These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Jita Park Speakers Corner

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

The CSM Has Run Its Course

First post
Author
Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
#61 - 2013-10-09 21:57:57 UTC
Since you're uninterested in facts and unencumbered by experience, you can tell yourself whatever story you like, and even believe it.


How restful. I envy you.

"Just remember later that I warned against any change to jump ranges or fatigue. You earned whats coming."

Grath Telkin, 11.10.2016

Princess Bride
SharkNado
#62 - 2013-10-09 23:37:16 UTC
Malcanis, people have said you are a rational person.

As a rational person, how does your sarcasm and attitude help the situation or you?

http://eveprincessbride.wordpress.com/

Red Templar
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#63 - 2013-10-10 05:50:00 UTC
Princess Bride wrote:
Malcanis, people have said you are a rational person.

As a rational person, how does your sarcasm and attitude help the situation or you?

Well it amuses those who are also rational.

Problem is, you cannot seriously argue with such delusions and such irrational people. The moment you start taking them seriously - they win. So its either ignore them, or ridicule to the point when its obvious to everyone, that what they are saying is total nonsense.

[b]For Love. For Peace. For Honor.

For None of the Above.

For Pony![/b]

Dracvlad
Taishi Combine
Astral Alliance
#64 - 2013-10-14 06:54:11 UTC  |  Edited by: Dracvlad
Red Templar wrote:
Princess Bride wrote:
Malcanis, people have said you are a rational person.

As a rational person, how does your sarcasm and attitude help the situation or you?

Well it amuses those who are also rational.

Problem is, you cannot seriously argue with such delusions and such irrational people. The moment you start taking them seriously - they win. So its either ignore them, or ridicule to the point when its obvious to everyone, that what they are saying is total nonsense.


This post is so funny on so many levels, I have to say that I was laughing at the irony of this for at least 10 minutes, please continue your circle jerk with Malcanis!, wow just wow, I am still cracked up Big smileLolRoll

When the going gets tough the Gankers get their CSM rep to change mechanics in their favour.

Blocked: Teckos Pech, Sonya Corvinus, baltec1, Shae Tadaruwa, Wander Prian, Daichi Yamato, Jonah Gravenstein, Merin Ryskin, Linus Gorp

Dracvlad
Taishi Combine
Astral Alliance
#65 - 2013-10-14 07:42:49 UTC  |  Edited by: Dracvlad
Princess Bride wrote:
Malcanis, people have said you are a rational person.

As a rational person, how does your sarcasm and attitude help the situation or you?


Now that I have stopped laughing at Red Templer, Malcanis is perfectly rational, he posts on pushing the 0.0 agenda, simple as, which is of course to force people out of hisec. His attitude and sarcasm is aimed at anyone who has a differing view to him, it is hugely destructive to the CSM in that it reinforces the view that the CSM is focussed mainly on 0.0 and the pew pew point of view, people who post a differing view on the CSM forums meet his scathing wit and insults which makes them unlikely to bother to continue to post, which is what he wants and which Red Templer unwittingly reinforced with his ill considered post.

His posts make the gap between the CSM's 0.0 bias and the hisec block ever wider, which is why so many people in highsec do not vote in the CSM elections, why give it legitamacy.

That being said, I think that there is a benefit for having player interaction with the developers and one can see that the active CSM members do a very good job, but one hopes that the CCP developers undestand that the CSM is only a representative of part of the game population.

The CSM should really think hard on having Malcanis as the first responder on their forums, because his attitude alienates people who post here with a different view point and who the CSM does not in any way shape or form represent.

EDIT: An example, a very well written post on this thread which is number 29, then see Malcanis's reply to it, makes the point doesn't it!

When the going gets tough the Gankers get their CSM rep to change mechanics in their favour.

Blocked: Teckos Pech, Sonya Corvinus, baltec1, Shae Tadaruwa, Wander Prian, Daichi Yamato, Jonah Gravenstein, Merin Ryskin, Linus Gorp

Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
#66 - 2013-10-14 09:06:53 UTC
Dracvlad wrote:
Princess Bride wrote:
Malcanis, people have said you are a rational person.

As a rational person, how does your sarcasm and attitude help the situation or you?


Now that I have stopped laughing at Red Templer, Malcanis is perfectly rational, he posts on pushing the 0.0 agenda, simple as, which is of course to force people out of hisec!


Roll

"Just remember later that I warned against any change to jump ranges or fatigue. You earned whats coming."

