These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Intergalactic Summit

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Peace between the Empire and the Republic, a Moderate viewpoint

Author
Lyn Farel
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#41 - 2013-10-01 17:43:50 UTC
Zsaryna Adrelana wrote:
We've shown we are willing to make steps, we've demonstrated a willingness t commit to a peace process. We have not seen anything in return from the Republic, not even a bouquet of flowers and a cake to say thank you.


If I remember correctly freedom fighters organizations were brandished criminal by CONCORD, and that would probably not have been possible without the approval of even the Minmatar delegates, under Midular's mandate. It went alongside Heideran edict against external slavery, maybe not correlated, but probably in the same mutual appeasement process.

Unless you consider that kind of steps forwards lesser than flowers and cake, of course.
Constantin Baracca
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#42 - 2013-10-01 17:52:24 UTC
Ava Starfire wrote:
Until the Empire admits fault and accepts responsibility for 700 years of murder, ****, torture, and kidnapping, and stops hiding behind that hateful "God" there will be no peace.

You want peace?

Stop pointing fingers and making ******* excuses. "Oh, but we could have been worse! Oh, but you attacked us!"

YES we attacked you. What the hell did you THINK would happen? What people, having endured what we did, and then having learned that an entire Tribe, believed to be lost, was in fact alive, what do you EXPECT us to do? Anything else is a delusion at best, period.

The Empire is a nation of war criminals, people who daily commit crimes against humanity.

You want peace? So do I.

Withdraw from our space. All of it. Immediately cease all hostilities.

Return Arzad to us. It is not yours. It never was.

Prosecute those holders who have used poison and torture for generations under international tribunal, as any war criminal should be tried.

Release ALL people held in generational slavery. Aww, its bad for your economy? Suck it up. Occupation and enslavement was pretty ******* bad for ours.

Not willing to do it, are you?

Then you dont want peace. You want to try and shift blame, to feel better about yourself and your hateful mockery of a faith.


Ava, in all honesty, do you think this tone or position will actually lead to peace? You have to understand that to want peace is to be calm in the face of anger, for anger goes both ways. At this point, we have enough hate to go around. There are elements of the Empire who have suggested that there will never be peace. The Minmatar Republic was born in violence and can only end in violence.

I've disagreed with that statement, which is to trust in the nature of people to look forward to peace rather than backwards at their own wounds. Have we not caused enough damage to each other? Is there not enough looking backward to go around for us all? Would you invite everyone here to share their stories of what ills we have experienced at the hands of the Minmatar Republic? There is blame to go around.

By continuing the warfare in the face of the Pax Amarria, whatever your reasoning, you perpetuate the conflict. People will die, Amarr and Matari all the same. As the pendulum swings, your people will be enslaved and then unenslaved, murdered and then raised again, there is no end to this conflict to be had through firepower.

What I can certainly guarantee is that if you are looking for peace, you will not find it behind you. Anger and hate are not thirsts that can be quenched. Like a chocolate, it tastes sweet for its fleeting moment, but then is gone. There is no life that can be taken or action that can be had that will make it go away because anger does not exist as a reaction. It is an emotion and a state of mind.

Think objectively about the situation. If you really want peace, ask not what everyone can do to make it happen for you. Ask what you can do to make it happen for everybody. Only when those who do the latter outnumber the former will we make progress.

"What good will it be for someone to gain the whole world, yet forfeit their soul? Or what can anyone give in exchange for their soul?"

-Matthew 16:26

Katy Moore
J. S. Radioactive Sheep Farm
#43 - 2013-10-01 18:10:43 UTC
Ava Starfire wrote:

Release ALL people held in generational slavery.

Not willing to do it, are you?

Then you dont want peace. You want to try and shift blame, to feel better about yourself and your hateful mockery of a faith.


The Empress Jamyl 1 has stated that the Lord informed her, personally, that the Age of Slavery is coming to an end.

So, that solves that.
Pieter Tuulinen
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#44 - 2013-10-01 18:33:44 UTC
Ray Mitar wrote:
The highly respected Tribeswoman Ava Starfire has put forth above a sincere and moderate proposal.

