These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Intergalactic Summit

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

The Theology Council is a Den of Indecency and Treason—An answer to Ms Gesakaarin

First post
Author
Lyn Farel
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#81 - 2013-10-05 10:43:02 UTC
Nicoletta Mithra wrote:
Odelya d'Hanguest wrote:
And coming back to the Empress: Maybe Jamyl Sarum did never experience a leaked adult holo, yet didn’t she do something far more blasphemous when she abandoned the doctrine of the sacred flesh?


No, because she didn't abandon the doctrine of sacred flesh.


Leaps of faith are amazing.

Gaven Lok'ri wrote:

You will burn in eternal damnation.


I am not familiar with that concept. It does not sound very orthodox. Care to elaborate ?
Slaver Filth
Council of Apostles
#82 - 2013-10-05 15:41:13 UTC
Gaven Lok'ri wrote:
I am done with this discussion, Heretic. When you declare the Empress a blasphemer you declare yourself beyond salvation.

You are a disgrace to your heritage. You are not Amarr, you are fallen. A failure. A pathetic disappointment of the vision of God. Your actions are a blight on the Amarrian institution of nobility and an insult to everyone who carries the responsibilities and titles of a Holder.

Your noble ancestors would be appalled to see what their descendant has wrought.

You will burn in eternal damnation.
You know nothing of being Amarr if you abandon our traditions, you need to study our recorded undisputed history, that proven path from the past has led us, God's Chosen People, to dominance in New Eden. Look to our past with and open heart, clear mind, and a humble but burning unquenchable desire for the truth, then you to will see the enormous sinful error that has engulfed God's Chosen People.

It was a time when we were not led by an Emperor sitting on our ancient Imperial throne, during our time of fear an instability a devious blasphemer with a mysterious wonder weapon that delivered us from the wrath of freed slaves crawled in to squat upon our Imperial throne, and the weak, and the frightened embraced the Sarum capsuleer despite the fact she committed ritual suicide when Emperor Doriam ascended to the Imperial throne. She was an heir that failed in her attempt to be selected Empress, Doriam was selected, how according to our traditions is this person alive?

King Khanid also chose to not follow our tradition but at least had the courage of his own convictions to break away from Amarr and carve out his own kingdom without becoming a capsuleer, a rebel yes, but one who might be returned to the flock because he maintained his sacred flesh. I am a capsuleer unfit to meet the requirement of sacred flesh to sit on our Imperial throne, the same as Jamyl.

Would any of you accept her wholly unorthodox path to the Imperial throne absent her wonder weapon that stopped but did not reverse the loses of the “Elder War”? Without the Minmatar throughly routing the Imperial Navy and threatening our very way of life whom amongst us would not have been demanding that this “living” failed candidate for the Imperial throne be thrown into a cleansing pit for all time?

She owed a debt to the Minmatar for creating her path to the throne with their attacks upon our Empire, she has never again used her wonder weapon to enforce the reclaiming she promised us, instead she rewarded those same Minmatar invaders by forcing us to relinquish more slaves to the Minmatar Republic. Was this the foul deal she negotiated with them, attack us then retreat, then when I am on the throne I'll give you everything and everyone you want, emancipation!

Why has the wonder weapon of this Sarum capsuleer not been used against the Minmatar Republic? Why does she not wield it against those who oppose the will of God in New Eden? Does it even exist? Was it just a part of the sinful hoax she duped the Amarrian people with? Open your eyes before this abomination destroys the Holy Amarr Empire.

"Child of Amarr seek not warmth in our cold hearts, we are the old serpent of New Eden and you must do your part, revel in our viciousness, we rule by venom and our strike is merciless, "

Nicoletta Mithra
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#83 - 2013-10-06 00:30:26 UTC  |  Edited by: Nicoletta Mithra
Lyn Farel wrote:
Nicoletta Mithra wrote:
Odelya d'Hanguest wrote:
And coming back to the Empress: Maybe Jamyl Sarum did never experience a leaked adult holo, yet didn’t she do something far more blasphemous when she abandoned the doctrine of the sacred flesh?


No, because she didn't abandon the doctrine of sacred flesh.


Leaps of faith are amazing.

It's not about leaps of faith. It's about proper understanding of what the doctrine of sacred flesh is about. The doctrine of sacred flesh is about the flesh of those from a royal line, which is by doctrine sacred. It's not - at least not directly - about the restriction of cloning for those of the royal families.The restriction of cloning is a consequence of this doctrine, but it is dependant on hown th doctrine is interpreted. So even if one is of the belief that the Empress is a capsuleer and a clone, all she would have to abandoned is that the restriction of cloning, but that doesn't mean that she by necessity did away with the doctrine of sacred flesh.

