These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Somer Blink - Asked to stop but have got worse!

First post
Author
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#301 - 2013-11-02 15:53:53 UTC  |  Edited by: Tippia
Prince Kobol wrote:
So in other words
…you have no argument and have to resort to genetic fallacies in your silly attempt to deflect attention away from this fact.

Quote:
So even a business as ruthless and evil such as Somer has contributed and helped player events
Nope. They've only advertised their product, which rather precludes it from being a community contribution.

Quote:
So does [mean] that they have or haven't contributed to the community?
I can't remember a single community contribution on their part, nor have I seen anyone ever being able to bring one up in all these threads.
Baali Tekitsu
AQUILA INC
Verge of Collapse
#302 - 2013-11-02 15:54:07 UTC
Prince Kobol wrote:
Baali Tekitsu wrote:
Prince Kobol wrote:
Tippia wrote:
Prince Kobol wrote:
How much have you donated to player run events?

How much I have paid does not change the fact that advertising your business is not the same as contributing to the community.

The event organisers contributed; Somer did not.


Still haven't answered my question.. no surprise there.

Also, if they were sponsoring player events for the sole purpose to promote their business as you say, then surely wouldn't they advertise the fact on their website every time they donated isk?

Maybe even post on the forum?

I mean its pretty crappy promotion if you keep donating isk to player events and not actually telling people that your doing it.

But thats what you would do as a "community contributor"


So does that they have or haven't contributed to the community?


Theyre a sponsor whos only interest is advertising and whos paying for advertising not a community thingie as which they got their community spotlight.

RATE LIKE SUBSCRIBE

Careby
#303 - 2013-11-02 15:59:42 UTC
I understand being against the kind of RMT Somer Blink engages in. I understand being against CCP's arbitrary enforcement of their EULA.

I don't really understand the reaction to the increased bonus. We don't know exactly what the communication was between CCP and Somer Blink. It may have gone something like this:

Quote:
Somer Blink: "Hey CCP, we've just been told by our GTC reseller that we have to stop offering a bonus to GTC buyers by November 7."

CCP: "That's right. We know you've been doing it for a long time, but a lot of players are upset, so we need to stop it."

Somer Blink: "Sorry to hear it. Would it be alright if we make the most of the last few days by running a huge sale?"

CCP: "That's a great idea. You, Markee Dragon, and our company will all make money on that idea. Go for it!"

Somer Blink: "Okay then that's what we'll do. We better let Markee Dragon know to stock up on GTC's, because we'll sell a ton of them."


If Somer can actually sell 300,000 GTC's in a week (which they would have to do to make that estimated $800,000), just imagine the millions CCP will rake in. Do you really think CCP did not approve of the plan?

Sergeant Dashing
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#304 - 2013-11-02 16:03:02 UTC
SOMER was asked to stop after November 7th. They aren't doing anything wrong.

This is a last ditch effort by them to squeeze out more profit.

Welcome to capitalism

/thread
Aivo Dresden
State War Academy
Caldari State
#305 - 2013-11-02 16:04:39 UTC
mama guru wrote:
This "oh it's np i talked to CCP on skype" is exactly the kind of **** that let Sirmolle and Dianabolic off the hook with the whole T20 thing.

That was 2005. Almost a decade later you're still butt hurt? Looking at your employment history, you didn't even play yet. I think you should get over yourself for a second and think of the massive contributions both those old players have made to and for the community, same for Somer blink - Get your head out for a minute.

As for you people claiming Somer never did anything at all, how about having a look outside of General Discussion? Just one example of how he is contributing to the EVE community is this. If you'd care to spend a minute and actually look around, you'd find that Somer has done quite a bit for the community.
Baali Tekitsu
AQUILA INC
Verge of Collapse
#306 - 2013-11-02 16:05:49 UTC
Careby wrote:
I understand being against the kind of RMT Somer Blink engages in. I understand being against CCP's arbitrary enforcement of their EULA.

I don't really understand the reaction to the increased bonus. We don't know exactly what the communication was between CCP and Somer Blink. It may have gone something like this:

Quote:
Somer Blink: "Hey CCP, we've just been told by our GTC reseller that we have to stop offering a bonus to GTC buyers by November 7."

CCP: "That's right. We know you've been doing it for a long time, but a lot of players are upset, so we need to stop it."

Somer Blink: "Sorry to hear it. Would it be alright if we make the most of the last few days by running a huge sale?"

CCP: "That's a great idea. You, Markee Dragon, and our company will all make money on that idea. Go for it!"

Somer Blink: "Okay then that's what we'll do. We better let Markee Dragon know to stock up on GTC's, because we'll sell a ton of them."