Grath Telkin, 11.10.2016

Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
#67 - 2013-10-14 09:15:10 UTC
Princess Bride wrote:
Malcanis, people have said you are a rational person.

As a rational person, how does your sarcasm and attitude help the situation or you?


Red Templar pretty much nailed it. There's no point arguing with people who fling "when did you start beating your wife" style accusational questions, because their confirmation bias is so strong that anything ones says or does is simply taken as further 'proof' that one is GUILTY!!!!!. In which case, why worry about it? One might as well please oneself.

Like the person to whom I made the reply above, who probably really does believe that I want to "drive people out of hi-sec". He has a 'picture' of who Malcanis is in his mind, and he will simply ignore anything that contradicts it, or, because he knows that I want to drive people out of hi-sec, if there is evidence that he can't simply handwave away, then he will claim it's deliberately falsified or else quote-mine some sentence fragment to "prove" that I want the exact opposite of what I have gone on public record to say I want (and even based my election campaign on).

With such people, there's no point being respectful or sincere or constructive; I don't respect them, I have nothing to say to them, and there's nothing there to build on.

So I entertain myself with them instead. Why shouldn't I?

"Just remember later that I warned against any change to jump ranges or fatigue. You earned whats coming."

Grath Telkin, 11.10.2016

Dracvlad
Taishi Combine
Astral Alliance
#68 - 2013-10-14 09:36:18 UTC  |  Edited by: Dracvlad
Malcanis wrote:
Princess Bride wrote:
Malcanis, people have said you are a rational person.

As a rational person, how does your sarcasm and attitude help the situation or you?


Red Templar pretty much nailed it. There's no point arguing with people who fling "when did you start beating your wife" style accusational questions, because their confirmation bias is so strong that anything ones says or does is simply taken as further 'proof' that one is GUILTY!!!!!. In which case, why worry about it? One might as well please oneself.

Like the person to whom I made the reply above, who probably really does believe that I want to "drive people out of hi-sec". He has a 'picture' of who Malcanis is in his mind, and he will simply ignore anything that contradicts it, or, because he knows that I want to drive people out of hi-sec, if there is evidence that he can't simply handwave away, then he will claim it's deliberately falsified or else quote-mine some sentence fragment to "prove" that I want the exact opposite of what I have gone on public record to say I want (and even based my election campaign on).

With such people, there's no point being respectful or sincere or constructive; I don't respect them, I have nothing to say to them, and there's nothing there to build on.

So I entertain myself with them instead. Why shouldn't I?


But the interesting thing is that if you go back through Malcanis's posts you will find that he attacks anyone who has a hisec and more carebear approach, its there on the forums for all to see.

Malcannis is a representative of the CSM who has decided to ridicule anyone who has a different view to his 0.0 centric viewpoint, posting here as he does is acting as a filter, that is why he should not do it if the CSM wants to be seen as representative, and only 14% of the accounts voting for the CSM makes a very strong case does it not.

And Malcanis you can bluster all you want, but it does not hide the facts of what you are doing, which Red Templer definately nailed and which I still find hilariously funny.

EDIT: Let me re-empashise what Red Templer really means:

Quote:
ridicule them to the point when its obvious to everyone, that what they are saying appears to be total nonsense.

When the going gets tough the Gankers get their CSM rep to change mechanics in their favour.

Blocked: Teckos Pech, Sonya Corvinus, baltec1, Shae Tadaruwa, Wander Prian, Daichi Yamato, Jonah Gravenstein, Merin Ryskin, Linus Gorp

Frying Doom
#69 - 2013-10-14 09:52:55 UTC  |  Edited by: Frying Doom
Trebor Daehdoow wrote:

This is my personal, initial reaction to this news. I want to emphasize that I do not have any significant non-public information about this, nor has the CSM had time to get any information from CCP.

1) CCP has the right to give away Ishukone Scorpions to anyone they want to, for any reason. They are a promotional item.

2) The choice of who they give them to (or don't give them to) has consequences in the community.

3) The recent SOMER-gate uproar means the consequences of this earlier interaction have magnified significance.

My initial impression is that the problem here is not that SOMER got the ships, but that the reward (and any others that CCP may have given out) were not made public.

"Publicity is justly commended as a remedy for social and industrial diseases. Sunlight is said to be the best of disinfectants; electric light the most efficient policeman." -- Louis D. Brandeis, Associate Justice of the United States Supreme Court


Malcanis wrote:


1) CCP have been giving special award ships for a long, long time. Why is it suddenly a problem now

2) If you seriously need to ask what the difference is between CCP making a legitimate decision and 1 rogue employee directly breaking company policy then all I can ask is that you grow up, get a job and see how life actually works. I can't be bothered to talk to naive children.


