These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Intergalactic Summit

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

The Theology Council is a Den of Indecency and Treason—An answer to Ms Gesakaarin

First post
Author
Odelya d'Hanguest
Order of St. Severian
#41 - 2013-09-30 16:35:25 UTC
Mr Mintor, Ms Mithra,

you seem so close, but yet you never reach the point…

Eran Mintor wrote:
Are you against Amarr adapting to it's changing environment?
To the contrary: But changes need to be made out of necessity and reason. They need to be based on the will of God and thus on the Scriptures. (You don’t follow His will when you burn the Scriptures like the deceivers and usurpers of the Theology Council did.) Stubborn are those who maintain and believe that what we have today is the best of all possibilities. But when we catch a glimpse back in time—and we can agree that the age of the prophets was superior to our own—we see the ideal order of society before our eyes. Accepting the current order of the Empire is to accept mediocracy. This might be forgiven, but for sure it is treason in the eyes of God for we were destined for greatness.

And, Ms Mithra, you confuse the argumentum ad antiquitatem with the argumentum ad veritatem, which seems logical since in your reasoning the argumentum ad vertiatum and the argumentum ad novitatem are of the same type…

Constantin Baracca wrote:
Actually... I suppose it's Lady Odelya? I prefer not to be addressed as Bishop or by my surname. My actual style is the Most Reverend Constantin Praetus Baracca III, Bishop of the Hinterlands. […]
Bishop of the Hinterlands,

my secretary will send you a message containing the details; you might also inspect the Book of Records.

Constantin Baracca wrote:
The Word of God and the Scriptures, by the time of the Council of Apostles, was certainly not being read in exegesis, nor being treated any better than now by the political powers that be (at the time the aformentioned Council). To say that we are always right in our first transcript of the Scriptures is simply not true and never has been. We have entire schools of science dedicated to finding new pieces of period material that can ever so slightly change the nature of what we know about the Scriptures. Nor are they truly being done written. In a thousand or two years, the Pax Amarria may be considered Scripture, as its wisdom seems most profound and timeless. There has never been a time when our culture has ever stopped and said, "Fair enough, we must know everything about the Scriptures now. Carry on this way forever." In fact, we're fairly certain we are still in a process of getting towards that state. We may not be even close yet.

May God forbid that the Pax Amarria will ever be considered “scripture” and may He smite those who find that the Scriptures were contingent products of happenstance! Exegesis and interpretation was and will always be part of our lives. Yet we must know the difference between reading a receipt and the scriptures—this is why we call this science theology and not literature studies!

Constantin Baracca wrote:
To re-examine the Scriptures over and over, looking for new meaning and context, isn't a heresy. It is a work of faith in which all Amarrians, in their way, take part.
Indeed, but we should open our hearts to hear His pure voice, and not the analysis of the newest fashion of Hedion University’s history department. The scripture doesn’t err. Historians do.

Constantin Baracca wrote:
So if we are not finished learning, even now, then it goes to follow we were not a millenium and a half ago, when the pool of scholars was smaller and more cloistered. If God had meant for us to serve a wicked purpose, I don't see how the Theology Council would fit the bill any better than the Council of Apostles did. The Theology Council wasn't around to produce the Mad Emperor. Obviously, God saw this aberration and corrected it.
Again, your instrumentalist approach becomes obvious. For you our faith is a mere tool to make people’s life a bit easier and more understandable—but I know and say that the opposite is the case! You have to suffer from the majesty of the Lord and live your life on your knees to be close to him! But your logic fits in: “God corrected it. The greatness of God, from which I tremble, becomes a trivial deux ex machina to solve what reason cannot. I clearly understand now, why you are the Bishop of the Hinterlands...

I advise you to fear the Lord, repent, and organise your affairs!

Odelya
Rodj Blake
PIE Inc.
Khimi Harar
#42 - 2013-09-30 16:58:09 UTC  |  Edited by: Rodj Blake
Odelya d'Hanguest wrote:
Makkal Hanaya wrote:
The Theology Council is a governing body in the Empire. An Amarrian who did not acknowledge its authority would be like a Caldari who didn't acknowledge the authority of the megacorp they were a citizen of.
Dano Gheinok, our most sweet and gift-bestowing prophet, did not acknowledge the Theology Council, Amash Akura, may God exalt him, did not either, Kuria, the earliest host of our holy religion, St. Junip, St. Anoyia, St. Askura, St. Ageroth, St. Anam, and all the Holy Disciples of the Lord did not bow their heads to the Theology Council, and so does not His Royal Khanid Majesty, of whom you and I are subjects. So are they less Amarrian than you are? A Khanid serving the State who is longing for the Kingdom to become like a lookalike of Tash-Murkon? And I thought you are saying: “Render unto Khanid the things which are Khanid’s; and unto God the things that are God’s.”

