely selfish and self-centeredly manipulative creature, one bereft of every social grace and principle, and to thereby learn to solve interesting problems. What's not to like?"
-JC Lawrence
KnowUsByTheDead
Sunlight...Through The Blight.
#106 - 2013-11-18 20:00:50 UTC
OP, if you are going to...

-Gank
-Awox
-Reverse Awox
-Scam
-Heist

So on and so forth...

Don't do it to new players. They are the lifeblood that exists to help propel the game forward.

It is better to take those actions against older players, as they should have learned their lessons. And if they haven't, then they deserve the fate of a gank.

Also...

Please keep in mind that new players have a month in which they are to be immune from "grief."

While it may have happened outside of a rookie system, next time I believe your best course of action would be to petition CCP in order to get an idea of what you can and can not do. Because rookies are important to the game.

I have done all of the "horrible, sociopathic playstyles" above. Many times.

But a newbie, man?

Seriously?

That newbie could have helped you "create" something bigger. Because, after all, isn't that what this game is about? Content creation? Building something in the sandbox?

Instead your content was:

-A ship put into structure
-A corp mate left (who could have proved over time to be very loyal and useful later on)
-A player leaving the game
-A half-assed post in GD about your "glorious triumph."

Congrats. You put a Retriever in structure. Roll

Next time, send them to me, as I can always find use for a new player that picks up the game quickly. Some examples...

-Hero tackle
-If he found his niche in industry...a possible industrial director...who can sell ships at a discount to corp mates.
-Bait
-A fellow FW plexer who could provide backup in the event of 3-4 frigates or destroyers dropping in a room.

The list goes on.

So next time...keep this in mind...

There is a reason why Goonswarm and related entities shower their newbies with isk, advice, and gifts. Ironically, it is also why they are the most tight-knit organization in the game, not to mention the most powerful.

They understand that loyalty is what propels an organization forward. And loyalty is far more important than isk, killmails, and the like. The only thing that eclipses that is proper content creation.


TL;DR


Don't screw with new players, man.

I remember the first time I was ganked. It hurt like hell, and I had to grab a Xanax to counter the loss of my entire first 7-8 months of assets. Around 8 bil lost.

I learned, and persevered on. But not because of me. But rather, because another suicide ganker in Niarja, convo'd me, talked me down, and helped me out with a couple 100mil. A veteran...who watched it happened...and watched as I sat on the gate in my pod...awe-stricken and unsure what to do.

Granted, I didn't get 7 months worth of work back, but it gave me a BC to start back up, and the will to keep on playing. And now, several years later, I am still here, and will more than likely be here for quite awhile longer.

Anyone but the newbies, bro. Anyone but the newbies.

Have a good day.

Big smile

Once you realize what a joke everything is, being the comedian is the only thing that makes sense.

Jythier Smith
BGG Wolves
#107 - 2013-11-18 20:01:33 UTC
In other news, I have no idea how to put in a signature.
Remiel Pollard
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#108 - 2013-11-18 20:02:00 UTC
Rekkr Nordgard wrote:
Self-proclaimed as in self-described.

Remiel Pollard wrote:
As a diagnosed sociopath myself


If I were one of your corpmates, I would be extremely concerned with your statements in this thread.


If you were one of my corpmates, you'd know me well enough not to be concerned at all.

“Some capsuleers claim that ECM is 'dishonorable' and 'unfair'. Jam those ones first, and kill them last.” - Jirai 'Fatal' Laitanen, Pithum Nullifier Training Manual c. YC104

Anslo
Scope Works
#109 - 2013-11-18 20:02:01 UTC
Rekkr Nordgard wrote:
Self-proclaimed as in self-described.

Remiel Pollard wrote:
As a diagnosed sociopath myself


If I were one of your corpmates, I would be extremely concerned with your statements in this thread.

I suggest evemailing his CEO this thread.

[center]-_For the Proveldtariat_/-[/center]

Riot Girl
You'll Cowards Don't Even Smoke Crack
#110 - 2013-11-18 20:03:23 UTC
Rekkr Nordgard wrote:
Remiel Pollard wrote:
As a diagnosed sociopath myself


If I were one of your corpmates, I would be extremely concerned with your statements in this thread.

You shouldn't worry about it. Most people who say that aren't really sociopaths.
Remiel Pollard
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#111 - 2013-11-18 20:06:09 UTC
Anslo wrote:
Rekkr Nordgard wrote:
Self-proclaimed as in self-described.

Remiel Pollard wrote:
As a diagnosed sociopath myself


If I were one of your corpmates, I would be extremely concerned with your statements in this thread.

I suggest evemailing his CEO this thread.


"Yeah, let's try to hurt him more!!"

No, that's not bullying at all.

“Some capsuleers claim that ECM is 'dishonorable' and 'unfair'. Jam those ones first, and kill them last.” - Jirai 'Fatal' Laitanen, Pithum Nullifier Training Manual c. YC104

Anslo
Scope Works
#112 - 2013-11-18 20:08:13 UTC
Remiel Pollard wrote:
Anslo wrote:
Rekkr Nordgard wrote:
Self-proclaimed as in self-described.

