These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
123Next pageLast page
 

HOW TO ABUSE THE LEGIT WARDEC EXPLOITS

Author
The Zerg Overmind
Rule Reversal
#1 - 2011-11-16 10:24:06 UTC  |  Edited by: The Zerg Overmind
This picture will show you exactly the step by step process on how to achieve highsec immunity from wardecs, and to save any of your towers infinitely. Your highsec towers will be completely invulnerable, no amount of wardecs will be able to destroy them, ever.

The exploit

For more information about the legality of this, visit this thread here, and see the GM ruling here.

CCP loves the mission bears, now go forth and use their exploits to enhance your gameplay. I will aid any of you with these abuses, Dec Shield will stand for the people. If you wish to promote a change to the current system of legal abuse, please give your support here.

To see a list of people we've aided with this in the past please visit our Dotlan listing. Every day we aid more corporations evade wardecs.
Jaroslav Unwanted
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#2 - 2011-11-16 10:25:45 UTC
Breaking News : thread which has not been there, totally new and great.
DarkAegix
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#3 - 2011-11-16 10:34:49 UTC
So, Dec Shield hates the service it claims to give people?
Yeah, sounds like a scam.

Change your corp to 'OUTRAEG ANGREE' or something.
Vihura
Vihura Cor
#4 - 2011-11-16 10:36:38 UTC
You are realy carebear if you want shot POS go to WH null or low, or wardeck all involved aliance.
Dr Karsun
Coffee Lovers Brewing Club
#5 - 2011-11-16 10:41:12 UTC
Vihura wrote:
You are realy carebear if you want shot POS go to WH null or low, or wardeck all involved aliance.


Wardeccing both the dec-shield and the corp is probably beyond this scammers field of view.

"Have you had your morning coffee?" -> the Coffee Lovers Brewing Club is recruiting! https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=363976#post363976

March rabbit
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#6 - 2011-11-16 10:46:54 UTC
Jaroslav Unwanted wrote:
Breaking News : thread which has not been there, totally new and great.

finally we NEED to go unsub, biomass and shoot Jita monument!

The Mittani: "the inappropriate drunked joke"

The Zerg Overmind
Rule Reversal
#7 - 2011-11-16 10:58:38 UTC
DarkAegix wrote:
So, Dec Shield hates the service it claims to give people?
Yeah, sounds like a scam.

Change your corp to 'OUTRAEG ANGREE' or something.

Raising awareness and discussion about wardecs in order to help those who cannot defend themselves is a good thing. Trying to encourage CCP to alter game mechanics to fix broken loopholes is a good thing.

No money is involved here, only information which I'm offering to you freely. How can I be a scam in any way? Honestly, how? No really, I'll wait, go ahead and explain.
Jaroslav Unwanted
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#8 - 2011-11-16 11:02:39 UTC
The Zerg Overmind wrote:
DarkAegix wrote:
So, Dec Shield hates the service it claims to give people?
Yeah, sounds like a scam.

Change your corp to 'OUTRAEG ANGREE' or something.

Raising awareness and discussion about wardecs in order to help those who cannot defend themselves is a good thing. Trying to encourage CCP to alter game mechanics to fix broken loopholes is a good thing.

No money is involved here, only information which I'm offering to you freely. How can I be a scam in any way? Honestly, how? No really, I'll wait, go ahead and explain.


If

why call it exploit ?
Rico Minali
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#9 - 2011-11-16 11:12:22 UTC
Wardeccs need a complete overhaul, we know this, ccp know and acknowledge this. However it isnt a simple clean cut thing, so many ways it can be manipulated and abused.

Focus on a solution, not teh problem. What we need is ideas on HOW wardeccs should really work, and get it into ccps hands.

Wardeccs need stop being a tool for griefers and start being a mechanism for actual warfare. NO, hisec should NOT be safesec, but it shouldnt be a place for griefers to enjoy free griefing either.

Trust me, I almost know what I'm doing.

Thorn Galen
Bene Gesserit ChapterHouse
The Curatores Veritatis Auxiliary
#10 - 2011-11-16 11:13:59 UTC
Cannot call it an Exploit, that's illegal according to the EULA.
"The GM cleared it" so it's not an exploit.

It's a broken game mechanic as described by the GM and CCP are busy with other "stuff" right now (Crucible much?)
Even when they are done with Crucible, they have other more important "Stuff" to fix.
When they are done fixing earlier issues (Faction Warfare springs to mind), they will "look into" finding some solution to the broken wardec mechanic.
Unjtil then, it's a waste of webz time and bandwidth reposting on a subject that has already been beaten to death in a stickied post.

War should be hellish expensive anyway. 50 Mill ISK to wardec another Corp ? That's cheaper than a packet of chips. It should cost billions to finance a war. 50 Million is a joke.


The Zerg Overmind
Rule Reversal
#11 - 2011-11-16 11:14:28 UTC
Jaroslav Unwanted wrote:


why call it exploit ?

Because for the last 3.5 years it has been an exploit.

The recent deregulation of wardec mechanics is a sloppy cover to reduce GM petitions right before their massive layoffs, not because the exploit was fixed. It's because they didn't want to bother regulating it anymore.

