These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Jita Park Speakers Corner

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

CCP Shills on the CSM

First post First post
Author
Rob Crowley
State War Academy
#261 - 2013-10-08 00:36:11 UTC
Ranger 1 wrote:
You can give away cool items to people who in your opinion contribute a lot of content to your sand box game.
Depends on 2 things: do the cool items provide an advantage in the sandbox and are those people competing in the sandbox? If both answers are yes you can't do that or it isn't a sandbox anymore.

Quote:
These two things are not mutually exclusive, especially when you consider who built and gave borders to that sand box to begin with.
Yes, they are mutually exclusive. CCP built and gave borders to that sandbox, I don't understand how that is particularly worthy of consideration, I expected everyone here to know the sandbox metaphor.

Quote:
1: Blinks "competitors" are not going to suffer in any way from this. Nobody in the "competition" is going to go out of business because of this.
Are you kidding? Not only did Somer get massive ingame valuables which in and of itself is bad for competitors cause the competition is all about wealth. They also were endorsed and called legitimate by CCP which of course is a competitive advantage. Your claim that nobody in the competition is going out of business because of this is rather bold, I'd like to have your psychic abilities.

Quote:
2: Blink, you, I, and everyone else don't own anything in game.
What does this legal technicality have to do with anything? Are you trying to say if CCP deleted your assets tomorrow because you technically don't own them and they don't like you that would be acceptable?

Quote:
Again, take a step back and get a grip.
I like your condescending attitude, but I'm kinda missing the jealousy angle.
Princess Bride
SharkNado
#262 - 2013-10-08 00:40:25 UTC
For me the issue IS that CCP had the poor judgment to give away the items in secret. How does that NOT end poorly for them given past issues? They didn't know their player base well enough by now to keep things transparent?

Of course they can decide to give away anything they want to anyone they want. That is not the issue. However, just because you CAN do a thing does not mean you SHOULD do a thing. If they had done it, and posted they had done it, that's one thing. But this is a mistake like the "greed is good" newsletter was a mistake. CCP isn't bad for thinking like they did. They were bad to think it wouldn't be leaked and hurt them when it was written down. It's naive of them, again.

I have canceled my annual renewal. I've never done that, even during Incarna. Frankly, I don't have that much confidence in this company for that kind of commitment at this time.

http://eveprincessbride.wordpress.com/

Kaarous Aldurald
Black Hydra Consortium.
#263 - 2013-10-08 00:40:56 UTC
Quote:
They aren't promoting aspects of the game. They're promoting specific groups of players of the game. Big difference.


The EXACT same thing can be said about tournament prizes. Alliance or otherwise.

And as for your comment about "messing with the sandbox", again, not true. AT rewards don't break the sandbox. Chribba being allowed to have the Veldnaught doesn't break the sandbox. Gnosis battlecruisers don't break the sandbox. Genolution implants... well, you get the point.

"Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."

One of ours, ten of theirs.

Best Meltdown Ever.

Rob Crowley
State War Academy
#264 - 2013-10-08 00:50:23 UTC
Tyberius Franklin wrote:
Suggests that AT rewards would not be allowed as they would still potentially distort economic parity between to competing entities. When referees don't interfere, they don't interfere. The AT is an interference to the sandbox as are it's rewards.

Any reward not earned in game with participation available to all entities in game under the full set of game rules (and freedoms) is a distortion of the sandbox. So why are some permissible and others not?
Everyone who has ever played Eve must have noticed within 5 minutes that it has some themepark elements and the AT is by far not the biggest one, PvE content is absolutely dwarfing that. But it's not a problem for the integrity of the sandbox because all these themepark elements are available to all entities in game under precise rules known by everyone in advance. And when the referees change the rules they don't support or punish anyone in particular.

This is the difference between referees changing rules between seasons to make the game more interesting and referees giving extra points to one of the teams. You see the difference?
Bizzaro Stormy MurphDog
B.L.U.E L.A.S.E.R.
#265 - 2013-10-08 01:00:34 UTC
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
Quote:
They aren't promoting aspects of the game. They're promoting specific groups of players of the game. Big difference.


