These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Suggesting updated rules for highsec capitals

First post
Author
admiral root
Red Galaxy
#21 - 2013-10-26 09:18:43 UTC
If you really want to shoot customs offices with a carrier take it to low / nullsec.

No, your rights end in optimal+2*falloff

Astecus
Utama Incorporated
Astral Alliance
#22 - 2013-10-26 11:50:02 UTC
Joffy Aulx-Gao wrote:
When you engage an interbus customs office you will get a suspect timer so my question is what would you do if someone engaged and scrammed your Archon?


The devblog at community.eveonline.com/news/dev-blogs/player-owned-customs-offices-in-hi-sec does not mention anything at all about turning suspect, and if this was the case, lots of people would just gather around the offices and quickly vanquish anyone trying to shoot it, basically causing it to take potensially forever to remove it. I believe the offices have around 14.5 million HP, which takes a while to take down, even when you are left alone.

If attacking it would indeed flag people as suspects, I would never use my Archon for this, and probably not any battleship either.

Reloaded Main: Astevon | Creator of the Anti-ganking channel, Anti-ganking.net and AstralServices.net

Baali Tekitsu
AQUILA INC
Verge of Collapse
#23 - 2013-10-26 11:59:08 UTC
Astecus wrote:
Joffy Aulx-Gao wrote:
When you engage an interbus customs office you will get a suspect timer so my question is what would you do if someone engaged and scrammed your Archon?


The devblog at community.eveonline.com/news/dev-blogs/player-owned-customs-offices-in-hi-sec does not mention anything at all about turning suspect, and if this was the case, lots of people would just gather around the offices and quickly vanquish anyone trying to shoot it, basically causing it to take potensially forever to remove it. I believe the offices have around 14.5 million HP, which takes a while to take down, even when you are left alone.

If attacking it would indeed flag people as suspects, I would never use my Archon for this, and probably not any battleship either.


If you attack an Interbus office you get a flag, if you attack a player owned one you need a wardec or get concorded.

RATE LIKE SUBSCRIBE

Astecus
Utama Incorporated
Astral Alliance
#24 - 2013-10-26 13:01:23 UTC
Baali Tekitsu wrote:
If you attack an Interbus office you get a flag


Quote from forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=3735448#post3735448:

CCP Paradox wrote:
POCOs will flag you as Criminal in High-Sec.
I am assuming you mean the InterBus CO (not POCO, thats player-owned.). An attack on these results in no consequence except PvE timer.
CONCORD doesn't care about InterBus, neither do the faction navy/police.


You will get a PvE logoff timer, just like you get every time you shoot NPCs or they shoot you. This is not a suspect timer, even though they have similar colors in the top left corner.

Reloaded Main: Astevon | Creator of the Anti-ganking channel, Anti-ganking.net and AstralServices.net

Minmatar Citizen160812
The LGBT Last Supper
#25 - 2013-10-26 13:11:07 UTC
Astecus wrote:


If attacking it would indeed flag people as suspects, I would never use my Archon for this, and probably not any battleship either.


This is the exact reason it SHOULD flag you as suspect just like low sec ones gave you GCC. Weed out the bads that will just be here crying about the war decs after their poop corp ninjas in a poco.
Noddy Comet
Lysdexic Agnostics - Thier is no Dog
#26 - 2013-10-26 13:43:02 UTC  |  Edited by: Noddy Comet
Astecus wrote:
The existing rules are as follows:

1. Capital ships may under no circumstances be used for aggression.


If you can't understand the very FIRST rule listed, perhaps you shouldn't be trusted to have one in hi sec in the first place.


inb4 tedious reality altering arguments of how blowing **** up is not considered aggression...

[i]"The biggest problem with quotes on the Internet, is that just because it's on the Internet too many believe them to be real" -[/i]Abraham Lincoln's "Berlin Wall" speech at the 1984 Winter Olympics.

Batelle
Federal Navy Academy
#27 - 2013-10-26 14:00:58 UTC
Hahahahha no.