It correctly balances the reality of proper justice versus the passions of righteous vengeance. Criminal acts have been committed and can not be swept away with polite words alone. Centuries of horrific slavery and pillaging can not be counter balanced by the few years of armed resistance and sabotage enacted by freedom fighters and or terrorists.

The Amarr conquered our worlds and killed untold millions with inhumane orbital bombardments, they still hold some of our ancestral worlds and billions of Matari in vicious slavery and speak of being compensated if they should ever return said worlds and free those held in illegal bondage.

Compensation for what you stole? Compensation for the generations you enslaved? To be allowed to remain an Empire after you have released our worlds and freed our people is a greater compensation then you could ever hope for.

War criminals must be prosecuted, Concord must enforce that Amarr will not trespass in Minmatar space ever again, and a modest tax on every transaction made by Amarrians anywhere in New Eden of say 3% should be levied and administered by the Sisters of Eve to help defer the cost of relocation and recovery from slavery by the Matari freed from slavery for the next twenty years.

To not accept the fair terms presented by the highly respected Tribeswoman Ava Starfire with the addition of the relocation and recovery tax means any talk of peace between the Minmatar Republic and the Amarr Empire is just that, talk.


As much affection as I hold Ava in, what she has promulgated is unworkable and potentially tragic. Your expansions to it have moved it out of the realm of the tragic and into the realms of fantasy.

The Republic already holds FAR more territory than it did pre-slavery. It was given trillions in aid and it spent a lot of it on building an invasion fleet. The Amarrians have started releasing slaves - to no diplomatic effect. Even the limited release that took place stressed Republic infrastructure to the point that many of the released still languish in refugee camps and many call the release 'a calculated and devious attack on the Republic'.

I once despaired of diplomacy but recent experience taught me that much is possible - but only if both parties deal in realities and not ideologies.

For the first time since I started the conversation, he looks me dead in the eye. In his gaze are steel jackhammers, quiet vengeance, a hundred thousand orbital bombs frozen in still life.

Gaven Lok'ri
PIE Inc.
Khimi Harar
#45 - 2013-10-01 19:16:04 UTC
The only road to peace is for Shakor to be removed from power and delivered to justice along with everyone else involved in the illegal attacks on Amarr and CONCORD. Any discussion that does not start with that step is futile.

The question is whether that removal from power and delivery to justice is accomplished by Amarrian arms or by internal reform in the Republic.

In the latter case, I expect some form of white peace might be arranged.

That said, the sight of pilots asking for reparations from Amarr when it was the Republic's sneak attack that broke a century of peaceful negotiation just illustrates why I hold little hope for peace in our time.

Admiral of the Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris

Divine Commodore 24th Imperial Crusade

Holder. Vassal of the Emperor Family

Gabriel Darkefyre
Gradient
Electus Matari
#46 - 2013-10-01 20:01:28 UTC
Katy Moore wrote:
Ava Starfire wrote:

Release ALL people held in generational slavery.

Not willing to do it, are you?

Then you dont want peace. You want to try and shift blame, to feel better about yourself and your hateful mockery of a faith.


The Empress Jamyl 1 has stated that the Lord informed her, personally, that the Age of Slavery is coming to an end.

So, that solves that.


That's Nice.

When Exactly?
Eran Mintor
Metropolis Commercial Consortium
#47 - 2013-10-01 20:03:28 UTC
Fredfredbug4 wrote:
The reason why the Empire is allowed in CONCORD is because they stated they would stop this whole reclaimy wamey business, now they are claiming that they want to start it up again, which would violate their promise to CONCORD and the three other major empire. You could make the argument that each of the big four committed genocide (it would be difficult to make a case for say, the Caldari) but you can't possibly argue that they were just as bad as the Amarr or even officially sanctioned. The Starkmanir were thought to be extinct for centuries as a result of an officially ordered genocide by Amarr high command.

Even if the cries for reclaiming are still no more than chest beating at this point, I would still be cautious. A lot of Jamyl's support came from her promise of the dawn of a new reclaiming. She could of lied about it, or she could of really meant it. The possibility of the latter is enough to be weary of the intentions of the Empire from a military standpoint.


