These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Intergalactic Summit

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

CONCORD is a laughingstock..

Author
Katrina Oniseki
Oniseki-Raata Internal Watch
Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
#41 - 2013-11-09 16:23:22 UTC
It is interesting to note that those who speak so highly of Duty and Honour and Sacrifice For The State would so openly and happily disregard orders given by Sami Okuuda of the Caldari Navy. Especially so brazenly and publicly. How strong and smart you must feel to insult Wing Commander Okuuda from the comforts of your armchair, when most of you didn't even answer the call in the first place, much less be forced to make the choice between saving yourselves and your crews or sacrifice for a greater goal. How easy it must be to make your judgement with the benefit of hindsight and post-action reports.

Granted, I did not lose my ship thanks to spatial distortions leaving me three jumps behind most of the fleet. By the time I had jumped through the Doril gate, most of the bubbles and camps were gone and I was able to slip through easily. Through luck and skill, I managed to survive along with the single crewman of my stealth bomber. I never really had to make much of a choice. By the time I was finally able to fly my ship through the gelatin soup that was spatial time-dilation, it was already over.

Yet some of you speaking so proudly here weren't even there to begin with. You ignored the call for aid. It wasn't made just by CONCORD. It was by your very own State. It was lead by someone with a longer service record than some of you have been alive. Who are you to question and ridicule those who gave their lives in service to the State? Who are you to disrespect heiian like that along with the tens of thousands of fallen crewmen who gave their lives for the State? I would expect such from foreigners... but not you, Pyre Falcon. Not you.

You reek of shame.

Katrina Oniseki

Pieter Tuulinen
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#42 - 2013-11-09 16:28:49 UTC
Katrina Oniseki wrote:
It is interesting to note that those who speak so highly of Duty and Honour and Sacrifice For The State would so openly and happily disregard orders given by Sami Okuuda of the Caldari Navy. Especially so brazenly and publicly. How strong and smart you must feel to insult Wing Commander Okuuda from the comforts of your armchair, when most of you didn't even answer the call in the first place, much less be forced to make the choice between saving yourselves and your crews or sacrifice for a greater goal. How easy it must be to make your judgement with the benefit of hindsight and post-action reports.

Granted, I did not lose my ship thanks to spatial distortions leaving me three jumps behind most of the fleet. By the time I had jumped through the Doril gate, most of the bubbles and camps were gone and I was able to slip through easily. Through luck and skill, I managed to survive along with the single crewman of my stealth bomber. I never really had to make much of a choice. By the time I was finally able to fly my ship through the gelatin soup that was spatial time-dilation, it was already over.

Yet some of you speaking so proudly here weren't even there to begin with. You ignored the call for aid. It wasn't made just by CONCORD. It was by your very own State. It was lead by someone with a longer service record than some of you have been alive. Who are you to question and ridicule those who gave their lives in service to the State? Who are you to disrespect heiian like that along with the tens of thousands of fallen crewmen who gave their lives for the State? I would expect such from foreigners... but not you, Pyre Falcon. Not you.

You reek of shame.


But not of the spilled blood of my kirjuun. Not today. That was not an operation in support of a Navy fleet, Oniseki-haani, you and yours lined up with the rest of the sheep to be shorn, gelded and taken to market.

I would not inflict that on my crews. Not for Concord. Not for Sami Okuuda (under whose command I have flown in the past - so I have some memory of his... qualities...) and if that brings me shame then I wear it proudly so that my kirjuun don't have to.

For the first time since I started the conversation, he looks me dead in the eye. In his gaze are steel jackhammers, quiet vengeance, a hundred thousand orbital bombs frozen in still life.

Scherezad
Revenent Defence Corperation
Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
#43 - 2013-11-09 16:35:06 UTC
That choice is yours to make, but you needn't pile scorn upon those who lost their lives answering the call.
Jinari Otsito
Otsito Mining and Manufacture
#44 - 2013-11-09 16:35:58 UTC
Someone forgot to put the safety on that weapons-grade tongue of Oniseki's. Try as I might, I can't find a flaw in that argument. I have never been part of the military machine before nor after my rise to capsuleerdom, but I'll still consider it partly applicable to myself.

