These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Test Server Feedback

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Mass test feedback, November 4th

First post First post
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Masao Kurata
Perkone
Caldari State
#41 - 2013-11-04 17:56:40 UTC
Machine Info and Settings

  • DirectX version your client was running (Cntrl+F to see this information): dx9
  • OS version: Windows 7 SP1
  • CPU: i5-3570
  • GPU: Radeon HD 4770
  • RAM: 8 GB
  • How many clients were you running at the same time? 1
  • Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): high
    • - Anti-Aliasing: medium
    - Shader Quality: medium
    - Texture Quality: high
    - LOD Quality: high


User Experience

  • Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed out: 14
  • Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed in: 13
  • Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 5
  • Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? No
  • We added texture LODing to reduce the client memory, textures loading when zooming in and out can be delayed in heavy scenes. Did you feel this degraded the visual experience? I did notice some very blurry textures, I guess this is why.
  • Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: There was a curious one way emergency warp on exiting the warp tunnel for the first jump, leaving me a million km from the gate.

Alvatore DiMarco
Capricious Endeavours Ltd
#42 - 2013-11-04 17:56:56 UTC
]Machine Info and Settings

  • DirectX version your client was running (Cntrl+F to see this information): DX11
  • OS version: Win7 Ultimate, x64
  • CPU: Athlon II X4, 3.2GHz
  • GPU: NVIDIA GTX 570
  • RAM: 6GB
  • How many clients were you running at the same time? 1
  • Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): High
    • - Anti-Aliasing: High
    - Shader Quality: High
    - Texture Quality: High
    - LOD Quality: High


User Experience

  • Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed out: 15-25
  • Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed in: 7-12
  • Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 5
  • Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? No
  • We added texture LODing to reduce the client memory, textures loading when zooming in and out can be delayed in heavy scenes. Did you feel this degraded the visual experience? Yes.
  • Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: The texture LODing was delayed enough that things (including my ship) didn't actually appear for 10 seconds or so when zooming in/out at the POS fight. I moved my camera to someone else's ship during the fight and it was 30 seconds before I saw anything other than their guns.

Imperator Erquilenne
Section 496
#43 - 2013-11-04 17:56:58 UTC
Machine Info and Settings

  • DirectX version your client was running: dx11
  • OS version: Windows 7
  • CPU: i7-3630QM
  • GPU: NVIDIA GeForce GTX675MX 4Gb GDDR5
  • RAM: 8 GB
  • How many clients were you running at the same time? 1
  • Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): High
    • - Anti-Aliasing: Disabled
    - Shader Quality: High
    - Texture Quality: High
    - LOD Quality: High


User Experience

  • Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed out: 15
  • Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed in: 5-10
  • Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? Have not been in this large a fleet on TQ
  • Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? No
  • We added texture LODing to reduce the client memory, textures loading when zooming in and out can be delayed in heavy scenes. Did you feel this degraded the visual experience? No
  • Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: Too much lag to really do much

Chastise Smart
Millenium Pigeon
#44 - 2013-11-04 17:57:11 UTC

DirectX version your client was running (Cntrl+F to see this information): dx9
OS version: win7
CPU: AMD Phenom(tm) II x4 965 processor 3.40 GHz
GPU: ATI Radeon HD 4800
RAM: 8 GB
How many clients were you running at the same time? 1 client
Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high):
- Anti-Aliasing: disabled
- Shader Quality: high
- Texture Quality: high
- LOD Quality: high


User Experience

Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed out: 30
Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed in: 5
Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 5
Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? no
We added texture LODing to reduce the client memory, textures loading when zooming in and out can be delayed in heavy scenes. Did you feel this degraded the visual experience? I do not know.
Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: what was good
Onamata Poeia
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#45 - 2013-11-04 17:57:11 UTC

  • DirectX version your client was running (Cntrl+F to see this information): dx11
  • OS version: win7
  • CPU: phenom 2 x4 955
  • GPU: amd radeon hd6850
  • RAM: 8G
  • How many clients were you running at the same time? Just 1
  • Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): Low
    • - Anti-Aliasing: Disabled
    - Shader Quality: None
    - Texture Quality: Medium
    - LOD Quality: High


User Experience

  • Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 7
  • Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? No
    • We added texture LODing to reduce the client memory, textures loading when zooming in and out can be delayed in heavy scenes. Did you feel this degraded the visual experience? Not noticably
  • Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: New bubbles are epic
Arki Shikkoken
Echelon Research
Goonswarm Federation
#46 - 2013-11-04 17:57:28 UTC
Machine Info and Settings

  • DirectX version : dx9
  • OS version: Windows 7 32-Bit
  • CPU: AMD Athlon X2 Dual-Core QL-65
  • GPU: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4500/5100 Series
  • RAM: 3 GB
  • How many clients were you running at the same time? : 1
  • Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): low
    • - Anti-Aliasing: Disabled
    - Shader Quality: Low
    - Texture Quality: Low
    - LOD Quality: Low


