These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

less than 2 weeks....
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Rekkr Nordgard
Steelforge Heavy Industries
#21 - 2013-11-06 18:25:21 UTC
Jarod Garamonde wrote:
Excited for Rubicon. I feel like this is going to be one of the best expansions, yet.


Why in the world would you say that? The Rubicon patch is pathetically lacking in any meaningful content. I have characters operating in high, low, and null sec and Rubicon is literally going to have absolutely no effect on me with the possible minor exception of interceptors.
Richard Ramlrez
Doomheim
#22 - 2013-11-06 18:26:33 UTC
Jarod Garamonde wrote:
Lipbite wrote:
2mill ISK per hour siphons combined with 800mil worth SoE cruisers and rarely seen ghost sites - these aren't that exciting. My sub is going to expire before Rubicon.


Contract me your stuff. Transfer me your toon.
Kthanxbai



Remember to send me the ISK too.
Jarod Garamonde
Jolly Codgers
Get Off My Lawn
#23 - 2013-11-06 18:27:38 UTC
I'm also hoping to see MORE Dust integration. Hopefully, CCP listens to the voices that keep saying "DUST should be the deciding factor in FW conflicts".... it makes more sense for ground Infantry to be the make-or-break factor in changing sovereignty. I would also like to see that same factor needed for taking sov in nullsec, as well.

This is really only the beginning of what will probably make EVE better than ever.

Now, Valkyrie.... holy crap.

That moment when you realize the crazy lady with all the cats was right...

    [#savethelance]
Jarod Garamonde
Jolly Codgers
Get Off My Lawn
#24 - 2013-11-06 18:28:24 UTC
Richard Ramlrez wrote:
Jarod Garamonde wrote:
Lipbite wrote:
2mill ISK per hour siphons combined with 800mil worth SoE cruisers and rarely seen ghost sites - these aren't that exciting. My sub is going to expire before Rubicon.


Contract me your stuff. Transfer me your toon.
Kthanxbai



Remember to send me the ISK too.


Confirming that I don't need the ISK. Richard can have it all.

That moment when you realize the crazy lady with all the cats was right...

    [#savethelance]
Rekkr Nordgard
Steelforge Heavy Industries
#25 - 2013-11-06 18:29:00 UTC
Jarod Garamonde wrote:
Hopefully, CCP listens to the voices that keep saying "DUST should be the deciding factor in FW conflicts".... it makes more sense for ground Infantry to be the make-or-break factor in changing sovereignty.


No, just no. GTFO.
Harry Forever
Pandemic Horde Inc.
Pandemic Horde
#26 - 2013-11-06 18:29:43 UTC
I'm still missing my mini nukes and mines... CCP

Harry Forever vs. Goonswarm
Jarod Garamonde
Jolly Codgers
Get Off My Lawn
#27 - 2013-11-06 18:30:17 UTC
Rekkr Nordgard wrote:
Jarod Garamonde wrote:
Hopefully, CCP listens to the voices that keep saying "DUST should be the deciding factor in FW conflicts".... it makes more sense for ground Infantry to be the make-or-break factor in changing sovereignty.


No, just no. GTFO.


Shunning the disbeliever...... now.

That moment when you realize the crazy lady with all the cats was right...

    [#savethelance]
Krimishkev
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#28 - 2013-11-06 18:30:46 UTC
Arduemont wrote:
I am looking forward to the changes Rubicon will make. All the ideas so far are very fine ones indeed and I will very much enjoy the warp speed changes and SoE ships.



Yeah, lets add more griefing mechanics to a game that is already over burdened with useless trolling structures that force people to dissappropriate from real life in order to accomplish a goal in a _game_. Instead of building mechanics that cause a commitment, we want more that cause ping pong bullshit gameplay that only elitists and trolls enjoy. Also, we want more area denial tactics too, because the cloak itself wasn't enough.
DaReaper
Net 7
Cannon.Fodder
#29 - 2013-11-06 18:31:02 UTC
Yea i'm agreeing with the other bitter vets. After nearly 10 years of playing, this is the first time that i'm rolling my eyes at an expansion. When I watched the announcement video is was seriously going 'wait that's it? wth?' I can see this might be a stepping stone to an awesome spring expansion, but... that one had better be awesome to justify this mediocre expansion that should just be a patch. fixes and like a handful of things that could be cool but are just a bit meh.

OMG Comet Mining idea!!! Comet Mining!

Eve For life.
Jarod Garamonde
Jolly Codgers
Get Off My Lawn
#30 - 2013-11-06 18:32:55 UTC  |  Edited by: Jarod Garamonde
DaReaper wrote:
Yea i'm agreeing with the other bitter vets. After nearly 10 years of playing, this is the first time that i'm rolling my eyes at an expansion. When I watched the announcement video is was seriously going 'wait that's it? wth?' I can see this might be a stepping stone to an awesome spring expansion, but... that one had better be awesome to justify this mediocre expansion that should just be a patch. fixes and like a handful of things that could be cool but are just a bit meh.


The first time?

Bro.... do you even Incarna?