It amazes me that CONCORD allowed Shakor to destroy their headquarters with no consequence nor act of retribution. With that extreme example in mind, I don't think CONCORD really cares about the Amarr and their Reclaiming so long as it adheres to the laws that have been set, such as the CEMWPA and Heideran's restriction to only enslaving people in Amarr territory. CONCORD isn't here to be judge and jury of a nation's own actions within it's borders, CONCORD's goal is to asses threats to safety and interstellar peace between the major empires and deal with it.

As for the Starkmanir, the creation of Sorrow's Gash on Starkman Prime was a result of a vicious rebellion that took the life of an Amarr Heir. I'm not sure how else you expected the Ardishapur family to react but I'm interested in hearing your ideas. Regardless, I'm not really sure what relevance it has to this discussion. Genocides occur on large and small scales everywhere, whether they be officially sanctioned or not. They can hinder peace but do not make it an impossibility.

Furthermore, Jamyl Sarum made mention of a New Reclaiming but the details as to what that entails were never mentioned. Baracca here likes to think it means a non-violent Reclaiming. I'm not sure how much truth that has but I'm not going to be a fool and speak for Jamyl Sarum about something I have no knowledge about.


Miss Rella, you seem to think everything involving Matari on these forums that you disagree with is "Matari Bashing," it is getting quite tiresome.


Miss Starfire, you seem to forget there was peace recently, though tenuous during it's worst times. Your beloved Ray of Matar worked hard to ensure this peace and obtain freedom for Matari through means other than bloodshed. Hot-heads like you demanded blood though, and now you have a war on your hands that does more harm to the Matari people than good.

Honestly, it could have been worse. I don't want to think what would've happened had Jamyl Sarum not returned and usurped Karsoth from power. Jamyl Sarum could've sent her fleets into the Republic after the Elder Fleet withdrawal, but she did not. I doubt Karsoth would've stopped at Ezzara.

You say you want peace and you make demands for that to happen. Let's hypothetically say all your demands are met. Where is the guarantee that your own war criminal, Maleatu Shakor, would settle there? Your nation is led by a war criminal, what does that say of possibilities for peace? There are many Matari who want nothing less than the extermination of the Amarr. Electus Matari is probably the best example of moderate Matari but, should Shakor remain in control, your voice will be drowned out by his retinue of warlords with no desire for peace.

Adrelana and Tuulinen make some good points. I advise listening to them.

Ray Mitar wrote:
To be allowed to remain an Empire after you have released our worlds and freed our people is a greater compensation then you could ever hope for.


This is a great example of what I was just talking about. Is this not a thinly-veiled threat? 'Be grateful if we don't destroy you after you give us what we want.'

The humble mouse comes to mind...give him a cookie and he'll ask for milk.

Then the mention of a laughable tax...why, so you can use that ISK for more capital ships instead of using it for your people, much like you did with the Federation's donations? You must take everyone for an idiot with the short-term memory of a fish.

This is becoming something of a joke now, rather than honest discussion.

-Eran
Gabriel Darkefyre
Gradient
Electus Matari
#48 - 2013-10-01 20:16:12 UTC  |  Edited by: Gabriel Darkefyre
Pieter Tuulinen wrote:
Ava, you have just asked the Empire to hand you a brimming cup of poison. I understand your anger, Winds know I do, and I sympathise with it, but what you have just asked for will destroy the Matari far more surely than it would destroy the Empire.

Even if all those people could be gotten to Minmatar space, you would bury half of them within a year.


To be honest, moving every last person of Matari Descent to the Republic is a Pipe Dream at best. Most of these people have never known a life outwith the Empire.

Personally, I'd settle for Slavery to be phased out completely within the Empire. If the Former Slaves wish to stay as Amarrian Commoners, then it's their choice. If their Holders have truly been doing their Jobs properly then they should have no issues with making a life for themselves within Amarrian Society. Likewise, if they choose to come to the Republic to make a new life for themselves and their Families then I, for one, would welcome them with open arms.
Valerie Valate
Church of The Crimson Saviour
#49 - 2013-10-01 20:58:47 UTC
Gabriel Darkefyre wrote:
Personally, I'd settle for Slavery to be phased out completely within the Empire.