Given these excellent examples of just how out of touch some members of the CSM are, do we really need people like this representing our wants and desires for this game to CCP.

There is of course the fact that in the last few CSMs they have become more of a PR arm for CCP than they are the representatives of the players.

Malcanis wrote:
Bluespot85 wrote:


There seems to be no more passion from ccp management to continue to make a great game.


I can tell you for a fact that this is not true. How many times does it have to be said that the last couple of years have been about addressing the technical debt and polish/iteration backlog? Which CCP have accomplished very well - I almost wish that they'd give us a taste of the Incarna/Tyrannis ere client for a few days, just to remind us all of how much they've improved EVE in the myriad small (and sometimes not so small) ways. Look, T1 ships that are worth something! Look, fights that aren't blackscreen fests! Look, countless minor improvements to the UI! And so on.

We've just had 4 expansions in a row that have been essentially all about "attention to detail". EVE is all the better for it. I certainly agree that it's time to start truly expanding the game again, but if that necessary foundation work hadn't been done, I wouldn't be agreeing.

Go watch Seagull's keynote presentation from this year's fanfest and tell me there's no passion there, I DARE you.


CSM White Paper wrote:

What is the CSM?

The Council of Stellar Management


The Council of Stellar Management (CSM) is a player-elected council who represent the views of the members of the EVE Online community to CCP. To quote part of the CSM white paper summary:
The purpose of the CSM is to represent society interests to CCP. This requires active engagement with the player community to master EVE issue awareness, understanding, and evaluation in the context of the greatest good for the greater player base.


I am not sure how "White Knighting" for CCP fits into the greatest good for the greater player base. While not all of the members of the CSM have been defending CCP dispite the apparent displeasure of the playerbase, some have and they have been the most vocal.

The CSM was created in the wake of the T20 crisis, now it appaers they would not be able to spot another T20 crisis if it ran up and punched them in the nose.

It is now apparent that a Douglas Adams quote has become reality in the CSM.

It is a well-known fact that those people who must want to rule people are, ipso facto, those least suited to do it... anyone who is capable of getting themselves made President should on no account be allowed to do the job.
-- Douglas Adams

The CSM is little more than a voice for CCP, it no longer speaks for the players, it needs to go.

There is no need to drag this out another year with a CSM9, just kill it at the end of this term, the forums are a far better example of what the players want in the game than the CSM.

Any spelling, grammatical and punctuation errors are because frankly, I don't care!!

Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
#70 - 2013-10-14 11:06:30 UTC
Frying Doom wrote:

I am not sure how "White Knighting" for CCP fits into the greatest good for the greater player base.


Have you considered the possibility that in your haste to drive the "CSM are shills" narrative that you've already forgotten numerous occasions where the CSM as a group and myself in particular have been sharply critical of CCP? For instance the TOS change affair, to name the most recent one of significance.

Or is it merely that you are simply being your normal dishonest, rabble-rousing, Confirmation-biased Dunning-Kruger Poster Child self?

"Just remember later that I warned against any change to jump ranges or fatigue. You earned whats coming."

Grath Telkin, 11.10.2016

Frying Doom
#71 - 2013-10-14 11:16:15 UTC  |  Edited by: Frying Doom
Malcanis wrote:
Frying Doom wrote:

I am not sure how "White Knighting" for CCP fits into the greatest good for the greater player base.


Have you considered the possibility that in your haste to drive the "CSM are shills" narrative that you've already forgotten numerous occasions where the CSM as a group and myself in particular have been sharply critical of CCP? For instance the TOS change affair, to name the most recent one of significance.

Or is it merely that you are simply being your normal dishonest, rabble-rousing, Confirmation-biased Dunning-Kruger Poster Child self?

I believe the quote that fits best is

" I can't be bothered to talk to naive children."

Yes you were a lot more sharply critical of CCP before you joined the CSM.

As I said all it is now from the CSM is a harsh note then spending the next few weeks defending CCPs actions.

The players elected the CSM to be their voice but all we see is a voice for CCP. Stuff the relationship with CCP, if access means that you are no longer the voice of the players then frankly we don't need the CSM.

Any spelling, grammatical and punctuation errors are because frankly, I don't care!!