Bishop Constantin, I will come back to your point later, thank you.

Odelya


Dano Gheinok didn't recognise the existence of an autonomous Khanid Kingdom, and neither did Amash Akura or any of the other saints that you mention.

Does that mean that you consider the Khanid Kingdom to be an indecent and treasonous body?

And since Dano Gheinok did not acknowledge the teachings of St Tetrimon, presumably you consider them to be a load of cobblers as well?

Dolce et decorum est pro Imperium mori

Odelya d'Hanguest
Order of St. Severian
#43 - 2013-09-30 17:32:58 UTC  |  Edited by: Odelya d'Hanguest
Rodj Blake wrote:
Dano Gheinok didn't recognise the existence of an autonomous Khanid Kingdom, and neither did Amash Akura or any of the other saints that you mention.

Does that mean that you consider the Khanid Kingdom to be an indecent and treasonous body?

And since Dano Gheinok did not acknowledge the teachings of St Tetrimon, presumably you consider them to be a load of cobblers as well?
You will find those questions already answered—the parts where I speak about necessity and reason, if you read carefully. It it isn't us who burn the Scriptures and alter them to see them fit to partisan interests. The Kingdom preserves the spirit and meaning of Dano Gheinok's (oh, sweet, gift-bestowing prophet) original message and the order which was laid down in it. If we would ask our beloved prophet today who rules in accordance with the Scriptures without doubt he would dismiss Jamyl Sarum and chose His Royal Khanid Majesty.

I advise you to fear the Lord and organise your affairs!

Odelya
Rodj Blake
PIE Inc.
Khimi Harar
#44 - 2013-09-30 17:54:52 UTC
Odelya d'Hanguest wrote:
Rodj Blake wrote:
Dano Gheinok didn't recognise the existence of an autonomous Khanid Kingdom, and neither did Amash Akura or any of the other saints that you mention.

Does that mean that you consider the Khanid Kingdom to be an indecent and treasonous body?

And since Dano Gheinok did not acknowledge the teachings of St Tetrimon, presumably you consider them to be a load of cobblers as well?
You will find those questions already answered—the parts where I speak about necessity and reason, if you read carefully. It it isn't us who burn the Scriptures and alter them to see them fit to partisan interests. The Kingdom preserves the spirit and meaning of Dano Gheinok's (oh, sweet, gift-bestowing prophet) original message and the order which was laid down in it. If we would ask our beloved prophet today who rules in accordance with the Scriptures without doubt he would dismiss Jamyl Sarum and chose His Royal Khanid Majesty.

I advise you to fear the Lord and organise your affairs!

Odelya


Your whole argument so far is basically that you're right and everyone who disagrees with you (ie the Theology Council, the Privy Council and the Empress) is wrong.

Except that the people you're disagreeing with have spent lifetimes praying, meditating and studying Scripture, while you're so incompetent that you couldn't even have your way with one of the least-picky women of easy pleasure in the cluster

Dolce et decorum est pro Imperium mori

Andreus Ixiris
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#45 - 2013-09-30 18:28:07 UTC
Rodj Blake wrote:
Your whole argument so far is basically that you're right and everyone who disagrees with you (ie the Theology Council, the Privy Council and the Empress) is wrong.

Isn't "I'm right and everyone who disagrees with me is wrong" the argument of the entire Amarr Empire?

Rodj Blake wrote:
... you're so incompetent that you couldn't even have your way with one of the least-picky women of easy pleasure in the cluster

Ahahahahaha.

OK, Rodj. We've known each other a long time and there's certainly no love lost between us, but... that one was good. Bravo, Rodj. Bravo.

Andreus Ixiris > A Civire without a chin is barely a Civire at all.

Pieter Tuulinen > He'd be Civirely disadvantaged, Andreus.

Andreus Ixiris > ...

Andreus Ixiris > This is why we're at war.

Anslo
Scope Works
#46 - 2013-09-30 19:00:15 UTC
Wow. She's crazier than Rodj.