"**CCP is changing policy, and has asked that we discontinue the bonus credit program after November 7th. So until then, enjoy a super-bonus of 1B Blink Credit for each 60-day GTC you buy!"**

Never forget.

ElQuirko
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#28 - 2013-10-26 14:07:16 UTC  |  Edited by: ElQuirko
Oxide Ammar wrote:
Everyone above farted "No" has never give reasonable counter arguments of why pve activity like this can't go through, as someone said they are jealous much Lol


*fart*

This can't go through for two reasons:

One - A carrier is capable of more than double the DPS of the next leading droneboat
Two - A carrier is capable of tanking far more than the next leading droneboat whilst dealing this DPS
Three - It's cheaper than the next leading pimp droneboat.

I very much doubt anybody is jealous of your 1.2bil hull that's stuck in highsec and useless; if you fancy taking a jaunt down to null you'll see things with 100x the value being actively used in combat, or hop into wormhole space and see "leet" ships like yours being used in group PVE, rather than rotting in a station.

Dodixie > Hek

Katrina Oniseki
Oniseki-Raata Internal Watch
Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
#29 - 2013-10-26 14:16:59 UTC  |  Edited by: Katrina Oniseki
ElQuirko wrote:

if you fancy taking a jaunt down to null you'll see things with 100x the value being actively used in combat and ratting, or hop into wormhole space and see "leet" ships like yours being used in group PVE and PvP, rather than rotting in a station.


Fixed it for you.

Katrina Oniseki

Astecus
Utama Incorporated
Astral Alliance
#30 - 2013-10-26 15:30:19 UTC
Minmatar Citizen160812 wrote:
This is the exact reason it SHOULD flag you as suspect


Imagine 100 elite pvp'ers from the same corp show up to destroy an office, and they all go suspect. One neutral pilot next to them could then pick any target he wanted, and all the others would not be able to fight back, because they would be concorded if they attacked the neutral ship. Seems you would weed out basically everybody that way.

Noddy Comet wrote:
If you can't understand the very FIRST rule listed


The GM didn't "understand" the first rule, perhaps the rules should be updated.

ElQuirko wrote:
One - A carrier is capable of more than double the DPS of the next leading droneboat
Two - A carrier is capable of tanking far more than the next leading droneboat whilst dealing this DPS
Three - It's cheaper than the next leading pimp droneboat.


One - An Archon is not capable of more dps than a Dominix Navy Issue, as outlined.
Two - The ability to tank is irrelevant when shooting Interbus offices, just as it is irrelevant when shooting belt rats.
Three - Cheaper how? 15 fighters costs about 255-300 mill. Then add 5x Drone Control Unit I which comes at around 320 mill. I believe you can fit a Dominix Navy Issue pretty good for around 500 mill total.

ElQuirko wrote:
rather than rotting in a station.


My Archon is usually in space 23/7, the only reason it is docked now, is because of the wardec, and rule number 2 doesn't allow me to undock now.

Reloaded Main: Astevon | Creator of the Anti-ganking channel, Anti-ganking.net and AstralServices.net

destiny2
Decaying Rocky Odious Non Evil Stupid Inane Nobody
Rogue Drone Recovery Syndicate
#31 - 2013-10-26 15:52:55 UTC
The new murader changes will do more dps then a single carrier, easily
Alice Saki
Nocturnal Romance
Cynosural Field Theory.
#32 - 2013-10-26 16:03:12 UTC
What a Waste, get that piece of rubbish into Low/Null

HS Sec Capitals.... Look at my Epeen.... Pretty much

FREEZE! Drop the LIKES AND WALK AWAY! - Currenly rebuilding gaming machine, I will Return.

Oxide Ammar
#33 - 2013-10-26 16:15:20 UTC
destiny2 wrote:
The new murader changes will do more dps then a single carrier, easily


/facepalm

Lady Areola Fappington:  Solo PVP isn't dead!  You just need to make sure you have your booster, remote rep, cyno, and emergency Falcon alts logged in and ready before you do any solo PVPing.