The EXACT same thing can be said about tournament prizes. Alliance or otherwise.

And as for your comment about "messing with the sandbox", again, not true. AT rewards don't break the sandbox. Chribba being allowed to have the Veldnaught doesn't break the sandbox. Gnosis battlecruisers don't break the sandbox. Genolution implants... well, you get the point.


So you equate someone at CCP "liking" a corporation enough to give them rare ships with CCP holding a tournament where the objectively determined winners get prizes?

So you equate someone at CCP "liking" a corporation enough to give them rare ships with giving EVERY PLAYER IN THE GAME a holiday gift?

You're in deep, man. But by all means, keep going! If you're persistent enough, CCP might give you a rare ship too!

I am not an alt of Chribba.

Bizzaro Stormy MurphDog
B.L.U.E L.A.S.E.R.
#266 - 2013-10-08 01:02:13 UTC
Rob Crowley wrote:
Tyberius Franklin wrote:
Suggests that AT rewards would not be allowed as they would still potentially distort economic parity between to competing entities. When referees don't interfere, they don't interfere. The AT is an interference to the sandbox as are it's rewards.

Any reward not earned in game with participation available to all entities in game under the full set of game rules (and freedoms) is a distortion of the sandbox. So why are some permissible and others not?
Everyone who has ever played Eve must have noticed within 5 minutes that it has some themepark elements and the AT is by far not the biggest one, PvE content is absolutely dwarfing that. But it's not a problem for the integrity of the sandbox because all these themepark elements are available to all entities in game under precise rules known by everyone in advance. And when the referees change the rules they don't support or punish anyone in particular.

This is the difference between referees changing rules between seasons to make the game more interesting and referees giving extra points to one of the teams. You see the difference?


Nonsense. CCP gives mission runners rare hardwirings all the time just for completing storyline missions. These BlinkScorps are no different.

. . . Right?

I am not an alt of Chribba.

Tyberius Franklin
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#267 - 2013-10-08 01:18:44 UTC
Rob Crowley wrote:
Tyberius Franklin wrote:
Suggests that AT rewards would not be allowed as they would still potentially distort economic parity between to competing entities. When referees don't interfere, they don't interfere. The AT is an interference to the sandbox as are it's rewards.

Any reward not earned in game with participation available to all entities in game under the full set of game rules (and freedoms) is a distortion of the sandbox. So why are some permissible and others not?
Everyone who has ever played Eve must have noticed within 5 minutes that it has some themepark elements and the AT is by far not the biggest one, PvE content is absolutely dwarfing that. But it's not a problem for the integrity of the sandbox because all these themepark elements are available to all entities in game under precise rules known by everyone in advance. And when the referees change the rules they don't support or punish anyone in particular.

This is the difference between referees changing rules between seasons to make the game more interesting and referees giving extra points to one of the teams. You see the difference?

PvE content hardly dwarfs the AT in regard to how unsandboxy it is, but that is not really significant here (and isn't really themeparkish anyways, though that's another topic). Your contention for the reason this was bad was it's effect on one side of a competition. AT rewards have that same effect. Now you propose that so long as there is a specifically stated framework, unsandboxlike as it is, the effect of those rewards is acceptable. Furthermore a sandbox game's creators should only reward content that is the opposite of intended eve gameplay.

By that logic the next up for unique ship handouts should be miners for excessive complaining about gankers.
Rabid Disconnection
Prism's Keepers
#268 - 2013-10-08 01:19:09 UTC
LOL For a game where the community prides themselves for being 'harder' than other MMO communities there sure is a bunch of crying on the forums here.

Well not only here, on just about every topic on the forums. So... is this community hard or crybaby? Actions speak louder than words.