[center]-_For the Proveldtariat_/-[/center]

Odelya d'Hanguest
Order of St. Severian
#47 - 2013-09-30 19:09:38 UTC
Rodj Blake wrote:
Your whole argument so far is basically that you're right and everyone who disagrees with you (ie the Theology Council, the Privy Council and the Empress) is wrong.

Except that the people you're disagreeing with have spent lifetimes praying, meditating and studying Scripture, while you're so incompetent that you couldn't even have your way with one of the least-picky women of easy pleasure in the cluster
You have irreversibly crossed the red line, Blake, I will not tolerate this scandalous and histrionic slander.
Eran Mintor
Metropolis Commercial Consortium
#48 - 2013-09-30 19:13:56 UTC
Truth hurts.

-Eran
Rodj Blake
PIE Inc.
Khimi Harar
#49 - 2013-09-30 19:21:53 UTC
Odelya d'Hanguest wrote:
Rodj Blake wrote:
Your whole argument so far is basically that you're right and everyone who disagrees with you (ie the Theology Council, the Privy Council and the Empress) is wrong.

Except that the people you're disagreeing with have spent lifetimes praying, meditating and studying Scripture, while you're so incompetent that you couldn't even have your way with one of the least-picky women of easy pleasure in the cluster
You have irreversibly crossed the red line, Blake, I will not tolerate this scandalous and histrionic slander.


It's only slander when it's knowingly false.

Also, you seem to be getting slander mixed up with libel. You should ask your lawyer sister what the difference is.

Dolce et decorum est pro Imperium mori

Nicoletta Mithra
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#50 - 2013-09-30 21:47:22 UTC
Rodj Blake wrote:
Your whole argument so far is basically that you're right and everyone who disagrees with you (ie the Theology Council, the Privy Council and the Empress) is wrong.


I admire you for the ability to put what she said in so simple, yet elegant words that are right to the point, Admiral Blake!
Zelarrs Elkoth
PIE Inc.
Khimi Harar
#51 - 2013-09-30 23:19:31 UTC
At a time when the Kingdom and Empire are actively reconciling, it is sad but I suppose inevitable to see reactionary agitation.

I don't really understand what you have to gain from this though, Ms. Odelya d'Hanguest. I do hope this is a personal crusade and not the views of our well respected allies, the 24eme Legion Etrangere?

Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris Captain, Head of Diplomacy, Recruiting Officer Contact on channel: "PIE Public" "I walk the razor's edge of embracing the future while protecting what we value of the past."

Gaven Lok'ri
PIE Inc.
Khimi Harar
#52 - 2013-10-01 19:35:07 UTC
Odelya d'Hanguest wrote:
Dano Gheinok, our most sweet and gift-bestowing prophet, did not acknowledge the Theology Council, Amash Akura, may God exalt him, did not either, Kuria, the earliest host of our holy religion, St. Junip, St. Anoyia, St. Askura, St. Ageroth, St. Anam, and all the Holy Disciples of the Lord did not bow their heads to the Theology Council, and so does not His Royal Khanid Majesty, of whom you and I are subjects. So are they less Amarrian than you are? A Khanid serving the State who is longing for the Kingdom to become like a lookalike of Tash-Murkon? And I thought you are saying: “Render unto Khanid the things which are Khanid’s; and unto God the things that are God’s.”



The Emperor Gheinok also did not fight his wars in Titans. Titans whose plans are a part of our scripture. The scriptures are expanded as the mission of God matures and more divine revelations occur. This is how it has always been. The Theology Council's job is to decide which of the new passages are genuine and to make sure that the various branches of the faith do not develop heretical practices.

The heresy that attempts to impose an unchanging and static scripture on the Amarrian people are one of the larger threats to Amarrian society. The end result of the argument is that the Scriptures become a dead document that cannot be updated as the mission of God for the Amarrian People requires.

There was a time when a council of Apostles was the God designated ruling body for Amarr. That time has long passed. Have you forgotten Khanid's ancestors fought *against* said Council of Apostles during the Moral Reforms and the very nature of his state is not supported by the Tetrimon's version of scripture? Khanid may tolerate the Tetrimon, but he does not support their theology.

We live in a society blessed by the direct divine support. God's hand is just as active today as it was thousands of years ago, and accordingly it is our God given duty as a rightly guided people to record the continued evidence of the hand of God in our world. To declare the scriptures a finished document is to deny that God is still working in this world.