Alice Saki
Nocturnal Romance
Cynosural Field Theory.
#34 - 2013-10-26 17:02:34 UTC
destiny2 wrote:
The new murader changes will do more dps then a single carrier, easily



The New Mod has just made the Phoenix viable. Roll

FREEZE! Drop the LIKES AND WALK AWAY! - Currenly rebuilding gaming machine, I will Return.

Maliandra
Doomheim
#35 - 2013-10-27 06:16:53 UTC  |  Edited by: Maliandra
ElQuirko wrote:
Oxide Ammar wrote:
Everyone above farted "No" has never give reasonable counter arguments of why pve activity like this can't go through, as someone said they are jealous much Lol


*fart*

This can't go through for two reasons:

One - A carrier is capable of more than double the DPS of the next leading droneboat
Two - A carrier is capable of tanking far more than the next leading droneboat whilst dealing this DPS
Three - It's cheaper than the next leading pimp droneboat.

I very much doubt anybody is jealous of your 1.2bil hull that's stuck in highsec and useless; if you fancy taking a jaunt down to null you'll see things with 100x the value being actively used in combat, or hop into wormhole space and see "leet" ships like yours being used in group PVE, rather than rotting in a station.
Are you serious dude?

He is one of the rare people that still has a capital ship in hi-sec. Why the hell would he go and remove it from hi-sec? That is quite possibly the LAST thing he should do. Even if he didn't want it for some reason, he'd be far better served selling it through someone like Chrissba or whatever (I know that's not his name :P). He'd get huge ISK for it and be able to buy 1 in low/WH with a lot of spare ISK leftover.
ElQuirko
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#36 - 2013-10-27 10:28:26 UTC  |  Edited by: ElQuirko
Katrina Oniseki wrote:
ElQuirko wrote:

if you fancy taking a jaunt down to null you'll see things with 100x the value being actively used in combat and ratting,

Fixed it for you.

I challenge you to find me a ratting titan. No, seriously.

Astecus wrote:

One - An Archon is not capable of more dps than a Dominix Navy Issue, as outlined.
Two - The ability to tank is irrelevant when shooting Interbus offices, just as it is irrelevant when shooting belt rats.
Three - Cheaper how? 15 fighters costs about 255-300 mill. Then add 5x Drone Control Unit I which comes at around 320 mill. I believe you can fit a Dominix Navy Issue pretty good for around 500 mill total.


One - Your Dominix Navy Issue will never apply that DPS on anything other than a stationary target. Your blaster tracking, with nothing to help it out and void in the guns, would barely be able to hit the POCO if it was going 1m/s.
Two - Let's talk about how shooting POCOs will make you suspect, shall we? You really want to sit in a glasscannon battleship at a POCO perfectly stationary so your blasters can actually apply some of their damage with a suspect timer flashing? And please, belt ratting in a carrier is next-level stupid. Besides the threat from hotdroppers in that you're ridiculously easy to find, you take just under a minute to warp between belts in order to shoot four rats at a time. Ratting carriers are used in anoms if the pilot has any sense.
Three - For a start, the DNI is not the "next leading pimp droneboat". Try the rattlesnake - same DPS, better active tank. Perfect for PVE. The average rattler hull is 420-ish mil, and will be fit with bling in order to maximise ticks. It will come out a similar price to a carrier.

EDIT: As an afterword to point one - try sticking Ogre IIs in instead of Garde IIs. The archon now outdamages your sentry dominix even including guns, 1746dps to 1739.

Maliandra wrote:
Are you serious dude?

He is one of the rare people that still has a capital ship in hi-sec. Why the hell would he go and remove it from hi-sec? That is quite possibly the LAST thing he should do. Even if he didn't want it for some reason, he'd be far better served selling it through someone like Chrissba or whatever (I know that's not his name :P). He'd get huge ISK for it and be able to buy 1 in low/WH with a lot of spare ISK leftover.