Then it seems like you and the Empress are in complete agreement.

Watch out, Captain Darkefyre, the Shakorian extremists will probably start shooting at you for agreeing with the Empress.

Hurr.

Doctor V. Valate, Professor of Archaeology at Kaztropolis Imperial University.

Gabriel Darkefyre
Gradient
Electus Matari
#50 - 2013-10-01 21:29:13 UTC
Valerie Valate wrote:
Gabriel Darkefyre wrote:
Personally, I'd settle for Slavery to be phased out completely within the Empire.


Then it seems like you and the Empress are in complete agreement.

Watch out, Captain Darkefyre, the Shakorian extremists will probably start shooting at you for agreeing with the Empress.

Hurr.


I think the difference between myself and the Empress would be that I would prefer there to be a reasonable timetable on the table for the process of phasing out the Legal Institution of Slavery without unquantifiable preconditions such as the Spiritual Health of the People in question.

Again, if the Holders had been doing their jobs properly, the Spiritual Health of their Slaves should not even be in question and they should already have the skills they need to both survive and thrive within Amarrian Society if that is their choice.

I suspect, however, that we'd be seeing just how badly many Holders have failed in their self appointed duty.
Ray Mitar
Ganksters Inc
#51 - 2013-10-01 21:41:39 UTC
Eran Mintor wrote:
Ray Mitar wrote:
To be allowed to remain an Empire after you have released our worlds and freed our people is a greater compensation then you could ever hope for.


This is a great example of what I was just talking about. Is this not a thinly-veiled threat? 'Be grateful if we don't destroy you after you give us what we want.'

The humble mouse comes to mind...give him a cookie and he'll ask for milk.

Then the mention of a laughable tax...why, so you can use that ISK for more capital ships instead of using it for your people, much like you did with the Federation's donations? You must take everyone for an idiot with the short-term memory of a fish.

This is becoming something of a joke now, rather than honest discussion.

-Eran
You completely misunderstood my comment, it was not a thinly veiled threat, it was an honest statement of reason. To inflict horrible crimes for centuries and then still be accepted at the table of civilization when you do no more then just stop is a fantastic deal, far better then they deserve, but in the interest of moving forward the Minmatar must move away from vengeance and embrace a future that does not require active warfare.

Because administration of support funds had been diverted to more offensive efforts I proposed a neutral respected third party to manage the taxes levied so such a thing could never happen again. If you think putting safeguards in place to disable the mistakes of the past repeating themselves is a fantasy, then I must conclude you do not want peace.
Constantin Baracca
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#52 - 2013-10-01 22:20:17 UTC
Gabriel Darkefyre wrote:
Valerie Valate wrote:
Gabriel Darkefyre wrote:
Personally, I'd settle for Slavery to be phased out completely within the Empire.


Then it seems like you and the Empress are in complete agreement.

Watch out, Captain Darkefyre, the Shakorian extremists will probably start shooting at you for agreeing with the Empress.

Hurr.


I think the difference between myself and the Empress would be that I would prefer there to be a reasonable timetable on the table for the process of phasing out the Legal Institution of Slavery without unquantifiable preconditions such as the Spiritual Health of the People in question.

Again, if the Holders had been doing their jobs properly, the Spiritual Health of their Slaves should not even be in question and they should already have the skills they need to both survive and thrive within Amarrian Society if that is their choice.

I suspect, however, that we'd be seeing just how badly many Holders have failed in their self appointed duty.


Hence why the emancipation went as it did. Notice that three groups of people were released:

Those with training in high-tech fields,

Those with work in ecclesiastical fields,

Those who had been enslaved for nine generations without release.

One of the things that isn't discussed is how many of those people stayed in the Empire. The rush of people from mostly the third category almost overwhelmed the infrastructure of the Minmatar Republic, but quite a few stayed put and moved into the civic sector. It became obvious that those three groups of people probably should not be enslaved for very long. If you're trusting slaves with your medical equipment and Scripture, odds are that they aren't going anywhere.

