These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

We seriously need to chill out a little...

Author
Jaroslav Unwanted
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#41 - 2011-11-17 15:52:25 UTC
Benilopax wrote:
Florestan Bronstein wrote:
Benilopax wrote:
What say you?

don't care if CCP employees hate me.


But angry posts turn them off the community and so constructive suggestions get lost.


Actually i would like to point out thats not true.

They actually are like the next forum troll laughing at stupid and if there are some well written feedbacks/suggestions than they look into it, giving them other point of views, not that they dont have an idea but its always good to see the "problem" from different perspectives.
Vincent Gaines
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#42 - 2011-11-17 15:58:43 UTC
Vachir Khan wrote:
:18 months:



Funnily enough, that was said about 18 months ago, wasn't it?

Not a diplo. 

The above post was edited for spelling.

Lharanai
Fools of the Blue Oyster
#43 - 2011-11-17 16:02:37 UTC
Vachir Khan wrote:
:18 months:


invalid as they rebuild EVE with carbon, just because you don't get new shiny things to blow up does not mean that they did nothing

Seriously, don't take me serious, I MEAN IT...seriously

Perramas
DreddNaut
#44 - 2011-11-17 16:12:37 UTC
Benilopax wrote:
Smoking Blunts wrote:
so, im ment to be happy that ccp showed up after 18months and are doing stuff they should have done in that 18months?



Well they can't go back in time. Your just gonna stay angry forever?


Nope just another 15 months.

Great minds discuss ideas, average minds discuss events, small minds discuss people- Eleanor Roosevelt

OT Smithers
Perkone
Caldari State
#45 - 2011-11-17 16:20:01 UTC  |  Edited by: OT Smithers
Slapping fresh makeup on an old hooker will not make her young and fresh again. Nor will engine trails.

I need look no further than the Naga, and CCPs half assed "solution" to the missile problem to see that nothing has actually changed.
OT Smithers
Perkone
Caldari State
#46 - 2011-11-17 16:20:23 UTC  |  Edited by: OT Smithers
duplicate post. CCP fix your freaking forums
Morganta
The Greater Goon
Clockwork Pineapple
#47 - 2011-11-17 16:25:36 UTC
OT Smithers wrote:
duplicate post. CCP fix your freaking forums


lol is that OOT Smithers???

from CRSland?
Zircon Dasher
#48 - 2011-11-17 16:38:34 UTC
Whiners shat up the forums with RAEG!!!!11 posts, unsub'd and stopped logging in, and shot a statue about it.

CCP rewarded them with mea culpa threads, resource reallocation, and "fix's".

And you are surprised that the people who want more/better/different are writing sperg threads while wallowing in thier own :bittervet:?

Rule 1 of managment: You will get the behaviour you reward.

Nerfing High-sec is never the answer. It is the question. The answer is 'YES'.

Morganta
The Greater Goon
Clockwork Pineapple
#49 - 2011-11-17 16:42:06 UTC  |  Edited by: Morganta
Zircon Dasher wrote:
Whiners shat up the forums with RAEG!!!!11 posts, unsub'd and stopped logging in, and shot a statue about it.

CCP rewarded them with mea culpa threads, resource reallocation, and "fix's".

And you are surprised that the people who want more/better/different are writing sperg threads while wallowing in thier own :bittervet:?

Rule 1 of managment: You will get the behaviour you reward.


how do you use words like mea culpa yet have such atrocious grammar and spelling?

must be a university graduate
Astrid Stjerna
Sebiestor Tribe
#50 - 2011-11-17 16:52:56 UTC
The Offerer wrote:

There are, however, a couple of things that will have a bad impact on the game, most notably corporation owned Customs Offices and I tried to explain why in the relevant thread.


And there will always be features of the game that aren't to our liking. Nobody, not even CCP, can do everything exactly how we'd like it. Ragequitting and screaming at CCP, while comforting to some, is really unproductive. It makes us look ungrateful, when we're actually incredibly lucky that CCP had the courage to even attempt the launch of an MMO on such an unprecedented scale.

