These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Intergalactic Summit

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Intaki and the Federation

Author
Pieter Tuulinen
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#21 - 2013-11-01 20:47:03 UTC
Caellach Marellus wrote:
Evi Polevhia wrote:
Caellach Marellus wrote:
It's amazing what you'll sign when a doomsday device is within system-close proximity of the spiritual birthplace of the Federation.


It's amazing the lengths a culture will go to to reclaim the home they were forced out of.


Not really relevant in this discussion though is it? While it's all cause and effect there's already many topics that have been side tracked on that discussion.

The point is, you really think without the Shiigeru's presence, that the Federation would have signed the CEWPA?


It's slightly more likely than the chance of them signing the recent power-sharing deal on Caldari Prime without the phyrric victory to displace the Shiigeru and their failure to capture the surface.

For the first time since I started the conversation, he looks me dead in the eye. In his gaze are steel jackhammers, quiet vengeance, a hundred thousand orbital bombs frozen in still life.

Andreus Ixiris
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#22 - 2013-11-01 21:19:39 UTC
Pieter Tuulinen wrote:
It's slightly more likely than the chance of them signing the recent power-sharing deal on Caldari Prime without the phyrric victory to displace the Shiigeru and their failure to capture the surface.

Issues which would never have been there in the first place if our system hadn't been invaded.

And then all our other systems hadn't also been invaded.

Yeah, that's Heth's fault, sure, but the State has to bear some responsibility for Heth at some point.

Andreus Ixiris > A Civire without a chin is barely a Civire at all.

Pieter Tuulinen > He'd be Civirely disadvantaged, Andreus.

Andreus Ixiris > ...

Andreus Ixiris > This is why we're at war.

Bryen Verrisai
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#23 - 2013-11-01 21:26:40 UTC
Evi Polevhia wrote:

It's amazing the lengths a culture will go to to reclaim the home they were forced out of.

I sure hope it's just like how they remember it when they left.
Scherezad
Revenent Defence Corperation
Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
#24 - 2013-11-01 21:27:19 UTC
Andreus Ixiris wrote:
Pieter Tuulinen wrote:
It's slightly more likely than the chance of them signing the recent power-sharing deal on Caldari Prime without the phyrric victory to displace the Shiigeru and their failure to capture the surface.

Issues which would never have been there in the first place if our system hadn't been invaded.

And then all our other systems hadn't also been invaded.

Yeah, that's Heth's fault, sure, but the State has to bear some responsibility for Heth at some point.

I have a hard time remembering anything longer than a few hours ago, and I can remember this argument being made previously on these boards more than once. Must we do this every time?
Pieter Tuulinen
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#25 - 2013-11-01 22:05:24 UTC
Bryen Verrisai wrote:
Evi Polevhia wrote:

It's amazing the lengths a culture will go to to reclaim the home they were forced out of.

I sure hope it's just like how they remember it when they left.


It isn't. It will be.

For the first time since I started the conversation, he looks me dead in the eye. In his gaze are steel jackhammers, quiet vengeance, a hundred thousand orbital bombs frozen in still life.

Pieter Tuulinen
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#26 - 2013-11-01 22:06:34 UTC
Andreus Ixiris wrote:
Pieter Tuulinen wrote:
It's slightly more likely than the chance of them signing the recent power-sharing deal on Caldari Prime without the phyrric victory to displace the Shiigeru and their failure to capture the surface.

Issues which would never have been there in the first place if our system hadn't been invaded.

And then all our other systems hadn't also been invaded.

Yeah, that's Heth's fault, sure, but the State has to bear some responsibility for Heth at some point.


None of which would have happened if.... Ah, you know what, if you haven't understood even the bare and basic fact that the bombardment and invasion of home and the ethnic cleansing that followed is not ancient history for us, then there's really no point talking about this any further.

For the first time since I started the conversation, he looks me dead in the eye. In his gaze are steel jackhammers, quiet vengeance, a hundred thousand orbital bombs frozen in still life.

Constantin Baracca
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#27 - 2013-11-01 23:20:29 UTC
Scherezad wrote:
Andreus Ixiris wrote:
Pieter Tuulinen wrote:
It's slightly more likely than the chance of them signing the recent power-sharing deal on Caldari Prime without the phyrric victory to displace the Shiigeru and their failure to capture the surface.

