These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

PvE in this game is Not Fun.

Author
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#101 - 2013-11-08 11:50:54 UTC
Xen Solarus wrote:
I've quoted everything you said
No, and that's the entire problem.

Your question has already been answered in the bits you skipped. Would you like to respond to that answer and perhaps answer the questions I asked in return?
Xen Solarus
Furious Destruction and Salvage
#102 - 2013-11-08 12:09:31 UTC
Tippia wrote:
Xen Solarus wrote:
I've quoted everything you said
No, and that's the entire problem.

Your question has already been answered in the bits you skipped. Would you like to respond to that answer and perhaps answer the questions I asked in return?


Well, there's only so many times i can face-palm. Certainly not going to make your argument for you, if you can't be bothered to explain even your most basic opinion on this subject. Usually you make very constructive, informed posts Tippa, but this is on par with someone covering their ears, closing their eyes and shouting "la la la, i can't hear you!". If you're right, you could demonstrate immediately by quoting your supposed "explanation" and prove me wrong, but you've failed to do so! I guess we'll never know why you think improving PvE content would be hugely counter-productive. Maybe you want me to make that argument for you as well? But, personally i can't think of any reasons why that would be the case, as it would only improve their gaming experience, and wouldn't effect anyone else in EvE that isn't interested in PvE.

But thanks for your opinion on the subject! Lol

Post with your main, like a BOSS!

And no, i don't live in highsec.  As if that would make your opinion any less wrong.  

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#103 - 2013-11-08 12:23:03 UTC
Xen Solarus wrote:
Well, there's only so many times i can face-palm.
Have you tried doing that less and reading a bit more? It will certainly help you with the problem you're currently having.

Quote:
Certainly not going to make your argument for you, if you can't be bothered to explain even your most basic opinion on this subject.
I've already made it. You've already skipped it. I'm still waiting for your answer before I offer any further arguments.

Quote:
I guess we'll never know why you think improving PvE content would be hugely counter-productive.
Sure we will. In fact, as others have noted, they have already learned why. You chose not to, many times over. As such, it seems utterly pointless to explain it one more time since there is absolutely nothing to suggest that you won't ignore it all over again like every time in the past.

Answer the questions I've asked you and we can continue, or you can just keep burying your head in the sand and wish that the posts available for everyone to read don't actually exist…
Xen Solarus
Furious Destruction and Salvage
#104 - 2013-11-08 12:49:46 UTC
Tippia wrote:
Xen Solarus wrote:
I guess we'll never know why you think improving PvE content would be hugely counter-productive.
Sure we will. In fact, as others have noted, they have already learned why. You chose not to, many times over. As such, it seems utterly pointless to explain it one more time since there is absolutely nothing to suggest that you won't ignore it all over again like every time in the past.


Lmao. Lol Classic arguments! Like i said, easy to prove me wrong, I've already quoted everything you said, and still you can't backup your opinion. Why? Because it isn't there. So, see little point in continuing against someone who's just going "la la la, i'm right, your wrong, you didn't read it, i don't have to explain myself, la la la!".

I think i'll call it "doing a Tippa". For when you have an opinion you don't explain, and when someone asks for more details regarding that opinion, you can just say "Well, you obviously didn't read it", and when they quote what you'd written (and you're failure to explain aforementioned opinion) you can then just say "Well, i've already said it once, not going to say it again!!". Any further attempts at direct questions regarding your opinion can then just be washed away with variants of "Already said it!!"

Post with your main, like a BOSS!

And no, i don't live in highsec.  As if that would make your opinion any less wrong.  

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#105 - 2013-11-08 13:01:02 UTC
Xen Solarus wrote:
[Like i said, easy to prove me wrong
Trivial, but also unnecessary. The ones I would have cared to prove it to have already seen it, and you have only proven to skip over it on multiple occasions.

So without any hint of you being able to read what I write or address the points I make, why should I waste any time reiterating the same thing one more time?

Quote:
I've already quoted everything you said
Incorrect. That's why you're in such a predicament here: because either way, you come out proven wrong. Either you're wrong about having read or quoted everything or your wrong about my not having answered your question. Your pick, really…

…but of course, you're trying for the third option: pretend that what you say is true and hope others will fall for it, in spite of the records showing otherwise.

Quote:
I think i'll call it "doing a Tippa". For when you have an opinion you don't explain
Ok. But why would you make up a term you'll never be able to use for something that never happens?

