These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Intergalactic Summit

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

[NEWS] “Operation Highlander” documents released, implicate Federation in widespread spying

Author
Lyn Farel
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#121 - 2013-10-28 19:44:32 UTC
Pieter Tuulinen wrote:
Ah, but there WAS a way out of that, Lyn. At least two that I can think of and the Federation picked the harder of the two.


I am curious to hear more about those two ways out of it that are not about armed conflict.

Do you mean that one is surrendering the planet ? If so, then as Mr Marellus said above, then one of the ways for the Caldari to get out of the deal 200 years ago was to surrender and comply to the law of the charter they signed, before trying to remove themselves from the system.
Makkal Hanaya
Revenent Defence Corperation
#122 - 2013-10-28 19:51:25 UTC  |  Edited by: Makkal Hanaya
Frencai Ayan wrote:
The Ni-Kunni societies before the coming of the Amarr built civilizations on a world hardly meant to sustain even the simplest of life. It is through great perseverance and ingenuity that we created the world we did, and it is a testament to the Ni-Kunni spirit that we managed to do even that.

When you look to how far we came in the time we had before we were invaded, with what we had to work with, you should look with pride.

Had we the easy conditions of the Amarr Prime settlers, there is little doubt in my mind that we would today stand as one of the greatest nations in the cluster. Sadly, as it was, one could only do so much with so very little resources. We found an equilibrium of survival by building a relationship with our world and our gods - until it was torn apart.

Someone is sticking the warp before the align.

You developed an ingenious and tenacious culture because your people found themselves on an inhospitable world. Same as the ethnic Caldari. If you had been on a different planet, you would have developed a different culture.

I doubt very much that the Ni-Kunni would have developed into a great nation if they'd been set down on Athra.

Violca Kari wrote:
I won't pretend that we, as a whole, would be better off had we been left to our own devices - we likely would not have even figured out basic atmospheric flight yet - but only the deluded and indoctrinated can say, with any sort of straight face, that such an "uplifting" was "good" for us.


Yes. What good is access to modern technology, services, and infrastructure when you have to face the horror of working in the service sector?

The average Ni-Kunni lives like a king compared to their pre-contact counterpart, but naturally none of them could call that a good thing with a straight face.

Render unto Khanid the things which are Khanid's; and unto God the things that are God's.

Andreus Ixiris
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#123 - 2013-10-28 20:03:49 UTC
Makkal Hanaya wrote:
I doubt very much that the Ni-Kunni would have developed into a great nation if they'd been set down on Athra.

Why not? After all, the Athrans did.

Are you perhaps spuriously implying Athrans have some sort of innate genetic or intellectual superiority?

Andreus Ixiris > A Civire without a chin is barely a Civire at all.

Pieter Tuulinen > He'd be Civirely disadvantaged, Andreus.

Andreus Ixiris > ...

Andreus Ixiris > This is why we're at war.

Anslo
Scope Works
#124 - 2013-10-28 20:15:33 UTC
Andreus Ixiris wrote:
Makkal Hanaya wrote:
I doubt very much that the Ni-Kunni would have developed into a great nation if they'd been set down on Athra.

Why not? After all, the Athrans did.

Are you perhaps spuriously implying Athrans have some sort of innate genetic or intellectual superiority?


This is a new thing?...

[center]-_For the Proveldtariat_/-[/center]

Andreus Ixiris
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#125 - 2013-10-28 20:20:17 UTC
Makkal's one of these neo-Amarrian charlatans like Baracca, trying to put a kinder, gentler face on the Amarrian religion without actually changing any of the things that put "having a kinder, gentler face" so high on the list of requirements for modern proselytisation in the first place.

Andreus Ixiris > A Civire without a chin is barely a Civire at all.

Pieter Tuulinen > He'd be Civirely disadvantaged, Andreus.

Andreus Ixiris > ...

Andreus Ixiris > This is why we're at war.

Anslo
Scope Works
#126 - 2013-10-28 20:24:21 UTC
Andreus Ixiris wrote:
Makkal's one of these neo-Amarrian charlatans like Baracca, trying to put a kinder, gentler face on the Amarrian religion without actually changing any of the things that put "having a kinder, gentler face" so high on the list of requirements for modern proselytisation in the first place.