The point is fair. The State asked for the service of loyal citizens and many of us refused. We now have little to back up our claim of citizenship, particularly by our actions. My occasionally mocking words towards those who came and died were in poor taste.

Prime Node. Ask me about augmentation.

Katrina Oniseki
Oniseki-Raata Internal Watch
Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
#45 - 2013-11-09 16:41:04 UTC
Pieter Tuulinen wrote:

But not of the spilled blood of my kirjuun. Not today. That was not an operation in support of a Navy fleet, Oniseki-haani, you and yours lined up with the rest of the sheep to be shorn, gelded and taken to market.

I would not inflict that on my crews. Not for Concord. Not for Sami Okuuda (under whose command I have flown in the past - so I have some memory of his... qualities...) and if that brings me shame then I wear it proudly so that my kirjuun don't have to.


You as a commander may choose to disregard the call for volunteer service. I know that as well as anybody, as I have refused to take part in the volunteer militia conflict. I can't and don't begrudge you for choosing not to assist.

What irritates me however are your self-satisfied comments in this thread as if you have a damned place to comment on it at all. You weren't there, and that's fine. That is your choice as a freelance captain. You once told me that I had no place to comment on those who give sacrifice for the Protectorate, because I do not fly with them and do not agree with the conflict. Now I say it to you. Your idle commentary disrespect the fallen.

So go back to your Rook, Tuulinen. Go back to your drinks and your still living kirjuun, and leave this topic to those who still mourn the loss of theirs.

You chose to take no part in this... try following that choice to the end and keep your opinions on it to yourself.

Katrina Oniseki

Desiderya
Blue Canary
Watch This
#46 - 2013-11-09 16:41:32 UTC
Katrina Oniseki wrote:
It is interesting to note that those who speak so highly of Duty and Honour and Sacrifice For The State would so openly and happily disregard orders given by Sami Okuuda of the Caldari Navy. Especially so brazenly and publicly. How strong and smart you must feel to insult Wing Commander Okuuda from the comforts of your armchair, when most of you didn't even answer the call in the first place, much less be forced to make the choice between saving yourselves and your crews or sacrifice for a greater goal. How easy it must be to make your judgement with the benefit of hindsight and post-action reports.

Granted, I did not lose my ship thanks to spatial distortions leaving me three jumps behind most of the fleet. By the time I had jumped through the Doril gate, most of the bubbles and camps were gone and I was able to slip through easily. Through luck and skill, I managed to survive along with the single crewman of my stealth bomber. I never really had to make much of a choice. By the time I was finally able to fly my ship through the gelatin soup that was spatial time-dilation, it was already over.

Yet some of you speaking so proudly here weren't even there to begin with. You ignored the call for aid. It wasn't made just by CONCORD. It was by your very own State. It was lead by someone with a longer service record than some of you have been alive. Who are you to question and ridicule those who gave their lives in service to the State? Who are you to disrespect heiian like that along with the tens of thousands of fallen crewmen who gave their lives for the State? I would expect such from foreigners... but not you, Pyre Falcon. Not you.

You reek of shame.


Did someone say armchair admiral?
I'm sorry, we were busy planning and winning engagements much closer to home. You see, we do our Duty even when there's no huge spotlight around to air those shiny brass medals every single day, despite the odds.
What we do not do, however, is run along like headless chicken because someone told us to. I'm sure it was a massive and overly important mission to the State, hence the amazing amount of naval power attached to this capsuleer rabble.

Ruthlessness is the kindness of the wise.

Pieter Tuulinen
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#47 - 2013-11-09 16:50:17 UTC  |  Edited by: Pieter Tuulinen
Katrina Oniseki wrote:
Pieter Tuulinen wrote:

But not of the spilled blood of my kirjuun. Not today. That was not an operation in support of a Navy fleet, Oniseki-haani, you and yours lined up with the rest of the sheep to be shorn, gelded and taken to market.

