EVE General Discussion

I don't think anyone wants to conquer hisec per se...but in the eyes of most null pilots, hisec is ripe for a culling. Don't deny it. If you fly through hisec how often do you wish you could just arbitrarily open your guns up on anyone and everyone.

It's funny because it's true.

I agree with the sentiment expressed above, all spaces need tweaks and fixes though to make them more interesting, more profitable and to further drive conflict on all levels.

Well you are, aren't you? I mean you see someone who you believe earns more money than you think they should compared to how much money you make and you are saying that you believe that you deserve more money.

Isn't that what you are saying? You either want more money by increasing your own wallet or by decreasing those who you don't approve of thereby increasing your wallet.

The only thing that would sound unbiased is that if I said (being a citizen of high sec), "You know maybe those people in null-sec should get more money." because its not my own wallet in question. You know I most likely would not mind it that much if null sec got a buff nor would I be bothered by high sec getting a nerf, but from my understanding of the complaint that isn't enough.



I'm not really projecting I'm just stating that you as a human have a bias about your personal preferences. I could most likely back this up with scientific studies if you want me to. I don't mind it if you can't see that you have a bias, because humans most of the time can't.



Maybe I wrote that on. I'm saying you think high sec's grass is greener and it makes you mad so you demand herbicide be put on it to make your side looke better.



Again, I'm going to chalk this up to personal opinion and bias. We've had these discussesions before and we have asked for numerical proof other than anecdotal observation and not even Tippia was able to provide a page of numbers provided by CCP to prove the point one way or another.

Its ok. I don't blame you for thinking the way you do. You are only human and you think that your opinion is right because of confirmation bias.



Oh this one is easy. I am also human and therefore sometimes have biases about what I believe so they maybe under question on occasion and sometimes I lack the comprehension to grasp quantum physics at lower levels. See. Self critizicism. Sometimes I have the idea that I can spell. But then I can say also I can't spell. I just proved you wrong again.

Look. I don't know if Star Citizen will have a functioning economy or not on par with EVE which is the criteria to for me to play it more than EVE. I certainly will most likely investigate its purchase.

I just like brining it up because it seems to bother people. They seem to have an emotional attachment... Nay a fanboyish attachment to the products they use and get all mad when people question their world view.

I say hatred and open criticism will improve a product. Simply showering them with praise and larels will only cause the product to stagnante with self-congradulations.

Renter: someone who hasn't figured out how cloaks and wormholes work.

hey, how are your renters doing

B..But Providences shittyness is part of its charm!

Confirming, the OP did not get the point of Malcanis' article.

The truth is, that Null and High sec need each other. The only place to get things like T2 modules and hulls...high sec. The only place to get the inputs to make T2 modules and hulls...null sec.

Those things are in nullsec. Goo is in lowsec. T2 modules built in null sit and rot on the market for 3 months at a time because its easier to just import a fully fitted ship from Jita in a jumpfreighter.

The _actual_ things that are not supplied in sov null directly. (minor exceptions for the odd drop).

skillbooks.
generic attribute implants.
hardwirings.
infinite isk agents.
blueprint originals.
detector arrays.
ihubs
tcu's
sbu's.

ie stuff thats really important to your corp members, or stuff thats real important to running a corp.

As far as conflict goes, it amuses me that a single good null system can support an active 200 character corp and needs care to manage peak login period (ie beyond about 100 the corp has to be diffuse amongst TZs as about 15 ratters is the limit at any one time). A single highsec L4 agent can easily support a 500 man character corp and then some, where diffusion would only be required to manage TIDI. There are a fairly finite number of "good" nullsec systems btw.

Both are dangerous, as in a 500 character highsec corp will inevitably collect wardecs, and anyone in a -0.9 will attest for the fact that the local roams will gravitate towards their systems (because that is the safari park is located).

Regardless of where you are, there is not sufficient signatures to keep a single prober occupied in a single system, and regardless of where you are, mining m3 is pretty much flat and uneconomic for anything but a multiboxer.