Issues which would never have been there in the first place if our system hadn't been invaded.

And then all our other systems hadn't also been invaded.

Yeah, that's Heth's fault, sure, but the State has to bear some responsibility for Heth at some point.

I have a hard time remembering anything longer than a few hours ago, and I can remember this argument being made previously on these boards more than once. Must we do this every time?


Many people live by proxy through their racial identity, so their worldview becomes somewhat colored by racial and inter-imperial issues. It's easy to see the world through a lens you've become accustomed to because it's all very familiar, and to consistently bring up the same arguments of dissonance.

It's based on an inherent fallacy, that because an empire did something in the past, that every single member of that empire can be judged according to that act. Not only does that assume every single member of an empire is precisely the same and that they all agree with the act, but that even if they do that they agree with it for the same reasons.

For instance, Pieter and Diana Kim may both think the retaking of Caldari Prime is a is a gain that should be protected, but that is where the confluence of their opinions on the matter end. It isn't fair to judge every single person you meet from an empire on the absolute value of one issue.

None of which has anything to do with the Intaki secession argument, of course. Perhaps we should return to the subject matter of whether or not they should be autonomous. I believe the relevant point about the Federation and Caldari warfare is that the Intaki are largely in the war zone, which I wasn't personally aware of (my job would make visiting a factionalist warzone counterproductive). That does raise an interesting question. Has the Federation overstepped its role in signing a treaty that makes their space the primary warzone? Should the Intaki have more say in the matter if so many of them are in the line of fire?

Should the local people in a given CEWPA legislated warzone have more of a say in whether or not the war takes place in their backyard? After all, it's easy to claim unity when it isn't your family in the crosshairs. Should the Intaki have the authority to legislate and negotiate on their own behalf with the Caldari in order to end the war, if Intaki faces a legitimate threat of occupation?

"What good will it be for someone to gain the whole world, yet forfeit their soul? Or what can anyone give in exchange for their soul?"

-Matthew 16:26

GoGo Yubari
PAK
#28 - 2013-11-02 08:51:05 UTC
Andreus Ixiris wrote:

Every time the Federation attempts "pan-national concern," it's cricitcised for meddling in the affairs of others. Every time the Federation concerns itself with "national interest, "it's accused of dereliction of duty. Every time the Federation adopts an "actively militaristic posture" (in this case, one of self-defence against unprovoked aggression) it's lambasted for some sort of fundamental failing.

You can't have your cake and eat it.

Yes, exactly. That is the problem with the current aims of the Federation.

Andreus Ixiris wrote:

Mordu's Legion haven't changed the state of the Intaki system one bit. The security status remains the same, Serpentis still infest the asteroid belts and deadspace complexes and the Legion was conspicuously absent during the two Sansha incursions of YC 112. But you know who wasn't? The FDU and Federal loyalists.

Indeed, the security status remains the same, with the Federal Navy gone. That is hardy a harsh criticism of Mordu's Legion. As for the Sansha, they've been a major problem in the cluster for a good while now, with capsuleers being the ones to deal with their incursions.

Andreus Ixiris wrote:

"Belligerent faction?" The State attacked us. Twice. Lest you forget, it also attacked and occupied Intaki.

The roots of the conflict between the State and Federation are of course long and much debated, even in this very thread. Looking past the current conflict, let me ask why could the Caldari simply not leave the Federation and become their own sovereign power? Why did the Hueremont Doctrine have to label them as criminals to be hounded, instead of past allies to establish strong links with? This succeeded in breaking the unity of the human sphere for good, instead of seeking to do the work for which the Federation existed and to repair the damage done. Perhaps the sign that some of its member-states were seceding or considering to secede was a sign that changes needed to be made in order to address their concerns and become more inclusive, instead of trying to retain signatories through military and punitive measures.

Changes were made, but instead of addressing the issues at hand the Federation became a power for itself and thus more centralized. The influence of member-states was diminished as a threat and dealing with external entities through military means became par for the course instead of attempting to create the harmonious galactic society that had been its driving vision. The baby had been thrown out with the bath water.

Of course, this is all ancient history by now, but the problem is that there seems to be a commitment in the Federation to continuing the age old rivalry with the Caldari by clinging to the mistakes of the past, instead of a commitment to bringing the conflict to an end.