Remiel Pollard wrote:
As a diagnosed sociopath myself


If I were one of your corpmates, I would be extremely concerned with your statements in this thread.

I suggest evemailing his CEO this thread.


"Yeah, let's try to hurt him more!!"

No, that's not bullying at all.


Then don't state your opinions are fact. You're sensitive about yourself, so how about showing some gods damned empathy towards people and their opinions/attitude towards a matter. If you don't like it, don't dish it out.

[center]-_For the Proveldtariat_/-[/center]

Leonardo Diom
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#113 - 2013-11-18 20:08:15 UTC
I doubt the CEO would care much.
Jythier Smith
BGG Wolves
#114 - 2013-11-18 20:08:17 UTC
Leonardo Diom wrote:
Jythier Smith wrote:


I am able to take a very mechanical approach to gaming. Gaming is a chance for me to be completely self-centered with no real-world consequences for it. The point of a game is for me to have an outlet to be completely selfish within. IE, the idea of a game is to win, so whatever goal I set for myself, it is my task to get to that goal utilizing all available methods.

This works a lot better for board games where the idea is to accumulate some sort of victory points in order to win the game (my favorite is money). I transferred some of this over to this game - my goal is not outright collection of ISK, but to set up profitable industry and mining opportunities involving other players as primaries. In order to achieve that goal I need trust from other players, or at least relationships with them, so I build those relationships and do my best to make sure they're well maintained. If, within playing the game, I also make some friends, so much the better. And maybe I do have other more secret goals that involve impacting people in real life, but that is how I live life, not play EVE.

So I play EVE selfishly and I give no credence to whether you succeed in your goals or not - in business, it's obviously relevant as far as a non-profitable partner becomes no partner soon enough. But my purpose isn't for you to succeed as such, it only is my purpose so far as it suits my own purposes.

I expect the same from other players as I respect them enough to expect them to maximize their own goal-reaching potential. The problems only come up when I do not realize what the other's goal is - then it is very difficult to predict what they would do.

At least in board games, everyone has the same goal (most of the time). So I know what actions to expect from people. EVE is a lot closer to life in that way.


While that is all very well, that is your approach to this game. I would say the noob player probably had another, possibly more altruistic one. This approach to the game is what makes your reaction to an event in the game different when compared to another player who has a different approach.

Now that I think it's clear why the noob reacted the way he did, I would like to ask a question: Do you think there are wrong approaches to games? If so, was the noob's approach an incorrect one?

I would say there are no wrong approaches to games as long as you accept the consequences your approach might have.
Following that thought I'd say that the noob did no wrong when he abandoned the player who attacked him. While his probable loss of money might not have been the greatest thing to happen to him, he did not get on the forums (as far as I know) to complain about what happened. In not doing so, I'd say he took responsibility for the consequences of his approach to the game.


Well, there are really two types of gamers here. There's the social gamer, who is playing a game in order to socialize, and there is a gamer who plays to win. And I believe that a social gamer is going to react very differently than I would to the same situations, because their primary purpose is different than mine... ie, to socialize. So it's really all wrapped up in the original manifesto, it's just that there are so many different purposes you can have in EVE that the reactions are equally varied.
Remiel Pollard
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#115 - 2013-11-18 20:08:36 UTC
Riot Girl wrote:
Rekkr Nordgard wrote:
Remiel Pollard wrote:
As a diagnosed sociopath myself


If I were one of your corpmates, I would be extremely concerned with your statements in this thread.

You shouldn't worry about it. Most people who say that aren't really sociopaths.


Citation need. Also, qualifications please.

“Some capsuleers claim that ECM is 'dishonorable' and 'unfair'. Jam those ones first, and kill them last.” - Jirai 'Fatal' Laitanen, Pithum Nullifier Training Manual c. YC104

Jythier Smith
BGG Wolves
#116 - 2013-11-18 20:10:28 UTC
This thread has totally helped me come to terms with ganking.

Thanks, thread.
Leonardo Diom
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#117 - 2013-11-18 20:15:20 UTC
Jythier Smith wrote:


Well, there are really two types of gamers here. There's the social gamer, who is playing a game in order to socialize, and there is a gamer who plays to win. And I believe that a social gamer is going to react very differently than I would to the same situations, because their primary purpose is different than mine... ie, to socialize. So it's really all wrapped up in the original manifesto, it's just that there are so many different purposes you can have in EVE that the reactions are equally varied.


I agree. The noob was a social player who was therefore hurt when a friend of his attacked him.
While I think that makes for a reasonable summary, there are still some people in this thread throwing linguistic feces at one another like monkeys.
ISD Tyrozan
ISD Community Communications Liaisons
ISD Alliance
#118 - 2013-11-18 20:15:54 UTC
Topic consists mostly of violations of Rule 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7. Topic has been locked.

ISD Tyrozan

Captain

Community Communication Liaisons (CCLs)

Interstellar Services Department

@ISDTyrozan | @ISD_CCL

Rekkr Nordgard
Steelforge Heavy Industries
#119 - 2013-11-18 20:15:55 UTC
Remiel Pollard wrote:
No, that's not bullying at all.


Internet pixels and cyber friendships don't matter, remember? Why would you care about losing either?