These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
12Next page
 

remove concord..

First post
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Julius Priscus
#1 - 2013-10-08 05:56:10 UTC
place the role in players hands.
leave gate guns on gates.
leave the disabled warp drives.
stop pilots ejecting or otherwise leaving the ship in anyway. ( placing into orca's etc )

when a player shoots another pilot without proper mechanics ie: suicide ganking , a beacon lites up so everyone in high sec can warp to that pilot. once the ship has been destroyed the beacon drops from local.

don't forget concord has not always been ingame.

discuss.
Arya Regnar
Darwins Right Hand
#2 - 2013-10-08 06:37:00 UTC
I am about to see this thread shot down like 1000 times before.

Watch it happen.

EvE-Mail me if you need anything.
Swiftstrike1
Swiftstrike Incorporated
#3 - 2013-10-08 06:41:26 UTC  |  Edited by: Swiftstrike1
Arya Regnar wrote:
I am about to see this thread shot down like 1000 times before.

Watch it happen.

pew pew pew! KABOOOM!!


For clarity's sake, we already have lowsec. Feel free to go live there if you don't like concord.

Casual Incursion runner & Faction Warfare grunt, ex-Wormholer, ex-Nullbear.
Rivr Luzade
Coreli Corporation
Pandemic Legion
#4 - 2013-10-08 07:47:25 UTC
Highsec is highsec for a reason. There is police and it's there for numerous reasons. Why should there be always more lawless space if people cannot even fill up and use the existing lawless space to the full extend?

UI Improvement Collective

My ridicule, heavy criticism and general pale outlook about your or CCP's ideas is nothing but an encouragement to prove me wrong. Give it a try.
Azrael Dinn
Imperial Mechanics
#5 - 2013-10-08 07:50:24 UTC
I've seen this idea before quite many times and for some reason people don't like it.

I personaly find the idea realy interesting and if done correctly it could open up complete new ways to play the game.

After centuries of debating and justifying... Break Cloaks tm
Jint Hikaru
OffWorld Exploration Inc
#6 - 2013-10-08 08:13:01 UTC
Bad idea that has come up before (blah blah search feature, blah... whatever)

Look, I realize that some of you PvPers are so massively endowed that you love to go waving it about and slapping other players with it. Especially those who don't want to be slapped (because lets face it, who wants to be slapped back when you want to feel all manly by being the slapper)...

but the truth is, there are MANY people playing Eve who have no interest in PvP. Loosing the 'semi protection' of HiSec will drive a lot of people from the game. That's the way it is.

No Concord = bad for Eve

Jint Hikaru - Miner / Salvager / Explorer / SpaceBum In the beginning the Universe was created. This has made a lot of people very angry and been widely regarded as a bad move.
Debora Tsung
Perkone
Caldari State
#7 - 2013-10-08 08:25:21 UTC
Julius Priscus wrote:

when a player shoots another pilot without proper mechanics ie: suicide ganking , a slice of bacon lites up so everyone in high sec can warp to it and get tasty bacon. Once the all bacon has been eaten everyone will be sad because there's no more bacon.

don't forget everything is better with bacon, even ingame.

discuss.



Done.

Stupidity should be a bannable offense.

Fighting back is more fun than not.

Sticky: AFK Cloaking Thread It's not pretty, but it's there.
Rivr Luzade
Coreli Corporation
Pandemic Legion
#8 - 2013-10-08 08:29:03 UTC
Besides, the players cannot even react to events Burn Jita accordingly and only think about getting on some Thrasher kills instead of protecting ships. Laughable dreams that EVE without Concord would be a better place. (Truth spoken, however, Concord cannot and should not provide full security.)

Also, how do you explain a simple player jump from Tenal to a aggression beacon in Khanid in a T1 Frigate? Or do you expect the mere local dwellers in Niarja or Uedama to fight against gank squads? And how many people would just remove this beacon from the overview because it constantly pops up in numbers and blocks more important things.

UI Improvement Collective

My ridicule, heavy criticism and general pale outlook about your or CCP's ideas is nothing but an encouragement to prove me wrong. Give it a try.
Tchulen
Trumpets and Bookmarks
#9 - 2013-10-08 08:51:45 UTC  |  Edited by: Tchulen
Julius Priscus wrote:
place the role in players hands.
leave gate guns on gates.
leave the disabled warp drives.
stop pilots ejecting or otherwise leaving the ship in anyway. ( placing into orca's etc )

when a player shoots another pilot without proper mechanics ie: suicide ganking , a beacon lites up so everyone in high sec can warp to that pilot. once the ship has been destroyed the beacon drops from local.

don't forget concord has not always been ingame.

discuss.



Please, at least try to think about what you're proposing even if it's just a little bit. If you're incapable of thinking get someone else to consider the implications of your proposal prior to posting. Otherwise you just come across as a tool.

Even a cursory level of thought regarding the removal of concord from high sec would show that it simply isn't possible without CCP garnering a mass account closure from a large number of the high sec players.

No matter whether you think it would be "cool" or "awesome" or "lol", it simply isn't in the best interests of the players or the game, would cause massive problems for CCP, reduction in revenue and therefore reduction in dev resources.

-1 for idiotic, badly thought out and quite probably a troll post.
Matthew97
#10 - 2013-10-08 09:23:57 UTC
Null Sec is that way --->
Velicitia
XS Tech
#11 - 2013-10-08 09:26:17 UTC
Julius Priscus wrote:

don't forget concord has not always been ingame.