Rob Crowley
State War Academy
#269 - 2013-10-08 01:19:38 UTC
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
Quote:
They aren't promoting aspects of the game. They're promoting specific groups of players of the game. Big difference.
The EXACT same thing can be said about tournament prizes. Alliance or otherwise.
No. "Any group who wins the tournament" is the exact opposite of "specific group of players".

Quote:
And as for your comment about "messing with the sandbox", again, not true.
You'd have to be more specific, what about my comment isn't true?

Quote:
AT rewards don't break the sandbox.
Why would they? Anyone can compete. Because the old ones are not obtainable anymore? Yeah, to a degree, see below.

Quote:
Chribba being allowed to have the Veldnaught doesn't break the sandbox. Gnosis battlecruisers don't break the sandbox. Genolution implants... well, you get the point.
In this case I would actually argue that hisec capitals do somewhat damage the sandbox, especially since they can't get traded anymore. It's just not nearly serious enough for me to care about, one important reason being it was not "Chribba can keep his hisec capital." but rather "Everyone who has a hisec capital can keep it." Plus there are strict rules of what you can't do with them to ensure the influence on the sandbox is small.

Regarding Gnosis and Genolution I guess you mean cause they won't be available in the future (don't remember how the Genolutions were seeded and if it stopped)? Yes those are of course grey areas regarding the sandbox too if some players have legacy items that can't be obtained anymore, but then again it's simply not practical to not change the game at all. In cases where the legacy items are perceived to have noticeable impact this is regularly discussed (e.g. T2 BPOs).

I'm not trying to fight every tiny piece of unsandboxiness that's in the game, but favouritism towards a specific group is a massive blow to the sandbox and furthermore it's completely unnecessary.
Tyberius Franklin
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#270 - 2013-10-08 01:22:43 UTC
Rob Crowley wrote:
Quote:
AT rewards don't break the sandbox.
Why would they? Anyone can compete.
As I understand I cannot as I am not a part of a player alliance, additionally there are a limited number of slots, and furthermore a limited number of matches and players per match. The vast majority of the game is excluded from competing.
Frying Doom
#271 - 2013-10-08 01:28:52 UTC
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
Quote:
They aren't promoting aspects of the game. They're promoting specific groups of players of the game. Big difference.


The EXACT same thing can be said about tournament prizes. Alliance or otherwise.

And as for your comment about "messing with the sandbox", again, not true. AT rewards don't break the sandbox. Chribba being allowed to have the Veldnaught doesn't break the sandbox. Gnosis battlecruisers don't break the sandbox. Genolution implants... well, you get the point.

They are completely different.

For example would you be happy if they suddenly gave 200 carriers to Goonswarm for their contributions to the community? or how about some T2 BPOs.

Or how about CCP gave them some limited items that sold for hundreds of billions which they then decided to sell and buy those T2 BPOs or Carriers with?

Giving rewards to a specific group is a lot different to giving everyone the same thing or giving the AT tournament winners a ship, especially as they have to pay for entry.

Any spelling, grammatical and punctuation errors are because frankly, I don't care!!

Lysandra Moore
WarMongers Armament Solutions
#272 - 2013-10-08 01:30:45 UTC
Alavaria Fera wrote:
Lysandra Moore wrote:
I am amazed that people see this as a non-issue.

I have no problem with CCP rewarding the community for their efforts. I get a little twinge when it is in rare items that can be used in game. (I would prefer some medal or maybe a monument in space … equally unique and in my opinion, much cooler.) I can even let that go.

I do have a problem with it when nobody knows about it. I might have stomached it if there was a grand show/blog about giving them away, even though I think 1 for each player in the corp was a bit much. At least we would have known they were getting honored. Even better if it was done to multiple player groups at a time. That would have the appearance of impartiality and a true feeling of ‘rewarding the community builders.’

But these were given out to a single corp with a wink and a nod. That … seems fishy.

Now Somber is getting unique ships to auction off. None of the other sites have, even though many have been spotlighted by CCP.