So, would you like to stop pretending and instead respond to my answer, and perhaps even answer the questions I asked in return?
Jenn aSide
Worthless Carebears
The Initiative.
#106 - 2013-11-08 13:03:30 UTC
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
Quote:
Logging in for some relaxing gameplay is all they're interested in, and if it can be improved upon further then all the better. Saying no to such a suggestion because "it already exists" doesn't work, as it doesn't exist for them. PvE is boring!!


If all they are interested in is relaxing gameplay... why do they care if it's boring? Boring and exciting are antonyms. Ergo, the less boring it is, the more exciting it is.

And excitement and relaxation don't precisely go hand in hand.


+1

i always have a hard time understanding whyt people can't just say "I want" instead of what they actually do end up staying (ie, "they want"). The people running missions over and over obviously like it this way. i pretty much like it as is.

I think Xen Solarus should stop hiding behind other people and just say "I think PVe should be more fun because I like PVE" and be done with it.
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#107 - 2013-11-08 13:11:39 UTC
Jenn aSide wrote:
I think Xen Solarus should stop hiding behind other people and just say "I think PVe should be more fun because I like PVE" and be done with it.

He should also stop hiding behind “others don't want it to be fun” and instead accept that fun is a subjective concept — changing content to match his perception will mean it no longer matches someone else's.

So just jumping in and changing things is probably not the right way to go.
Xen Solarus
Furious Destruction and Salvage
#108 - 2013-11-08 13:34:42 UTC
People often assume i argue my points because i want them, like i must be a highsec player who only does missions to have these opinions. This couldn't be farther from the truth. I live in wormholes! Lol Plus i've lived in every area in EvE and tried all its aspects. The difference is i don't have the whole "EvE should be exactly this way" opinion that many seem to think, as if the game has a particular way that has to be played, and that anyone not playing it that way must be doing it wrong. You might as well write "Waaaa the sandbox should be exactly like this!" EvE is an amazing game for exactly the reason it caters for all playstyles, from the hardened, superactive pirate right down to the super-busy single parent.

I know players that have busy lives, that enjoy logging into EvE for an hour or so, if they're lucky, and just want to do all the things the highsec hater crowd label as boring. I don't see any issues with improving that limited PvE experience, they pay their subs after all, just like the rest of us. I see that you obviously do have issues with this, and fail spectacularly at being able to explain why.

Given you plenty of chances to prove me wrong, but i see you're intent on "doing a Tippa". We can all throw out meaningless opinions, and like the saying goes "they're like bums, everyone has one!" The difference being that many can explain and back theirs up with details more constructive than "la la la i'm right, i said it, you didn't read it, la la la".

Still, thanks for the laughs, it's all very amusing! Lol

Post with your main, like a BOSS!

And no, i don't live in highsec.  As if that would make your opinion any less wrong.  

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#109 - 2013-11-08 13:46:50 UTC  |  Edited by: Tippia
Xen Solarus wrote:
The difference is i don't have the whole "EvE should be exactly this way" opinion that many seem to think, as if the game has a particular way that has to be played, and that anyone not playing it that way must be doing it wrong.
…and yet, you're making exactly that kind of argument. You're stating (with no qualification or basis) that content must be changed because you don't like that content and wilfully ignore the reasoning that maybe your personal taste is not the best guiding principle for such a change, especially when we consider how many people are currently doing that content.

Quote:
Given you plenty of chances to prove me wrong
…and I did so long before you gave me any chances. You chose to ignore them and go off on irrelevant tangents. The difference is that I can explain and back up my stance with details, and you apparently cannot so you have to go the ad hominem and red herring fallacy route instead.

Now, would you like to stop pretending and instead respond to my answers, and perhaps even answer the questions I asked in return? Or are you going to keep covering your ears (and eyes) and pretend that they never existed in the hope that others will fail to read as well…
Cpt Tirel
Institute For Continuous Glory
#110 - 2013-11-08 13:49:51 UTC
Eve is not built around PVE like most other older MMOs. There is nothing wrong with PVE as many people in this thread make it sound like, but rather with EVE and its old, limited game mechanics. Interesting PVE is something we could have seen more of with WIS but it seems we wont.
Remiel Pollard
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#111 - 2013-11-08 13:54:56 UTC
Thomas Hurt wrote:
The PvE in this game is Not Fun. For most (normal) people, it is straight up chore to do any sort of ratting or missioning, and the only thing that makes it tolerable is bullshitting on voicechat with other people that are doing it with you. I humbly request that CCP do something to make the PvE in E.v.E. entertaining/engrossing/interesting and at least vaguely tolerable.


