These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

[Rubicon] Sisters of EVE faction ships

First post First post First post
Author
Bouh Revetoile
In Wreck we thrust
#1741 - 2013-10-17 08:52:13 UTC  |  Edited by: Bouh Revetoile
Nevyn Auscent wrote:
Iudicium Vastus wrote:
I'm imagining afk cloaking will become just slightly more scary with these new covops moderate to high dps drone ships, being much quicker to get into than recons. Now maybe some supposed afk'ers will reach out and actually badtouch you.

Except for the part where all the EFT warrioring going on is assuming perfect V's in all drone skills..... Now go and actually look how long that takes. Then how long to get the perfect V's in all Gunnery skills for Medium Blasters to go with their EFT warrioring. And perfect V in 2 cruisers.
Now look at how little time is needed for Recons relative to that training.

These are certainly not faster to train into than recons to kick those numbers out.

You are forgetting that for the ship to be overpowered they also need to shoot at a structure, otherwise the tracking formula might have some words against their pretty numbers : Ogre II tracking is only good against larger target ; for 125m sig radius targets, the dps drop to 55% *if she doesn't move*...
Nevyn Auscent
Broke Sauce
#1742 - 2013-10-17 09:08:48 UTC
Bouh Revetoile wrote:

You are forgetting that for the ship to be overpowered they also need to shoot at a structure, otherwise the tracking formula might have some words against their pretty numbers : Ogre II tracking is only good against larger target ; for 125m sig radius targets, the dps drop to 55% *if she doesn't move*...

Oh no, I'm not forgetting that part either. I'm just not bothering to argue it, I have at least that much faith in CCP that they have some clue about heavy drones damage application.
Sparkus Volundar
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#1743 - 2013-10-17 10:05:26 UTC  |  Edited by: Sparkus Volundar
ConranAntoni wrote:
Checked back into thread to see if people finally calmed down from being ******** and thinking paper dps is actual dps;

Leave disapointed.

Will wait till IQ rises above that of a potato.


Rumour has it that ships can fly/drop in groups with distributed ewar, and that armour fits have 5 mids.

.

Scorpionstrike
Federal Defense Union
Gallente Federation
#1744 - 2013-10-17 11:03:00 UTC
Any idea of the LP cost yet ? :P
Bouh Revetoile
In Wreck we thrust
#1745 - 2013-10-17 11:22:54 UTC
Sparkus Volundar wrote:
ConranAntoni wrote:
Checked back into thread to see if people finally calmed down from being ******** and thinking paper dps is actual dps;

Leave disapointed.

Will wait till IQ rises above that of a potato.


Rumour has it that ships can fly/drop in groups with distributed ewar, and that armour fits have 5 mids.

You mean exactly like an Ishtar, but with a cloak ?

How does the Deimos compare to the Vigilant which have a 90% web on top ?
Xequecal
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#1746 - 2013-10-17 11:27:29 UTC
Nevyn Auscent wrote:
Bouh Revetoile wrote:

You are forgetting that for the ship to be overpowered they also need to shoot at a structure, otherwise the tracking formula might have some words against their pretty numbers : Ogre II tracking is only good against larger target ; for 125m sig radius targets, the dps drop to 55% *if she doesn't move*...

Oh no, I'm not forgetting that part either. I'm just not bothering to argue it, I have at least that much faith in CCP that they have some clue about heavy drones damage application.


Heavy drones do not do half damage to stationary cruisers. This is ridiculous.
Bouh Revetoile
In Wreck we thrust
#1747 - 2013-10-17 12:16:22 UTC  |  Edited by: Bouh Revetoile
Xequecal wrote:
Nevyn Auscent wrote:
Bouh Revetoile wrote:

You are forgetting that for the ship to be overpowered they also need to shoot at a structure, otherwise the tracking formula might have some words against their pretty numbers : Ogre II tracking is only good against larger target ; for 125m sig radius targets, the dps drop to 55% *if she doesn't move*...

Oh no, I'm not forgetting that part either. I'm just not bothering to argue it, I have at least that much faith in CCP that they have some clue about heavy drones damage application.


Heavy drones do not do half damage to stationary cruisers. This is ridiculous.

The trackin formula don't care about what you believe...