User Experience

  • Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed out: 10
  • Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed in: 2
  • Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) : 5
  • Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? : No
  • We added texture LODing to reduce the client memory, textures loading when zooming in and out can be delayed in heavy scenes. Did you feel this degraded the visual experience? No
  • Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: Experience was ok for me for that fleet size, i'm happy that my GPU didn't overheated.


etherial nova
Perkone
Caldari State
#47 - 2013-11-04 17:57:33 UTC
DirectX version your client was running (Cntrl+F to see this information): DX9
OS version: Microsoft Windows 7 Professional 64-bit
CPU: i5-4670
GPU: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760
RAM: 8Gb
How many clients were you running at the same time? 1
Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): High
- Anti-Aliasing: Disabled
- Shader Quality: High
- Texture Quality: High
- LOD Quality: High


User Experience

Average FPS during the fight: Was not paying attention to the FPS. TiDi was more of an impact than frame issues.


Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome): 5


Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? No


We added texture LODing to reduce the client memory, textures loading when zooming in and out can be delayed in heavy scenes. Did you feel this degraded the visual experience? I noticed it when zooming in on my ship. In a way it does, but I am not one to complain about it.


Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: There were 2 bugs that I will be submitting reports for. The first was after first the mass gate jump. When I landed, my ship auto-warped to some deadspace location. The second was during the warp to dock up, I had the MFD animation on the rear of my ship midwarp.
Baygun
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#48 - 2013-11-04 17:57:44 UTC

DirectX version your client was running (Cntrl+F to see this information):
OS version: windows 7 (latest SP)
CPU: i7 2nd generation
GPU: nvidia GTX560 Ti
RAM: 8GB
How many clients were you running at the same time? 1 client
Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): high
- Anti-Aliasing: Medium
- Shader Quality: high
- Texture Quality: high
- LOD Quality: high


User Experience

Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed out: 50
Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed in: 23
Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) : N/A
Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? no
We added texture LODing to reduce the client memory, textures loading when zooming in and out can be delayed in heavy scenes. Did you feel this degraded the visual experience? NO
Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: TiDi'ed jumping between systems is awsome :)
Humanitas
United Society Enterprises
#49 - 2013-11-04 17:58:03 UTC  |  Edited by: Humanitas
DirectX version your client was running (Cntrl+F to see this information): Direct X 11
OS version: Windows 7
CPU: i7 3770
GPU: AMD RADEON HD 7770
RAM: 16 GB
How many clients were you running at the same time? 1
Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): High
- Anti-Aliasing: High
- Shader Quality: High
- Texture Quality: High
- LOD Quality: High


User Experience

Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed out: 30 FPS
Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed in: 23 FPS
Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 7
Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? No
We added texture LODing to reduce the client memory, textures loading when zooming in and out can be delayed in heavy scenes. Did you feel this degraded the visual experience? No

Ran smoother this time than last mass test. Also noticed that TiDi was only at 40% roughly and not 10% like last time. Was also fleetless this time with a fuller overview and had brackets on and still got the same and maybe a little higher fps at the gate with everything set to high still.
Brakh Openhimer
Shocky Industries Ltd.
Goonswarm Federation
#50 - 2013-11-04 17:58:13 UTC  |  Edited by: Brakh Openhimer
DirectX version your client was running (Cntrl+F to see this information): Dx11
OS version: Win7
CPU: Q6600
GPU: GTX550ti
RAM:4GB
How many clients were you running at the same time? 1
Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): High
- Anti-Aliasing: Disabled: High
- Shader Quality: High
- Texture Quality: High
- LOD Quality: High

Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed out: 30
Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed in: 20
Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 5
Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? No
We added texture LODing to reduce the client memory, textures loading when zooming in and out can be delayed in heavy scenes. Did you feel this degraded the visual experience? Once or twice for few sec
Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: Stable visual, no crash, minimal lag(~5sec), no other issues
Utopa Kashuken
Eos Tribe
#51 - 2013-11-04 17:58:22 UTC
DirectX version your client was running (Cntrl+F to see this information): dx9
OS version: win 7
CPU: Intel Celeron B800
GPU: Intel(R) HD Graphics
RAM: 6GM
How many clients were you running at the same time? : 2
Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high):
- Anti-Aliasing: Off
- Shader Quality: Low
- Texture Quality: Low
- LOD Quality: Low

User Experience
Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) : 5
Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? : No
We added texture LODing to reduce the client memory, textures loading when zooming in and out can be delayed in heavy scenes. Did you feel this degraded the visual experience? : No
FComa
FComa Corporation
#52 - 2013-11-04 17:59:15 UTC
Machine Info and Settings

DirectX 9 (11)
OS version: win 8 pro
CPU:i7
GPU:nvidia geforce 640m
RAM:8G
How many clients were you running at the same time?2
Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high):high
- Anti-Aliasing:
- Shader Quality:
- Texture Quality:
- LOD Quality:


User Experience

Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed out:
Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed in:
Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome)8
Did you experience any disconnects or crashes?no
We added texture LODing to reduce the client memory, textures loading when zooming in and out can be delayed in heavy scenes. Did you feel this degraded the visual experience?
Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.:liked the new warp implant set (ascending) , dunno if it worked though :)
Kae Arjar
Doomheim
#53 - 2013-11-04 17:59:26 UTC
DirectX version : 9
OS version: Win 8.1
CPU: i5
GPU: GeForce GT 420M
RAM: 8GB
How many clients were you running at the same time: 1
Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): Lowest