Make it more like PVP then? Yeah, they're working on that.

“Some capsuleers claim that ECM is 'dishonorable' and 'unfair'. Jam those ones first, and kill them last.” - Jirai 'Fatal' Laitanen, Pithum Nullifier Training Manual c. YC104

Xen Solarus
Furious Destruction and Salvage
#112 - 2013-11-08 14:09:31 UTC
Tippia wrote:
Xen Solarus wrote:
The difference is i don't have the whole "EvE should be exactly this way" opinion that many seem to think, as if the game has a particular way that has to be played, and that anyone not playing it that way must be doing it wrong.
…and yet, you're making exactly that kind of argument. You're stating (with no qualification or basis) that content must be changed because you don't like that content and wilfully ignore the reasoning that maybe your personal taste is not the best guiding principle for such a change, especially when we consider how many people are currently doing that content.


Never said it should be changed, or that i don't like the content, so thanks for making stuff up! I said it was boring and repetitive, and should be improved. You're counter-agrument was that this would be hugely counter-productive, but again failed to explain why this is the case, or who it could be counter-productive to. Doesn't matter how many times you say you have explained that, because you haven't. Maybe if you say it enough times, we'll all spontaneously just know the answer?

And already answered your question, in regards to your opinion that there is already PvE content out there. Thats the only opinion you've been able to express with reasoning so far. I'll requote for ease, as i can easily backup my statements with immediate evidence!

Tippia wrote:

Now, would you like to expand on your first point? In particular, could you expand on it in the context of everyone + dog doing L4s when the kind of PvE content you're asking for already exists, and why the former should be transformed into the latter in spite of the evidence suggesting that such a change is not necessary (and could, in fact, be hugely counter-productive).


Xen Solarus wrote:
The sort of people that just run missions all the time are (sometimes!) the sort that don't have the time in the real-world to do all the other things you've listed. I'm sorry but playing computer games does not make a hobby. Maybe if you're the sort that puts tons of time and effort in, but for the sort of players i'm talking about this is not what they're after. Logging in for some relaxing gameplay is all they're interested in, and if it can be improved upon further then all the better. Saying no to such a suggestion because "it already exists" doesn't work, as it doesn't exist for them. PvE is boring!! Definitely needs to love and improvement. Such an improvement wouldn't effect those that don't PvE, but they moan about it anyways, usually without being able to explain why.


Now, feel free to post, specifically, where you explained how improving PvE would be hugely counter-productive. I'm pretty sure you'll "do a Tippa" again at this challenge! Cool

Post with your main, like a BOSS!

And no, i don't live in highsec.  As if that would make your opinion any less wrong.  

Richard Ramlrez
Doomheim
#113 - 2013-11-08 14:17:26 UTC
What lacks in PVE is a story. No, not the EVE story you have to find in wiki. A chain of missions that would be significant (and of course rewarding something awesome at the end) for each race. With NPCS that would fly with us, die and make us worry and bother about them.

Cutscenes etc. Like Mass Effect without the gay choices.


Then PVE would have a meaning besides blitz missions without even knowing if those agents have a full body or they only have those heads in life support giving us tasks.
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#114 - 2013-11-08 14:22:50 UTC  |  Edited by: Tippia
Xen Solarus wrote:
Never said it should be changed, or that i don't like the content
Incorrect.
You said that “PvE missions need some out-of-the-box thinking, they need to be more exciting. They need to have an interesting story behind them, something that can seem to matter […] i'd go as far as to say that PvE in EvE is boring” — that's a lots of normative and absolute statements right there. You never addressed the points I made in regards to this.

Quote:
You're counter-agrument was that this would be hugely counter-productive, but again failed to explain why this is the case, or who it could be counter-productive to.
Incorrect.
I explained why this is the case and for whom, and you never addressed the points I made.

Quote:
And already answered your question, in regards to your opinion that there is already PvE content out there.
That wasn't the question, and you didn't actually address the point I made. You just went off on a tangent that once again presumed that your taste is universal and implied that anyone who thought otherwise was playing incorrectly.

If you read the posts and parts you refuse to acknowledge in your quotes, you'll notice that your question had already been answered before you even asked it. Hell, I answered it, and then others explained my stance to you, and you still ignored it.