Varius Xeral
Doomheim
#72 - 2013-10-14 13:38:18 UTC
Oh hey, Frying Chicken Little Doom is back, there goes any possibility of constructive discourse in this subsection.

Official Representative of The Nullsec Zealot Cabal

Baaldor
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#73 - 2013-10-14 13:40:37 UTC
From the start the CSM, from my understanding, was to actually take the ideas and concerns from the masses of autistic squirrels and try to format any "rational" points into a format that every one can agree on and understand.

And from there, a discussion can be initiated to see if it is viable in business sense and fits the model and spirit of this game.

But apparently, now we have some nerd rage from folk that believe that if they voted, they are entitled to some sort right that what is supposedly wanted from the masses, then it should be so.

The only thing going on here is that you have a minority of self important and self entitled little **** bags, that will most likely leave the game for something else after they get what they want, leaving us to continually deal with the crap they left behind.

Essentially they did not get what they wanted so now they are throwing their toys out of the pram.



Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation
The Honda Accord
#74 - 2013-10-14 18:06:55 UTC
Baaldor wrote:
From the start the CSM, from my understanding, was to actually take the ideas and concerns from the masses of autistic squirrels and try to format any "rational" points into a format that every one can agree on and understand.

And from there, a discussion can be initiated to see if it is viable in business sense and fits the model and spirit of this game.

But apparently, now we have some nerd rage from folk that believe that if they voted, they are entitled to some sort right that what is supposedly wanted from the masses, then it should be so.

The only thing going on here is that you have a minority of self important and self entitled little **** bags, that will most likely leave the game for something else after they get what they want, leaving us to continually deal with the crap they left behind.

Essentially they did not get what they wanted so now they are throwing their toys out of the pram.





The CSM was first an oversight organization that was a response to scandals involving CCP shenanigans. It also became an advisory committee of sorts over time. In fact these days the focus seems to be an assistant game designer. I would describe the scorpion give away the exact sort of scandal that the CSM was created to address. Not sure why this hasn't been a huge issue for the CSM.

I can say I'm not sure the CSM has the conduit into CCP anymore to address a scandal like this as it seems CCP sees this as a good thing for the "community" and not a scandal so the CSM may not be able to get any traction on the issue. I am going to assume that the CSM sees it for what it is (a horrible action on CCP's part) but has found CCP uninterested in any engagement on the issue.

Issler
Baaldor
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#75 - 2013-10-14 18:14:38 UTC  |  Edited by: Baaldor
Issler Dainze wrote:
Baaldor wrote:
From the start the CSM, from my understanding, was to actually take the ideas and concerns from the masses of autistic squirrels and try to format any "rational" points into a format that every one can agree on and understand.

And from there, a discussion can be initiated to see if it is viable in business sense and fits the model and spirit of this game.

But apparently, now we have some nerd rage from folk that believe that if they voted, they are entitled to some sort right that what is supposedly wanted from the masses, then it should be so.

The only thing going on here is that you have a minority of self important and self entitled little **** bags, that will most likely leave the game for something else after they get what they want, leaving us to continually deal with the crap they left behind.

Essentially they did not get what they wanted so now they are throwing their toys out of the pram.





The CSM was first an oversight organization that was a response to scandals involving CCP shenanigans. It also became an advisory committee of sorts over time. In fact these days the focus seems to be an assistant game designer. I would describe the scorpion give away the exact sort of scandal that the CSM was created to address. Not sure why this hasn't been a huge issue for the CSM.

I can say I'm not sure the CSM has the conduit into CCP anymore to address a scandal like this as it seems CCP sees this as a good thing for the "community" and not a scandal so the CSM may not be able to get any traction on the issue. I am going to assume that the CSM sees it for what it is (a horrible action on CCP's part) but has found CCP uninterested in any engagement on the issue.

Issler


Oversight? In order to do that you have to have unfettered access to whatever it is you are supposed to be "over-sighting" and who the hell do you think is going to enforce any wrong doings..seriously.

CCP stuck their dingus in a few too many holes granted, and T20 was not one of their smoothest PR moments. But seriously the folks that were voted in were folks that were to take the wailing from the masses and make sense of it and share it with CCP.

CSM is nothing more than just a group of players that happen to have some sense (Well short of Ank and Jade) to actually present solid ideas to CCP for future growth.

However, CCP is a privately owned company, we pay them for a service, and they allow us to log in. So, basically it is their world and we are just trying to find a nut. The fact that they invited some players to sit down and beak bread says quite a bit.