Aelisha wrote:

Furthermore, Andreus Ixiris has provided a critical deconstruction of your posts that I am in agreement with in the vein of general logic; you have stooped to revisionist history and a misreading of the political situation present and past between the Federation and State to construct a favorable case for your ideology. I support Andreus' reading of your work in this instance, not out of love for the Federation, but in the interests of bringing the real issues of Intaki secession to light, if not in the region of Placid, then at least in the dissolution of the bar on Syndicate Intaki colonization.

By and large I wait to see this critical deconstruction of the posts made. Some of Andreus' points were addressed above, but as far as I can see not many facts were in fact in contention. Instead, he defends the status quo and current vision of the Federation were I presented a more critical appraisal of past and current times.

Just calling it revisionist history doesn't make it so.

Also, understand that the simple statements in history books hide complex truths.

Aelisha wrote:

Perspective, reasoning and a focus on reconciliation will gather more momentum for the cause of an Independent Intaki state than the erroneous and misleading rhetoric displayed by the original poster.

It is interesting to note that the posts that started this thread have solely been taken to be arguments for Intaki separatism and independence. Perhaps this is the legacy of an ideology connected to my name. Yet, quite clearly my conclusions in the text also considered an other alternative.

Love by nature. Live by luck. Kill by profession.

GoGo Yubari
PAK
#29 - 2013-11-02 09:13:47 UTC  |  Edited by: GoGo Yubari
Constantin Baracca wrote:

We have our faith and, in lieu of faith, the Federation has politics. Their politics, like our faith, may not ever be carried out perfectly, for men are fallible creatures. But there's nothing wrong with rallying around something that works in an ideal world and then working towards the ideal.

That is essentially what the Gallente Federation is. The Church of Democracy.

It is true that the requirements for democracy and universal suffrage are inscribed into the Federal Charter. This necessity makes the Federation incompatible with the Caldari State and the Amarr Empire, thus causing a failing of its original mandate of bringing humanity together. Yet the Federation gives tacit approval to these powers by its affiliation to CONCORD. It sets a double standard for itself there.

Perhaps the promotion of democracy would be best served through best practices and inclusive behavior. Instead, the Federation attempts to hermetically seal its democracy from interstellar society at large and by building these borders sets itself irreconcilably at odds with other ideologies. If it is indeed the Church of Democracy could it do a better job of preaching if it did not shut out the unbeliever?

Stitcher wrote:

What would independence buy them? Well, for starters they'd become a lone system, an independent enclave encysted within and surrounded by the Federation, meaning that all interstellar trade would have to cross Federation borders and be subject to their laws. Intaki would need to find a naval force to replace the fact that they're covered by the same kind of FedNav response fleet that dealt with the Kador assault. I doubt the system itself has the resources to build stargates to other territories and bypass Federation borders. Independence from the Federation would gain them nothing, and lose them much.

Any formulation of Intaki sovereignty might very well encompass more worlds than simply the homeworld. The history described in the first posts provides the clear de jure basis for this.

Andrea Okazon wrote:

I think the OP's history reminds us of something quite interesting, actually, which is that the Federation (as originally conceived) is an idea whose time has passed -- though I believe it is an idea whose time will come again.

I'm not talking about democratic liberalism, but about the idea of ecumenical interplanetary government. When the Federation was conceived, it was a "light touch" -- a very limited government intended to safeguard the interests of its members, who retained political autonomy (and who, to a significant extent, still do).

The idea that the Federation was destined to be a meeting place for all humanity was an expression of ignorance, not arrogance. We did not know that the Amarr had already returned to space. We had uncertain evidence that interplanetary forms of "identity" were even sustainable over the long term.

The transformation -- some would say corruption -- of the original minimally-interventionist, non-military Federation into its current form is the result of many things, but clearly the external pressure of a strongly centralized, expansionist and incommensurable interplanetary government (the Amarr) played a large part, even in the absence of open warfare.

Good points and indeed the idea's time has come through CONCORD. This has placed the Federation in a strange position. The question is that does the Federation serve any purpose by defending its current situation and developing a strategy for national advantage that is antagonistic to the other powers. Perhaps it could work to become an expression or extension of CONCORD, or a new form of expression based on the same idea.

