These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
12Next page
 

Was there a server rollback this morning?

Author
Becham
Sensible People
Sigma Grindset
#1 - 2013-10-07 15:11:13 UTC  |  Edited by: Becham
I was on after down time, fiddled around , moved some assets, plugged in some implants on a blank clone, did a little ratting, you know, typical kind of chores.

Checked on iClone, and all my assets are back where they started, implants are still in the hangar, and no bounties shown in wallet. Just wondering if API is borked, or a rollback thing happened.
Paul Panala
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#2 - 2013-10-07 15:12:30 UTC
Becham wrote:
I was on after down time, fiddled around , moved some assets, plugged in some implants on a blank clone, did a little ratting, you know, typical kind of chores.

Checked on iClone, and all my assets are back where they started, implants are still in the hangar, and no . Just wondering if API is borked, or a rollback thing happened.


Most likely just a API delay.
Lykouleon
Noble Sentiments
Second Empire.
#3 - 2013-10-07 15:45:25 UTC
EVE doesn't do rollbacks, its the delay in the API.

Lykouleon > CYNO ME CLOSER so I can hit them with my sword

Solstice Project
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#4 - 2013-10-07 16:38:27 UTC
Lykouleon wrote:
EVE doesn't do rollbacks, its the delay in the API.

To be historically correct and if my memory doesn't trick me,
they did it ONCE, a long time ago, when CONCORD took a day off.
Tikitina
Doomheim
#5 - 2013-10-07 16:42:39 UTC
Solstice Project wrote:
Lykouleon wrote:
EVE doesn't do rollbacks, its the delay in the API.

To be historically correct and if my memory doesn't trick me,
they did it ONCE, a long time ago, when CONCORD took a day off.


I don't think they did it then but even further back.

And IIRC, CCP said due to their experience with that, it will never happen again.

Bo Dado
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#6 - 2013-10-07 16:44:22 UTC
Paul Panala wrote:
Becham wrote:
I was on after down time, fiddled around , moved some assets, plugged in some implants on a blank clone, did a little ratting, you know, typical kind of chores.

Checked on iClone, and all my assets are back where they started, implants are still in the hangar, and no . Just wondering if API is borked, or a rollback thing happened.


Most likely just a API delay.

This. Happens to me daily on Neocom
Solstice Project's Alt
Doomheim
#7 - 2013-10-07 17:49:25 UTC
Tikitina wrote:
Solstice Project wrote:
Lykouleon wrote:
EVE doesn't do rollbacks, its the delay in the API.

To be historically correct and if my memory doesn't trick me,
they did it ONCE, a long time ago, when CONCORD took a day off.


I don't think they did it then but even further back.

And IIRC, CCP said due to their experience with that, it will never happen again.

Oh they did.
I wished i could give you a link,
but the search times i can think of don't help.

IIRC, it was the day before EvE went online officially, as in went out of the beta.

It was planned to happen, but i doubt they'll ever do it again.

Buy Solstice Project for PLEX4GOOD ! https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&find=unread&t=301266 (this alt-character will get deleted once the sale is done, on 6th of december)

Magnus Saken
State War Academy
Caldari State
#8 - 2013-10-09 17:38:17 UTC
i was there for the concord malfunction.. they didnt roll back but i remember them suspending accounts of people who were ganking people in hi sec.
Steve Ronuken
Fuzzwork Enterprises
Vote Steve Ronuken for CSM
#9 - 2013-10-09 18:27:29 UTC
Assets have a 6 hour delay, iirc.

Woo! CSM XI!

Fuzzwork Enterprises

Twitter: @fuzzysteve on Twitter

Gogela
Epic Ganking Time
CODE.
#10 - 2013-10-09 20:15:56 UTC
Magnus Saken wrote:
i was there for the concord malfunction.. they didnt roll back but i remember them suspending accounts of people who were ganking people in hi sec.

Well that's BS. If it was the game bugging out that's not the fault of the players. Disappointed to hear that.