OK...so they're trying not to be dicks like their counterparts. Why do they deserve to be berated for this?

[center]-_For the Proveldtariat_/-[/center]

Zsaryna Adrelana
Imperial Shipment
Amarr Empire
#127 - 2013-10-28 20:33:06 UTC
It is a strange day when I find myself agreeing with the Lady of Blades about anything. However, speaking as one of the 'indoctrinated'. I am rather glad we were taken in by the Amarrians. Our homeworld was not capable of sustaining us unless we were assisted and given a leg up by someone and the Amarrians got there first. The Amarrians did not have to provide us aid as they did. They did not have to let the first Ad-Drelana take up the mantle of service in the Navy but they did. They did not have to provide us with the tools we needed to survive on our homeworld, but they did. They did not have to emancipate us, but they did. The Amarrians leashed us, kept us bound until we were ready to take our place among the peoples of the cluster.

The Ni-Kunni have served the Empire proudly for a thousand years. We have sold their goods, we have fought in their wars and we have done mighty deeds that we could not have accomplished if left to our own devices. We stand astride the cluster now, spreading our goods and services to the furthest star under the Imperial banner. What would we have accomplished without the Amarrians and their god exactly? Marooned in the middle of a hostile sea of gold to be crushed by our own homeworld and its climate? We would have clawed our way skywards to be shot out of the sky by Imperial forces. The Caldari had the technology to forge their own way, we did not. So for that I am thankful to the Amarrians that they have uplifted us to the stars and moulded us into an image that is (mostly) respectable.

I do this for many reasons. I do it because I believe it is right. I do it because I will profit by it. These all consolidate into one reason: I do it because I can.

Andreus Ixiris
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#128 - 2013-10-28 21:01:19 UTC  |  Edited by: Andreus Ixiris
Anslo wrote:
OK...so they're trying not to be dicks like their counterparts. Why do they deserve to be berated for this?

You clearly didn't read my post, Anslo.

They haven't changed anything fundamental about their beliefs - they've simply replaced supercilous arrogance with self-assured condescension. All it's done is replaced "you will kneel now" with "in time, you'll kneel." It's no less dangerous, just insidious rather than obvious. They still want the world to change to accomodate their beliefs, rather than trying to change their beliefs to fit the world, and they still can't conceive of the fact that some people don't want their religion and never will. They're just willing to lie, cheat and steal in the dark, rather than murder, torture and pillage in the open - and in that way I actually respect them less than unapologetic thugs like PIE Inc. At least PIE has never claimed to be anything else.

Andreus Ixiris > A Civire without a chin is barely a Civire at all.

Pieter Tuulinen > He'd be Civirely disadvantaged, Andreus.

Andreus Ixiris > ...

Andreus Ixiris > This is why we're at war.

Pieter Tuulinen
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#129 - 2013-10-28 21:08:48 UTC
Lyn Farel wrote:
Pieter Tuulinen wrote:
Ah, but there WAS a way out of that, Lyn. At least two that I can think of and the Federation picked the harder of the two.


I am curious to hear more about those two ways out of it that are not about armed conflict.

Do you mean that one is surrendering the planet ? If so, then as Mr Marellus said above, then one of the ways for the Caldari to get out of the deal 200 years ago was to surrender and comply to the law of the charter they signed, before trying to remove themselves from the system.


One of these days I really must starve you, beat you, put a gun to the heads of your family and have you sign a piece of paper giving me your home in perpetuity. Perhaps then you'll understand why a contract signed under duress is not binding.

Surrendering something that is not yours should not be considered an onerous requirement, Lyn. I know it's a nice planet, I'm quite fond of it myself, but it isn't yours and I'm not thrilled at the idea of you deciding who can live there.

For the first time since I started the conversation, he looks me dead in the eye. In his gaze are steel jackhammers, quiet vengeance, a hundred thousand orbital bombs frozen in still life.

Silas Vitalia
Doomheim
#130 - 2013-10-28 21:17:53 UTC
Pieter Tuulinen wrote:
a contract signed under duress is not binding.



Leverage, dear!


Am I to assume none of the Megas achieved market share without....aggressive contracts at some point?