The last group was more nebulous, but the meaning was clear. In nine generations, if you haven't successfully converted someone to being a successful Amarrian, you're doing something wrong. It's become apparent that centuries of simply allowing Holder families free reign to release slaves only when it pleased them wasn't a good enough system. There needs to be some sort of central control mechanism. Slavery was always meant to be a period of education, not an endemic system of labor.

In essence, those Holders who failed to do their duties lost their slaves to elsewhere. Those who did probably retained them as employees.

In reality, Jamyl is returning us to a Scriptural interpretation, filling the slave class more with prisoners than conquered people. People need correcting. I don't think the system is going anywhere, as it is very effective at doing what it is meant to do. It has become obvious that certain Holders were taking their name a bit too literally. You weren't supposed to simply hold onto your slaves for as long as you could, you were supposed to make them into proper citizens.

I suppose the barometer of success has been passed down. Once that emancipation order was completed, people could see exactly who was and was not performing their job correctly.

I imagine this is only the start of the domestic reformation of the program. I think you will see quite a bit more regulation of who can be enslaved, the length of their servitude, and the manner in which their education is conducted. However, I doubt the system will ever be phased out completely. At the very least, it is far better as a civic re-education system than a prison. I see it becoming far more tied to its Scriptural doctrine, though, and being used as a means for reintroducing the disenfranchised and criminal back into proper society with a better understanding of civic duty and hopefully with some employable skills.

One of our domestic priorities, though, is evaluating the localized effects of the emancipation so that we know who probably should not be operating as a Holder anymore. Or it may simply be that conquest produces too many slaves for proper education. The Matari might certainly have been more than the Empire could effectively digest. Hence why so many were worked and went undereducated. A Holder who understands and carries out his responsibilities efficiently and thoroughly is a bit of a rarer breed than perhaps had previously been thought.

Then again, perhaps my perspective is skewed to the emancipation. House Baracca broke even on the slaves leaving. One left permanently, one married and came back. It isn't as if our ecclesiastical servitude or ability to follow an educational doctrine are difficult when you are headed by a family of priests.

"What good will it be for someone to gain the whole world, yet forfeit their soul? Or what can anyone give in exchange for their soul?"

-Matthew 16:26

Fredfredbug4
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#53 - 2013-10-01 22:34:16 UTC  |  Edited by: Fredfredbug4
Lyn Farel wrote:


How is that different from what is explained in the Pax Amarria ? And I mean the part where it speaks about ideals of cooperation and joint ventures of all sorts, not the gallente part of economic and cultural slavery.

Every coin usually has two sides.


It's nothing different from the Pax Amarria, you just need to practice what you preach, literally.

Also, what we have is not slavery. I'd imagine that if any member states wanted to secede peacefully, they could. Problem is radical groups often don't want a peaceful secession. The Tempelis Drauganaurs ruined the negotiations between the Caldari and Gallente for either a compromise to be reached for the Caldari to secede peacefully.

Lyn Farel wrote:


The only thing that is backward is pre Vak'Atioth thinking, the kind to be strangely subject to resurgence these days with the recent words of Merimeth Sarum.


If your Empire considered pre Vak'Atioth thinking backwards, then why are there still slaves?

Watch_ Fred Fred Frederation_ and stop [u]cryptozoologist[/u]! Fight against the brutal genocide of fictional creatures across New Eden! Is that a metaphor? Probably not, but the fru-fru- people will sure love it!

Pieter Tuulinen
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#54 - 2013-10-01 22:41:08 UTC
Because a Rhea doesn't turn on a kredit?

For the first time since I started the conversation, he looks me dead in the eye. In his gaze are steel jackhammers, quiet vengeance, a hundred thousand orbital bombs frozen in still life.

Pieter Tuulinen
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#55 - 2013-10-01 22:43:57 UTC
Ray Mitar wrote:
You completely misunderstood my comment, it was not a thinly veiled threat, it was an honest statement of reason. To inflict horrible crimes for centuries and then still be accepted at the table of civilization when you do no more then just stop is a fantastic deal, far better then they deserve, but in the interest of moving forward the Minmatar must move away from vengeance and embrace a future that does not require active warfare.