Dunno if you were around for it, but during Burn Jita somebody logged a Nyx in that'd been there since near the start of the game and hadn't been seen since. Highsec carriers are a lot more common than you think. He's not allowed to sell it, either. Roll

Dodixie > Hek

Felicity Love
Doomheim
#37 - 2013-10-27 10:40:26 UTC  |  Edited by: Felicity Love
... or the existing entries could simply be edited to say:

"Capitals in Hi Sec must be used for asteroid mining ONLY. Failure to undock with anything other than Civilian Mining Lasers fitted into all Hi slots will result in immediate CONKORDOKKEN...."

Pretty much puts an end to any concerns or need to debate this ever again. Roll

"EVE is dying." -- The Four Forum Trolls of the Apocalypse.   ( Pick four, any four. They all smell.  )

Astecus
Utama Incorporated
Astral Alliance
#38 - 2013-10-27 12:49:11 UTC
ElQuirko wrote:
Your Dominix Navy Issue will never apply that DPS on anything other than a stationary target.

Customs offices are stationary targets, being able to hit moving targets is irrelevant.

ElQuirko wrote:
Let's talk about how shooting POCOs will make you suspect, shall we?

Shooting a POCO would make you criminal and get you concorded, unless you wardec first. But I assume you meant shooting highsec interbus offices, which does not make you suspect, I quote again:

CCP Paradox wrote:
POCOs will flag you as Criminal in High-Sec.
I am assuming you mean the InterBus CO (not POCO, thats player-owned.). An attack on these results in no consequence except PvE timer.
CONCORD doesn't care about InterBus, neither do the faction navy/police.

The PvE timer mentioned is the NPC logoff timer you get every time you shoot NPCs or they shoot you. It is not the same as a suspect timer, even though they have similar colors in the top left corner.

ElQuirko wrote:
You really want to sit in a glasscannon battleship

Yes, this is perfectly viable since you will get no suspect timer. I believe many people will be doing exactly that when Rubicon hits.

ElQuirko wrote:
try sticking Ogre IIs in instead of Garde IIs

Good point, I was wrong in assuming Garde IIs would give the best dps against a stationary target, since Ogres get bonus from more skills. Switching to Ogre IIs, the Archon does indeed get 1746 dps, while the DNI gets 1784 dps, which doesn't change the fact that the DNI can get a better dps.

The rattlesnake does have a better tank, but I seem to be having trouble getting it above 1351 dps with T2 torpedoes, can you show me how? I used the DNI because it has a damage bonus to two different weapon systems.

Reloaded Main: Astevon | Creator of the Anti-ganking channel, Anti-ganking.net and AstralServices.net

Astecus
Utama Incorporated
Astral Alliance
#39 - 2013-10-27 13:36:34 UTC
Astecus wrote:
while the DNI gets 1784 dps

Scrap that, by switching one Drone Damage Amplifier II for another Magnetic Field Stabilizer II, it actually gets 1789 dps. I must have been sleeping while fitting earlier.

Felicity Love wrote:
... or the existing entries could simply be edited to say:

"Capitals in Hi Sec must be used for asteroid mining ONLY. Failure to undock with anything other than Civilian Mining Lasers fitted into all Hi slots will result in immediate CONKORDOKKEN...."

This would be a simple rule to understand, if CCP decided to go that way. But since my carrier has no turret slots and can't fit mining lasers, I would prefer to be able to fit Drone Control Unit I in hislots instead, to be able to field up to 15 mining drones.

Reloaded Main: Astevon | Creator of the Anti-ganking channel, Anti-ganking.net and AstralServices.net

Katrina Oniseki
Oniseki-Raata Internal Watch
Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
#40 - 2013-10-27 13:40:39 UTC
ElQuirko wrote:
Katrina Oniseki wrote:
ElQuirko wrote:

if you fancy taking a jaunt down to null you'll see things with 100x the value being actively used in combat and ratting,

Fixed it for you.

I challenge you to find me a ratting titan. No, seriously.


www.youtube.com/watch?v=wbZt7e_jn8w

If I find a still living one, I'll give you a ring though. :P

Katrina Oniseki