These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Hi Sec: Your Future Vision

First post
Author
Shadow Love
Strategic Exploration and Development Corp
Silent Company
#341 - 2013-11-13 00:36:13 UTC  |  Edited by: Shadow Love
Ill go on record here and say that after 4 years in highsec and the hundreds, probably thousands of people I have interacted with, I don't recall a single one saying they are a highsec alt of a 0.0 char. A few were low sec inclined players who also chilled in high but the staggering majority were highsec players. I guess your mileage may vary but you may need to look outside your group of peers when determining "who" highsec players are.

Edited: original post made on my phone, fixed a couple spelling/missing word things.
Maldiro Selkurk
Radiation Sickness
#342 - 2013-11-13 00:37:23 UTC
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
Quote:
Way to be wrong in so many ways. I left WOW not because they made it more accessible to the casual player but because they added unnecessary new fight mechanics that added nothing to the game but more rabid button pushing in a game that already pretty much required you play with your shoes off so you could properly run all the hotkeys necessary to be successful.


If you think that game is hard, then I'm pretty sure you never learned to keybind.

The rest of your post can be summed up thusly. My evidence is anecdotal.

Which it is. And while I may not be able to speak for the 2.5 million in the last 9 months that dropped that atrocious game, or for you, I can speak for my 53 member guild who all quit simultaneously. We quit because they made it too easy for little Timmy. To be more specific, when we made server first for a 25 man raid achievement, then they nerfed that content the next week. Petty? Perhaps, but that was the straw on the camel's back. Anyone else I know irl gives me much the same reason for their quitting, they got tired of Blizzard's crap.


Again, you present anecdotal evidence from a fraction of the WOW player base that is so small as to be statistically insignificant.

This 'evidence' amounts to nothing more than your opinion which by the way is dead wrong. It makes no sense that millions would all stop playing a game for the limited number of reasons you outlined, as i said before nobody knows why they chose to leave, especially not you (excepting for you and apparently your guildmates, which as i mentioned are insignificant and i mean that in so many ways)

P.S. Thanks CCP for doing one thing correct and getting my sig back because it certainly applies to this discussion in which i currently find myself involved.

Yawn,  I'm right as usual. The predictability kinda gets boring really.

Andski
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#343 - 2013-11-13 01:14:49 UTC
Shadow Love wrote:
Ill go on record here and say that after 4 years in highsec and the hundreds, probably thousands of people I have interacted with, I don't recall a single one saying they are a highsec alt of a 0.0 char. A few were low sec inclined players who also chilled in high but the staggering majority were highsec players. I guess your mileage may vary but you may need to look outside your group of peers when determining "who" highsec players are.

Edited: original post made on my phone, fixed a couple spelling/missing word things.


Are 0.0 players supposed to wear some kind of "0.0 alt" badge in hisec?

Twitter: @EVEAndski

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths."    - Abrazzar

Shadow Love
Strategic Exploration and Development Corp
Silent Company
#344 - 2013-11-13 01:31:26 UTC
Andski wrote:
Are 0.0 players supposed to wear some kind of "0.0 alt" badge in hisec?


No, I'd imagine not, just relating my experience. I would surmise that most likely 0.0 highsec alts primarily sit in NPC corps or 1 man tax evasion corps, which if true is kind of odd considering most 0.0 players views on such things on the forums. If that isn't the case, then there is apparently a very solid trend for 0.0 highsec alts never revealing that they have another character in nullsec.
Anomaly One
Doomheim
#345 - 2013-11-13 01:34:38 UTC
Shadow Love wrote:
Andski wrote:
Are 0.0 players supposed to wear some kind of "0.0 alt" badge in hisec?


No, I'd imagine not, just relating my experience. I would surmise that most likely 0.0 highsec alts primarily sit in NPC corps or 1 man tax evasion corps, which if true is kind of odd considering most 0.0 players views on such things on the forums. If that isn't the case, then there is apparently a very solid trend for 0.0 highsec alts never revealing that they have another character in nullsec.


why would they reveal it ? it's like a mark of shame P

Never forget. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a8sfaN8zT8E http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5l_ZjVyRxx4 Trust me, I'm an Anomaly. DUST 514 FOR PC

Kaarous Aldurald
Black Hydra Consortium.
#346 - 2013-11-13 01:40:37 UTC
Quote:
Ill go on record here and say that after 4 years in highsec and the hundreds, probably thousands of people I have interacted with, I don't recall a single one saying they are a highsec alt of a 0.0 char.