User Experience

Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed out: 15

Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed in: 2

Did you experience any disconnects or crashes: Nope

We added texture LODing to reduce the client memory, textures loading when zooming in and out can be delayed in heavy scenes. Did you feel this degraded the visual experience: No, was zoomed out too far for the majority
Bogelcat
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#54 - 2013-11-04 17:59:38 UTC
irectX version your client was running (Cntrl+F to see this information):
OS version:windows7
CPU:2.8ghz i7
GPU:
RAM:8gb
How many clients were you running at the same time? 3
Graphic setting of the client: high
- Anti-Aliasing: disabled
- Shader Quality:high
- Texture Quality:high
- LOD Quality:high


User Experience

Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed out: not sure but very low
Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed in:not sure but very low
Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome): have not been in fleet that size before
Did you experience any disconnects or crashes?no
We added texture LODing to reduce the client memory, textures loading when zooming in and out can be delayed in heavy scenes. Did you feel this degraded the visual experience?no
Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.:
Hybrid Carlin
Exiles of Chaos
Balcora Gatekeepers
#55 - 2013-11-04 17:59:40 UTC  |  Edited by: Hybrid Carlin
delete
frankFTW91
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#56 - 2013-11-04 18:00:01 UTC
DX11
Windows 7 x64
Intel i7 920
Nvidia GTX 560ti
6GB
2 Clients
High Graphics Settings
AA Disabled

AVG FPS zoomed out: 40 fps
AVG FPS zoomed in: 10 fps

Client Performance: 6

I did not notice any visual degradation as a result of the delayed texture loading. The fight was impressive visually.

The initial invites did not go as well as the last mass test. The performance of the client was improved was the last mass test, I had less module activation lag and the client remained responsive.

At the end of the fight when after we were instructed to leave the field, I warped straight through a bubble that was on grid with the gate on the way to the station. I'm not sure if I was actively in a bubble when I initiated warp but I thought that bubbles in your path would stop warp. I was in a non nullified tengu.
m4n5
BB's Bunch
#57 - 2013-11-04 18:00:27 UTC

DirectX version your client was running (Cntrl+F to see this information): dx11
OS version: Win7 x 64
CPU: i5 2400
GPU: HD 5770
RAM: 16GB
How many clients were you running at the same time? 2
Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): high
- Anti-Aliasing: disabbled
- Shader Quality: high
- Texture Quality: high
- LOD Quality:high


User Experience


Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed out: 10-13
Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed in: 3-8
Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 4
Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? no
We added texture LODing to reduce the client memory, textures loading when zooming in and out can be delayed in heavy scenes. Did you feel this degraded the visual experience? no
Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: very nice guys... real nice graphics!!!
McGringo
Multispace Technologies Inc
#58 - 2013-11-04 18:00:32 UTC
CCP Habakuk wrote:
Machine Info and Settings

  • DirectX version your client was running (Cntrl+F to see this information): DX 11
  • OS version: Win 8.1
  • CPU: Intel Core i7 2.4 GHz
  • GPU: GTX 780m
  • RAM: 16 gb
  • How many clients were you running at the same time? 1
  • Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): high across the board
    • - Anti-Aliasing: Disabled
    - Shader Quality: High
    - Texture Quality: High
    - LOD Quality: High


User Experience

  • Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed out: 19+
  • Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed in: 12+
  • Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 7
  • Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? No
  • We added texture LODing to reduce the client memory, textures loading when zooming in and out can be delayed in heavy scenes. Did you feel this degraded the visual experience? No
  • Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.:
    • Quite good flow, slightly laggy but still good based on the amount of players in fleets fighting.
Claire Strife
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#59 - 2013-11-04 18:00:33 UTC  |  Edited by: Claire Strife
Machine Info and Settings

DirectX version my client was running: 11
OS version: Windows 7 64-bit
CPU: AMD Phenom (tm) II x4 955 Processor 3.20 GHz
GPU: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 1GB
RAM: 8gb
How many clients were you running at the same time? Only 1

Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): medium
- Anti-Aliasing: Disabled
- Shader Quality: High
- Texture Quality: High
- LOD Quality: High


User Experience

Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed out: 20-30 fps
Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed in: 1-10 fps

Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 8

Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? No
We added texture LODing to reduce the client memory, textures loading when zooming in and out can be delayed in heavy scenes. Did you feel this degraded the visual experience? Yes
Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: I am very proud that I took part in test. That was really fun. Keep it up!
mantka fist
Malevelon Roe Industries
Convocation of Empyreans
#60 - 2013-11-04 18:00:44 UTC
Dx11
GPU- Nvidia gt 630m
8 gigs
1 client
anti-al disabled
shader high
texture high
lod Quality high
exp was fun
zoomed out fps 15
zoomed in 5
5
no DC
NO
it was a good test