I would not inflict that on my crews. Not for Concord. Not for Sami Okuuda (under whose command I have flown in the past - so I have some memory of his... qualities...) and if that brings me shame then I wear it proudly so that my kirjuun don't have to.


You as a commander may choose to disregard the call for volunteer service. I know that as well as anybody, as I have refused to take part in the volunteer militia conflict. I can't and don't begrudge you for choosing not to assist.

What irritates me however are your self-satisfied comments in this thread as if you have a damned place to comment on it at all. You weren't there, and that's fine. That is your choice as a freelance captain. You once told me that I had no place to comment on those who give sacrifice for the Protectorate, because I do not fly with them and do not agree with the conflict. Now I say it to you. Your idle commentary disrespect the fallen.

So go back to your Rook, Tuulinen. Go back to your drinks and your still living kirjuun, and leave this topic to those who still mourn the loss of theirs.

You chose to take no part in this... try following that choice to the end and keep your opinions on it to yourself.


Your opinion is noted, Vice-Admiral. Thankfully I am not in your chain of command and nor am I an Ishukone citizen. With the greatest of respect you've stated your opinion and this exchange has no further useful purpose.

I will say, for the public record, that I feel that ignoring the lessons that are written in the blood of those who did trust Concord is the greatest possible disrespect for the Fallen.

For the first time since I started the conversation, he looks me dead in the eye. In his gaze are steel jackhammers, quiet vengeance, a hundred thousand orbital bombs frozen in still life.

Katrina Oniseki
Oniseki-Raata Internal Watch
Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
#48 - 2013-11-09 16:52:30 UTC  |  Edited by: Katrina Oniseki
Desiderya wrote:

Did someone say armchair admiral?
I'm sorry, we were busy planning and winning engagements much closer to home. You see, we do our Duty even when there's no huge spotlight around to air those shiny brass medals every single day, despite the odds.
What we do not do, however, is run along like headless chicken because someone told us to. I'm sure it was a massive and overly important mission to the State, hence the amazing amount of naval power attached to this capsuleer rabble.


If that is what you want to call me, you're welcome to it. I'd rather you insult me than those you have been.

Whether or not you agree with me is up to you. There is still no good reason for any of you to be commenting in this thread in the fashion you have been.

Quote:
Your opinion is noted, Vice-Admiral. Thankfully I am not in your chain of command and nor am I an Ishukone citizen. With the greatest of respect you've stated your opinion and this exchange has no further useful purpose.

I will say, for the public record, that I feel that ignoring the lessons that are written in the blood of those who did trust Concord is the greatest possible disrespect for the Fallen.


You may dispense with the sarcastic formalities, thank you.

However, you're correct. I have nothing more to say on the topic.

Katrina Oniseki

Pieter Tuulinen
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#49 - 2013-11-09 16:58:00 UTC  |  Edited by: Pieter Tuulinen
Katrina Oniseki wrote:

Quote:
Your opinion is noted, Vice-Admiral. Thankfully I am not in your chain of command and nor am I an Ishukone citizen. With the greatest of respect you've stated your opinion and this exchange has no further useful purpose.

I will say, for the public record, that I feel that ignoring the lessons that are written in the blood of those who did trust Concord is the greatest possible disrespect for the Fallen.


You may dispense with the sarcastic formalities, thank you.

However, you're correct. I have nothing more to say on the topic.


I'm afraid I have nothing other than sarcastic formalities to offer on the subject of who is the better Caldari. Unless it's a discussion you'd like to have in person. Perhaps if those who lost crew want to mourn them together, a thread separate from 'Concord is a laughing stock' ought to be set up?

For the first time since I started the conversation, he looks me dead in the eye. In his gaze are steel jackhammers, quiet vengeance, a hundred thousand orbital bombs frozen in still life.

