Test Server Feedback

gtx 680
i5 3570k
8gb
maxed settings, everything absolutely max, recording with fraps at half quality at 15fps in battle. Without fraps around 30-50fps.
Performance was very very nice.

Machine Info and Settings

DirectX version your client was running (Cntrl+F to see this information): dx9
OS version: Win 8
CPU: i5 - 3570 k
GPU: gtx 670 gainward phantom
RAM: 6 gb
How many clients were you running at the same time? 2
Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high):
- Anti-Aliasing: low
- Shader Quality: low
- Texture Quality: low
- LOD Quality: low


User Experience

Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed out: 5-6
Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed in: 3-4
Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) : 1
Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? : no
We added texture LODing to reduce the client memory, textures loading when zooming in and out can be delayed in heavy scenes. Did you feel this degraded the visual experience? no

Machine Info and Settings


DirectX version your client was running (Cntrl+F to see this information): dx9
OS version: Win 7 Professional
CPU: i7 2600k OCed @ 4,5GHz
GPU: GTX 680 Phantom 2x SLI
RAM: 8GB Ram
How many clients were you running at the same time? 4
Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): Mainclient=MAX / seconday clients=Medium
- Anti-Aliasing: max on main, medium on secondarys
- Shader Quality: max, medium secondarys
- Texture Quality: max, medium on secondarys
- LOD Quality: max, medium on secondarys


User Experience


Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed out: 50
Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed in: 35-40
Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome): 9
Did you experience any disconnects or crashes?: No, all was fine
We added texture LODing to reduce the client memory, textures loading when zooming in and out can be delayed in heavy scenes. Did you feel this degraded the visual experience? Background went white on all clients for about 5 seconds, no lag
Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.:

Had some time dilation while jumping, but then all was fine at the tower. Gatecamp was a little bit laggy but still fine, better then on TQ. Overall: very nice! Keep on the good work!

DirectX version your client was running (Cntrl+F to see this information): dx11
OS version: Windows 7
CPU: IK I5
GPU: gtx 455
RAM: 8gb
How many clients were you running at the same time? 1
Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): high


User Experience


Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot: 10 fps
Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? No

Machine Info and Settings

DirectX version your client was running: DirectX11
OS version: Windows 7 64bit
CPU: Intel i7-2600k @ 4.5GHz
GPU: 2x nVidia GeForce GTX680 2-way SLI
RAM: 16GB DRR3 @ 1600MHz
How many clients were you running at the same time?: 1
Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): High
- Anti-Aliasing: High
- Shader Quality: High
- Texture Quality: High
- LOD Quality: High


User Experience

Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed out: ~30
Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed in: ~20-25

Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome): 4 Worse than the previous Masstest

Did you experience any disconnects or crashes?: None

We added texture LODing to reduce the client memory, textures loading when zooming in and out can be delayed in heavy scenes. Did you feel this degraded the visual experience?: Yes, the ships/tower and effects looked blurry/hard-egded. Sorry, but I do enjoy EvE for its graphics as well and zoom around a lot.

Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.:
Similar program like the previous test, just quite worse in terms of framerate.
Capital jumping was better this time, barely long waiting times.
Effects and explosions looked a bit weird/cheap this time.
TiDi kicked in (Did not happen last time)

Thank you very much!

DirectX 11
OS version: Windows 8.1
CPU:Intel core i7-3820 @3.60ghz
GPU: GeForce GTX 670
RAM:16 G
2 clients
Graphic setting high
- Anti-Aliasing: off
- Shader Quality:high
- Texture Quality: high
- LOD Quality:high

Nothing unusual to report visually, except stuck in warp tunnel for over a minute.

DirectX version your client was running (Cntrl+F to see this information):
OS version: Windows 7 Ultimate 64bit
CPU: Phenom II x4 960t BE (unlocked 6 core at 3.0GHz
GPU: Radeon HD 7870 Sapphire OC Ed.
RAM: G.skill Sniper (2x4GB)
How many clients were you running at the same time? 2
Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): high
- Anti-Aliasing: high
- Shader Quality: high
- Texture Quality: high
- LOD Quality: high


User Experience

Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed out: 40~60
Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed in: 20~30
Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 4
Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? No
We added texture LODing to reduce the client memory, textures loading when zooming in and out can be delayed in heavy scenes. Did you feel this degraded the visual experience? No
Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: Had fun c;

Machine Info and Settings
DirectX version: 11
OS version: Windows 7 SP1
CPU: i7-2600K
GPU: NVidia GeForce GTX 560 Ti, driver version 331.58
RAM: 16 GB
How many clients were you running at the same time? 1
Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): high
- Anti-Aliasing: high
- Shader Quality: high
- Texture Quality: high
- LOD Quality: high

User Experience
Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed out: 20
Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed in: 12
Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size?: 7
Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? No
We added texture LODing to reduce the client memory, textures loading when zooming in and out can be delayed in heavy scenes. Did you feel this degraded the visual experience? No

DirectX version your client was running (Cntrl+F to see this information):dx11
OS version:win7
CPU:intel quad i5 3550
GPU:nvidia 660Ti
RAM:8gb
How many clients were you running at the same time? 1
Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): hight
- Anti-Aliasing: high
- Shader Quality: high
- Texture Quality:high
- LOD Quality:high


User Experience , It felt like last test went better , there was lower FPs and i had lag when i tried to target anything at the poitot fight
, also i had no fleet invite
Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed out: 20 fps
Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed in: 14
Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome)
Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? NO
We added texture LODing to reduce the client memory, textures loading when zooming in and out can be delayed in heavy scenes. Did you feel this degraded the visual experience? not really,
Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: