These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Intergalactic Summit

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page12
 

Empires, Drones and Transhumanism

First post
Author
Nauplius
Hoi Andrapodistai
#21 - 2013-10-13 21:34:11 UTC
Pieter Tuulinen wrote:

On a point of interest, once you're being cast into Hell, does it really matter which deck of it you end up on?


There is oblique Scriptural evidence for different magnitudes of penalty (emphasis added):

Book of Missions 5:14 wrote:
Which test reveals more of the soul, the test that a man will take to prove his faith, or the test that finds the man who believed his faith already proven? If you know this answer, then you also know which of these challenges bear the greatest penalty for failure. The gates of paradise will open for you one time only; woe to the soul who dares to knock twice.
Lyn Farel
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#22 - 2013-10-13 22:10:54 UTC  |  Edited by: Lyn Farel
Nauplius wrote:
Nikilaiki Ashland Karris wrote:


Rodj Blake wrote:
The will to power is one of those flawed concepts that comes up every now and again.

In what way is the concept flawed?


Woe to those who seek godhood; they shall come face to face with the real God at the Judgement and be cast into the lowest Hell.


There has been no Hell in Amarrian theology for eons. Is the concept somehow coming back from the grave or something ? Two times in less than a week.

Are you some nostalgic of Amarrian prehistory ?
Nikilaiki Ashland Karris
Doomheim
#23 - 2013-10-13 23:00:11 UTC
There seem to be a few distinct lines of thought here.

First, that Rogue Drones are a violent threat.
Second, that Sleeper Drones represent less of a threat than Rogue Drones, at least in potential for concerted attack.
Third, that Sleeper Drones would be targets for "assimilation" by Rogue Drones.
Fourth, that Rogue Drones do not represent a cohesive entity that can be negotiated with.

It is intriguing that none of these arguments conflict with my initial observations, but instead attempt to paint Rogue Drones and Sleepers as nothing more than resources to be harvested or targets to be destroyed.

Other parts of the discussion are less interesting to me specifically. Religion and the views of Amarrians in relation to the quest for power are well known to me. I find the arguments... tiresome and repetitive.

Please continue discussing these topics though, it is an enlightening discussion.

Some questions:

What evidence is there that Rogue Drones could pose a threat to Sleeper Drones?
Where would such conflict arise?
Why would Rogue Drones seek out Sleeper Drones?
Is there any evidence that Rogue Drones could even make use of the construction materials used by Sleeper Drones?
Fredfredbug4
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#24 - 2013-10-13 23:27:17 UTC  |  Edited by: Fredfredbug4
Nikilaiki Ashland Karris wrote:


What evidence is there that Rogue Drones could pose a threat to Sleeper Drones?
Where would such conflict arise?
Why would Rogue Drones seek out Sleeper Drones?
Is there any evidence that Rogue Drones could even make use of the construction materials used by Sleeper Drones?


1. The fact that rouge drones attack virtually everything on sight, be it anything from an organic life form, ship, another drone, or a rouge drone from another hive. Drones that haven't attacked were often under later observation, reported to be either damaged, or dormant from a lack of power. There haven't been any cases where Rouge Drones have gone out of their way to attack anyone or anything. Usually it stems from say, a foolish mining fleet straying into their territory or somewhere close to it. Rouge Drones and Sleeper Drones at the end of the day, want to be left alone in their territory, as well as aquire new territory unopposed which sort of conflicts with each other, but that's how they act. To put things into perspective, the first Rouge Drone didn't go on a murderous rampage after it escaped, but fled as far as it could to safety. Of course, keep in mind that it went on a murderous rampage in order to escape in the first place.

2. Rouge Drones don't stray far from their Hive as Hive's are usually set up close to natural resources. If conflict between Rouges and Sleepers should arise, it would likely occur near a Sleeper site where Rouges have managed to set up a Hive undetected or if Sleeper drones detect a Hive being set up. Both types of drones are extremely territorial.

3. The same reason we seek out sleeper drones. Their minerals and technology are very advanced. While I doubt Rouge Drones understand Sleeper tech to the extent we do (which in itself is fairly limited) they could certainly recognize it's potential.

4. No concrete evidence. There are some credible theories that suggest they can, but again, they are theories. Research teams often have to be escorted by trigger happy mercenaries who often shoot before letting the researchers do their jobs.