Desiderya
Blue Canary
Watch This
#50 - 2013-11-09 16:58:13 UTC
I'd call it education. And hope that those involved have learned their lesson.
The metaphor of the sheep was quite astute, one can still hear the bleating over various channels.

Besides, what do you want me to do "out of respect for the fallen", hold your hands and tell everyone how terrible it was? What a sad, sad day that your actions had indeed entirely foreseeable consequences, sacrificing so many for so little. Really, I am extremely proud of your level of grace with which you defend this insane folly.

Ruthlessness is the kindness of the wise.

Pieter Tuulinen
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#51 - 2013-11-09 17:01:26 UTC
Scherezad wrote:
That choice is yours to make, but you needn't pile scorn upon those who lost their lives answering the call.


Suuolo, I thought you knew me better than that. I have heaped no scorn on those who gave their lives following the orders of their commanders. My scorn was reserved strictly for their immortal officers, who didn't have to share that sacrifice.

Now, I know I'm equally immune from that greatest of consequences, but I have tried to ensure that the loss of my crews has had meaning, at least.

For the first time since I started the conversation, he looks me dead in the eye. In his gaze are steel jackhammers, quiet vengeance, a hundred thousand orbital bombs frozen in still life.

Ayallah
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#52 - 2013-11-09 17:32:15 UTC
Anslo wrote:
Watch out, we got a bad ass over here. Because nothing says superior skill to justify bragging rights like a couple hundred pilots.


The irony.

Goddess of the IGS

As strength goes.

Iwan Terpalen
Doomheim
#53 - 2013-11-09 18:25:40 UTC  |  Edited by: Iwan Terpalen
Katrina Oniseki wrote:
Who are you to disrespect heiian like that along with the tens of thousands of fallen crewmen who gave their lives for the State[...]

Heiian has been made out to be a lot of things, Chūjō, but it seems only a recent thing that its ideal of obedience has been prefixed with blind, and its ideal of sacrifice with pointless. If the core concepts of our society can now be used to condemn a failure to decorate some nullsec warlords' kill statistics as dishonorable, I fear Provist memetic engineers have managed to do some lasting damage.
Scherezad
Revenent Defence Corperation
Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
#54 - 2013-11-09 18:31:06 UTC
Pieter Tuulinen wrote:
Scherezad wrote:
That choice is yours to make, but you needn't pile scorn upon those who lost their lives answering the call.


Suuolo, I thought you knew me better than that. I have heaped no scorn on those who gave their lives following the orders of their commanders. My scorn was reserved strictly for their immortal officers, who didn't have to share that sacrifice.

Now, I know I'm equally immune from that greatest of consequences, but I have tried to ensure that the loss of my crews has had meaning, at least.

I had thought you knew me better than that too, suuolo.

We are not so lucky as to be able to dismiss a request made by the Caldari Navy, despite how futile or suicidal the request might seem to be. I am happy to take all the scorn and abuse for the decision to follow, however, being the one who led them. They have earned their peace.
Pieter Tuulinen
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#55 - 2013-11-09 18:42:06 UTC
And I wish them nothing less, may their Ancestors recognise and welcome them, may the winds blow warmly upon them.

I am curious as to which Navy Fleet the State capsuleers were supporting, though? Did the call come directly from the Caldari Navy or was it, as it appeared to be, a CTA by Concord 'in the name of' the signatory fleets?

For the first time since I started the conversation, he looks me dead in the eye. In his gaze are steel jackhammers, quiet vengeance, a hundred thousand orbital bombs frozen in still life.

Scherezad
Revenent Defence Corperation
Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
#56 - 2013-11-09 18:47:39 UTC
We flew as Command and Control support for Wing Commander Sami Okuuda, Wing 25. We provided microwarp telemetry while en route and at the engagement. CONCORD spoke with the blessings of the Caldari Navy as confirmed by Okuuda-haan.
Pieter Tuulinen
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#57 - 2013-11-09 19:35:11 UTC
So... One ship, then.