If Somer can actually sell 300,000 GTC's in a week (which they would have to do to make that estimated $800,000), just imagine the millions CCP will rake in. Do you really think CCP did not approve of the plan?


But this thread is not about if CCP approves of it but if we approve of it.

RATE LIKE SUBSCRIBE

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#307 - 2013-11-02 16:11:13 UTC  |  Edited by: Tippia
Gah! Forums!!

Aivo Dresden wrote:
As for you people claiming Somer never did anything at all, how about having a look outside of General Discussion? Just one example of how he is contributing to the EVE community is this.
No, that's Telegram Sam contributing to the EVE community. Somer is still just a advertising their business.

No-one ever claimed that he never did anything, only that he never contributed to the community — advertising your business doesn't really count.
Jorden Ishonen
Doomheim
#308 - 2013-11-02 16:20:46 UTC
Aivo Dresden wrote:
mama guru wrote:
This "oh it's np i talked to CCP on skype" is exactly the kind of **** that let Sirmolle and Dianabolic off the hook with the whole T20 thing.

That was 2005. Almost a decade later you're still butt hurt?


Almost a decade later, you're still trying to defend it?

The amount of time passed doesn't make it any less wrong. The fact that history is repeating itself here only makes it all the more relevant.
Aivo Dresden
State War Academy
Caldari State
#309 - 2013-11-02 16:24:11 UTC
That's extremely narrow minded. He isn't advertising anything there.

He is contributing by stimulating and encouraging more players to write fiction, by offering a considerably larger prize than we previously had for such contests. This might motivate people who previously were not that interested to actually write something as well. You can call it what you want, but contributions and efforts like the one Somer made there, are vital to the community.
Diomedes Calypso
Aetolian Armada
#310 - 2013-11-02 16:24:56 UTC  |  Edited by: Diomedes Calypso
Baali Tekitsu wrote:
Careby wrote:
I understand being against the .......................
..............................
............................

Do you really think CCP did not approve of the plan?


But this thread is not about if CCP approves of it but if we approve of it.



Interesting and useful point.

I always assume discussions I'm in are just about some theoretical look at subjects.

What I actually feel is secondary. I figure both sides will concede the parts of arguments that would run against what they feel because we're just trying to look at things together ?


FOR ME goal is to understand.

I play games to have fun

I got to Forums to have fun. Fun on forums is the exploration of ideas !

.

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#311 - 2013-11-02 16:33:19 UTC
Aivo Dresden wrote:
That's extremely narrow minded. He isn't advertising anything there.

He is contributing by stimulating and encouraging more players to write fiction, by offering a considerably larger prize than we previously had for such contests.
He's contributing and not advertising in the same way as Tag Heuer is running a race and not advertising when they plaster their name across every F1 course and TV transmission…
Prince Kobol
#312 - 2013-11-02 16:45:56 UTC
Baali Tekitsu wrote:


Theyre a sponsor whos only interest is advertising and whos paying for advertising not a community thingie as which they got their community spotlight.


Does include Eve Uni, RvB and the latest Eve Fiction competition then?
Prince Kobol
#313 - 2013-11-02 16:47:45 UTC
Tippia wrote:
Aivo Dresden wrote:
That's extremely narrow minded. He isn't advertising anything there.

He is contributing by stimulating and encouraging more players to write fiction, by offering a considerably larger prize than we previously had for such contests.
He's contributing and not advertising in the same way as Tag Heuer is running a race and not advertising when they plaster their name across every F1 course and TV transmission…


So in other words its bad thing that he is giving 100 plex's towards the prize fund then..

The bastard !!!!
Kate stark
#314 - 2013-11-02 16:48:05 UTC
Prince Kobol wrote:
Baali Tekitsu wrote:


Theyre a sponsor whos only interest is advertising and whos paying for advertising not a community thingie as which they got their community spotlight.


Does include Eve Uni, RvB and the latest Eve Fiction competition then?


which of those are an isk making business?

Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this.

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#315 - 2013-11-02 16:50:15 UTC
Prince Kobol wrote:
Baali Tekitsu wrote:

Theyre a sponsor whos only interest is advertising and whos paying for advertising not a community thingie as which they got their community spotlight.

Does include Eve Uni, RvB and the latest Eve Fiction competition then?

Their sponsorship certainly does — that's still just taking advantage of a community event to advertise their brands. The difference is that they also provide actual community contributions through their own events and community services (none of which break the EULA by being businesses).
Argus Sorn
Star Frontiers
Brotherhood of Spacers
#316 - 2013-11-02 16:59:35 UTC  |  Edited by: Argus Sorn
Aivo Dresden wrote:
That's extremely narrow minded. He isn't advertising anything there.