Admiral of the Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris

Divine Commodore 24th Imperial Crusade

Holder. Vassal of the Emperor Family

Constantin Baracca
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#53 - 2013-10-01 22:47:05 UTC
Gaven Lok'ri wrote:
Odelya d'Hanguest wrote:
Dano Gheinok, our most sweet and gift-bestowing prophet, did not acknowledge the Theology Council, Amash Akura, may God exalt him, did not either, Kuria, the earliest host of our holy religion, St. Junip, St. Anoyia, St. Askura, St. Ageroth, St. Anam, and all the Holy Disciples of the Lord did not bow their heads to the Theology Council, and so does not His Royal Khanid Majesty, of whom you and I are subjects. So are they less Amarrian than you are? A Khanid serving the State who is longing for the Kingdom to become like a lookalike of Tash-Murkon? And I thought you are saying: “Render unto Khanid the things which are Khanid’s; and unto God the things that are God’s.”



The Emperor Gheinok also did not fight his wars in Titans. Titans whose plans are a part of our scripture. The scriptures are expanded as the mission of God matures and more divine revelations occur. This is how it has always been. The Theology Council's job is to decide which of the new passages are genuine and to make sure that the various branches of the faith do not develop heretical practices.

The heresy that attempts to impose an unchanging and static scripture on the Amarrian people are one of the larger threats to Amarrian society. The end result of the argument is that the Scriptures become a dead document that cannot be updated as the mission of God for the Amarrian People requires.

There was a time when a council of Apostles was the God designated ruling body for Amarr. That time has long passed. Have you forgotten Khanid's ancestors fought *against* said Council of Apostles during the Moral Reforms and the very nature of his state is not supported by the Tetrimon's version of scripture? Khanid may tolerate the Tetrimon, but he does not support their theology.

We live in a society blessed by the direct divine support. God's hand is just as active today as it was thousands of years ago, and accordingly it is our God given duty as a rightly guided people to record the continued evidence of the hand of God in our world. To declare the scriptures a finished document is to deny that God is still working in this world.




Amen, Gaven.

"What good will it be for someone to gain the whole world, yet forfeit their soul? Or what can anyone give in exchange for their soul?"

-Matthew 16:26

Odelya d'Hanguest
Order of St. Severian
#54 - 2013-10-02 10:38:48 UTC
Zelarrs Elkoth wrote:
At a time when the Kingdom and Empire are actively reconciling, it is sad but I suppose inevitable to see reactionary agitation.

I don't really understand what you have to gain from this though, Ms. Odelya d'Hanguest. I do hope this is a personal crusade and not the views of our well respected allies, the 24eme Legion Etrangere?
Truth is what I have to gain. Has the quest for truth and virtue a place within the ranks of PIE Inc.? Or have your hearts and minds become entirely sclerotic? You can ask your cherished admiral how he replied to a very kind and conciliatory letter my sister sent him. Ask him how he reacted to her offer that aimed at mitigating this conflict. I fear that the obdurateness within certain factions of the Empire has reached a painful spike, so that being “reactionary”—which translates to being tolerant and benevolent—is the only possible answer. Your well respected allies have never declared someone a heretic on the basis of slander.

Gaven Lok'ri wrote:
Odelya d'Hanguest wrote:
Dano Gheinok, our most sweet and gift-bestowing prophet, did not acknowledge the Theology Council, Amash Akura, may God exalt him, did not either, Kuria, the earliest host of our holy religion, St. Junip, St. Anoyia, St. Askura, St. Ageroth, St. Anam, and all the Holy Disciples of the Lord did not bow their heads to the Theology Council, and so does not His Royal Khanid Majesty, of whom you and I are subjects. So are they less Amarrian than you are? A Khanid serving the State who is longing for the Kingdom to become like a lookalike of Tash-Murkon? And I thought you are saying: “Render unto Khanid the things which are Khanid’s; and unto God the things that are God’s.”

The Emperor Gheinok also did not fight his wars in Titans. Titans whose plans are a part of our scripture. The scriptures are expanded as the mission of God matures and more divine revelations occur. This is how it has always been. The Theology Council's job is to decide which of the new passages are genuine and to make sure that the various branches of the faith do not develop heretical practices.
Where exactly did I state that the plan which God laid down for our society is related to the way we should deal with technology? Technological progress is a mere instrument, we need it for practical, but not for spiritual purposes. The divine plan for our society however, is not a simple tool for salvation, but a sanctified and eternal order which should not be changed out of political reasons—and there has not been a single reason for the implementation of the Theology Council which wasn’t political in its essence.