Guns to heads, metaphorical and otherwise.

Sabik now, Sabik forever

Anslo
Scope Works
#131 - 2013-10-28 21:19:56 UTC
Andreus Ixiris wrote:
Anslo wrote:
OK...so they're trying not to be dicks like their counterparts. Why do they deserve to be berated for this?

You clearly didn't read my post, Anslo.

They haven't changed anything fundamental about their beliefs - they've simply replaced supercilous arrogance with self-assured condescension. All it's done is replaced "you will kneel now" with "in time, you'll kneel." It's no less dangerous, just insidious rather than obvious. They still want the world to change to accomodate their beliefs, rather than trying to change their beliefs to fit the world, and they still can't conceive of the fact that some people don't want their religion and never will. They're just willing to lie, cheat and steal in the dark, rather than murder, torture and pillage in the open - and in that way I actually respect them less than unapologetic thugs like PIE Inc. At least PIE has never claimed to be anything else.


And the Federation is completely, 100% not guilty of its own BS?

[center]-_For the Proveldtariat_/-[/center]

Caellach Marellus
Stormcrows
#132 - 2013-10-28 21:29:09 UTC
Pieter Tuulinen wrote:
Lyn Farel wrote:
Pieter Tuulinen wrote:
Ah, but there WAS a way out of that, Lyn. At least two that I can think of and the Federation picked the harder of the two.


I am curious to hear more about those two ways out of it that are not about armed conflict.

Do you mean that one is surrendering the planet ? If so, then as Mr Marellus said above, then one of the ways for the Caldari to get out of the deal 200 years ago was to surrender and comply to the law of the charter they signed, before trying to remove themselves from the system.


One of these days I really must starve you, beat you, put a gun to the heads of your family and have you sign a piece of paper giving me your home in perpetuity. Perhaps then you'll understand why a contract signed under duress is not binding.


Why not go the whole hog and hold it ransom by pointing a doomsday weapon at their home world, and demanding people who have actually lived there the past 200 years leave..

Oh wait.



On the alternative they could have paid the compensation due on those colonies they tried to hide from the rest of the Federation, then seceeded peacefully. The State tried to get out of their part of the deal of being in the Federation (something every other member state paid their fair share of) and then secceed afterwards having not tried to cheat everyone else at the table, as opposed to thinking they could flaunt rules and break agreements, and that no comeuppance or backlash were due.

Ego lead to the choice to bite off more than they could chew, but it wasn't the only option they had, and they certainly weren't under duress of the like when they made it.

When your gut instincts tell you something is wrong, trust them. When your heart tells you something is right, ignore it, check with your brain first. Accept nothing, challenge everything.

Jinari Otsito
Otsito Mining and Manufacture
#133 - 2013-10-28 21:31:39 UTC
Anslo wrote:
Andreus Ixiris wrote:
Anslo wrote:
OK...so they're trying not to be dicks like their counterparts. Why do they deserve to be berated for this?

You clearly didn't read my post, Anslo.

They haven't changed anything fundamental about their beliefs - they've simply replaced supercilous arrogance with self-assured condescension. All it's done is replaced "you will kneel now" with "in time, you'll kneel." It's no less dangerous, just insidious rather than obvious. They still want the world to change to accomodate their beliefs, rather than trying to change their beliefs to fit the world, and they still can't conceive of the fact that some people don't want their religion and never will. They're just willing to lie, cheat and steal in the dark, rather than murder, torture and pillage in the open - and in that way I actually respect them less than unapologetic thugs like PIE Inc. At least PIE has never claimed to be anything else.


And the Federation is completely, 100% not guilty of its own BS?


Of course it is, like everyone else. The sins of one doesn't absolve the other, though. Nor does the insidious threat of the faithful invalidate the open threat of the war machine. Both are problematic at the very best of days, and either are ignored only at significant peril.

Why do people always respond to statements illuminating flaws, threats or problems with "yeah but X is dangerous, greedy, flawed, this and that too!" as if it somehow cancels out the initial subject?

Prime Node. Ask me about augmentation.

Andreus Ixiris
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#134 - 2013-10-28 21:31:45 UTC  |  Edited by: Andreus Ixiris
Anslo wrote:
And the Federation is completely, 100% not guilty of its own BS?