Constantin Baracca wrote:

None of which has anything to do with the Intaki secession argument, of course. Perhaps we should return to the subject matter of whether or not they should be autonomous. I believe the relevant point about the Federation and Caldari warfare is that the Intaki are largely in the war zone, which I wasn't personally aware of (my job would make visiting a factionalist warzone counterproductive). That does raise an interesting question. Has the Federation overstepped its role in signing a treaty that makes their space the primary warzone? Should the Intaki have more say in the matter if so many of them are in the line of fire?

Should the local people in a given CEWPA legislated warzone have more of a say in whether or not the war takes place in their backyard? After all, it's easy to claim unity when it isn't your family in the crosshairs. Should the Intaki have the authority to legislate and negotiate on their own behalf with the Caldari in order to end the war, if Intaki faces a legitimate threat of occupation?

While questions of Intaki sovereignty and secession are entirely fitting for the discussion at hand, I should note again that these are not the only concerns raised here.

The Intaki Assembly does in fact have more than a little say in these issues, I should add. It allowed them to make the S&S (Shipping & Security) deal with Ishukone and Mordu's Legion, which have played no small part in helping the homeworl in dealing with the war. Ideal it is not, but neither is it insignificant.

Love by nature. Live by luck. Kill by profession.

Etienne Saissore
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#30 - 2013-11-02 09:38:36 UTC
I understand the appeal and even longing for the traditional lifestyle. This sentiment exists also among the ethnic Gallente, there are various associations dedicated to preservation of the history and the interest in these matters frequently finds an expression in various anachronistic events.

Intaki have a very unique and interesting culture and its continuation and maintenance are worthy goals which I can fully support.

However, I am not convinced that the proponents of secession talk for all the people of Intaki origin. Let us look at a short list of CEO's of a few Federal corporations:

Federal Administration: Agenbaert Goisin
Federation Customs: Blayme Eyghotelle
University of Caille: Carbircelle Habiniestan
Scope: Herirlier Allerchel
Bank of Luminaire: Larcacraine Palere
Material Acquisition: Ontre Ildrie
Egonics: Penille Ampaert
Federal Marines: General Barset Fait
Crux Special Tasks Group: Jani Pier Theisant

I could also add the current head of the Senate, Aulmont Meis, and the former president Souro Foiritan to this list. All these extremely talented Intakis have risen to important positions of leadership in a scale which is difficult to fathom. These Intaki are key actors in the Union, they are the face and backbone of the Federation.

It seems to me that any divergent roads there might be, lie primarily within the Intaki community itself.
Andreus Ixiris
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#31 - 2013-11-02 10:38:15 UTC
No, **** it. You're just presenting precisely the same criticisms you were before and calling it a rebuttal.

Andreus Ixiris > A Civire without a chin is barely a Civire at all.

Pieter Tuulinen > He'd be Civirely disadvantaged, Andreus.

Andreus Ixiris > ...

Andreus Ixiris > This is why we're at war.

GoGo Yubari
PAK
#32 - 2013-11-02 10:46:46 UTC  |  Edited by: GoGo Yubari
Andreus Ixiris wrote:
No, **** it. You're just presenting precisely the same criticisms you were before and calling it a rebuttal.

There wasn't much to rebut. You claimed Mordu's Legion is doing a bad job and asserted that the Federation isn't the belligerent party in the current war.

Love by nature. Live by luck. Kill by profession.

Andreus Ixiris
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#33 - 2013-11-02 10:51:57 UTC
GoGo Yubari wrote:
There wasn't much to rebut. You claimed Mordu's Legion is doing a bad job and asserted that the Federation isn't the belligerent party in the current war.

I claimed a lot more than that but you're selectively ignoring the points I was making, as most seccessionalists do. And for your information, I never claimed Mordu's Legion was doing a "bad" job unless the Federal Navy were also doing a "bad" job, because the situation has clearly not improved since Mordu's Legion took over. This is what I was pointing out - if you're reading "the Mordu's Legion is doing a bad job" from that, well, you must have been thinking it too. And incidentally, the Federal Navy, as the previous security contractor, had a very specific mandate not to interfere with the Intaki system any more than was aboslutely neccessary because this was a clause written into the Federation's founding charter itself. The Mordu's Legion are bound by no such obligation, and yet haven't improved the situation in Intaki one bit.

Meanwhile, the Federation is not the belligerent in the current war. This isn't really a matter for debate.