The same is true if one assumes that she did away when accepting King Khanid as a member of the Privy Council, even though one is of the opinion that the King's miraculous youth is a result of repeated cloning.

Anyway, she didn't express that she did away with said doctrine. Nor did she give any indication that she changed to an Interpretation that merits a shift away from the restriction in place for cloning. The Privy Council in accord with the Theology Council proclaimed her eligible to become Empress prior to her coronation. Thus, it is quite clear that she did not break with the doctrine of purity of flesh. All that one might more or less reasonably claim - though this would still be based on idle speculation of whether the Empress or the King were in fact cloned - is that the acceptence of the consequence of cloning causing impurity of flesh is not any more supported by a modern interpretation of the doctrine.

So, there is no leap of faith needed, just proper reasoning instead of idle speculation and clinging to consequences that are not really necessary, even if one accepts that idle speculation as facts.
Shirin Khashour
Praetorian Auxiliary Force
Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris
#84 - 2013-10-06 07:17:44 UTC
Lyn Farel wrote:

Gaven Lok'ri wrote:

You will burn in eternal damnation.


I am not familiar with that concept. It does not sound very orthodox. Care to elaborate ?


Lord Admiral Lok'ri is a busy man, far too busy to explain basic school lessons that you should already know.

Given that burning away evil and eternal damnation for those who turn away from God are extremely common concepts that are some of the oldest elements of the Amarrian faith, I find it quite strange that you could claim to have never come across them. They appear in some of the most commonly known and quoted bits of scriptures; I had thought every schoolchild in Amarr was aware of them.

Either the Ammatar education system was in a great deal more trouble than I realized, or you are consciously baiting the Admiral with a statement you know is nonsense. Either way, I see no reason to forward your question to his attention.

Commandant of PAux.     "Surround yourself with the faithful, Stand together, for there is no strength like it under the heavens."  - The Scriptures, Book of Missions 71:21
Lyn Farel
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#85 - 2013-10-06 10:11:26 UTC
Nicoletta Mithra wrote:
Lyn Farel wrote:
Nicoletta Mithra wrote:
Odelya d'Hanguest wrote:
And coming back to the Empress: Maybe Jamyl Sarum did never experience a leaked adult holo, yet didn’t she do something far more blasphemous when she abandoned the doctrine of the sacred flesh?


No, because she didn't abandon the doctrine of sacred flesh.


Leaps of faith are amazing.

It's not about leaps of faith. It's about proper understanding of what the doctrine of sacred flesh is about. The doctrine of sacred flesh is about the flesh of those from a royal line, which is by doctrine sacred. It's not - at least not directly - about the restriction of cloning for those of the royal families.The restriction of cloning is a consequence of this doctrine, but it is dependant on hown th doctrine is interpreted. So even if one is of the belief that the Empress is a capsuleer and a clone, all she would have to abandoned is that the restriction of cloning, but that doesn't mean that she by necessity did away with the doctrine of sacred flesh.

The same is true if one assumes that she did away when accepting King Khanid as a member of the Privy Council, even though one is of the opinion that the King's miraculous youth is a result of repeated cloning.

Anyway, she didn't express that she did away with said doctrine. Nor did she give any indication that she changed to an Interpretation that merits a shift away from the restriction in place for cloning. The Privy Council in accord with the Theology Council proclaimed her eligible to become Empress prior to her coronation. Thus, it is quite clear that she did not break with the doctrine of purity of flesh. All that one might more or less reasonably claim - though this would still be based on idle speculation of whether the Empress or the King were in fact cloned - is that the acceptence of the consequence of cloning causing impurity of flesh is not any more supported by a modern interpretation of the doctrine.

So, there is no leap of faith needed, just proper reasoning instead of idle speculation and clinging to consequences that are not really necessary, even if one accepts that idle speculation as facts.


Oh, that is actually an interesting point of view.

Please forgive me for assuming that you held the common "miracle" belief that I have witnessed time and time again on these Galnet boards.
Lyn Farel
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#86 - 2013-10-06 10:17:51 UTC  |  Edited by: Lyn Farel
Shirin Khashour wrote:
Lyn Farel wrote:

Gaven Lok'ri wrote:

You will burn in eternal damnation.


I am not familiar with that concept. It does not sound very orthodox. Care to elaborate ?


Lord Admiral Lok'ri is a busy man, far too busy to explain basic school lessons that you should already know.

Given that burning away evil and eternal damnation for those who turn away from God are extremely common concepts that are some of the oldest elements of the Amarrian faith, I find it quite strange that you could claim to have never come across them. They appear in some of the most commonly known and quoted bits of scriptures; I had thought every schoolchild in Amarr was aware of them.