Gaven Lok'ri wrote:
The heresy that attempts to impose an unchanging and static scripture on the Amarrian people are one of the larger threats to Amarrian society. The end result of the argument is that the Scriptures become a dead document that cannot be updated as the mission of God for the Amarrian People requires.

There was a time when a council of Apostles was the God designated ruling body for Amarr. That time has long passed. Have you forgotten Khanid's ancestors fought *against* said Council of Apostles during the Moral Reforms and the very nature of his state is not supported by the Tetrimon's version of scripture? Khanid may tolerate the Tetrimon, but he does not support their theology.

We live in a society blessed by the direct divine support. God's hand is just as active today as it was thousands of years ago, and accordingly it is our God given duty as a rightly guided people to record the continued evidence of the hand of God in our world. To declare the scriptures a finished document is to deny that God is still working in this world.
I agree: the divine revelation continues. And we haven’t been ordered to establish a Theology Council. The requirements of our sanctified and traditional order are still standing.

I pray for you that God returns to your heart, for it saddens me to see it so abandoned,
Odelya
Samira Kernher
Cail Avetatu
#55 - 2013-10-02 11:40:13 UTC  |  Edited by: Samira Kernher
The Theology Council was established by the Emperor, and so it was the will of God. If it was indecent and treasonous, then Her Imperial Majesty would declare it such. She has not.

It is not our place to make such proclamations.
Kyllsa Siikanen
Tuonelan Virta
#56 - 2013-10-02 12:24:32 UTC  |  Edited by: Kyllsa Siikanen
Hmm. From this:

"In the beginning all things were as one.
God parted them and breathed life into his creation
Divided the parts and gave each its place
And unto each, bestowed purpose"
- The Scriptures, Book I 1:4

This hints at a predestined purpose for every thing, and if i am not mistaken, is one of the most important verses in the whole of the Scriptures? For many years, I have wrestled with this bit, as it is so similar to ours. God gives every thing purpose. It is HIS work that guides life, and guides us. To go against this purpose is to go against God. It says nothing about God's personal attachment to His creation, nor about it being at all difficult for him to create; he simply desired it, and it was. This is in line with the Amarrian view of God as a being of supreme power and limitless ability; he wished it, and so it was.

To this:

Within this nothingness
I know very clearly
The directions and the points
Of every possible location

I forge my wisdom
Into an arc surrounding all
I forge my heartbeat
Into a heavens-wide sphere

Translated from Sebiestor, where the alliteration and rhyme holds

And this is a small excerpt from a much larger body who's name, and the bulk of the content, have been lost to time. This piece - 68 lines are extant- is named Perkunjasungaa, which translates to "Skyforger's song". If one does, indeed, acknowledge that we all came from some common origin, the difference becomes even more striking. The Skyforger knows the place and purpose things shall take, but it never says anything about that purpose being his decision; he literally created the universe, set it in motion, and sits back to watch. To go against our purpose is to go against creation, NOT against him in particular. We all have a part we SHOULD play, but that part is dictated by the universe and our part in it, not by the single divinity. The Skyforger has some attachment to what he has crafted, and it was not as simple for him as it was for God - he had to put his wisdom and his heart into it, a saying which is somewhat akin to "His blood, sweat, and tears".

Of course, all Minmatar do not practice the same religion. And, of course, the above was written - we think - because it was inspired by the religion, the work is not the basis for the religion. Yet another difference.

Anyway, interesting. Thank you for the debate you all had regarding your God's omnipotence, or lack thereof. Similarities are striking, but the differences are far moreso.

Carry on!

“Crying is all right in its own way while it lasts. But you have to stop sooner or later, and then you still have to decide what to do.” 

― C.S. Lewis 

Odelya d'Hanguest
Order of St. Severian
#57 - 2013-10-02 21:30:51 UTC
Samira Kernher wrote:
The Theology Council was established by the Emperor, and so it was the will of God. If it was indecent and treasonous, then Her Imperial Majesty would declare it such. She has not.
Samira, read everything which has been written here so far again. Think about it for a while and see what is right and wrong. Do not just apply the standard PIE procedure: to ignore what you have found out and to congratulate your superiors on their greatness.