Andreus Ixiris > A Civire without a chin is barely a Civire at all.

Pieter Tuulinen > He'd be Civirely disadvantaged, Andreus.

Andreus Ixiris > ...

Andreus Ixiris > This is why we're at war.

Veikitamo Gesakaarin
Doomheim
#34 - 2013-11-02 11:02:29 UTC
Andreus Ixiris wrote:


Meanwhile, the Federation is not the belligerent in the current war. This isn't really a matter for debate.


One might ask what the Federation seeks to accomplish by continuing its belligerence against the Caldari State. A nominal two party framework has established what may be an answer to the Caldari Prime Question that is fair and equitable to both Federation and State -- which was always the core reason for the 108 invasion.

Kurilaivonen|Concern

GoGo Yubari
PAK
#35 - 2013-11-02 11:06:47 UTC  |  Edited by: GoGo Yubari
Andreus Ixiris wrote:
GoGo Yubari wrote:
There wasn't much to rebut. You claimed Mordu's Legion is doing a bad job and asserted that the Federation isn't the belligerent party in the current war.

I claimed a lot more than that but you're selectively ignoring the points I was making, as most seccessionalists do. And for your information, I never claimed Mordu's Legion was doing a "bad" job unless the Federal Navy were also doing a "bad" job, because the situation has clearly not improved since Mordu's Legion took over. This is what I was pointing out - if you're reading "the Mordu's Legion is doing a bad job" from that, well, you must have been thinking it too. And incidentally, the Federal Navy, as the previous security contractor, had a very specific mandate not to interfere with the Intaki system any more than was aboslutely neccessary because this was a clause written into the Federation's founding charter itself. The Mordu's Legion are bound by no such obligation, and yet haven't improved the situation in Intaki one bit.

Meanwhile, the Federation is not the belligerent in the current war. This isn't really a matter for debate.

I understand why you brand me secessionist based on an appraisal of ... ahh, my earlier activities, but this piece of writing was not really pro-secession at all really, outside of recognizing the concept.

Re-reading your initial reply, you really didn't make more claims that remain unaddressed. You said something about not being able to have and eat your cake to which I agreed. We can apparently agree on the role of Mordu's Legion as well, while the fact remains that they have in fact done more for the system in recent times than the Federal Navy, because the Federal Navy have not done anything at all, as per the S&S deal recognized by Federal law. We can disagree on the nature of belligerency in the Caldari-Gallente conflict, which I see not simply as a question of who started it, but also regarding the commitment to continuing the war. There was also an additional "fun fact", which my initial posting did not argue against at all.

Love by nature. Live by luck. Kill by profession.

Marnian Veroe
National Republican Party
#36 - 2013-11-02 11:10:09 UTC  |  Edited by: Marnian Veroe
Seriphyn Inhonores wrote:
More capsuleers should really consider the purpose of the modern day Federation. If it's no longer what it set out to be, what is it? Why not ditch the culturally-biased (some would say) Constitution in favour of a far looser confederacy of the different states? We can retain the central military and economic policy, but is the central constitutional framework necessary if it'll just cause tension?


Are you crazy ? The central government is already weak enough to allow most low security worlds to be pillaged and burned by that proxy war. And they have to deal with that alone, and do not even have the right to vote any longer since the Federation has become the embodiment of double standards (core world against rim worlds).

A decentralization would only mean less national cohesion, a giant mess, without speaking about what I would call a liberal orgy where every federal state can do as they please, thus increasing in-between federal worlds tension, feuds, and resentment. Core worlds would be even more indifferent to the situation in the border zones and everyone would soon be left to their very own.

The Federal Constitution is the very last thing everyone would call biased. It already lets too much leverage to every member state, does not recognize ethnicity in its own terms but federal identity, and as shown in recent cases again with the Midular assassination and that Brutor self defense, ruled out objectively and with admirable rationality, true to its own beliefs. Where is the bias ? The only bias comes from core world senators that form a majority and started to slowly choke rim worlds by removing them the right to vote and the right to be defended by sacrifying them to the CEWPA.

I loathe your ivory tower mentality, general. When I think you once swore an oath to protect all the Federation, no matter the state, no matter the world and the ethnicity, and now that I read of this... It is no wonder that you resigned from the military. What a waste.