No matter how hard you and Seriphyn try to seal yourselves away in your little 100% relativist bubbles, Anslo, you won't always be able to deflect criticism away from nations you don't owe loyalty to by bringing up the flaws of a nation you do. Show some godsdamned national pride for once. The Federation is about as far from perfect as we can get - people like Thoun Gaterau and Mentas Blaque clearly attest to that - but for heavens' sake we're still a damn sight better than the other three, and better than the Amarr by the largest margin - and lest you think otherwise, the other nations would hardly stop claiming to be the best even if we did so ourselves.

Not every foreigner is a threat to the Federation. We pride oureselves on being able to recognise that. But some most definitely are, and not all of them are, like Rodj Blake, kind enough to wave a giant, brightly-coloured flag with the words "I AM A THREAT TO THE FEDERATION" emblazoned on it. Tolerance, acceptance and integration are a good thing, but the sensible Federal citizen realises that there is a limit to all of them.

Andreus Ixiris > A Civire without a chin is barely a Civire at all.

Pieter Tuulinen > He'd be Civirely disadvantaged, Andreus.

Andreus Ixiris > ...

Andreus Ixiris > This is why we're at war.

Pieter Tuulinen
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#135 - 2013-10-28 21:45:05 UTC
Caellach Marellus wrote:
Pieter Tuulinen wrote:
Lyn Farel wrote:
Pieter Tuulinen wrote:
Ah, but there WAS a way out of that, Lyn. At least two that I can think of and the Federation picked the harder of the two.


I am curious to hear more about those two ways out of it that are not about armed conflict.

Do you mean that one is surrendering the planet ? If so, then as Mr Marellus said above, then one of the ways for the Caldari to get out of the deal 200 years ago was to surrender and comply to the law of the charter they signed, before trying to remove themselves from the system.


One of these days I really must starve you, beat you, put a gun to the heads of your family and have you sign a piece of paper giving me your home in perpetuity. Perhaps then you'll understand why a contract signed under duress is not binding.


Why not go the whole hog and hold it ransom by pointing a doomsday weapon at their home world, and demanding people who have actually lived there the past 200 years leave..

Oh wait.



On the alternative they could have paid the compensation due on those colonies they tried to hide from the rest of the Federation, then seceeded peacefully. The State tried to get out of their part of the deal of being in the Federation (something every other member state paid their fair share of) and then secceed afterwards having not tried to cheat everyone else at the table, as opposed to thinking they could flaunt rules and break agreements, and that no comeuppance or backlash were due.

Ego lead to the choice to bite off more than they could chew, but it wasn't the only option they had, and they certainly weren't under duress of the like when they made it.


I know! Isn't it absolutely appalling that we had to go to that sort of extreme to get your attention? I'll gladly give Heth full blame for not negotiating a settlement once we had the Titan in orbit (for five years!) but the fact that we had to invade at all? That's on the Federation, I'm afraid.

To avoid circular argument, where I simply repeat everything I've said before, I will go so far as to simply point out that between you, Lyn and yourself managed to take the position that the State ought to have both surrendered it's home planet AND given over it's new colonies before leaving the Federation.

No. Now, why don't you go join the conversation where you lambast the Amarrians for being oppressive and unreasonable overlords?

For the first time since I started the conversation, he looks me dead in the eye. In his gaze are steel jackhammers, quiet vengeance, a hundred thousand orbital bombs frozen in still life.

Jinari Otsito
Otsito Mining and Manufacture
#136 - 2013-10-28 21:49:07 UTC
Surrender your tribes, clans and kin. Surrender your colonies and your homes. Surrender.

I suppose there's a twisted and foul logic in there being peace once the tyrant powers to be rule all undisputed, but I don't think I'd find that peace palatable.

Prime Node. Ask me about augmentation.

Caellach Marellus
Stormcrows
#137 - 2013-10-28 21:52:06 UTC
Pieter Tuulinen wrote:

To avoid circular argument, where I simply repeat everything I've said before, I will go so far as to simply point out that between you, Lyn and yourself managed to take the position that the State ought to have both surrendered it's home planet AND given over it's new colonies before leaving the Federation.