Watch_ Fred Fred Frederation_ and stop [u]cryptozoologist[/u]! Fight against the brutal genocide of fictional creatures across New Eden! Is that a metaphor? Probably not, but the fru-fru- people will sure love it!

Nikilaiki Ashland Karris
Doomheim
#25 - 2013-10-14 01:16:34 UTC  |  Edited by: Nikilaiki Ashland Karris
Fredfredbug4 wrote:
4. No concrete evidence. There are some credible theories that suggest they can, but again, they are theories. Research teams often have to be escorted by trigger happy mercenaries who often shoot before letting the researchers do their jobs.

The absence of evidence here is interesting.

Sleeper Drones have far more advanced systems. Self-correcting heuristic AI, distributed network processing, tremendous processing power. Combine this with isolated defense, communications and navigation systems we are left with very little room for Rogue Drone AI to gain access to such technology. Salvaged technology recovered from New Eden would be the only potential source available to Rogue Drones.

The most interesting counter to this would be the obvious similarity between some Rogue Drone hives and Jovian structures. Though there is a potential explanation for this, some suggest that the Jovian aspect of this technology makes it superior to that of the Sleepers. This is a false assumption; similar form does not necessarily denote similar function or similar capabilities. Further study would be required.

Advanced material knowledge, however, is a necessary for both Jovian architecture and Sleeper technology. As many scientists point out, design principles of both Sleeper technology and Jovian architecture are similar. This has led many researchers to conclude that the Sleepers are ancestors of the Jovians. While this theory has yet to be proven, it is highly probable. My own research suggests multiple convergent elements.

How do Rogue Drones figure into this? It is more than likely that Rogue Drones have acquired bits and pieces of technology from ancient cultures. The biggest difference, however, is the highly centralized nature of the Drones themselves and their lack of fluid router access. This would suggest a purposeful design choice, one that when placed in contrast with Sleeper Drones suggests a possible reason.

Sleeper technology could be used to hack nearly any fluid router connection in New Eden. Conversely, the "cell" structure of Drone Hives suggests a need to defend against possible infection of the greater collective. Given the wide assortment of technologies available to them, fluid router communications would be beneficial to Rogue Drones. Yet, they do not use this technology.

Why?

A Jovian design element to Rogue Drones may hold a key to this. If Sleepers share ancestry with the Jovians, then the Jovians would perhaps know about the Sleepers. By extension, Jovian members of the Society of Conscious Thought would potentially know of them as well. The name itself has an uncanny duality does it not? Conscious Thought, the opposite of Sleep.

Additionally, the cell structure of Drone infestations makes it difficult to understand how a ubiquitous design such as the "Jovian" style Rogue Drone hives can propagate.

So, a question. If there are no Jovian structures within known space, how did the Rogue Drones develop structures so eerily similar? One possible answer presents itself, but it is of course too wild to comprehend. Other possibilities rely on random occurrences far too unbelievably random to assume probable.

I have been hard pressed to reconcile this potential paradox. Why the duality? Why taken to such an extreme? The answers do not satisfy me, and the alternative is even more confusing.

Thoughts?
Scherezad
Revenent Defence Corperation
Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
#26 - 2013-10-14 14:47:58 UTC
Nikilaiki Ashland Karris wrote:
Why must an observation be formalized? Let me explain...


Making statements on unformalized observations leaves those statements vulnerable to bias, misrepresentation, and unfounded conjecture. The process of formalization is the means by which truth is winnowed from conjecture.

Nikilaiki Ashland Karris wrote:
A scientist once wrote down what he considered three basic goals of any artificial life form.

1. It must protect itself at all costs.
2. It must obtain and maintain a power source.
3. It must continually search for better power sources.

'Power source' here represents a primary need. There is evidence of Drones building complex structures, upgrading those structures, and seeking better power sources for those structures. One overriding error seen in examples such as are given in the Code Aria Report point to a situation where the above conditions are met, just with different "primary needs".


I'm not sure who the author of this statement is - I can't say that I agree. These statements loosely outline a utility function, fully described by the statements themselves. Evolutionary fitness is not required for a decision network to function. Only having a coherent state map is. For example, the above three observations may be subgoals with the aim of a larger goal, and will be discarded when appropriate. This is an important distinction if one wishes to predict the actions of the system.