PS : I remember someone made tests with Dominix because people where not believing the tracking bonus would be useful. It appeared that the bonus was indeed useful on smaller targets because it allow heavy drones to be more effective on cruisers than untracking bonused medium ones. Overall heavy drones do need the 50% tracking bonus to be really more effective than medium drones on cruisers.
Sparkus Volundar
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#1748 - 2013-10-17 12:49:08 UTC
Bouh Revetoile wrote:
Sparkus Volundar wrote:
ConranAntoni wrote:
Checked back into thread to see if people finally calmed down from being ******** and thinking paper dps is actual dps;

Leave disapointed.

Will wait till IQ rises above that of a potato.


Rumour has it that ships can fly/drop in groups with distributed ewar, and that armour fits have 5 mids.


You mean exactly like an Ishtar, but with a cloak ?

How does the Deimos compare to the Vigilant which have a 90% web on top ?



"And then Sir Thomas More pointed out that a boy without a winkle is a girl, and everyone was really disappointed."

No, because you cannot BOBS portal an Ishtar.

Since neither the Deimos or Vigilant can fit a COCD, they don't really compare either.

.

Bouh Revetoile
In Wreck we thrust
#1749 - 2013-10-17 13:11:42 UTC  |  Edited by: Bouh Revetoile
Sparkus Volundar wrote:
"And then Sir Thomas More pointed out that a boy without a winkle is a girl, and everyone was really disappointed."

No, because you cannot BOBS portal an Ishtar.

Since neither the Deimos or Vigilant can fit a COCD, they don't really compare either.

So it's definitely the cloak which scare the **** out of everybody here...

Maybe the kind of cloak BLOBS have would freak people out a little less ? But IMO the point of this cruiser is to "replace" T3 as main combat ship for black ops operations in the future.
Omnathious Deninard
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#1750 - 2013-10-17 15:07:41 UTC
Bouh Revetoile wrote:
Sparkus Volundar wrote:
"And then Sir Thomas More pointed out that a boy without a winkle is a girl, and everyone was really disappointed."

No, because you cannot BOBS portal an Ishtar.

Since neither the Deimos or Vigilant can fit a COCD, they don't really compare either.

So it's definitely the cloak which scare the **** out of everybody here...

Maybe the kind of cloak BLOBS have would freak people out a little less ? But IMO the point of this cruiser is to "replace" T3 as main combat ship for black ops operations in the future.

The fear of the cloak has never been questioned, and most who are afraid of it want the ship nerfed to hell and back simply because it can use a covert ops cloak.

If you don't follow the rules, neither will I.

Harvey James
The Sengoku Legacy
#1751 - 2013-10-17 15:52:39 UTC  |  Edited by: Harvey James
Astero - this is more balanced i feel the -1 mid is for it being a drone boat as even faction droneboats lose 1 slot e.g. NVexor

Role Bonus: 100% reduction in CPU requirement for cloaks
Role Bonus: 37.5% increase Scan Probe Strength
Role Bonus: +5 Virus strength for Relic and Data Analyzers

Can fit Cover Ops Cloaking devices

Amarr Frigate Bonus:
4% bonus to Armor Resists per level

Gallente Frigate Bonus:
20% bonus to drone hit-points per level

Slot layout: 2H, 3M(-1), 4L; 2 turrets, 0 launchers
Fittings: 32 PWG, 170 )CPU
Defense (shields / armor / hull) : 475 / 600 / 525
Capacitor (amount) : 430
Mobility (max velocity / agility / mass / align time): 312 / 2.87 / 975000 / 3.88s
Drones (bandwidth / bay): 25 / 75
Targeting (max targeting range / Scan Resolution / Max Locked targets): 37km / 620 / 6
Sensor strength: 13
Signature radius: 38
Cargo Capacity: 210

T3's need to be versatile so no rigs are necessary ... they should not have OP dps and tank

ABC's should be T2, remove drone assist, separate HAM's and Torps range, -3 HS for droneboats

Nerf web strength, Make the blaster Eagle worth using

Harvey James
The Sengoku Legacy
#1752 - 2013-10-17 16:03:06 UTC  |  Edited by: Harvey James
Stratios