For the first time since I started the conversation, he looks me dead in the eye. In his gaze are steel jackhammers, quiet vengeance, a hundred thousand orbital bombs frozen in still life.

Vikarion
Doomheim
#58 - 2013-11-09 19:38:08 UTC
Katrina Oniseki wrote:

What irritates me however are your self-satisfied comments in this thread as if you have a damned place to comment on it at all. You weren't there, and that's fine. That is your choice as a freelance captain. You once told me that I had no place to comment on those who give sacrifice for the Protectorate, because I do not fly with them and do not agree with the conflict. Now I say it to you. Your idle commentary disrespect the fallen.


One might suspect that there is, perhaps, a slight difference between fighting in a war between the State and our greatest enemy, and participating in a one-time event which is "blessed by the Caldari Navy".

Let me ask: why is it that, if the Caldari Navy essentially asks you to commit suicide under the command of CONCORD, to no purpose, you find that obligatory, but not obligatory when, say, the Caldari State requests that certain systems be retaken?

Of course, what this almost certainly is is an attempt to gain some sort of traction by castigating people for having planet-side commitments at the time.
Katrina Oniseki
Oniseki-Raata Internal Watch
Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
#59 - 2013-11-09 20:32:32 UTC  |  Edited by: Katrina Oniseki
Vikarion, you have either not fully read or misunderstood what I've said. I'm not going to reply to your bait.

Iwan Terpalen, you as well have misunderstood what I said.

Desiderya, you're simply trolling at this point.

I have not berated anybody for the choice of not showing up. Only for posting their peanut gallery opinions here and elsewhere from the comfort of hindsight and not having been there at all. There is a distinct difference.

But that's alright. You four clearly don't agree, and you don't have the fortitude to admit what you said was in poor taste. So, again...

Katrina Oniseki wrote:
I have nothing more to say on the topic.


I would appreciate if there will be no other quotes and comments and questions made for me; as I'd like to actually follow through on that.

Thanks.

Katrina Oniseki

Veikitamo Gesakaarin
Doomheim
#60 - 2013-11-09 20:47:11 UTC
Katrina Oniseki wrote:
It is interesting to note that those who speak so highly of Duty and Honour and Sacrifice For The State would so openly and happily disregard orders given by Sami Okuuda of the Caldari Navy. Especially so brazenly and publicly. How strong and smart you must feel to insult Wing Commander Okuuda from the comforts of your armchair, when most of you didn't even answer the call in the first place, much less be forced to make the choice between saving yourselves and your crews or sacrifice for a greater goal. How easy it must be to make your judgement with the benefit of hindsight and post-action reports.

Granted, I did not lose my ship thanks to spatial distortions leaving me three jumps behind most of the fleet. By the time I had jumped through the Doril gate, most of the bubbles and camps were gone and I was able to slip through easily. Through luck and skill, I managed to survive along with the single crewman of my stealth bomber. I never really had to make much of a choice. By the time I was finally able to fly my ship through the gelatin soup that was spatial time-dilation, it was already over.

Yet some of you speaking so proudly here weren't even there to begin with. You ignored the call for aid. It wasn't made just by CONCORD. It was by your very own State. It was lead by someone with a longer service record than some of you have been alive. Who are you to question and ridicule those who gave their lives in service to the State? Who are you to disrespect heiian like that along with the tens of thousands of fallen crewmen who gave their lives for the State? I would expect such from foreigners... but not you, Pyre Falcon. Not you.

You reek of shame.


And you reek of naivety.

As far as I'm concerned the operation in question was to utilize capsuleers as a distraction -- while they're all preoccupied with each other in an established killzone the DED has free reign to conduct their operations of interest. I might say those who were lead to their slaughter within an interdiction bubble performed their required tasks admirably. It is however not a slaughter I felt the approximately ten active capsuleer operatives of the Combine would contribute much to one way or another.

You appear to be mistaking pride with appropriate cynicism and pragmatism.

Kurilaivonen|Concern