The spirit of the rules governing wardecs are still broken, and abused. Our primary goal is to raise awareness and affect a change in game mechanics, or GM policy. Angering lots of people by denying them otherwise legitimate war targets is a means to raise awareness. That is why we do this, that is why this is still an exploit, that is why you must know about it. Plus, my Paint skills must be acknowledged.

Akrasjel Lanate
Immemorial Coalescence Administration
Immemorial Coalescence
#12 - 2011-11-16 11:15:26 UTC
This change with alliance dec shield is ********. Nuf said.

CEO of Lanate Industries

Citizen of Solitude

Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
#13 - 2011-11-16 11:15:59 UTC
Thorn Galen wrote:
It should cost billions to finance a war. 50 Million is a joke.




It should cost billions to fight a war. Just declaring it shouldn't cost much more than the cost of a registered delivery, or maybe a taxi if you're delivering the notification by hand.

"Just remember later that I warned against any change to jump ranges or fatigue. You earned whats coming."

Grath Telkin, 11.10.2016

Thorn Galen
Bene Gesserit ChapterHouse
The Curatores Veritatis Auxiliary
#14 - 2011-11-16 11:18:15 UTC
The Zerg Overmind wrote:
Jaroslav Unwanted wrote:


why call it exploit ?

Because for the last 3.5 years it has been an exploit.

The recent deregulation of wardec mechanics is a sloppy cover to reduce GM petitions right before their massive layoffs, not because the exploit was fixed. It's because they didn't want to bother regulating it anymore.

The spirit of the rules governing wardecs are still broken, and abused. Our primary goal is to raise awareness and affect a change in game mechanics, or GM policy. Angering lots of people by denying them otherwise legitimate war targets is a means to raise awareness. That is why we do this, that is why this is still an exploit, that is why you must know about it. Plus, my Paint skills must be acknowledged.



Sounds like you're upset that it's no longer a cheap 50Mill to wage war.
Yes the wardec thing is broken. Now re-read that stickied post and try figure out why they cannot do anything about it right now.
Stop crying and pay the proper price for War. You're sounding a lot like a certain individual who is ex-Eve University and also went on and on and on and on and on and on about this same issue.

DEV PLEASE LOCK THIS THREAD
The Zerg Overmind
Rule Reversal
#15 - 2011-11-16 11:37:24 UTC
Thorn Galen wrote:

Sounds like you're upset that it's no longer a cheap 50Mill to wage war.
Yes the wardec thing is broken. Now re-read that stickied post and try figure out why they cannot do anything about it right now.
Stop crying and pay the proper price for War. You're sounding a lot like a certain individual who is ex-Eve University and also went on and on and on and on and on and on about this same issue.

DEV PLEASE LOCK THIS THREAD

Firstly, your tears are delicious and will be added to the ample collection we have going.

Secondly, I love how nothing in your post has any relevance to anything in this post. You seem to be rambling about dec shields, while this thread is about wardec evasion and rendering highsec towers invulnerable. The two are very different.

Thirdly, your information on wardec pricing is inaccurate. (Corp-corp wardecs start at 2mil each, Corp-Ally, or Ally-Ally start at 50mil each)

Fourthly, all tears you shed here over Eve University will be collected and sent to them in a courier contract, the collateral for yours will be especially low.

Fifth, this thread offers legitimate information and discussion about a "game feature" that we are lobbying to change. You are welcome to go down vote the proposed fixes here.
Ptraci
3 R Corporation
#16 - 2011-11-16 11:46:55 UTC
The Zerg Overmind wrote:
Every day we aid more corporations evade wardecs.


Maybe you start deccing real corporations in low/null sec instead of carebears in high sec and stop having these problems.
Skippermonkey
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#17 - 2011-11-16 11:49:26 UTC
The Zerg Overmind wrote:
The recent deregulation of wardec mechanics is a sloppy cover to reduce GM petitions right before their massive layoffs, not because the exploit was fixed. It's because they didn't want to bother regulating it anymore.


QFT

COME AT ME BRO

I'LL JUST BE DOCKED IN THIS STATION

Mrs Sooperdudespaceman
Doomheim
#18 - 2011-11-16 12:02:03 UTC
CCP unstickied the announcement.
Mrs Sooperdudespaceman
Doomheim
#19 - 2011-11-16 12:04:10 UTC
Ptraci wrote:
The Zerg Overmind wrote:
Every day we aid more corporations evade wardecs.


Maybe you start deccing real corporations in low/null sec instead of carebears in high sec and stop having these problems.


Maybe you should realise that this is part of the game.
Takseen
Federal Defense Union
Gallente Federation
#20 - 2011-11-16 13:37:01 UTC
Malcanis wrote:
Thorn Galen wrote:
It should cost billions to finance a war. 50 Million is a joke.




It should cost billions to fight a war. Just declaring it shouldn't cost much more than the cost of a registered delivery, or maybe a taxi if you're delivering the notification by hand.


I thought the wardec fee was a bribe to Concord to look the other way, no? Its not unreasonable to expect the costs to go up after so many years of ISK inflation.
123Next pageLast page