These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
12Next page
 

A way to scan cloaked ships down?

First post
Author
Maximillian Logos
Ember Inc.
Curatores Veritatis Alliance
#1 - 2013-10-06 10:01:46 UTC
Hey ccp,

im kind of new to things down in nullsec but from everything ive seen so far, it seem rather overpowered that there is no way at all to find out where a cloaked ship is hiding. Since people cant rightly do things pve wise inside a system with a cloaky hanging about for fear of it dropping 10 other cloakies on their heads, its possible to lock down entire alliances with just a group of 10 people who are willing to let their alts be afk for the entire day in systems.

Factually 1 person locks down a system with 20-30 people in it, people who might be paying to play their game, but who are forced to just wait and hope that that 1 red goes away because the game designers failed to put a balancing counterpoint for claokies in the game.

In every game mechanics have strong points and weak points, sadly it seems that you failed to implement any real weak point to a cloaked ship, they can cloak up, and cannot be scanned found, unless your randomly bump into them or get into 2k range of them. Now im not a mathematician but im sure someone could find out what the chances of that are 1^-10000000 most likely...

Domanique Altares
Rifterlings
#2 - 2013-10-06 10:15:10 UTC
Apparently it's also difficult to scan down the massive AFK cloaking thread.

It is not, however, difficult to conduct PVE with a cloaky in system. Just undock and go do it.
Maximillian Logos
Ember Inc.
Curatores Veritatis Alliance
#3 - 2013-10-06 10:16:50 UTC
please dont reply with troll posts, there no reason to. as you well know if we do undock we get the 10 ships on us as mentioned in the first post.
Raphael Celestine
Celestine Inc.
#4 - 2013-10-06 10:17:05 UTC
Quote:
im kind of new to things down in nullsec

And new to F&I too, clearly. This comes up OVER and OVER here - the thread immediately below this one is an AFK cloakers thread as well. You should probably go do some reading before bring it up again...
Maximillian Logos
Ember Inc.
Curatores Veritatis Alliance
#5 - 2013-10-06 10:22:59 UTC
Assuming that most people post unhelpful posts like the 2 above that would mean that more than 60% of the posts in that thread are trolls, better to open a new post and hope ccp notices
Domanique Altares
Rifterlings
#6 - 2013-10-06 10:28:08 UTC
Maximillian Logos wrote:
Assuming that most people post unhelpful posts like the 2 above that would mean that more than 60% of the posts in that thread are trolls, better to open a new post and hope ccp notices


I'm glad that you consider us to be trolls. Enjoy when your thread is closed for being yet another needless duplicate.

I'm sorry that you're too afraid to undock and do things when there's a cloaky in system. Perhaps you should return to highsec?
Raphael Celestine
Celestine Inc.
#7 - 2013-10-06 10:35:20 UTC  |  Edited by: Raphael Celestine
Maximillian Logos wrote:
Assuming that most people post unhelpful posts like the 2 above that would mean that more than 60% of the posts in that thread are trolls, better to open a new post and hope ccp notices

I'm not sure that 'this topic has been discussed many, many times here already', along with a link to said discussion, really qualifies as 'unhelpful'...

The reason we're being somewhat dismissive is because you've said nothing new. There are already a lot of posts about AFK cloaking in F&I. A significant number of them make pretty much exactly the same suggestion you have here, and people have already discussed the pros and cons of this kind of thing extensively. The least you could do is give a quick summary in your OP of what your responses are to the most common counter-arguments - but as far as I can tell from your post, you haven't even bothered to find out what those counter-arguments are.

EDIT: Nikk Narrel has given some of the best explanations of what's wrong with this idea; if you want to filter out some of the chaff, try searching for his posts.
Yolo
Unknown Nation
#8 - 2013-10-06 10:40:17 UTC
Domanique Altares wrote:
Maximillian Logos wrote:
Assuming that most people post unhelpful posts like the 2 above that would mean that more than 60% of the posts in that thread are trolls, better to open a new post and hope ccp notices


I'm glad that you consider us to be trolls. Enjoy when your thread is closed for being yet another needless duplicate.

I'm sorry that you're too afraid to undock and do things when there's a cloaky in system. Perhaps you should return to highsec?

Maybe there are endless duplicates of this question over and over again, because there is no counter to cloakies?
It's like knowing there is a ninja following you, you know he is there, just go about your business, he is unable to act while he is hidden, but once he gets the chance, he will stab you in your heart. Happy days. What are you going to do as a counter, always go around 20 people in a group, just in case the ninja, that you have been told is following you decides to take action?

There is discussions about removing local, like wormholes. but you fail to see the point, cloakies does not work the same way in wormholes, there is no way to bridge a fleet in via titan or blackops. But in 0.0, everything within x light years is a threat, not only the hidden one in local.

There difference is so big people just ignore it in these discussions, becuase they are unable to wrap their feeble little minds around it.

- since 2003, bitches

Vaju Enki
Secular Wisdom
#9 - 2013-10-06 10:44:46 UTC
Carebears just don't learn, they are even afraid of AFK ships....

You a solution for you problem, make cloaked ship invisible in local. Problem solved.