And this does not smack as favoritism to a lot of you? Really? Not even a little bit?

>sigh<

Is that what the ccp and csm comments look like to you



Between the various posts on multiple threads, it seems like people cannot fathom that this could look like favoritism.

Do I think CCP was really ‘These guys are super cool. Lets give them free stuff.’ No, I do not. I do think they were trying to reward an out of game resource for what they have done to add to the game. However, when the same group gets special consideration under the table and then gets a second offering of special items (albeit to auction off) later in the year, it can create a perception of cronyism.

In a game as meta as eve, if you allow a smidgen of CCP/Dev/GM to player/alliance/group bias to be perceived, it can definitely raise ones eyebrow and hurt the players trust in the game.

Truthfully, this all boils down to another edition of "CCP Presents How to Do Something in the Worst Way Possible, Despite Our Intentions"

Now onto the CSM statement thread to see what is happening there.
Kaarous Aldurald
Black Hydra Consortium.
#273 - 2013-10-08 01:30:49 UTC
Quote:
No. "Any group who wins the tournament" is the exact opposite of "specific group of players".


It does mean "specific group of players". PvP pilots. It doesn't do anything for market characters, miners, industrialists, etc. CCP does this to promote PvP, and they reward the people who do PvP in that context accordingly.

Quote:
In this case I would actually argue that hisec capitals do somewhat damage the sandbox, especially since they can't get traded anymore. It's just not nearly serious enough for me to care about, one important reason being it was not "Chribba can keep his hisec capital." but rather "Everyone who has a hisec capital can keep it." Plus there are strict rules of what you can't do with them to ensure the influence on the sandbox is small.


But it's not "everyone". It's just Chribba.

Quote:
In cases where the legacy items are perceived to have noticeable impact this is regularly discussed (e.g. T2 BPOs).


The context of those BPOs needs to be taken into account. First of all, the items involved could not be easily replicated at that stage in the game. It wasn't "oh, have a few BPOs", it was "Here, how about I (I being a dev) help you corner an entire market in exchange for a director's position for my alt." There was quid pro quo involved. Not just a donation. Huge, huge difference there.

Quote:
I'm not trying to fight every tiny piece of unsandboxiness that's in the game, but favouritism towards a specific group is a massive blow to the sandbox and furthermore it's completely unnecessary.


It's not really favoritism. It's a promotional item. It just happens to be a fairly big one, as opposed to say, Quafe Catalysts. That's the first reason people are upset. Because it's expensive. The second reason is all the sneaking around. Which is the only one I give credence to, but considering how CCP is, this is more or less just Roll worthy, as Malcanis mentioned.

"Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."

One of ours, ten of theirs.

Best Meltdown Ever.

Tyberius Franklin
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#274 - 2013-10-08 01:33:08 UTC
Frying Doom wrote:
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
Quote:
They aren't promoting aspects of the game. They're promoting specific groups of players of the game. Big difference.


The EXACT same thing can be said about tournament prizes. Alliance or otherwise.

And as for your comment about "messing with the sandbox", again, not true. AT rewards don't break the sandbox. Chribba being allowed to have the Veldnaught doesn't break the sandbox. Gnosis battlecruisers don't break the sandbox. Genolution implants... well, you get the point.

They are completely different.

For example would you be happy if they suddenly gave 200 carriers to Goonswarm for their contributions to the community? or how about some T2 BPOs.

Or how about CCP gave them some limited items that sold for hundreds of billions which they then decided to sell and buy those T2 BPOs or Carriers with?

Giving rewards to a specific group is a lot different to giving everyone the same thing or giving the AT tournament winners a ship, especially as they have to pay for entry.

200 Carriers? I'd be fine with that. T2 BPO's not so much, new items that have the capacity to provide continued additional value would be an issue. Selling them for BPO's is similarly a non issue. The capacity was there and probably being used to begin with, so it being in their hands is no more an issue than it being in someone else'. I see no issue with CCP rewarding players or organizations they find exceptional.
Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe
#275 - 2013-10-08 01:33:46 UTC
Rob Crowley wrote:
Tyberius Franklin wrote:
Suggests that AT rewards would not be allowed as they would still potentially distort economic parity between to competing entities. When referees don't interfere, they don't interfere. The AT is an interference to the sandbox as are it's rewards.