Signatures should be used responsibly...

Mr Epeen
It's All About Me
#11 - 2013-10-09 20:30:58 UTC
Gogela wrote:
Magnus Saken wrote:
i was there for the concord malfunction.. they didnt roll back but i remember them suspending accounts of people who were ganking people in hi sec.

Well that's BS. If it was the game bugging out that's not the fault of the players. Disappointed to hear that.


This was not an isolated thing.

If CCP tells you that a certain action is considered an exploit and you go ahead and do it anyway, you learn what 'consequences for your actions' really means.

Plenty more examples of this from over the years. EVE attracts the type of people who try to get away with whatever they can in twisting game mechanics into something they were not intended to be. It's good for the game but can come back to bite you on the ass if you push it too far.

Mr Epeen Cool
Gogela
Epic Ganking Time
CODE.
#12 - 2013-10-09 21:13:33 UTC
Mr Epeen wrote:
Gogela wrote:
Magnus Saken wrote:
i was there for the concord malfunction.. they didnt roll back but i remember them suspending accounts of people who were ganking people in hi sec.

Well that's BS. If it was the game bugging out that's not the fault of the players. Disappointed to hear that.


This was not an isolated thing.

If CCP tells you that a certain action is considered an exploit and you go ahead and do it anyway, you learn what 'consequences for your actions' really means.

Plenty more examples of this from over the years. EVE attracts the type of people who try to get away with whatever they can in twisting game mechanics into something they were not intended to be. It's good for the game but can come back to bite you on the ass if you push it too far.

Mr Epeen Cool

For persistent problems like the old POS cycle exploit that makes good sense. For an isolated glitch it doesn't seem very sandboxy. Everyone should always be on their toes in EvE. I guess I don't know what "too far" means, sometimes.

Signatures should be used responsibly...

Mr Epeen
It's All About Me
#13 - 2013-10-09 21:39:05 UTC
Gogela wrote:
I guess I don't know what "too far" means, sometimes.


Well, Gogela, I'll tell what too far means to me.

First off, someone discovers a clever exploit and uses it to their advantage. (Have to give the Little Bees credit here. They're probably the best at this) Then as the word gets out and more people start doing it, CCP decides they don't like it and announce that until they can fix it, they will ban people for using it.

But the little dweebs that can't think for themselves and discover these things before they are considered exploits cry 'unfair' and go ahead and do it anyway and get themselves banned. That's the pushing it part.

As to the one off things like concord taking a day off , it's only common sense to not take advantage as you know it's going to get you a vacation as well if you run around ganking everything with immunity. It's a game breaker. Granted, common sense is in short supply in this game, but CCP can not be held responsible for the stupidity of some of their players.

Mr Epeen Cool
Tikitina
Doomheim
#14 - 2013-10-10 15:48:17 UTC
Gogela wrote:
For persistent problems like the old POS cycle exploit that makes good sense. For an isolated glitch it doesn't seem very sandboxy. Everyone should always be on their toes in EvE. I guess I don't know what "too far" means, sometimes.


Players shouldn't assume that they can take advantage of a glitch to do something that normally is clearly outside the bounds of what is expected. Blowing up everything in sight because Concord is failing to show up is certainly one of those.

If only a few did this, CCP might have just gave things back and told those who did it that is was a bad idea, but since so many were blatantly doing this CCP had no choice but to be heavy handed.

Those of us who have been in the game long enough have seen this many times. If a few players take advantage of something occasionally, they normally get told, bad idea.

If a significant number of people start doing something on a regular basis, and then go brag about in the forums clearly showing how to take advantage of such glitch, expect to get hit with a sledgehammer.

And then they cry why?

Its a fairly clear concept to understand. The number of people taking advantage of the glitch plus the number affected times the isk involved equals the exponent that is applied to the consequence.


Gogela
Epic Ganking Time
CODE.
#15 - 2013-10-10 18:41:58 UTC
Mr Epeen wrote:
Well, Gogela, I'll tell what too far means to me.