Richard Ramlrez wrote:
What lacks in PVE is a story. No, not the EVE story you have to find in wiki. A chain of missions that would be significant (and of course rewarding something awesome at the end) for each race. With NPCS that would fly with us, die and make us worry and bother about them.

Cutscenes etc. Like Mass Effect without the gay choices.

Then PVE would have a meaning besides blitz missions without even knowing if those agents have a full body or they only have those heads in life support giving us tasks.
This is only true for missions, and that's not the only kind of PvE content out there. The only thing that would be iffy is for it to “be significant” — this is not a universe where everyone is a hero in their own instanced or character-dependent environmental bubble. Even so, FW and incursions offer something along those lines without creating those kinds of forced disconnects in the world.

The problem you're facing is that, for the most part, it's only really about the ISK. Anything that gets in the way of that goal — including story and cut-scenes — will be frustrating and disliked, and will just make people stick with the standard and steady income streams. This, in turn, puts into question the value of creating that kind of content: it's a consumption product that costs a ton to produce and most likely only serves a very small number of people.
Xen Solarus
Furious Destruction and Salvage
#115 - 2013-11-08 14:28:55 UTC
Seems like fun, "doing a Tippa", being able to say whatever you like without having to prove any of it. Lol Even when directly quoted showing this fact, or challenged to prove otherwise.

What was that you said, oh sorry i didn't hear you over the sound of how right i am. "la la la, can't hear you, la la la". Feel free to refer to my previous posts that fail to explain my opinions! Roll

Seriously quite pointless and impossible to have a serious discussion with someone acting like a child.

Though back to the actual topic, i see no harm in the improvement of PvE content. It would make EvE even better!! Cool

Post with your main, like a BOSS!

And no, i don't live in highsec.  As if that would make your opinion any less wrong.  

Richard Ramlrez
Doomheim
#116 - 2013-11-08 14:31:20 UTC
Xen Solarus wrote:
Seems like fun, "doing a Tippa", being able to say whatever you like without having to prove any of it. Lol Even when directly quoted showing this fact, or challenged to prove otherwise.

What was that you said, oh sorry i didn't hear you over the sound of how right i am. "la la la, can't hear you, la la la". Feel free to refer to my previous posts that fail to explain my opinions! Roll

Seriously quite pointless and impossible to have a serious discussion with someone acting like a child.

Though back to the actual topic, i see no harm in the improvement of PvE content. It would make EvE even better!! Cool



I believe that a fun PVE overhaul would even motivate some bored to death PVPers to try it for a change.
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#117 - 2013-11-08 14:32:44 UTC  |  Edited by: Tippia
Xen Solarus wrote:
Seems like fun, "doing a Tippa", being able to say whatever you like without having to prove any of it.
Good thing I never have to resort to something like that, then.

Quote:
What was that you said
Well, that's your entire problem, isn't it? You refuse to actually read what people write and you skip over the parts that you can't respond to. Your post is still there for the world to see how you messed up (and if an “edited” tag shows up on it all of a sudden, we'll know that you're just trying to cover your tracks).

Quote:
Seriously quite pointless and impossible to have a serious discussion with someone acting like a child.
I know, but I hope that you'll come around and stop throwing your toys out of the pram just because I wrote something you can't respond to. Ignoring it won't make it go away. So just grow up, read what I wrote, and respond to it… if you can.

Quote:
i see no harm in the improvement of PvE content.
You realise that no-one ever claimed otherwise, right?
Xen Solarus
Furious Destruction and Salvage
#118 - 2013-11-08 14:34:58 UTC
You should totally go back and read that post i never wrote, it totally explains the opinion i have never expressed, and proves how completely right i am.

Lol

Post with your main, like a BOSS!

And no, i don't live in highsec.  As if that would make your opinion any less wrong.  

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#119 - 2013-11-08 14:44:00 UTC
Xen Solarus wrote:
You should totally go back and read that post i never wrote, it totally explains the opinion i have never expressed, and proves how completely right i am.
Ok, since you can't address my point or answer my previous questions, how about you answer this new one instead:

What is it you think my argument is?
tigger digger
Pator Tech School
Minmatar Republic
#120 - 2013-11-08 14:46:05 UTC
If you want fun, try doing level 3 distribution missions to raise your standing.

Every MMO has some kind of grind to improve your character. In Eve, skills aren't a grind, they're just there. So, it's raising standings and making ISK doing PvE.

Somehow, the grind makes achieving things more satisfying.

(Slimy, yet satisfying!)