Kyllsa Siikanen wrote:
"In the beginning all things were as one.
God parted them and breathed life into his creation
Divided the parts and gave each its place
And unto each, bestowed purpose"
- The Scriptures, Book I 1:4

This hints at a predestined purpose for every thing, and if i am not mistaken, is one of the most important verses in the whole of the Scriptures? For many years, I have wrestled with this bit, as it is so similar to ours. God gives every thing purpose. It is HIS work that guides life, and guides us. To go against this purpose is to go against God. It says nothing about God's personal attachment to His creation, nor about it being at all difficult for him to create; he simply desired it, and it was. This is in line with the Amarrian view of God as a being of supreme power and limitless ability; he wished it, and so it was.
Ms Siikanen,

thank you for your contribution which prove that even a Sebiestor clanswoman might achieve a deeper understanding of the Lord’s plan than an old, fossilised admiral and his sycophantic camarilla. Now just ignore the superstitious beliefs about the “skyforger” and you’ll be fine.

Odelya
Gaven Lok'ri
PIE Inc.
Khimi Harar
#58 - 2013-10-03 01:34:49 UTC  |  Edited by: Gaven Lok'ri
Quote:
Where exactly did I state that the plan which God laid down for our society is related to the way we should deal with technology? .


You did not. But you should have.

Records of divinely inspired technological advancement is a part of our scriptures, the technology with which we fight our wars is as much a part of the Amarrian faith as any other practice.

Societal structures are also a form of technology. They change based on size and conditions. When God requires that Amarrian society change, it will change as required, and the new revelations that led to this development will after a great deal of vetting enter the library of scriptures. This is how it has always worked and our willingness to follow when God calls is why the Amarr are the Chosen of God.

The Tetrimonic argument would have us fail to add direct revelations from God to the scriptures. That would be evil. It is an argument that the very life of our society, the direct connection of everything into the correct way of life that is Amarr, needs to stop evolving and that we need to step away from the ever changing demands of God's plan for Amarr. That would be stepping away from the true path.

Also your attempts to separate the political and the spiritual demonstrate that the Gallente cancer has invaded your thoughts about religion.

The two are not separable and cannot be separable. All acts are either religious acts or anti-religious. The only question regarding the rightness of any act is whether it is in accordance with the will of God. Political acts can be rightly guided. They can also work against Amarr. What matters is not the label political, but only whether or not the act is holy.

We have the Empress to lead us and destiny to follow. We cannot do wrong so long as we follow the will of God's chosen ruler of Amarr.

Admiral of the Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris

Divine Commodore 24th Imperial Crusade

Holder. Vassal of the Emperor Family

Samira Kernher
Cail Avetatu
#59 - 2013-10-03 04:34:10 UTC
Odelya d'Hanguest wrote:
Samira Kernher wrote:
The Theology Council was established by the Emperor, and so it was the will of God. If it was indecent and treasonous, then Her Imperial Majesty would declare it such. She has not.
Samira, read everything which has been written here so far again. Think about it for a while and see what is right and wrong. Do not just apply the standard PIE procedure: to ignore what you have found out and to congratulate your superiors on their greatness.


That is not just PIE procedure. The Emperor's authority is absolute. The Theology Council has the blessing of the Emperor, and so the Theology Council has the blessing of God. Thus it is heretical to oppose it.
Makkal Hanaya
Revenent Defence Corperation
#60 - 2013-10-03 07:52:16 UTC  |  Edited by: Makkal Hanaya
Odelya d'Hanguest wrote:
Makkal Hanaya wrote:
The Theology Council is a governing body in the Empire. An Amarrian who did not acknowledge its authority would be like a Caldari who didn't acknowledge the authority of the megacorp they were a citizen of.
Dano Gheinok, our most sweet and gift-bestowing prophet, did not acknowledge the Theology Council, Amash Akura, may God exalt him, did not either, Kuria, the earliest host of our holy religion, St. Junip, St. Anoyia, St. Askura, St. Ageroth, St. Anam, and all the Holy Disciples of the Lord did not bow their heads to the Theology Council, and so does not His Royal Khanid Majesty, of whom you and I are subjects. So are they less Amarrian than you are?

Given that I'm not Amarrian, it would be difficult for a group of mostly True Amarr who were born and raised in the Empire to be less Amarrian than I.


Quote:
A Khanid serving the State who is longing for the Kingdom to become like a lookalike of Tash-Murkon? And I thought you are saying: “Render unto Khanid the things which are Khanid’s; and unto God the things that are God’s.”

You appear to be a Khanid woman claiming to be Amarrian while insulting another Khanid for wanting the Kingdom to be Amarrian, as evidenced by said Khanid working for a megacorp.

That can't be right though because that makes no sense.

Render unto Khanid the things which are Khanid's; and unto God the things that are God's.