He is contributing by stimulating and encouraging more players to write fiction, by offering a considerably larger prize than we previously had for such contests. This might motivate people who previously were not that interested to actually write something as well. You can call it what you want, but contributions and efforts like the one Somer made there, are vital to the community.


Vital?

Come off that one, please. EVE would do just fine without SOMERblink. Your fiction contest would run fine with 2, 3, 4, or even 10 plex as a prize. In fact, if you turned down SOMER prizes you might have more folks like myself included interested in donating. You may not get to 100 PLEX, but you'd have a decent prize either way.

In fact, what SOMER does is diminish the value of the PLEX and therefore make it harder for such competitions to exist - because a competition that gave away 5-10 PLEX would seem pointless in a world where 100 PLEX give-a-ways are common. Donations of 1-2 PLEX are diminished by his donations and therefore people are less likely to give.

And SOMER does all of this to get what they are getting now: a defense against violating the EULA. SOMER has bought your approval, even though you are approving of what basically constitutes a breach of the rules of the game. SOMER has bought CCP Guard's approval, CCP Navigator's approval, EVE Vegas' approval and countless others' approval. Not by bribing them outright, but through influence peddling. It is textbook marketing - I can only hope that David Reid and Hilmar and others at CCP who are a little bit more saavy at this stuff see through the "BS".

No one wants to play a game where one entity, an in game entity (especially one using your game for a business), wields that sort of influence over the game creators, who are supposed to be above the fray in that regard. But CCP was bought - not because this makes them isk (I actually do not necessarily believe SOMER's bonus increases their profits much - I think the economics of that are complicated by the demand for game time) but because SOMER has led countless devs to actually believe they are "vital" for their game when they contribute nothing in reality.

No they are not vital, SOMER just does a good job of making people believe they are, devs included, and therefore they have recruited proxys to their defense.

At least his 1 billion isk sell out has revealed to more people the truth about SOMER. CCP asks you to stop something, and your first thought is to milk it for all it is worth. The supporters are right at least in saying it is SOMER's right to do so. And at least their true nature as a BUSINESS entity is revealed. I can only hope that CCP shuts them down, because at this point that is what they deserve.

And CCP needs to educate its staff more on the various forms that bribery and influence peddling can take - so that this doesn't happen again.
Eli Green
The Arrow Project
#317 - 2013-11-02 17:26:37 UTC
Gambling is a bad habit mmmmk?

wumbo

Aivo Dresden
State War Academy
Caldari State
#318 - 2013-11-02 17:36:54 UTC  |  Edited by: Aivo Dresden
Argus Sorn wrote:
Vital? Come off that one, please. EVE would do just fine without SOMERblink.
OK mister selective reading. I said contributions and efforts like the one Somer made for the writing contest are vital to the community. The efforts are vital, not Somer Blink.

Argus Sorn wrote:
In fact, if you turned down SOMER prizes you might have more folks like myself included interested in donating.
Empty words, why should your contribution depend on who else is contributing? That makes no sense.

Argus Sorn wrote:
In fact, what SOMER does is diminish the value of the PLEX and therefore make it harder for such competitions to exist - because a competition that gave away 5-10 PLEX would seem pointless in a world where 100 PLEX give-a-ways are common. Donations of 1-2 PLEX are diminished by his donations and therefore people are less likely to give.
How so? Now a ton of people can get a prize, instead of just the top 3 or top 5. Now there is enough prizes to pretty much reward all good stories and efforts. You make it sound like No.1 gets 50PLEX and the rest gets nothing.

Argus Sorn wrote:
And CCP needs to educate its staff more on the various forms that bribery and influence peddling can take - so that this doesn't happen again.
I think it's unfortunate that so many people are yelling murder and fire and claiming Somer broke the EULA. Maybe you just don't realise that CCP gave the OK for exactly this when he first started his business. Just unfortunate no one at CCP steps up and clears this up. Instead they are letting the community turn on Somer.
Diomedes Calypso
Aetolian Armada
#319 - 2013-11-02 18:27:41 UTC  |  Edited by: Diomedes Calypso
Argus Sorn wrote:
Aivo Dresden wrote:
That's extremely narrow minded. He isn't advertising anything there.

He is contributing by stimulating and encouraging more players to write fiction, by offering a considerably larger prize than we previously had for such contests. This might motivate people who previously were not that interested to actually write something as well. You can call it what you want, but contributions and efforts like the one Somer made there, are vital to the community.


Vital?

Come off that one, please. EVE would do just fine without SOMERblink. Your fiction contest would run fine with 2, 3, 4, or even 10 plex as a prize. In fact, if you turned down SOMER prizes you might have more folks like myself included interested in donating. You may not get to 100 PLEX, but you'd have a decent prize either way.