Any reward not earned in game with participation available to all entities in game under the full set of game rules (and freedoms) is a distortion of the sandbox. So why are some permissible and others not?
Everyone who has ever played Eve must have noticed within 5 minutes that it has some themepark elements and the AT is by far not the biggest one, PvE content is absolutely dwarfing that. But it's not a problem for the integrity of the sandbox because all these themepark elements are available to all entities in game under precise rules known by everyone in advance. And when the referees change the rules they don't support or punish anyone in particular.

This is the difference between referees changing rules between seasons to make the game more interesting and referees giving extra points to one of the teams. You see the difference?

Well it's the referees' game so they can give points where-everrr~ they want

:1trit:

Triggered by: Wars of Sovless Agression, Bending the Knee, Twisting the Knife, Eating Sov Wheaties, Bombless Bombers, Fizzlesov, Interceptor Fleets, Running Away, GhostTime Vuln, Renters, Bombs, Bubbles ?

Nevyn Auscent
Broke Sauce
#276 - 2013-10-08 01:34:12 UTC  |  Edited by: Nevyn Auscent
Frying Doom wrote:
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
Quote:
They aren't promoting aspects of the game. They're promoting specific groups of players of the game. Big difference.


The EXACT same thing can be said about tournament prizes. Alliance or otherwise.

And as for your comment about "messing with the sandbox", again, not true. AT rewards don't break the sandbox. Chribba being allowed to have the Veldnaught doesn't break the sandbox. Gnosis battlecruisers don't break the sandbox. Genolution implants... well, you get the point.

They are completely different.

1. For example would you be happy if they suddenly gave 200 carriers to Goonswarm for their contributions to the community? or how about some T2 BPOs.

2. Or how about CCP gave them some limited items that sold for hundreds of billions which they then decided to sell and buy those T2 BPOs or Carriers with?

Giving rewards to a specific group is a lot different to giving everyone the same thing or giving the AT tournament winners a ship, especially as they have to pay for entry.



To answer.
1. That I would have an issue with. As they affect the balance of power. 30 poor mans scorpions do not affect the balance of power in a significant way. 200 capitals however do.

2. If they had community spotlighted Goons in a Dev Blog at some point, and if some collectors decided they totally had to have those 'special' edition but not very useful items for hundreds of billions, I would have no issue. That is down to peoples greed in game giving the goons an advantage. Not the items themselves giving an advantage.

While I don't have the quote, someone did point out that Somer are not the only community group to have received the watch scorps for their contribution, so there are more out there than people are quoting in this thread already. And I have no issues with anyone who has been a big enough deal for the Devs to blog about officially getting token prizes. Which is all those Scorps are. Tokens. Because they have worse stats than a standard scorp. It is only we as players who have too much isk to know what to do with it that give them value as a result. As opposed to a T2 BPO which has a much more real & discernible in game advantage.
Kaarous Aldurald
Black Hydra Consortium.
#277 - 2013-10-08 01:42:30 UTC
Frying Doom wrote:
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
Quote:
They aren't promoting aspects of the game. They're promoting specific groups of players of the game. Big difference.


The EXACT same thing can be said about tournament prizes. Alliance or otherwise.

And as for your comment about "messing with the sandbox", again, not true. AT rewards don't break the sandbox. Chribba being allowed to have the Veldnaught doesn't break the sandbox. Gnosis battlecruisers don't break the sandbox. Genolution implants... well, you get the point.

They are completely different.

For example would you be happy if they suddenly gave 200 carriers to Goonswarm for their contributions to the community? or how about some T2 BPOs.