Couple things here. If you were randomly hanging around highsec, would you admit to being a Goon alt?

For that matter, would you even talk at all?

If I were just an isk making, or trading, or whatever alt and my main resides in and plays in null, I wouldn't really socialize with everyone I met. I'd get my business done, and log off.

Think about that. Think about all the people you didn't talk to. If even 1/5 of them were Goons...

"Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."

One of ours, ten of theirs.

Best Meltdown Ever.

Shadow Love
Strategic Exploration and Development Corp
Silent Company
#347 - 2013-11-13 01:47:12 UTC  |  Edited by: Shadow Love
I do think about that a lot, I just had no real basis to say everyone that I haven't talked to is a nullsec alt. What I do have a basis to say is that the vast majority of people I've spoken to and interacted with in the game are, from what I could see, highsec players. That's the only real info I have from my limited perspective in the game.

Edit: I'm not really fighting or contending anything here. If you want my honest opinion of highsec, it's that I hate how fragmented and broken up it's population is despite being so massive. I hate how there seem to be hundreds, or thousands of 5-10 man corps piddling around while nullsec blocks number in the thousands of characters and actually achieve something. It bothers me how some who likely do have highsec alts call for nerfs, and if these nerfs came they would simply (I think) abandon their highec alts after reaping the benefits of it for so many years to go back to null. Where does that leave actual highsec players? Just kind of screwed.

I'm not a fan of the proliferation of alts in EVE, I feel like the game would benefit tremendously from more interaction. I laugh everytime someone bashes an alt mining fleet stating they need to interact with others in the sandbox, and then one thread over talk about their cyno alt being manditory as if, deep down, it's truly any different. You want things to be easier for you, so you rely on yourself instead of others. I think that's the main problem with EVE and its greatest flaw.

My vision of highsec, the way I would like it, would be actual large corps that matter. Corps that would bother with a war, that were large enough to field a defense, and have something worth defending. Corps large enough that, if they suddenly realized they could, could make a legitimate push into null without just having to rent, or whatever most do (I'm ignorant of this process and fully admit it).

That's it, in a nutshell. I wish corporations in highsec mattered. Right now, they really don't.
Jenn aSide
Worthless Carebears
The Initiative.
#348 - 2013-11-13 04:53:11 UTC
Shadow Love wrote:


Edit: I'm not really fighting or contending anything here. If you want my honest opinion of highsec, it's that I hate how fragmented and broken up it's population is despite being so massive. I hate how there seem to be hundreds, or thousands of 5-10 man corps piddling around while nullsec blocks number in the thousands of characters and actually achieve something.


It's not our fault that the kinds of people who would call high sec home are the same kinds of people who can't organize themselves or cooperate with each other enough to do anything (like click a couple buttons and elect a person to the CSM for example)

Quote:

It bothers me how some who likely do have highsec alts call for nerfs, and if these nerfs came they would simply (I think) abandon their highec alts after reaping the benefits of it for so many years to go back to null. Where does that leave actual highsec players? Just kind of screwed.


And how about the null sec people who are virtually forced by circumstance to maintain high sec alts in the 1st place? You think null sec players WANT to be chained to the Kindergarten of Space (High Sec). But the reality is, High Sec is so good, only a fool would use anything else, becuase sure, null industrialists (for example) could maybe make some things in null, but that would take more time, more effort and more money, no need for that when Jita is available.

Quote:

I'm not a fan of the proliferation of alts in EVE, I feel like the game would benefit tremendously from more interaction. I laugh everytime someone bashes an alt mining fleet stating they need to interact with others in the sandbox, and then one thread over talk about their cyno alt being manditory as if, deep down, it's truly any different. You want things to be easier for you, so you rely on yourself instead of others. I think that's the main problem with EVE and its greatest flaw.