After such a difficult year -- Monoclegate, the botched Incarna launch, the layoffs -- l think we should give CCP a little more time to pick up the pieces.

I can't get rid of my darn signature!  Oh, wait....

Captain Carius
#51 - 2011-11-17 17:00:59 UTC
My brother and I gave them six years to fix the game.

Was that long enough for you?
Trainwreck McGee
Doomheim
#52 - 2011-11-17 17:39:13 UTC
CCP should be CONSTANTLY fixing and tweaking and balancing this game.

This game is insanely complicated and should be under constant revision

All developers should play EVE a lot or they are bad at there jobs.

CCP Trainwreck - Weekend Custodial Engineer / CCP Necrogoats foot stool

Drifterin Thedark
#53 - 2011-11-17 17:43:09 UTC  |  Edited by: Drifterin Thedark
Like i've said before, the people CCP are trying to please now will never be content. They should already know this, after favoring the minority in 0.0 alliances for years, and getting nothing but abuse in return. It's one thing after another with them, and they all agree CCP must suffer if their ever-changing demands are not met.

If it were my company i'd tell those self entitled brats where to go, and focus on making the game better for everyone, not just whoever cries the loudest in 0.0.
Cedar Locus
Fleet 2 die
#54 - 2011-11-17 18:59:01 UTC
will chill when eve is dead
Astrid Stjerna
Sebiestor Tribe
#55 - 2011-11-18 01:57:06 UTC
Trainwreck McGee wrote:

This game is insanely complicated and should be under constant revision


That's why it's not under constant revision -- this game is far more complex than most MMOs. Every change has to be made carefully, in case another system gets thrown out of whack. You can't balance hybrids, for example, unless you're certain that 'balancing' them isn't just going to make another category of weapons obsolete, or that they won't become hugely powerful when combined with a specific set of implants, or that the balance changes don't knock the weapons out of cap range for their intended ships.

I can't get rid of my darn signature!  Oh, wait....

Catlos JeminJees
TunDraGon
Goonswarm Federation
#56 - 2011-11-18 02:40:41 UTC
Captain Carius wrote:
My brother and I gave them six years to fix the game.

Was that long enough for you?



6 yrs of "waiting to fix" Wtf?????? quit already
Jett0
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#57 - 2011-11-18 03:02:36 UTC
A lot of Crucible is awesome by itself. The other part is awesome only by comparison. Regardless, it's still awesome.

What I'm truly waiting for is the next summer expansion. If CCP continues pushing in this direction, it'll make Crucible look like a prologue.

Occasionally plays sober

Montevius Williams
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#58 - 2011-11-18 03:18:59 UTC
Crucible is the best Expansion since Apoc. Period. Its not even close. Look at where CCP was 2 months ago and look at where they are now. Anyone that cant see a clear difference is just blind or not cognizant of whats going on.

"The American Government indoctrination system known as public education has been relentlessly churning out socialists for over 20 years". - TravisWB

MaiLina KaTar
Katar Corp
#59 - 2011-11-18 10:35:43 UTC  |  Edited by: MaiLina KaTar
Astrid Stjerna wrote:
Trainwreck McGee wrote:

This game is insanely complicated and should be under constant revision


That's why it's not under constant revision -- this game is far more complex than most MMOs.

As a matter of fact it isn't. You shouldn't mistake needlessy bloated UI and redundant mechanics for complexity.

Tons of dead baggage and a shoddy UI to deal with it is one of the major issues the game has. Stuff like fuel blocks are merely the first baby steps to attempt to fix some this mess.
ilmon
Legio Noviomagum
#60 - 2011-11-18 11:50:15 UTC
Benilopax wrote:
Ok, 18 months sure, but stuff is being worked on now. And has been for 3 months so far, development takes time to develop.



then ccp could learn to not time and time again make empty promises