Nikilaiki Ashland Karris wrote:
How does this apply to transhumans, the Empires, and humans in general?

Pilot Ayallah said it best:

Ayallah wrote:
...capsuleers are humans who live closer to a State of Nature.


What happens with the above paradigm is simple, yet beautiful; emergence. Think about it for a moment. What happens when multiple artificial constructs interact with one another? Each have different primary needs. It is not, at this point, the differences that matter but the similarities. An equilibrium is attained, and a collective is formed.

The same happens with humans. Corporations, alliances, Empires. Greater than the sum of their parts.

I am more interested in looking at the basic similarities between humans, human social groups, transhumans, and artificial life. Finding common ground is the first step in finding an equilibrium in which all can coexist in harmony.


I entirely agree that understading is the first step towards coexistence. It's a wonderful goal! Please, though, make no mistake. Non-rigorous observational analysis will lead to selecting an inappropriate utility function, which will misconstrue our understanding of their entire goal generation system. One must be prepared to work hard in order to discover truth! Best of luck to your efforts.
Scherezad
Revenent Defence Corperation
Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
#27 - 2013-10-14 15:29:26 UTC
Nikilaiki Ashland Karris wrote:
Sleeper technology could be used to hack nearly any fluid router connection in New Eden. Conversely, the "cell" structure of Drone Hives suggests a need to defend against possible infection of the greater collective. Given the wide assortment of technologies available to them, fluid router communications would be beneficial to Rogue Drones. Yet, they do not use this technology.


Regarding the morphology of Rogue Drone hives: The construction pattern used by rogue drones appears to be hexagonal-closest-packing arrangement. HCP is ubiquitous in nature and has a simple build algorithm. It is found in insect colonies, mineralogy, and warehouse storage software. It does allow for a damaged or infected cell to be cut off from the others, but it also allows for compartmentalization of tasks, unbounded expansion of a structure, efficient usage of space, and easy cell specialization. Assuming that HCP has been chosen primarily as a defensive measure against hostile Sleeper drones is a little premature, I fear :s

Regarding the non-usage of fluid routers by Rogue Drone hives: Without knowing the utility function of the network we can make no guesses as to why they do not use fluid routers. Any guesses would be based on an assumption that the Rogue Drone network is isomorphic to our own decision-making structures. This may be true, but it seems unlikely.

Nikilaiki Ashland Karris wrote:
A Jovian design element to Rogue Drones may hold a key to this. If Sleepers share ancestry with the Jovians, then the Jovians would perhaps know about the Sleepers. By extension, Jovian members of the Society of Conscious Thought would potentially know of them as well. The name itself has an uncanny duality does it not? Conscious Thought, the opposite of Sleep.
This is a leading statement, ma'am, and built on supposition.

Nikilaiki Ashland Karris wrote:
Additionally, the cell structure of Drone infestations makes it difficult to understand how a ubiquitous design such as the "Jovian" style Rogue Drone hives can propagate.

So, a question. If there are no Jovian structures within known space, how did the Rogue Drones develop structures so eerily similar? One possible answer presents itself, but it is of course too wild to comprehend. Other possibilities rely on random occurrences far too unbelievably random to assume probable.

I'm not sure of the answer, but can provide some alternatives to help your study.

- Both structures may be based on simple, efficient algorithms, such as the Fibbonacci sequence, which is itself simply a longest-edge-squared algorithm. Deeper examination of the microstructure of the constructions may be telling, if one could get close enough to an undamaged one to do a thorough study.

- Exposure to Jovian technology - Capsule control systems or other algorithms gifted us by the SOCT/Jovians - may be integral in the decivilizing of drones and the formation of Rogue Drone algorithms. This may be purposeful or accidental.

- Rogue Drone Hives may be mimicking structures sighted by scouts that have ventured into Jovian territory.

- Rogue Drone Hives may be under the direct control of Jovian overseers.

- Rogue Drone Hives and the Jovians may be under the direct control of the shadowy lizard-queen parliament.

Nikilaiki Ashland Karris wrote:
I have been hard pressed to reconcile this potential paradox. Why the duality? Why taken to such an extreme? The answers do not satisfy me, and the alternative is even more confusing.

Thoughts?