My vision of highsec, the way I would like it, would be actual large corps that matter. Corps that would bother with a war, that were large enough to field a defense, and have something worth defending. Corps large enough that, if they suddenly realized they could, could make a legitimate push into null without just having to rent, or whatever most do (I'm ignorant of this process and fully admit it).

That's it, in a nutshell. I wish corporations in highsec mattered. Right now, they really don't.


Now ask yourself why this doesn't happen.

Null (and low and wormhole) organizations exist because they have to. Because the next guys over might have enough power to push you aside, ruining everything you've worked to build. The evolution of non-high sec organizations is and was tottally natural, the same way mankind went from families to tribes to clans to eventually nations.

There is no such compelling factor in high sec. High Sec pilots ability to dock somewhere isn't a matter of standings, diplomacy, strength of arms, joining the right corp or anything else. It's a matter or clicking the station and clicking dock for you. There is little cooperations because there is no need for it.

Want high sec to be more vibrant in the way you suggest? Then CCP would have to change high sec to foster competiton through scarcity in some way. This has been done already in one way, it's called incursions (boy do those guys like to contest each other , even popping the MOMs to prevent others from running incursions, THAT is competation driving conflict).
Maadai Ansa
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
#349 - 2013-11-13 06:08:29 UTC
Scatim Helicon wrote:
The future vision of highsec? A sea of autopiloting and pseudobotting characters performing acts of tedium on an infinite loop, interrupted only by indignant shrieking should the terrifying bogeymen of encouraging players to 'interact with others' or 'adapt to changes', or 'think for yourself' be either introduced or even suggested.


As opposed to nullsec - a sea of pseudobotting characters performing acts of tedium red cross shooting in an infinite loop,
interrupted only by indignant shrieking should the terrifying bogeymen of player not marked blue enter the system?
Onictus
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#350 - 2013-11-13 07:02:32 UTC
Shadow Love wrote:
Ill go on record here and say that after 4 years in highsec and the hundreds, probably thousands of people I have interacted with, I don't recall a single one saying they are a highsec alt of a 0.0 char. A few were low sec inclined players who also chilled in high but the staggering majority were highsec players. I guess your mileage may vary but you may need to look outside your group of peers when determining "who" highsec players are.

Edited: original post made on my phone, fixed a couple spelling/missing word things.



Half of my four active accounts are in empire, and most people I know have an Indy or market toon, 2-3 cynonots and whatnot.
Andski
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#351 - 2013-11-13 07:08:02 UTC
Maadai Ansa wrote:
As opposed to nullsec - a sea of pseudobotting characters performing acts of tedium red cross shooting in an infinite loop,
interrupted only by indignant shrieking should the terrifying bogeymen of player not marked blue enter the system?


as an npc alt who has never set foot outside of hisec, let me tell you what nullseccers do

Twitter: @EVEAndski

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths."    - Abrazzar

Maadai Ansa
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
#352 - 2013-11-13 07:31:29 UTC
Andski wrote:
Maadai Ansa wrote:
As opposed to nullsec - a sea of pseudobotting characters performing acts of tedium red cross shooting in an infinite loop,
interrupted only by indignant shrieking should the terrifying bogeymen of player not marked blue enter the system?


as an npc alt who has never set foot outside of hisec, let me tell you what nullseccers do


The thought of having multiple accounts is outside of your intellectual power I presume.
Ishtanchuk Fazmarai
#353 - 2013-11-13 07:32:49 UTC
Onictus wrote:
Shadow Love wrote:
Ill go on record here and say that after 4 years in highsec and the hundreds, probably thousands of people I have interacted with, I don't recall a single one saying they are a highsec alt of a 0.0 char. A few were low sec inclined players who also chilled in high but the staggering majority were highsec players. I guess your mileage may vary but you may need to look outside your group of peers when determining "who" highsec players are.

Edited: original post made on my phone, fixed a couple spelling/missing word things.



Half of my four active accounts are in empire, and most people I know have an Indy or market toon, 2-3 cynonots and whatnot.


And you would totally love that they lost their usefulness and you had to substitute their function with your nullsec main... right?