Either the Ammatar education system was in a great deal more trouble than I realized, or you are consciously baiting the Admiral with a statement you know is nonsense. Either way, I see no reason to forward your question to his attention.



Maybe you should review your Amarrian theology more closely then, instead of accusing others not to be knowledgeable on basic school lessons. I am not going to do a prejudice and think that because you are a PIE servant, that your beliefs are completely nonsensical, but what you show here does not really help in that way either.

Eternal damnation and burning evil, commonly referred by the concept of hell, has never been part of Amarrian scriptures and theological matters. Hell is a heathen concept that is commonly used as slang by most people to designate the worst place to live in at a given time. In Amarrian theology, there is indeed only Heaven. Being barred from entering Heaven does not mean ending up in some hellish place.

I am fairly certain that the good admiral shares the same beliefs on the matter, like most Amarrians do.

I am not really willing to play a silly game of social ladder and who has the most prominent place in the society with you, but if that is really what you want, do not be surprised to lose at that game.
Samira Kernher
Cail Avetatu
#87 - 2013-10-06 11:29:52 UTC  |  Edited by: Samira Kernher
Neither Lord Lok'ri nor Commandant Khashour have said 'hell'. They spoke of no 'place'. What his lordship threatened was eternal torment. This is not foreign to the faith, for those who refuse God or sin greatly. Let alone burning away evil, which our very lasers are built to do. You should review the Book of Amarr Askura, which speaks of both.
Lyn Farel
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#88 - 2013-10-06 12:19:29 UTC  |  Edited by: Lyn Farel
No matter how you twist its meaning, eternal damnation is still pretty much similar to many concepts of hell. Maybe I should not have mentioned the word in the first place, but all of this is merely a travesty.

Amarr Askura only mentions abandonment (forsaken), not eternal damnation.
Samira Kernher
Cail Avetatu
#89 - 2013-10-06 12:47:42 UTC
Lyn Farel wrote:
Amarr Askura only mentions abandonment (forsaken), not eternal damnation.


You do not consider the two one and the same?
Nicoletta Mithra
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#90 - 2013-10-06 13:45:10 UTC
Lyn Farel wrote:


Oh, that is actually an interesting point of view.

Please forgive me for assuming that you held the common "miracle" belief that I have witnessed time and time again on these Galnet boards.

Whether I hold the common "miracle" belief or not is nothing I commented on and is my private matter: My point is that it is really largely inconsequential for the question if the Empress or anyone else accepts the doctrine of sacred flesh, whether one subscribes to the belief that the Empress has been cloned or brought back to life by a miracle.
Lyn Farel
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#91 - 2013-10-06 14:38:00 UTC
Samira Kernher wrote:
Lyn Farel wrote:
Amarr Askura only mentions abandonment (forsaken), not eternal damnation.


You do not consider the two one and the same?


Maybe it is a matter of semantics, then. It seems to be often the root of the problem when it comes to my interaction with PIE Inc.

Nicoletta Mithra wrote:
Lyn Farel wrote:


Oh, that is actually an interesting point of view.

Please forgive me for assuming that you held the common "miracle" belief that I have witnessed time and time again on these Galnet boards.

Whether I hold the common "miracle" belief or not is nothing I commented on and is my private matter: My point is that it is really largely inconsequential for the question if the Empress or anyone else accepts the doctrine of sacred flesh, whether one subscribes to the belief that the Empress has been cloned or brought back to life by a miracle.


I think you misunderstood me. I genuinely apologized for ascribing those beliefs to yourself.
Odelya d'Hanguest
Order of St. Severian
#92 - 2013-10-13 23:33:24 UTC  |  Edited by: Odelya d'Hanguest
Nicoletta Mithra wrote:
Lyn Farel wrote:
Nicoletta Mithra wrote:
Odelya d'Hanguest wrote:
And coming back to the Empress: Maybe Jamyl Sarum did never experience a leaked adult holo, yet didn’t she do something far more blasphemous when she abandoned the doctrine of the sacred flesh?


No, because she didn't abandon the doctrine of sacred flesh.


Leaps of faith are amazing.

It's not about leaps of faith. It's about proper understanding of what the doctrine of sacred flesh is about. The doctrine of sacred flesh is about the flesh of those from a royal line, which is by doctrine sacred. It's not - at least not directly - about the restriction of cloning for those of the royal families.The restriction of cloning is a consequence of this doctrine, but it is dependant on hown th doctrine is interpreted. So even if one is of the belief that the Empress is a capsuleer and a clone, all she would have to abandoned is that the restriction of cloning, but that doesn't mean that she by necessity did away with the doctrine of sacred flesh.