Role Bonus: 20% bonus to Energy Turret damage
Role Bonus: 50% reduction in Energy Turret capacitor need
Role Bonus: 37.5% increase Scan Probe Strength
Role Bonus: +5 Virus strength for Relic and Data Analyzers

Can fit Cover Ops Cloaking devices

Amarr Cruiser Bonus:
4% bonus to Armor Resists per level

Gallente Cruiser Bonus:
20% bonus to Drone hit-points and 7.5% bonus to Drone damage per level

Slot layout: 5H, 4M(-1), 5L; 4 turrets, 0 launchers
Fittings: 920 PWG, 400 CPU
Defense (shields / armor / hull) : 1750 / 2400 / 2250
Capacitor (amount) : 1700
Mobility (max velocity / agility / mass / align time): 182 / .47 / 9350000 / 6.09s
Drones (bandwidth / bay): 100 / 500
Targeting (max targeting range / Scan Resolution / Max Locked targets): 55km / 275 / 7
Sensor strength: 20
Signature radius: 150
Cargo Capacity: 550

T3's need to be versatile so no rigs are necessary ... they should not have OP dps and tank

ABC's should be T2, remove drone assist, separate HAM's and Torps range, -3 HS for droneboats

Nerf web strength, Make the blaster Eagle worth using

sarkenna
RIVVEN Inc
#1753 - 2013-10-17 17:33:31 UTC  |  Edited by: sarkenna
Taking away drone bandwith for a laser bonus is doing the ship as an exploration vessel no favor. It only moves it towards buffertanked gankmobile which seems to be feared on this forum anyway (unrightfully so I believe). It also makes this ship way less balanced than in its current state, even though it comes in the disguise of balancing effort here and there...

Why is that ?

Recognize firstly, that a dmg bonus of any decent kind would easily net increase pvp fit dmg output of that ship in the suggested form, especially apllied dmg output. Because this extra gun outshines a single heavy drone easily

Recognize secondly, that we explorers need our highslots for utility and scan. We can't make much use of the weapon bonus ..who can ? Right the pvp oriented roaming ganker, priate, gate camper or whoever..he would jump in cirlces for a 20 % bonus on 4 turrets or something along the line.

Recognize thirdly, that we explorers need sustained and therefore active tanking in our endeavors. Thus we seldom strain ourselves with energy hungry turrets if we do not need to....we need the drones and the drone bonus.

Lastly recognize, that drones are not, have never been and very likely never will be the DOOM and NIGHTMARE of pvp as it was made out by others in this thread. All those paper drafts with 900+ DPS by employing heavy drones need to really be reality checked by their creators.
Who here has heard those glory stories of roaming heavy drone vexors and myrmidons in low sec being the bane of all pilots and totally overpowered...i haven't..you probably neither. Drones are AT BEST a support dps weapon system in all pvp and have ever been. That is why the gank ishtar always racked up as much blasters as it could get and it probably wouldn't attack anything but a BS with heavy drones anyway...instead it most likely will field mediums against most targets.

Again why is the drone bonus nothing to be feared ? Because in all honesty a single smartbomb or emergency warpout ruins your day (or in a deep exploration territory like wormholes your whole weekend..). Can you loose your lasers ? Or blasters or missiles, by warping, cloaking, or other pilots ? Thus vastly reducing your dps without even having to fit any ewar or simply canceling it out completely ? i don't think so.


To be honest a decent pvp fit thorax can propably dismantle a statios just fine...

So can we please stop pretending that Heavy Drone Stratios with a price tag of 400 millions or whatever are going to wreck havoc in eve pvp...
Omnathious Deninard
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#1754 - 2013-10-17 18:07:54 UTC
sarkenna wrote:
Taking away drone bandwith for a laser bonus is doing the ship as an exploration vessel no favor. It only moves it towards buffertanked gankmobile which seems to be feared on this forum anyway (unrightfully so I believe). It also makes this ship way less balanced than in its current state, even though it comes in the disguise of balancing effort here and there...

Why is that ?