The Tears Must Flow

Alvatore DiMarco
Capricious Endeavours Ltd
#10 - 2013-10-06 10:47:18 UTC
I would prefer that CCP implement a feature that lets us hunt down and destroy anti-cloaking threads.
Domanique Altares
Rifterlings
#11 - 2013-10-06 11:00:55 UTC
Yolo wrote:

Maybe there are endless duplicates of this question over and over again, because there is no counter to cloakies?


I fail to see why a ship that can do nothing to you requires a counter in the current game environment.

I also fail to see why people can't manage to go PVE when there's a cloaky in system. I run exploration plexes and rat in lowsec. Guess what also works in lowsec? Cynos and bridges. Not only do I not dock up in fear of cloakies, I don't dock up in fear of all the **** that's actually on long d-scan that can be actively looking for me. Fucks given: Zero. Unless it's on short scan, I'm not worried about it. Cynos happen; it's the risk you take in this game. If I spent all my time docked up and in fear of people who might come get me, I'd be just like a nullbear and not get anything done all day.
Maximillian Logos
Ember Inc.
Curatores Veritatis Alliance
#12 - 2013-10-06 11:02:45 UTC
what you fail to see is that this post is not directed at you, it is directed at ccp, i dont really care about any of your opinions on this matter, feel free to open up your own post and discuss in depth the mechanics of this game just dont do it in my post....

the reason im not suggesting anything is because i dont know what you can or cant do against this since i didnt design the game and dont know what the goals for this game are.
Omnathious Deninard
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#13 - 2013-10-06 11:04:27 UTC
Maximillian Logos wrote:
what you fail to see is that this post is not directed at you, it is directed at ccp, i dont really care about any of your opinions on this matter, feel free to open up your own post and discuss in depth the mechanics of this game just dont do it in my post....

Features & Ideas Discussion

Learn what the underlined word means.

If you don't follow the rules, neither will I.

Alvatore DiMarco
Capricious Endeavours Ltd
#14 - 2013-10-06 11:08:51 UTC  |  Edited by: Alvatore DiMarco
Omnathious Deninard wrote:
Maximillian Logos wrote:
what you fail to see is that this post is not directed at you, it is directed at ccp, i dont really care about any of your opinions on this matter, feel free to open up your own post and discuss in depth the mechanics of this game just dont do it in my post....

Features & Ideas Discussion

Learn what the underlined word means.


Part of me wants to say "Brother Deninard, forgive him. He is but a neophyte amongst us and he knows not what he does."

The other part of me wants to say "This is EVE, if he has enough intelligence to play the game he has enough intelligence to search the forums before posting. He gets what's coming to him and this is it."

I'm not sure which route to take. Anyone have a coin?



Maximillian Logos wrote:
what you fail to see is that this post is not directed at you, it is directed at ccp, i dont really care about any of your opinions on this matter, feel free to open up your own post and discuss in depth the mechanics of this game just dont do it in my post....

the reason im not suggesting anything is because i dont know what you can or cant do against this since i didnt design the game and dont know what the goals for this game are.


What you fail to see is that we're not in this subforum with you. You're in this subforum with us. The only way anything is going to get CCP's attention is if it's posted in F&I and either has a lot of positive feedback, is a revolutionary new idea that's not terrible or makes some absolutely amazing points that nobody has ever made before. Of these criteria, your topic only meets the first.

You are not a special snowflake entitled to an audience with the devs any more than the rest of us are.

Nevermind the coin. I think I'll be choosing Option 2.
Icarus Able
Refuse.Resist
#15 - 2013-10-06 11:18:46 UTC
Stop being a *****. Thats how you conduct PvE with a cloaky in system.
Icarus Able
Refuse.Resist
#16 - 2013-10-06 11:19:46 UTC
Maximillian Logos wrote:
please dont reply with troll posts, there no reason to. as you well know if we do undock we get the 10 ships on us as mentioned in the first post.



that wasnt a troll post...He was being serious you twerp.
Maximillian Logos
Ember Inc.
Curatores Veritatis Alliance
#17 - 2013-10-06 11:20:34 UTC  |  Edited by: Maximillian Logos
..
Omnathious Deninard
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#18 - 2013-10-06 11:23:58 UTC
CCP Spitfire wrote:

5) Before posting an idea, please check the Commonly Proposed Ideas Thread to see if there's already a topic running for it. Reposts will be locked and routed to the active thread.

Something you failed to do

If you don't follow the rules, neither will I.

Alvatore DiMarco
Capricious Endeavours Ltd
#19 - 2013-10-06 11:33:58 UTC
Maximillian Logos wrote:
i knew b4 hand that i get all these sad fucks posting here who have nothing better to do all day than post in other peoples posts instead of making their own posts.... ah well it was worth a try


You must be new to the forums, or perhaps forums as a whole. People post in each others' threads around here (they're called threads btw) as a means of communication with each other. By posting a thread in a forum, you are agreeing that you understand other people will very likely post their responses in it.
Mag's
Azn Empire
#20 - 2013-10-06 12:48:42 UTC
There is already a thread open regarding this and it includes your very unoriginal idea.

Counters to cloaking are already in the game. What your topic is about, is the counter people use against the local chat channel. If you wish AFKing to stop, then you must include changes to that also and make it part of a package.

Anyway I've reported this thread, as it's redundant due to the one that already exists.

Destination SkillQueue:- It's like assuming the Lions will ignore you in the Savannah, if you're small, fat and look helpless.

12Next page