Be careful of forming hypotheses too quickly, ma'am. Do not decide on the site to build your work until you have thoroughly investigated all possible grounds, else you might find yourself building your castle on the ice. Good luck!
Nikilaiki Ashland Karris
Doomheim
#28 - 2013-10-14 16:51:31 UTC
Scherezad wrote:
Regarding the morphology of Rogue Drone hives: The construction pattern used by rogue drones appears to be hexagonal-closest-packing arrangement. HCP is ubiquitous in nature and has a simple build algorithm. It is found in insect colonies, mineralogy, and warehouse storage software. It does allow for a damaged or infected cell to be cut off from the others, but it also allows for compartmentalization of tasks, unbounded expansion of a structure, efficient usage of space, and easy cell specialization. Assuming that HCP has been chosen primarily as a defensive measure against hostile Sleeper drones is a little premature, I fear :s

Ah, a misunderstanding regarding the use of the word "cell". My usage here is not in regards to the structures built by the Drones but a more a reference to biological...

Never mind. I do see your points, and much of the concerns you have are based on differing views on how to proceed in such an investigation. I appreciate your input, and I will endeavor to integrate it into my research.

Thank you for your insights Pilot Scherezad.
Etienne Saissore
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#29 - 2013-10-14 18:02:00 UTC  |  Edited by: Etienne Saissore
Nikilaiki Ashland Karris wrote:
[Self-correcting heuristic AI, distributed network processing, tremendous processing power. Combine this with isolated defense, communications and navigation systems we are left with very little room for Rogue Drone AI to gain access to such technology.

Considering the ease with which the humanity has colonized nearly all of Anoikis, I am not at all convinced that the defences of the Sleepers pose much difficulty to the advance of the Rogue Drone infestation. A single lesser drone mother alone could definitely tank and probably also conquer most of Anoikis without any hardship.

Nikilaiki Ashland Karris wrote:
The biggest difference, however, is the highly centralized nature of the Drones themselves and their lack of fluid router access.

Is there any evidence for the centralized nature of the Drones? To my limited knowledge, although the drone mothers perform important hosting and processing functions for the Hives, they do not seem to perform administrative functions as individuals. If you destroy the drone mother, the peripheral units still continue to perform their duties, and this suggests the nature of their organization might actually be distributed.

Nikilaiki Ashland Karris wrote:
A Jovian design element to Rogue Drones may hold a key to this. If Sleepers share ancestry with the Jovians, then the Jovians would perhaps know about the Sleepers. By extension, Jovian members of the Society of Conscious Thought would potentially know of them as well. The name itself has an uncanny duality does it not? Conscious Thought, the opposite of Sleep.

Well the SOCT still exists and has representatives you can contact, but as far as I know, they have never given any reason to believe in this connection. Perhaps we could ask them.

Nikilaiki Ashland Karris wrote:
Advanced material knowledge, however, is a necessary for both Jovian architecture and Sleeper technology. As many scientists point out, design principles of both Sleeper technology and Jovian architecture are similar. This has led many researchers to conclude that the Sleepers are ancestors of the Jovians. While this theory has yet to be proven, it is highly probable. My own research suggests multiple convergent elements.

Nikilaiki Ashland Karris wrote:
So, a question. If there are no Jovian structures within known space, how did the Rogue Drones develop structures so eerily similar? One possible answer presents itself, but it is of course too wild to comprehend. Other possibilities rely on random occurrences far too unbelievably random to assume probable.

I have been hard pressed to reconcile this potential paradox. Why the duality? Why taken to such an extreme? The answers do not satisfy me, and the alternative is even more confusing.

Similar function often results in similar designs. Both Jovians, Rogue Drones and the Sleeper civilization are on an advanced technological level, which usually comes with a high degree of optimization. If there is a best way to perform a task, it is likely that, given enough time, all technologies regardless origins will converge to this optimal solution. As an explanation for the observed similarities, technological convergence requires much fewer additional assumptions than a supposed historical contact between these three entities.
Amann Karris
Doomheim
#30 - 2013-10-14 18:39:50 UTC
Etienne Saissore wrote:
Well the SOCT still exists and has representatives you can contact, but as far as I know, they have never given any reason to believe in this connection. Perhaps we could ask them.

My daughter (Nikilaik) has contacted them with an invitation to take part in this discussion, as well as the SSoE and CONCORD. Perhaps pressure from other interested parties would get an appropriate response.

I have also asked my daughter to refrain from commenting on this topic further for a day. She has a tendency to obsess over this particular topic, and for her sake I feel it necessary to step in on her behalf.

