These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Test Server Feedback

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Increase unanchorable zone around gates and stations

Author
Michael Harari
Genos Occidere
HYDRA RELOADED
#1 - 2013-11-13 13:03:18 UTC
With such a short radius where you cannot anchor depots and such, every hub station is going to become absolutely swarmed with these things, and since you have to go suspect and wait 2 days, killing them becomes dangerous and a pain.

Increase the unanchorable distance to 1 AU, to prevent these things from being on grid at all.
Abdiel Kavash
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#2 - 2013-11-13 13:29:51 UTC  |  Edited by: Abdiel Kavash
Why exactly would you want to anchor a spaceyurt (or any of the other deployables for that matter) on a station?
Michael Harari
Genos Occidere
HYDRA RELOADED
#3 - 2013-11-13 13:39:10 UTC
Abdiel Kavash wrote:
Why exactly would you want to anchor a spaceyurt on a station?


There are a number of reasons including

1) They are cheap so you can just spam them on jita undock just to clutter up overviews
2) If you duel in highsec, you can anchor them all over to refit mid fight/refit to stabs incase you get bumped
3) Unkillable for days advertisement for your corp/serve
4) Global warpins (insta undocks, depots that you can warp to after you warp to station @100, and then land right next to the station)

Gates have many of the same problems, and in addition, it allows people to bypass the main balancing factor behind ecm when supporting a gatecamp.
Batelle
Federal Navy Academy
#4 - 2013-11-13 15:39:01 UTC
Michael Harari wrote:
With such a short radius where you cannot anchor depots and such, every hub station is going to become absolutely swarmed with these things, and since you have to go suspect and wait 2 days, killing them becomes dangerous and a pain.

Increase the unanchorable distance to 1 AU, to prevent these things from being on grid at all.



200km fine, 1 AU lolno.

"**CCP is changing policy, and has asked that we discontinue the bonus credit program after November 7th. So until then, enjoy a super-bonus of 1B Blink Credit for each 60-day GTC you buy!"**

Never forget.

Michael Harari
Genos Occidere
HYDRA RELOADED
#5 - 2013-11-13 15:42:07 UTC  |  Edited by: Michael Harari
200km still allows you to spam grid with them.
Batelle
Federal Navy Academy
#6 - 2013-11-13 15:44:24 UTC
Michael Harari wrote:
200km still allows you to spam grid with them.


then 600km, whatever. Not 150,000,000 km.

"**CCP is changing policy, and has asked that we discontinue the bonus credit program after November 7th. So until then, enjoy a super-bonus of 1B Blink Credit for each 60-day GTC you buy!"**

Never forget.

Thatt Guy
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#7 - 2013-11-13 22:19:00 UTC
Michael Harari wrote:
200km still allows you to spam grid with them.



You realize spamming a grid with anything is considered an exploit?

Haters gonna hate, Trolls gonna troll.

Michael Harari
Genos Occidere
HYDRA RELOADED
#8 - 2013-11-13 22:20:34 UTC
Thatt Guy wrote:
Michael Harari wrote:
200km still allows you to spam grid with them.



You realize spamming a grid with anything is considered an exploit?


No its not. Causing lag is an exploit.
Thatt Guy
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#9 - 2013-11-13 22:24:48 UTC
Michael Harari wrote:
Thatt Guy wrote:
Michael Harari wrote:
200km still allows you to spam grid with them.



You realize spamming a grid with anything is considered an exploit?


No its not. Causing lag is an exploit.


That's what spamming something does, causes lag :)

Although you have a valid point, they can also not be anchored with-in a certain distance for another of the same type, that should limit it somewhat.

Haters gonna hate, Trolls gonna troll.