In fact, what SOMER does is diminish the value of the PLEX and therefore make it harder for such competitions to exist - because a competition that gave away 5-10 PLEX would seem pointless in a world where 100 PLEX give-a-ways are common. Donations of 1-2 PLEX are diminished by his donations and therefore people are less likely to give.

And SOMER does all of this to get what they are getting now: a defense against violating the EULA. SOMER has bought your approval, even though you are approving of what basically constitutes a breach of the rules of the game. SOMER has bought CCP Guard's approval, CCP Navigator's approval, EVE Vegas' approval and countless others' approval. Not by bribing them outright, but through influence peddling. It is textbook marketing - I can only hope that David Reid and Hilmar and others at CCP who are a little bit more saavy at this stuff see through the "BS".

No one wants to play a game where one entity, an in game entity (especially one using your game for a business), wields that sort of influence over the game creators, who are supposed to be above the fray in that regard. But CCP was bought - not because this makes them isk (I actually do not necessarily believe SOMER's bonus increases their profits much - I think the economics of that are complicated by the demand for game time) but because SOMER has led countless devs to actually believe they are "vital" for their game when they contribute nothing in reality.

No they are not vital, SOMER just does a good job of making people believe they are, devs included, and therefore they have recruited proxys to their defense.

At least his 1 billion isk sell out has revealed to more people the truth about SOMER. CCP asks you to stop something, and your first thought is to milk it for all it is worth. The supporters are right at least in saying it is SOMER's right to do so. And at least their true nature as a BUSINESS entity is revealed. I can only hope that CCP shuts them down, because at this point that is what they deserve.

And CCP needs to educate its staff more on the various forms that bribery and influence peddling can take - so that this doesn't happen again.


This is actually one of the best posts I've read in the weeks of following this.

I'm sure that the points you raise have been mentioned many many times, but here you distill it for me.

The writing contest award - Player fortunes and awards pale against the size of the fortunes $ RMT can create.

-- Mega corps have mega ISK too.. but that's by product of their pursuit of Sovereignty for game purposes.. which is usually the fruition of years of play and bonds with other players (and bonds with leaders of corps who are made of smaller tight-nit associations of players).

-- some traders and industrialists but their motivation comes for enjoying the economy and the fact they "horde" their fortunes is often motivated by the sense that if they gave it away too freely they'd undermine the economy they enjoy. While I have a tiny fraction of the mega wealthy (some of them are mega wealthy indeed.. able to afford two titans aint squat to them) I love playing the economy in games. To me it's like Sid Meirs Civilization a little ... whats the point of Strategy game if I use the assets to undermine the game economy?

But, when the $ to isk thing meshes too closely, odd things happen. CCP makes wonderful attempts to be sure that use $ to buy ISK (via Plex) doesn't keep others from participating. Everytime something like a cruiser gets a buff it makes it so low sp players newer to the game with less abilities to earn ISK in game can still participate in a role with those with far more ISK. (I started as one of those fabled tackling and target painting a HAC war target when still in my trial period ... what fun even though I certainly got popped after helping the crowd)


In my heart, I've been sort of sympathetic to SOMER ... I've seen the arguments of folks equating it to RMT but I figured "hey, guys are making some $ while promoting more net GTC sales for CCP via the well known and well proven human gambling urges/pleasures"

-- I have had some nagging misgivings but I thought most of them were related to the tawdryness of exploiting gambling YET, your post is helping clarify some other drifting worries I couldn't quite place.

My experience in the game has led me to feel that most $ > Ples > ISK buyers really were trying to Keep UP .. too busy with RL to farm or just not enjoying that part of the game. They used their $-ISK to fit the same ships that others in their corp/alliances farmed for. There were always a few ISK pinatas with faction fit T3s and slave but they were prizes, not corp mates.

With an otherwise unintended use of $ to get ISK items because people enjoy gambling. .. you up the "norm" "in-ships" in typical type corps. That could skew the fleet compositions in ways that undermine normal ISK earning (you helped me put a finger on that)

.

KIller Wabbit
MEME Thoughts
#320 - 2013-11-02 19:07:17 UTC
TigerXtrm wrote:
Oh for the love of god, when will you people stop complaining?

CCP has set a strict deadline. 10 days and then all incentives and rewards in return for the use of affiliate links are to be gone. That's it. Until then anyone is free to do whatever they like. Taking advantage of the time you have left is not rocket science, any reasonably smart person would do this. See the Amazon mess up, people took massive advantage of that because they knew it could end at any minute.


10 days were given... WTH CCP - expecting the postman to take that long to move a letter? Yeah, the fault is on CCP. 48Hours would have been more than enough compliance time.