First off, someone discovers a clever exploit and uses it to their advantage. (Have to give the Little Bees credit here. They're probably the best at this) Then as the word gets out and more people start doing it, CCP decides they don't like it and announce that until they can fix it, they will ban people for using it.

But the little dweebs that can't think for themselves and discover these things before they are considered exploits cry 'unfair' and go ahead and do it anyway and get themselves banned. That's the pushing it part.

As to the one off things like concord taking a day off , it's only common sense to not take advantage as you know it's going to get you a vacation as well if you run around ganking everything with immunity. It's a game breaker. Granted, common sense is in short supply in this game, but CCP can not be held responsible for the stupidity of some of their players.

It sounds like you had a bad experience. Yes for exploits like the one I mentioned that's a very reasonable policy. However, for a one-of event... something that only happens for a single day? Well that's just a sandbox variable. Sometimes you're the mouse and sometimes you're the cat, and that unfairness and variability makes the game more real. S*** man sometimes people get hit by cars... (in non-pvp parts of the earth as well!). Bad things can happen to good people... I think you're too stuck on the rules. A persistent problem is game breaking because it allows for a systemic advantage to those that know about it and screws up the balance CCP tries to maintain. A single day event isn't comparable. I think we could let such things slide. In fact it would be a better game if CCP intentionally threw a wrench into the works from time to time. Fortunately Rubicon looks like just my kind of wrench... but that's another topic.

Tikitina wrote:
...outside the bounds of what is expected..

For Tikitina, ^ This is your problem... what you don't like. We're diametrically opposed on this one. No point arguing.

Signatures should be used responsibly...

Na Und
Galactronics
#16 - 2013-10-10 19:35:01 UTC
A software glitch is a "sandbox variable." I can now say I've seen it all, though sadly, the EVE forum never disappoints.
Sirinda
Ekchuah's Shrine Comporium
#17 - 2013-10-10 21:45:24 UTC
Gogela wrote:
sandbox variable



So just because the police are on strike for one day makes it okay to go outside mugging people left and right? Because that's what you're saying.

Also, this.
Gogela
Epic Ganking Time
CODE.
#18 - 2013-10-10 22:27:36 UTC
Sirinda wrote:
Gogela wrote:
sandbox variable

So just because the police are on strike for one day makes it okay to go outside mugging people left and right? Because that's what you're saying.

Within the context of EvE, that's exactly what I'm saying. It's a game. Like GTAV. You know that you are not actually in a real spaceship right? Do you understand that? Might be something you want to give some thought to. Not tellin' ya what to do. Just sayin'

Do you blow people up in real life? Maybe you should visit that link for yourself there, guy.

Signatures should be used responsibly...

Azeroth Uluntil
Last Chance for Redemption
FFEW Associates
#19 - 2013-10-11 05:24:58 UTC
Gogela wrote:
Sirinda wrote:
Gogela wrote:
sandbox variable

So just because the police are on strike for one day makes it okay to go outside mugging people left and right? Because that's what you're saying.

Within the context of EvE, that's exactly what I'm saying. It's a game. Like GTAV. You know that you are not actually in a real spaceship right? Do you understand that? Might be something you want to give some thought to. Not tellin' ya what to do. Just sayin'

Do you blow people up in real life? Maybe you should visit that link for yourself there, guy.




What if we do? Blow people up in real life that is.

Also, you are an idiot.
Grunanca
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#20 - 2013-10-11 08:44:20 UTC
Tikitina wrote:
Solstice Project wrote:
Lykouleon wrote:
EVE doesn't do rollbacks, its the delay in the API.

To be historically correct and if my memory doesn't trick me,
they did it ONCE, a long time ago, when CONCORD took a day off.


I don't think they did it then but even further back.

And IIRC, CCP said due to their experience with that, it will never happen again.



Yeah CONCORD day off wasnt even enough. That just resulted in a lot of bans and a looooong que on reimursements.
12Next page