Also... I *AM* a bittervet, and I say "awesomesauce".

That moment when you realize the crazy lady with all the cats was right...

    [#savethelance]
Rekkr Nordgard
Steelforge Heavy Industries
#31 - 2013-11-06 18:35:00 UTC
Jarod Garamonde wrote:
The first time?

Bro.... do you even Incarna?


At least with Incarna they tried something ambitious which would have been awesome if they had pulled it off. Rubicon is blatantly yawn worthy; "let's adjust some stats and call it an expansion".
Jarod Garamonde
Jolly Codgers
Get Off My Lawn
#32 - 2013-11-06 18:36:40 UTC
Everyone that says "mediocre" has no vision.
Think about what this will do for future expansions.

That moment when you realize the crazy lady with all the cats was right...

    [#savethelance]
Jarod Garamonde
Jolly Codgers
Get Off My Lawn
#33 - 2013-11-06 18:37:30 UTC
Rekkr Nordgard wrote:
Jarod Garamonde wrote:
The first time?

Bro.... do you even Incarna?


At least with Incarna they tried something ambitious which would have been awesome if they had pulled it off. Rubicon is blatantly yawn worthy; "let's adjust some stats and call it an expansion".


No.

Incarna did more harm to EVE than good. Nothing could have saved it.

That moment when you realize the crazy lady with all the cats was right...

    [#savethelance]
Pennywise le'Fluffer
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#34 - 2013-11-06 18:42:26 UTC
Jarod Garamonde wrote:
I'm also hoping to see MORE Dust integration. Hopefully, CCP listens to the voices that keep saying "DUST should be the deciding factor in FW conflicts".... it makes more sense for ground Infantry to be the make-or-break factor in changing sovereignty. I would also like to see that same factor needed for taking sov in nullsec, as well.

This is really only the beginning of what will probably make EVE better than ever.

Now, Valkyrie.... holy crap.


**** that. It's already ******* ******** that one group can be pushed back from making a system vulnerable indefinitely by overwhelming swarms of idiots with PS3s. I don't own a console and won't own one and if bullshit like DUST keeps shitting in my sandbox I'll find a new one.
Rekkr Nordgard
Steelforge Heavy Industries
#35 - 2013-11-06 18:42:36 UTC
Jarod Garamonde wrote:
Rekkr Nordgard wrote:
Jarod Garamonde wrote:
The first time?

Bro.... do you even Incarna?


At least with Incarna they tried something ambitious which would have been awesome if they had pulled it off. Rubicon is blatantly yawn worthy; "let's adjust some stats and call it an expansion".


No.

Incarna did more harm to EVE than good. Nothing could have saved it.



LOL, someone who sees "vision" in some crappy deployables, but can't see how revolutionary being able to walk around stations and interact with other players there would have been,
Krimishkev
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#36 - 2013-11-06 18:44:04 UTC  |  Edited by: Krimishkev
Jarod Garamonde wrote:
Everyone that says "mediocre" has no vision.
Think about what this will do for future expansions.


I'd really like to try some of that KoolAid you've been drinking.


Again, if you could clarify what it is that's actually so ground breaking in Rubicon that it sets a precedent for future expansions, I would appreciate it.


Then again, I guess I'm just not on the _level_.
Jenn aSide
Worthless Carebears
The Initiative.
#37 - 2013-11-06 18:45:24 UTC
Jake Warbird wrote:
What's with all this optimism, OP? Haven't you heard?

Bastion sucks,
Interceptors suck,
Deployable Tractor structure thingy sucks,
Ghost sites suck, everything sucks. Infact, the only thing that's supposed to suck, Siphons, doesn't suck.

But seriously, waiting for Rubicon and the 'Sky has fallen' threads.



You forgot "Jake Warbird Sucks, Nerf him"! CCp is going to come to your house and when they are done, you will be 10 inches shorter and less good looking. They will proclaim you "Balanced" and fly back to Iceland. Cool
Athena Maldoran
Doomheim
#38 - 2013-11-06 18:47:27 UTC
*If you dont have an eyepatch Your doing it wrong*

wait a min....
Skeln Thargensen
Doomheim
#39 - 2013-11-06 18:47:34 UTC
it's a patchspansion but being able to change your fit on the fly in hostile space is really going to be something. I'm looking forward to that.

but yeah, i think they need something amazing for the spring one.

forums.  serious business.
Krimishkev
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#40 - 2013-11-06 18:52:32 UTC
Rekkr Nordgard wrote:
Jarod Garamonde wrote:
Rekkr Nordgard wrote:
Jarod Garamonde wrote:
The first time?

Bro.... do you even Incarna?


At least with Incarna they tried something ambitious which would have been awesome if they had pulled it off. Rubicon is blatantly yawn worthy; "let's adjust some stats and call it an expansion".


No.

Incarna did more harm to EVE than good. Nothing could have saved it.



LOL, someone who sees "vision" in some crappy deployables, but can't see how revolutionary being able to walk around stations and interact with other players there would have been,


Please no... "Incarna would have been better than Rubicon if"