Recognize firstly, that a dmg bonus of any decent kind would easily net increase pvp fit dmg output of that ship in the suggested form, especially apllied dmg output. Because this extra gun outshines a single heavy drone easily

Recognize secondly, that we explorers need our highslots for utility and scan. We can't make much use of the weapon bonus ..who can ? Right the pvp oriented roaming ganker, priate, gate camper or whoever..he would jump in cirlces for a 20 % bonus on 4 turrets or something along the line.

Recognize thirdly, that we explorers need sustained and therefore active tanking in our endeavors. Thus we seldom strain ourselves with energy hungry turrets if we do not need to....we need the drones and the drone bonus.

Lastly recognize, that drones are not, have never been and very likely never will be the DOOM and NIGHTMARE of pvp as it was made out by others in this thread. All those paper drafts with 900+ DPS by employing heavy drones need to really be reality checked by their creators.
Who here has heard those glory stories of roaming heavy drone vexors and myrmidons in low sec being the bane of all pilots and totally overpowered...i haven't..you probably neither. Drones are AT BEST a support dps weapon system in all pvp and have ever been. That is why the gank ishtar always racked up as much blasters as it could get and it probably wouldn't attack anything but a BS with heavy drones anyway...instead it most likely will field mediums against most targets.

Again why is the drone bonus nothing to be feared ? Because in all honesty a single smartbomb or emergency warpout ruins your day (or in a deep exploration territory like wormholes your whole weekend..). Can you loose your lasers ? Or blasters or missiles, by warping, cloaking, or other pilots ? Thus vastly reducing your dps without even having to fit any ewar or simply canceling it out completely ? i don't think so.


To be honest a decent pvp fit thorax can propably dismantle a statios just fine...

So can we please stop pretending that Heavy Drone Stratios with a price tag of 400 millions or whatever are going to wreck havoc in eve pvp...

Very well put.

If you don't follow the rules, neither will I.

Tyberius Franklin
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#1755 - 2013-10-17 20:33:46 UTC
Harvey James wrote:
Astero - this is more balanced i feel the -1 mid is for it being a drone boat as even faction droneboats lose 1 slot e.g. NVexor

This is a pirate faction boat such as the Gila, which is not a slot down from it's peers if i recall correctly. That said, we don't know what the balance changes will bring to the pirate cruisers.
epicurus ataraxia
Illusion of Solitude.
Illusion of Solitude
#1756 - 2013-10-17 20:33:46 UTC
Taking away mid slots from the asteros kills it.
Unable to explore efficiently.
Standard fit relic and data analysers cargo scanner(forget it without) and prop mod.

Would be completely unused for exploration after your suggestion.
Do NOT reduce mid slots from these ships.

There is one EvE. Many people. Many lifestyles. WE are EvE

Harvey James
The Sengoku Legacy
#1757 - 2013-10-17 21:07:07 UTC
well they need to lose a slot from somewhere ..

T3's need to be versatile so no rigs are necessary ... they should not have OP dps and tank

ABC's should be T2, remove drone assist, separate HAM's and Torps range, -3 HS for droneboats

Nerf web strength, Make the blaster Eagle worth using

Omnathious Deninard
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#1758 - 2013-10-17 21:21:52 UTC
Harvey James wrote:
well they need to lose a slot from somewhere ..

Well it has been brought up and the initial post does suggest that pirate ships are exempt from the slot loss.

If you don't follow the rules, neither will I.

Harvey James
The Sengoku Legacy
#1759 - 2013-10-17 21:23:06 UTC
Omnathious Deninard wrote:
Harvey James wrote:
well they need to lose a slot from somewhere ..

Well it has been brought up and the initial post does suggest that pirate ships are exempt from the slot loss.


but navy aren't .. that makes no sense at all

T3's need to be versatile so no rigs are necessary ... they should not have OP dps and tank

ABC's should be T2, remove drone assist, separate HAM's and Torps range, -3 HS for droneboats

Nerf web strength, Make the blaster Eagle worth using

William Clarque
Free Traders
#1760 - 2013-10-17 21:32:20 UTC
Harvey James wrote:
Omnathious Deninard wrote:
Harvey James wrote:
well they need to lose a slot from somewhere ..

Well it has been brought up and the initial post does suggest that pirate ships are exempt from the slot loss.


but navy aren't .. that makes no sense at all


It makes perfect sense. Pirate faction ships are meta 8. Navy faction ships are only meta 7.