Or how about CCP gave them some limited items that sold for hundreds of billions which they then decided to sell and buy those T2 BPOs or Carriers with?

Giving rewards to a specific group is a lot different to giving everyone the same thing or giving the AT tournament winners a ship, especially as they have to pay for entry.


Well, I am pro Goon, so I would be rather happy. It would still be wrong however.

But the difference between a usable ship of war, like a Carrier, and a ship spinning **** trophy like an Ishukur Scorpion is vast indeed.

The fact that you equate the two is ludicrous.

Also, I am not entirely sure the dev tools can seed capitals, as their system is, to the best of my knowledge, an extension of the plugin that is used for gift redemption, and requires a station to be used.

"Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."

One of ours, ten of theirs.

Best Meltdown Ever.

Baron' Soontir Fel
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#278 - 2013-10-08 01:50:25 UTC
Alduin666 Shikkoken wrote:
A CSM member is supposed to represent his voters and not act on his own opinions.


You elect a member to make his own decisions. There's a reason why people don't vote on every law and only Senators/Congressmen do.



(It'd be worse off than it is now)
Deka Ekato
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#279 - 2013-10-08 02:10:22 UTC
So this is what the CSM has become, as shown by the current vocal members :

- It's anothere PR avenue / tool for CCP, which provides The Eve community with standarised and formatted answers, in case they mess up, like they seriously have done so.

- The vocal CSM members are simply in the CSM for themselves. They do not care or represent anyone. They are init just for the known / unknown goodies they can get, both in and out of game.

- They only care about their own personal interests.

- They are simply CCP's puppets.

CCP, how low will you stoop to? You release your "CSM / PR" machine to try to ease anothere PR mess you have once again created, before you decide to make an official statement about this mess, ( if you ever do ).

I do not know about the other CSM members, but their silence, on this matter, is, to me, suspicious.

Maybe the time has come to also rethink if the Eve community needs a CSM at all, cause the current vocal members seem to be CCP Puppets and so out of touch with the community concerning SomerGate.
Frying Doom
#280 - 2013-10-08 02:21:22 UTC  |  Edited by: Frying Doom
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
Frying Doom wrote:
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
Quote:
They aren't promoting aspects of the game. They're promoting specific groups of players of the game. Big difference.


The EXACT same thing can be said about tournament prizes. Alliance or otherwise.

And as for your comment about "messing with the sandbox", again, not true. AT rewards don't break the sandbox. Chribba being allowed to have the Veldnaught doesn't break the sandbox. Gnosis battlecruisers don't break the sandbox. Genolution implants... well, you get the point.

They are completely different.

For example would you be happy if they suddenly gave 200 carriers to Goonswarm for their contributions to the community? or how about some T2 BPOs.

Or how about CCP gave them some limited items that sold for hundreds of billions which they then decided to sell and buy those T2 BPOs or Carriers with?

Giving rewards to a specific group is a lot different to giving everyone the same thing or giving the AT tournament winners a ship, especially as they have to pay for entry.


Well, I am pro Goon, so I would be rather happy. It would still be wrong however.

But the difference between a usable ship of war, like a Carrier, and a ship spinning **** trophy like an Ishukur Scorpion is vast indeed.

The fact that you equate the two is ludicrous.

Also, I am not entirely sure the dev tools can seed capitals, as their system is, to the best of my knowledge, an extension of the plugin that is used for gift redemption, and requires a station to be used.

What I equate as equal is their in game value. The fact that these ships could have been sold on for hundreds of billions of isk and the resulting isk being used to massively alter the sandbox. As any ship or item in short supply will be sort by collectors and the resulting isk used for god knows what.

Giving one organisation or several an in game advantage, should never be alright. The AT you pay for the chance, so even though you get some nice ships if you win, you have probably already paid more they are going to be worth.

EvE is supposed to be a sandbox, it really becomes a pointless sandbox if devs start handing out hundreds of billions of isks worth of goodies.

Any spelling, grammatical and punctuation errors are because frankly, I don't care!!