Intergalactic Summit

Ms Hanaya,

thank you for your question. Her Grace has asked me to provide you with a copy of “Elementary Civic Education for Boys and Girls” written by Catiz Akurani, where you will find that the terms Amarr and Khanid are not mutually exclusive.

An Amarrian can be Khanid, and a Khanid can be Amarrian, although both conditions are bound to certain preconditions, which are legally defined by being listed in the Book of Records. Thus being Amarrian, as defined by religious, legal, and cultural terms, does not equate being a True Amarrian, as defined by racial terms, which a Khanid, of course, cannot be. Ms Akurani gives a very good and understandable overview for this matters.

As a result of this the duchess does not “appear to be a Khanid woman who is claiming to be Amarrian”, she certainly is both. (Unless, of course, you were implying with your statement that you see the Khanid purely as a racial group.) The second part of your statement refers to the Kingdom and the Empire, wherein Amarrian equates Imperial, while Khanid equates Royal. I hope the matters in question are now understandable.

Yours sincerely,
Morijah d’Hanguest
CEO of Ishtirak d’Hanguest

Admiral Blake,

it pleases the duchess and me to see you so snaky and irritated that you are taking this discussion to the spelling level.

Yours sincerely,
Morijah d’Hanguest
CEO of Ishtirak d’Hanguest

Admiral Blake,

let me say it frank this time. As a lawyer yourself you should understand to eschew unethical behaviour like “cherry picking”, i. e. a quoting out of context in a selective manner that suits your argumentation while omitting the facts that do not. So far you have not even presented circumstantial evidence or arguments against the duchess, and your refutation of her claims and statements lacks any scriptural, legal or logical basis.

Instead of waisting our time with your biased sophistry and with corrupting the innocent, you could, for example, answer to the latest correspondence you have received from us or reply to the questions the duchess has asked you. May I also remind you that not all languages of New Eden are translated in the same quality and that the tongue that our house speaks for generations is not the imperial standard language. To base your argument on the difference of an “r” and an “R” is shameless hypocrisy at its best—but is suits you.

Yours sincerely,
Morijah d’Hanguest
CEO of Ishtirak d’Hanguest

Failure to maintain reasonable equipment standards is still a failing.

You want evidence to back up my claims?

Well let's start with the allegation that your sister willfully placed a bounty on a member of an allied corporation shall we?

Here's her confession.

Now the claim that your sister "couldn't even have (her) way with one of the least-picky women of easy pleasure in the cluster..."

Here is all the evidence we need

As for the assertion that your sister took part in the production of holoreels of an adult nature, here is her admission not only of doing just that but also of lying about it

Now I ask the good people of the Intergalactic Summit: is such a person qualified to pass judgement on the morality of others? Are they qualified to decide whether or not a part of the apparatus of the Amarr Empire has legitimacy?

Tell me Morijah, exactly what is it that makes you think that your sister has the right to question the legitimacy not only of the Theology Council but also of the Privy Council and the Empress herself?

So, you are critiquing Admiral Blake having done a background check on someone who has called the Theology Council treasonous?

Nobility shows itself through Right Action. It is a great birthright and a great responsibility. Applying Gallente logic concepts like "ad personam" to this discussion only digs the hole your family is in deeper. Making a spectacle of oneself is an action guided by Molok, not by God. Making public accusations against the Theology Council and Scriptures are also actions guided by Molok. Such a person has no ability to be correct, for she is guided by evil forces and has betrayed Amarr. To separate the person and their status with God from the argument they are making is a classic example of the cancer of allowing Gallente concepts to enter into discussions of Amarr.

Amarrian nobility have a massive responsibility to be paragons of prudence and Godly behavior. We are blessed with authority due to the actions of our ancestors, which means that we are also burdened with equal responsibility to live up to that authority. A noble who behaves in the manner we are seeing here and who espouses heretical beliefs is a betrayal of those ancestors and does not deserve to be treated with any honor. Said noble has abdicated the moral right to the authority she wields.

The hell does that have to do with anything?

I don't insist people call me Admiral, especially when they're outside my chain of command. When they do, it's through their own choice.

I'm a humble man at heart, but it seems that my past adventures have earned me a certain amount of respect and so many people feel the need to honour me.




And yet you fight for this woman whose purity you question.

There are none so blind as those who will not see!

Jamly is an abomination, a blasphemous insult to the long traditions of our Holy Amarr Empire, even regenerated an Emperor could live perhaps 500 years, and then die, she is a wholly cloned capsuleer! As foolish followers like you will one day see for themselves when they open their eyes.

I am done with this discussion, Heretic. When you declare the Empress a blasphemer you declare yourself beyond salvation.

You are a disgrace to your heritage. You are not Amarr, you are fallen. A failure. A pathetic disappointment of the vision of God. Your actions are a blight on the Amarrian institution of nobility and an insult to everyone who carries the responsibilities and titles of a Holder.

Your noble ancestors would be appalled to see what their descendant has wrought.

You will burn in eternal damnation.