People should remember senator Celes Aguard, that I fully support.
Andreus Ixiris
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#37 - 2013-11-02 12:12:57 UTC
Veikitamo Gesakaarin wrote:
One might ask what the Federation seeks to accomplish by continuing its belligerence against the Caldari State. A nominal two party framework has established what may be an answer to the Caldari Prime Question that is fair and equitable to both Federation and State -- which was always the core reason for the 108 invasion.

One might ask the State the same question.

GoGo Yubari wrote:
Re-reading your initial reply, you really didn't make more claims that remain unaddressed. You said something about not being able to have and eat your cake to which I agreed. We can apparently agree on the role of Mordu's Legion as well, while the fact remains that they have in fact done more for the system in recent times than the Federal Navy, because the Federal Navy have not done anything at all, as per the S&S deal recognized by Federal law.

"What have the Federal Navy ever done for us?"
"Yeah, those shiftless layabouts! What a waste of our tax dollars! It's like they're not even the security contractors for this system or something!"
"..."
"... oh wait."

No, the fact remains that the Mordu's Legion have not done more for the system in recent times than the Federal Navy. They've done precisely the same and not one iota more. The system has not fallen into CONCORD-unsupervised 0.0 anarchy. Good work, Mordu's Legion! You have done exactly enough work so as not to fail at your job. The only noticeable change in the entire system is that there are Legion starships loitering around the Intaki V station that disgruntled, tetchy capsuleers can shoot at.

Andreus Ixiris > A Civire without a chin is barely a Civire at all.

Pieter Tuulinen > He'd be Civirely disadvantaged, Andreus.

Andreus Ixiris > ...

Andreus Ixiris > This is why we're at war.

Veikitamo Gesakaarin
Doomheim
#38 - 2013-11-02 12:25:52 UTC
Andreus Ixiris wrote:
Veikitamo Gesakaarin wrote:
One might ask what the Federation seeks to accomplish by continuing its belligerence against the Caldari State. A nominal two party framework has established what may be an answer to the Caldari Prime Question that is fair and equitable to both Federation and State -- which was always the core reason for the 108 invasion.

One might ask the State the same question.



The answer I arrive at is the defense of State citizens and territory against the depredations of the Roden Administration and men such as Mentas Blaque who would seek to prolong the war through continued military belligerence since the current state of CEWPA limited conflict serves both their economic and political interests.

Kurilaivonen|Concern

GoGo Yubari
PAK
#39 - 2013-11-02 12:31:18 UTC  |  Edited by: GoGo Yubari
Andreus Ixiris wrote:

No, the fact remains that the Mordu's Legion have not done more for the system in recent times than the Federal Navy. They've done precisely the same and not one iota more. The system has not fallen into CONCORD-unsupervised 0.0 anarchy. Good work, Mordu's Legion! You have done exactly enough work so as not to fail at your job. The only noticeable change in the entire system is that there are Legion starships loitering around the Intaki V station that disgruntled, tetchy capsuleers can shoot at.


Look, we're actually not disagreeing on much here, so please put aside the caustic rhetoric. The underlined part is where the facts disagree with your viewpoint. Might be just semantic confusion.

After Intaki switched to Caldari sovereignty the S&S agreement was re-negotiated and has remained in force after the system's return into the Federation. So, earlier the Federal Navy handled system defense as in most Federation systems. After the change, Mordu's Legion has handled it. Yes, they have done the same task, while the Navy has not done anything recently, because they are contractually not obligated and in fact not allowed. This has been the point all along which can be referenced by actually reading the original post.

Love by nature. Live by luck. Kill by profession.

Cosmo Cyrano
October Country
#40 - 2013-11-02 12:42:24 UTC
GoGo Yubari wrote:
We can disagree on the nature of belligerency in the Caldari-Gallente conflict, which I see not simply as a question of who started it, but also regarding the commitment to continuing the war.


I don't reckon we need to wonder much about that while Roden is in charge. Him and the rest of his mates are going to be raking in ISK as long as they can drag it out.

I don't suppose it occurred to anyone, but the fact that the Fed Navy and now Mordus are both doing much the same job in security despite the heavy..wossit? (disparity!) in all their resources just might have something to do with the orders and brief they get from the Assembly?

If Intaki is a low security backwater, its because the Assembly want it to be a low security backwater.