Yes they have. They might not have been the "guaranteed instant death" that they are now (or rather, have been for about 8 years), but they have always been in game.

One of the bitter points of a good bittervet is the realisation that all those SP don't really do much, and that the newbie is having much more fun with what little he has. - Tippia
GeMiPaT
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
#12 - 2013-10-08 09:37:03 UTC
Hi Julius,

Well I think... you should have posted this in the "one-line bad idea" thread Pirate
Barrogh Habalu
Imperial Shipment
Amarr Empire
#13 - 2013-10-08 09:59:35 UTC  |  Edited by: Barrogh Habalu
Interesting mech. On one hand, sufficiently oganized fleet with alts and all that stuff will be able to lock down Jita or what have you.

On the other hand, unless shot hard enough, that fleet is stuck there until subscripion runs out. In the end I'm not sure if this change as presented will be a buff to hisec safety or otherwise Big smile

Future of T3 cruisers - multi-tool they aspired to be instead of sledgehammer they have become
To mare
Advanced Technology
#14 - 2013-10-08 10:56:05 UTC
i would like to see concord nerfed to a reasonable level, still deadly but not invincible.
give concord ships about 1000-1500 dps at close range and around 150KEHP for a BS and change the number of spawned ships depending on system secs.

that way normal random ganker would still die in a fire but very big and organized fleets could cause some serious trouble

would also make an use of bilboards advicing other ppl to dont jump there :D
Maximus Aerelius
PROPHET OF ENIGMA
#15 - 2013-10-08 11:52:14 UTC
Julius Priscus wrote:
don't forget concord has not always been ingame.


Yes they have and I've played since 2003 (Post-Beta Castor Patch)

[b]Fast Character Switching "XP Stylee" Undocking - More Routes Out of Station[/b] Here's my tear jar > |_| < Fill 'er up!
Tchulen
Trumpets and Bookmarks
#16 - 2013-10-08 13:37:02 UTC
Julius Priscus wrote:
its not a chat log.


That depends how CCP decides to interpret it. People chat in email and it's logged in text on CCP's servers and the clients of all individuals in the email chain. So it could be interpreted as a chat log.

I do love the fact that you've ignored all responses other than the one that had nothing to do with your thread but was merely a polite suggestion aimed at keeping you from shooting yourself in the foot through ignorance and idiocy.
Julius Priscus
#17 - 2013-10-08 13:41:34 UTC
Tchulen wrote:
Julius Priscus wrote:
its not a chat log.


That depends how CCP decides to interpret it. People chat in email and it's logged in text on CCP's servers and the clients of all individuals in the email chain. So it could be interpreted as a chat log.

I do love the fact that you've ignored all responses other than the one that had nothing to do with your thread but was merely a polite suggestion aimed at keeping you from shooting yourself in the foot through ignorance and idiocy.



try this... I don't hover over my keyboard waiting for replies. I do other stuff irl, like sleep, shopping and a social life.

not everyone who plays this game lives for it.
Maximus Aerelius
PROPHET OF ENIGMA
#18 - 2013-10-08 13:41:46 UTC
Tchulen wrote:
Julius Priscus wrote:
its not a chat log.


That depends how CCP decides to interpret it. People chat in email and it's logged in text on CCP's servers and the clients of all individuals in the email chain. So it could be interpreted as a chat log.

I do love the fact that you've ignored all responses other than the one that had nothing to do with your thread but was merely a polite suggestion aimed at keeping you from shooting yourself in the foot through ignorance and idiocy.


I've had a post removed that I posted which contained a message from a person who decided to message me repeatedly despite being told to keep the discussion in the thread and it was removed as it was in violation of said rule. Just trying to help you out.

[b]Fast Character Switching "XP Stylee" Undocking - More Routes Out of Station[/b] Here's my tear jar > |_| < Fill 'er up!
Julius Priscus
#19 - 2013-10-08 13:43:12 UTC
Tchulen wrote:
Julius Priscus wrote:
place the role in players hands.
leave gate guns on gates.
leave the disabled warp drives.
stop pilots ejecting or otherwise leaving the ship in anyway. ( placing into orca's etc )

when a player shoots another pilot without proper mechanics ie: suicide ganking , a beacon lites up so everyone in high sec can warp to that pilot. once the ship has been destroyed the beacon drops from local.

don't forget concord has not always been ingame.

discuss.



Please, at least try to think about what you're proposing even if it's just a little bit. If you're incapable of thinking get someone else to consider the implications of your proposal prior to posting. Otherwise you just come across as a tool.

Even a cursory level of thought regarding the removal of concord from high sec would show that it simply isn't possible without CCP garnering a mass account closure from a large number of the high sec players.

No matter whether you think it would be "cool" or "awesome" or "lol", it simply isn't in the best interests of the players or the game, would cause massive problems for CCP, reduction in revenue and therefore reduction in dev resources.

-1 for idiotic, badly thought out and quite probably a troll post.


last three words..
Tchulen
Trumpets and Bookmarks
#20 - 2013-10-08 13:45:01 UTC
Julius Priscus wrote:

try this... I don't hover over my keyboard waiting for replies. I do other stuff irl, like sleep, shopping and a social life.

not everyone who plays this game lives for it.


Other than the fact you were clearly hovering over your keyboard waiting for a post you could attempt at replying, evidenced by your last two replies.

Rather than derailing your own thread, how about entering the discussion you started? Just a thought Roll
12Next page