These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page12
 

New corpses for Rubicon?

First post
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Nerath Naaris
Pink Winged Unicorns for Peace Love and Anarchy
#21 - 2013-10-15 11:06:31 UTC
KuroVolt wrote:
I actually like that they decided to cover up the *naughty bits* with some cloth.

It is a VAST improvement over the current status quo where we are supposed to just pretend people dont have genitalia.


I still dont see what the big deal is with having everything visible though, if you can play EVE then Im sure you already knew about the whole boy/girl difference thing.


Actually, they don´t (have genitalia). Nor nipples (at least the female ones).

At least according to the WiS-pictures of Avatars where the clothes are glitched away (should be around somewhere on the Internet if you are interested). Seems like they never were intended to be stark naked and the designers just didn´t.... design them for us.

A shame really, because "enlargement" implants undoubtly could have been a huge success for the NEX store....

Je suis Paris // Köln // Brüssel // Orlando // Nice // Würzburg, München, Ansbach // Saint-Étienne-du-Rouvray

Je suis Berlin // Fort Lauderdale // London // St. Petersburg // Stockholm

Je suis [?]
Silvetica Dian
Imperial Shipment
Amarr Empire
#22 - 2013-10-15 11:07:03 UTC
cyndrogen wrote:
KuroVolt wrote:
I actually like that they decided to cover up the *naughty bits* with some cloth.

It is a VAST improvement over the current status quo where we are supposed to just pretend people dont have genitalia.


I still dont see what the big deal is with having everything visible though, if you can play EVE then Im sure you already knew about the whole boy/girl difference thing.



It's not about how much you reveal but what you choose to cover that gets our attention.



like this? http://www.digdang.com/image/nothing_covered_but_her_eyes/7136/

Money at its root is a form of rationing. When the richest 85 people have as much wealth as the poorest 3.5 billion (50% of humanity) it is clear where the source of poverty is. http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/jan/20/trickle-down-economics-broken-promise-richest-85
Velicitia
XS Tech
#23 - 2013-10-15 11:45:42 UTC  |  Edited by: Velicitia
Nerath Naaris wrote:
KuroVolt wrote:
I actually like that they decided to cover up the *naughty bits* with some cloth.

It is a VAST improvement over the current status quo where we are supposed to just pretend people dont have genitalia.


I still dont see what the big deal is with having everything visible though, if you can play EVE then Im sure you already knew about the whole boy/girl difference thing.


Actually, they don´t (have genitalia). Nor nipples (at least the female ones).

At least according to the WiS-pictures of Avatars where the clothes are glitched away (should be around somewhere on the Internet if you are interested). Seems like they never were intended to be stark naked and the designers just didn´t.... design them for us.

A shame really, because "enlargement" implants undoubtly could have been a huge success for the NEX store....


I think the point was "look, we know we're naked when we die, so why do we have to pretend clones have no genitalia?".

Real world -> because CCP didn't want the content to get rated 'M' (or equivalent in other countries -- ESRB rating is 'T' with the caveat of "online interaction not rated") for having "correct" bits for the frozen corpse models. And well, since you can't remove the underwear anyway, why waste resources making said bits for the new avatars...

Ingame lore -> do clones even have genitalia in the first place?

One of the bitter points of a good bittervet is the realisation that all those SP don't really do much, and that the newbie is having much more fun with what little he has. - Tippia
LordSwift
Wrabble Wrousers
#24 - 2013-10-15 12:09:45 UTC
yes we can have sex as described in the books so yes we do have them

Mal: "If anyone gets nosy, just...you know... shoot 'em. "

Zoe: "Shoot 'em?"

Mal: "Politely."
KuroVolt
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#25 - 2013-10-15 12:42:44 UTC  |  Edited by: KuroVolt
Velicitia wrote:
Nerath Naaris wrote:
KuroVolt wrote:
I actually like that they decided to cover up the *naughty bits* with some cloth.

It is a VAST improvement over the current status quo where we are supposed to just pretend people dont have genitalia.


I still dont see what the big deal is with having everything visible though, if you can play EVE then Im sure you already knew about the whole boy/girl difference thing.


Actually, they don´t (have genitalia). Nor nipples (at least the female ones).

At least according to the WiS-pictures of Avatars where the clothes are glitched away (should be around somewhere on the Internet if you are interested). Seems like they never were intended to be stark naked and the designers just didn´t.... design them for us.

A shame really, because "enlargement" implants undoubtly could have been a huge success for the NEX store....


I think the point was "look, we know we're naked when we die, so why do we have to pretend clones have no genitalia?".

Real world -> because CCP didn't want the content to get rated 'M' (or equivalent in other countries -- ESRB rating is 'T' with the caveat of "online interaction not rated") for having "correct" bits for the frozen corpse models. And well, since you can't remove the underwear anyway, why waste resources making said bits for the new avatars...

Ingame lore -> do clones even have genitalia in the first place?


Exactly, which is why I said I prefer them being covered over them just being magically absent.

I understand the M rating thing, but that is a great example of our skewed western morals.

*Oh, a mutlilated corpse, how nice.*
*Wait, better cover up that p3nis, we wouldnt want anybody turning into a rapist from looking at this!*

Edit: seriously CCP? How about we also censor bladder and kidney.

BoBwins Law: As a discussion/war between two large nullsec entities grows longer, the probability of one comparing the other to BoB aproaches near certainty.
Previous page12