The same is true if one assumes that she did away when accepting King Khanid as a member of the Privy Council, even though one is of the opinion that the King's miraculous youth is a result of repeated cloning.

Anyway, she didn't express that she did away with said doctrine. Nor did she give any indication that she changed to an Interpretation that merits a shift away from the restriction in place for cloning. The Privy Council in accord with the Theology Council proclaimed her eligible to become Empress prior to her coronation. Thus, it is quite clear that she did not break with the doctrine of purity of flesh. All that one might more or less reasonably claim - though this would still be based on idle speculation of whether the Empress or the King were in fact cloned - is that the acceptence of the consequence of cloning causing impurity of flesh is not any more supported by a modern interpretation of the doctrine.

So, there is no leap of faith needed, just proper reasoning instead of idle speculation and clinging to consequences that are not really necessary, even if one accepts that idle speculation as facts.
You argue like one of the Theology Council’s most foul myrmidons. The matter of cloning and the sanctitude of royal flesh are fiercely intertwined. Your separation is nothing but obscurant, artificial corruption. And even if we follow your twisted logic and that of the succession trials—which are nothing but an unwanted innovation in Amarr history: The idea behind Shathol'Syn is the permanent death of the heir—not his return—to prevent civil war and schism. Although this practice is primitive, man-made, and without precedence in the Empire’s history before the Theology Council started to corrupt its foundations, I find it appalling how fast each and every concept can be changed according to their whims.

But you are not really interested in questions of theology or serving the Lord, are you? You are interested in serving those in power. Regardless of how wrong and astray they might be. Regardless if they usurp it or rightfully own it. Be reminded: “To know the true path, but yet, to never follow it. That is possibly the gravest sin”

While slanderous rumours that His Majesty has cloned himself are just malicious rumours, it is an established fact that Jamyl Sarum had herself cloned, abandoned the Doctrine of Sacred Flesh, and despite this became Empress.

I pray for you,
Odelya d'Hanguest
Odelya d'Hanguest
Order of St. Severian
#93 - 2013-10-13 23:35:21 UTC
Gaven Lok'ri wrote:
I am done with this discussion, Heretic. When you declare the Empress a blasphemer you declare yourself beyond salvation.

You are a disgrace to your heritage. You are not Amarr, you are fallen. A failure. A pathetic disappointment of the vision of God. Your actions are a blight on the Amarrian institution of nobility and an insult to everyone who carries the responsibilities and titles of a Holder.

Your noble ancestors would be appalled to see what their descendant has wrought.

You will burn in eternal damnation.
And for you, poor Gaven, I pray too.
Nauplius
Hoi Andrapodistai
#94 - 2013-10-14 03:40:38 UTC
Lyn Farel wrote:

Maybe you should review your Amarrian theology more closely then, instead of accusing others not to be knowledgeable on basic school lessons. I am not going to do a prejudice and think that because you are a PIE servant, that your beliefs are completely nonsensical, but what you show here does not really help in that way either.

Eternal damnation and burning evil, commonly referred by the concept of hell, has never been part of Amarrian scriptures and theological matters. Hell is a heathen concept that is commonly used as slang by most people to designate the worst place to live in at a given time. In Amarrian theology, there is indeed only Heaven. Being barred from entering Heaven does not mean ending up in some hellish place.

I am fairly certain that the good admiral shares the same beliefs on the matter, like most Amarrians do.

I am not really willing to play a silly game of social ladder and who has the most prominent place in the society with you, but if that is really what you want, do not be surprised to lose at that game.


Take heed that your denial of Hell be not a license to sin, lest you find yourself assigned there at the Judgement.

But of course there is a Hell, and of course many Amarrians believe it exists. We have ship classes named Damnation and Abaddon; are these words just jibberish or heretical doctrine?

Or consider the case of Amarrian researcher Fajah Ateshi, who according to the reports of the Empyreans who rescued her came to believe in Hell after hearing the voices of her former assistants.
Lyn Farel
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#95 - 2013-10-14 18:41:55 UTC
Again, hell is a concept dating back to prehistory of the Amarr religion. That I deny or not it exists, or the concept in itself, is completely besides the point.

I could cite countless examples of Amarrian testimonies like you just did.

"I wonder, are you familiar with the concept of hell? Even the most fervently spiritual Amarrians believe in heaven yet scorn the concept of hell as outdated - hell, my people believe, is a state of mind. I am coming to think that this may be true."

The one you showed is just another proof of a believer starting to believe in an outdated concept.
Odelya d'Hanguest
Order of St. Severian
#96 - 2013-10-14 19:30:57 UTC  |  Edited by: Odelya d'Hanguest
[Never mind]