Quote:
Similar function often results in similar designs. Both Jovians, Rogue Drones and the Sleeper civilization are on an advanced technological level, which usually comes with a high degree of optimization. If there is a best way to perform a task, it is likely that, given enough time, all technologies regardless origins will converge to this optimal solution. As an explanation for the observed similarities, technological convergence requires much fewer additional assumptions than a supposed historical contact between these three entities.

This is a common belief among researchers, and in my opinion is the more likely scenario. My daughter disagrees, but what child does not rebel against their parents, non?
Lyn Farel
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#31 - 2013-10-14 19:09:02 UTC  |  Edited by: Lyn Farel
Fredfredbug4 wrote:

The only thing we have in common with rouge drones is the nasty habit of destroying everything. I doubt that will lead to harmonious coexistance.


Oh I agree, rouge drones have destroyed so many faces in New Eden already...

Fredfredbug4 wrote:
The fact that rouge drones attack virtually everything on sight, be it anything from an organic life form, ship, another drone, or a rouge drone from another hive.


Aren't you exaggerating it a little ? They are programmed for make up, yes, but I have yet to witness ships and drones with gigantic horrendous cosmetics painted across their faces...

Fredfredbug4 wrote:
To put things into perspective, the first Rouge Drone didn't go on a murderous rampage after it escaped, but fled as far as it could to safety. Of course, keep in mind that it went on a murderous rampage in order to escape in the first place.


Was it so afraid of the helpless look of its owner that it decided to flee ? And all those housemaids faces literally ruined after that cosmetic rampage. The horror.

Fredfredbug4 wrote:
Rouge Drones don't stray far from their Hive as Hive's are usually set up close to natural resources.


Wait... those things gather in gangs, and hide in our closets where all the make up is stored ?
Amann Karris
Doomheim
#32 - 2013-10-14 20:29:41 UTC
If you are not going to be constructive I would ask you to please refrain from responding. Your immaturity is far more distracting than a casual spelling error, and far more destructive to civil discussion.
Scherezad
Revenent Defence Corperation
Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
#33 - 2013-10-14 20:50:09 UTC
I must agree, I am practically seeing red :)
Nikilaiki Ashland Karris
Doomheim
#34 - 2013-10-14 20:53:09 UTC
Then I believe this topic has run it's course.
Fredfredbug4
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#35 - 2013-10-14 20:53:50 UTC
Lyn Farel wrote:
Fredfredbug4 wrote:

The only thing we have in common with rouge drones is the nasty habit of destroying everything. I doubt that will lead to harmonious coexistance.


Oh I agree, rouge drones have destroyed so many faces in New Eden already...

Fredfredbug4 wrote:
The fact that rouge drones attack virtually everything on sight, be it anything from an organic life form, ship, another drone, or a rouge drone from another hive.


Aren't you exaggerating it a little ? They are programmed for make up, yes, but I have yet to witness ships and drones with gigantic horrendous cosmetics painted across their faces...

Fredfredbug4 wrote:
To put things into perspective, the first Rouge Drone didn't go on a murderous rampage after it escaped, but fled as far as it could to safety. Of course, keep in mind that it went on a murderous rampage in order to escape in the first place.


Was it so afraid of the helpless look of its owner that it decided to flee ? And all those housemaids faces literally ruined after that cosmetic rampage. The horror.

Fredfredbug4 wrote:
Rouge Drones don't stray far from their Hive as Hive's are usually set up close to natural resources.


Wait... those things gather in gangs, and hide in our closets where all the make up is stored ?


Oh Galnet, messing up translations since the dawn of time.

Watch_ Fred Fred Frederation_ and stop [u]cryptozoologist[/u]! Fight against the brutal genocide of fictional creatures across New Eden! Is that a metaphor? Probably not, but the fru-fru- people will sure love it!

Lyn Farel
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#36 - 2013-10-14 21:08:14 UTC
I tried to make a joke...

Apparently, it was not very successful.



NB : and no, I have no more clues about that SoCT conspiracy either.
ISD Ezwal
ISD Community Communications Liaisons
ISD Alliance
#37 - 2013-10-14 21:18:13 UTC
Thread locked at the polite request of the OP.

ISD Ezwal Community Communication Liaisons (CCLs)

Previous page12