Also, maybe you always log in every character you have?

Roses are red / Violets are blue / I am an Alpha / And so it's you

Josef Djugashvilis
#354 - 2013-11-13 07:42:19 UTC
Andski wrote:
Shadow Love wrote:
Ill go on record here and say that after 4 years in highsec and the hundreds, probably thousands of people I have interacted with, I don't recall a single one saying they are a highsec alt of a 0.0 char. A few were low sec inclined players who also chilled in high but the staggering majority were highsec players. I guess your mileage may vary but you may need to look outside your group of peers when determining "who" highsec players are.

Edited: original post made on my phone, fixed a couple spelling/missing word things.


Are 0.0 players supposed to wear some kind of "0.0 alt" badge in hisec?


Yes.

So that we can say, grrr goons in local. Smile

This is not a signature.

Andski
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#355 - 2013-11-13 07:57:38 UTC
Maadai Ansa wrote:
Andski wrote:
Maadai Ansa wrote:
As opposed to nullsec - a sea of pseudobotting characters performing acts of tedium red cross shooting in an infinite loop,
interrupted only by indignant shrieking should the terrifying bogeymen of player not marked blue enter the system?


as an npc alt who has never set foot outside of hisec, let me tell you what nullseccers do


The thought of having multiple accounts is outside of your intellectual power I presume.


notice how i said "alt"

don't you feel silly now

Twitter: @EVEAndski

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths."    - Abrazzar

Maadai Ansa
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
#356 - 2013-11-13 08:00:20 UTC
Andski wrote:
Maadai Ansa wrote:
Andski wrote:
Maadai Ansa wrote:
As opposed to nullsec - a sea of pseudobotting characters performing acts of tedium red cross shooting in an infinite loop,
interrupted only by indignant shrieking should the terrifying bogeymen of player not marked blue enter the system?


as an npc alt who has never set foot outside of hisec, let me tell you what nullseccers do


The thought of having multiple accounts is outside of your intellectual power I presume.


notice how i said "alt"

don't you feel silly now


Your argument was that posting on a high sec alt implies lack of knowledge or experience in nullsec.
Not sure if dim or simply running out of arguments.
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#357 - 2013-11-13 10:22:57 UTC
Maadai Ansa wrote:
Your argument was that posting on a high sec alt implies lack of knowledge or experience in nullsec.
Not sure if dim or simply running out of arguments.

His argument was that posting blatantly ignorant fables that can only have been created by those who have no experience of the matter from a character that obviously has no experience on the matter doesn't bode well for the overall trustworthiness of your statements.

If you want to make claims that go counter to the known reality of the situation, it helps if you at least provide some reason not to dismiss it as complete nonsense out of hand.
March rabbit
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#358 - 2013-11-13 11:20:59 UTC
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
Quote:
Ill go on record here and say that after 4 years in highsec and the hundreds, probably thousands of people I have interacted with, I don't recall a single one saying they are a highsec alt of a 0.0 char.


Couple things here. If you were randomly hanging around highsec, would you admit to being a Goon alt?

For that matter, would you even talk at all?

i've seen it several times when person just says in local "Lol, high-sec-pvp. I'm back to 0.0"Lol

The Mittani: "the inappropriate drunked joke"

Jythier Smith
BGG Wolves
#359 - 2013-11-13 13:32:35 UTC
Everyone's a high sec player. Just some people have null sec alts. Isn't that what you're actually saying?

So since 99% of players are high-sec players, do we really want to mess around with it? I can imagine a world where null-sec is the place to be, but it really isn't for the casual player or the new player who can't really survive the rats yet.
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#360 - 2013-11-13 13:40:24 UTC
Jythier Smith wrote:
So since 99% of players are high-sec players, do we really want to mess around with it?
All the more reason to do so. And no, 99% of players are not highsec players in the sense that the “highsec is a majority”-whingers perceive the term.

Quote:
I can imagine a world where null-sec is the place to be, but it really isn't for the casual player or the new player who can't really survive the rats yet.
Sure it is. The myth that you can't be a newbie or a casual player in null has been and continues to be disproved every day ever since the game went live.