No. Now, why don't you go join the conversation where you lambast the Amarrians for being oppressive and unreasonable overlords?


Erm, that's not what I said, it might be what you think I said, or hope I said, because it's a point you can argue against.

But it's not what I said.

When your gut instincts tell you something is wrong, trust them. When your heart tells you something is right, ignore it, check with your brain first. Accept nothing, challenge everything.

Fredfredbug4
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#138 - 2013-10-28 21:53:57 UTC
Caellach Marellus wrote:


Why not go the whole hog and hold it ransom by pointing a doomsday weapon at their home world, and demanding people who have actually lived there the past 200 years leave..

Oh wait.



On the alternative they could have paid the compensation due on those colonies they tried to hide from the rest of the Federation, then seceeded peacefully. The State tried to get out of their part of the deal of being in the Federation (something every other member state paid their fair share of) and then secceed afterwards having not tried to cheat everyone else at the table, as opposed to thinking they could flaunt rules and break agreements, and that no comeuppance or backlash were due.

Ego lead to the choice to bite off more than they could chew, but it wasn't the only option they had, and they certainly weren't under duress of the like when they made it.


I believe you are oversimplifying history. Attempts at peaceful secession were underway. War hungry U-Nats were looking for the first chance to stop it they could find. When terrorist destroyed Nouvelle Rouvenor, they felt that was a valid reason to commence the attack.


Watch_ Fred Fred Frederation_ and stop [u]cryptozoologist[/u]! Fight against the brutal genocide of fictional creatures across New Eden! Is that a metaphor? Probably not, but the fru-fru- people will sure love it!

Caellach Marellus
Stormcrows
#139 - 2013-10-28 21:57:56 UTC  |  Edited by: Caellach Marellus
Fredfredbug4 wrote:
Caellach Marellus wrote:


Why not go the whole hog and hold it ransom by pointing a doomsday weapon at their home world, and demanding people who have actually lived there the past 200 years leave..

Oh wait.



On the alternative they could have paid the compensation due on those colonies they tried to hide from the rest of the Federation, then seceeded peacefully. The State tried to get out of their part of the deal of being in the Federation (something every other member state paid their fair share of) and then secceed afterwards having not tried to cheat everyone else at the table, as opposed to thinking they could flaunt rules and break agreements, and that no comeuppance or backlash were due.

Ego lead to the choice to bite off more than they could chew, but it wasn't the only option they had, and they certainly weren't under duress of the like when they made it.


I believe you are oversimplifying history. Attempts at peaceful secession were underway. War hungry U-Nats were looking for the first chance to stop it they could find. When terrorist destroyed Nouvelle Rouvenor, they felt that was a valid reason to commence the attack.


Not at all, it needed to never even go that far, the blockades, the ethnic cleansing ground side, all of it, could have all been avoided long, long before. The other member states of the Federation could have been compensated financially for the Caldari deception, before they seceeded peacefully. No loss of life or home and no prolonged conflict that has long lost a great deal of it's meaning and mostly exists to fund the arms dealers.

When your gut instincts tell you something is wrong, trust them. When your heart tells you something is right, ignore it, check with your brain first. Accept nothing, challenge everything.

Pieter Tuulinen
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#140 - 2013-10-28 22:01:27 UTC
Caellach Marellus wrote:
Pieter Tuulinen wrote:

To avoid circular argument, where I simply repeat everything I've said before, I will go so far as to simply point out that between you, Lyn and yourself managed to take the position that the State ought to have both surrendered it's home planet AND given over it's new colonies before leaving the Federation.

No. Now, why don't you go join the conversation where you lambast the Amarrians for being oppressive and unreasonable overlords?


Erm, that's not what I said, it might be what you think I said, or hope I said, because it's a point you can argue against.

But it's not what I said.


I came in here with great hope for the future and some admiration for the people of the Federation. You have reduced me to stubborn denials and bitter intransigence.

You make me feel that shooting is preferable to shouting. I think we both lose.

For the first time since I started the conversation, he looks me dead in the eye. In his gaze are steel jackhammers, quiet vengeance, a hundred thousand orbital bombs frozen in still life.