The only heart burn right now, is that folks are not getting what they want to satisfy their self entitlement rage.
Frying Doom
#76 - 2013-10-14 20:07:29 UTC  |  Edited by: Frying Doom
*retracted*

Having looked over some of the events that have occured during my absence, I must admit the CSM did do a good job of handling the standard CCP errors.

It was only in the last crisis that some of them seem to have stuffed it up so badly.

But I will say that the CSMs access to CCP means nothing if you stop being the voice of the players and start acting as a CCP PR arm, as the quotes in one of my above posts show.

Any spelling, grammatical and punctuation errors are because frankly, I don't care!!

Mike Azariah
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#77 - 2013-10-15 00:58:51 UTC
Quote:
But the interesting thing is that if you go back through Malcanis's posts you will find that he attacks anyone who has a hisec and more carebear approach, its there on the forums for all to see.


Anecdotal, Malc has been nothing but polite in any conversation with me and with topics covering hisec.

Said it before and I will say it again. We do work with CCP in regards to issues like the most current one but please do not discount what we do if you do not hear the conversations we have behind closed doors. Wait to see if there is an effect, a change.

If we make no difference, nothing gets better, this CSM term then it our fault, not the process, not the office, our fault.

m

Mike Azariah  ┬──┬ ¯|(ツ)

Frying Doom
#78 - 2013-10-15 02:36:38 UTC
Mike Azariah wrote:
Quote:
But the interesting thing is that if you go back through Malcanis's posts you will find that he attacks anyone who has a hisec and more carebear approach, its there on the forums for all to see.


Anecdotal, Malc has been nothing but polite in any conversation with me and with topics covering hisec.

Said it before and I will say it again. We do work with CCP in regards to issues like the most current one but please do not discount what we do if you do not hear the conversations we have behind closed doors. Wait to see if there is an effect, a change.

If we make no difference, nothing gets better, this CSM term then it our fault, not the process, not the office, our fault.

m

People are unlikely to believe the CSM is doing anything behind closed doors to voice the concerns of players if members are publicly saying things like
"1) CCP has the right to give away Ishukone Scorpions to anyone they want to, for any reason. They are a promotional item.

2) The choice of who they give them to (or don't give them to) has consequences in the community."

The CSM is the voice of the players and if the players can not hear it they will presume that they have gone mute. Much like the need for CCP transparency, the CSM needs to be even more transparent, especially during a crisis.

Any spelling, grammatical and punctuation errors are because frankly, I don't care!!

Dracvlad
Taishi Combine
Astral Alliance
#79 - 2013-10-15 06:36:09 UTC
Mike Azariah wrote:
Quote:
But the interesting thing is that if you go back through Malcanis's posts you will find that he attacks anyone who has a hisec and more carebear approach, its there on the forums for all to see.


Anecdotal, Malc has been nothing but polite in any conversation with me and with topics covering hisec.

Said it before and I will say it again. We do work with CCP in regards to issues like the most current one but please do not discount what we do if you do not hear the conversations we have behind closed doors. Wait to see if there is an effect, a change.

If we make no difference, nothing gets better, this CSM term then it our fault, not the process, not the office, our fault.

m


I am sure he is polite to his mother too, don't confuse a working relationship with forum behaviour, Malcanis is posting on the forums as he was before he was elected, that is perhaps acceptable in the other parts of the forums, but these two sections should not be turned into his personal play ground which certainly seems to be the case. If you cannot see the impact that has on the hisec player base who don't exactly have a culture of interacting unless roused out of their slumber to post by some nerf that they find unacceptable then you are missing a trick, these people normally only post when they are fed up, so of course its going to be a bit of a rant, do I need to spell that out, and the first CSM member they meet is Malcanis who ridicules them to shut them up, he is a public relations disaster in terms of interacting with the hisec player base.

And in this very thread he admits to posting to shut people up who he disagrees with by using ridicule, either you want to interact with your hisec player base or you don't, so far it looks like you don't!

When the going gets tough the Gankers get their CSM rep to change mechanics in their favour.

Blocked: Teckos Pech, Sonya Corvinus, baltec1, Shae Tadaruwa, Wander Prian, Daichi Yamato, Jonah Gravenstein, Merin Ryskin, Linus Gorp

Varius Xeral
Doomheim
#80 - 2013-10-15 12:05:23 UTC
rofl

speaking for all of "hisec" and suggesting special posting privileges for the "posting disadvantaged"

just stop, you are demented

Official Representative of The Nullsec Zealot Cabal