Because administration of support funds had been diverted to more offensive efforts I proposed a neutral respected third party to manage the taxes levied so such a thing could never happen again. If you think putting safeguards in place to disable the mistakes of the past repeating themselves is a fantasy, then I must conclude you do not want peace.


People are assuming that because your demands are so extreme and outlandish, that what they are is actually constructive dismissal of the possibility of negotiation. It's clear that, despite the horrific effects on the population of the Republic as a whole, some elements of Matari society prefer the... flexibility... that the war brings and are prospering by it.

They're assuming that your stance indicates you are one of those people, like Shakor, who prospers from the war and would continue it by any and all means.

For the first time since I started the conversation, he looks me dead in the eye. In his gaze are steel jackhammers, quiet vengeance, a hundred thousand orbital bombs frozen in still life.

Ray Mitar
Ganksters Inc
#56 - 2013-10-01 22:46:20 UTC
Could someone perhaps enlighten me on exactly how long, as in how many years are counted in an Amarrian generation?

For most people it means the time between the birth of the parents and the birth of their children. So if slavery has existed for several hundred years whom would not be well beyond their ninth generation?

The Day of Darkness happened in 22480 AD, anyway you do the math if the Empire truly followed their Empress almost all but the most recently enslaved should have been set free.
Ray Mitar
Ganksters Inc
#57 - 2013-10-01 22:56:21 UTC
Pieter Tuulinen wrote:
Ray Mitar wrote:
You completely misunderstood my comment, it was not a thinly veiled threat, it was an honest statement of reason. To inflict horrible crimes for centuries and then still be accepted at the table of civilization when you do no more then just stop is a fantastic deal, far better then they deserve, but in the interest of moving forward the Minmatar must move away from vengeance and embrace a future that does not require active warfare.

Because administration of support funds had been diverted to more offensive efforts I proposed a neutral respected third party to manage the taxes levied so such a thing could never happen again. If you think putting safeguards in place to disable the mistakes of the past repeating themselves is a fantasy, then I must conclude you do not want peace.


People are assuming that because your demands are so extreme and outlandish, that what they are is actually constructive dismissal of the possibility of negotiation. It's clear that, despite the horrific effects on the population of the Republic as a whole, some elements of Matari society prefer the... flexibility... that the war brings and are prospering by it.

They're assuming that your stance indicates you are one of those people, like Shakor, who prospers from the war and would continue it by any and all means.
I will not hesitate to continue to bring permanent death to as many Amarrians as I run across in New Eden as long as the state of war exists. I will immediately get on with other things as soon as the peace is declared.

It is easy to label us primitive tribesmen that were conquered by the technologically more advanced Amarrians but it is not completely accurate. We had experienced centuries of Peace before the Day of Darkness so we were no longer warlike enough to have fought them off, the savages were in the warp capable spaceships not in the harmonious tribes they pillaged.

Given the chance we would happily revert back to our peaceful culture. Although the innocence has been deflowered and it is only fair to conclude that the Minmatar Republic will always require a state of the art military force to assure that peace is never again violently ripped from our people.
Constantin Baracca
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#58 - 2013-10-01 23:04:30 UTC
Ray Mitar wrote:
Could someone perhaps enlighten me on exactly how long, as in how many years are counted in an Amarrian generation?

For most people it means the time between the birth of the parents and the birth of their children. So if slavery has existed for several hundred years whom would not be well beyond their ninth generation?

The Day of Darkness happened in 22480 AD, anyway you do the math if the Empire truly followed their Empress almost all but the most recently enslaved should have been set free.


Well, slavery continued until only fairly recently, and prisoners are continually moved into penal education. It isn't a set term of years, but generations from the first direct lineal ancestor's enslavement. So if a slave's grandfather was enslaved, he would be the second generation (his father would be a first generation slave, his grandfather the original slave). It's difficult to speculate how long ago the longest current slave would still be enslaved, but let's estimate, for example, that a slave was sired regularly every thirty years. Nine generations forward from the original would be two-hundred and seventy years, give or take.

One of the problems the emancipation has run into is that, although they were required to keep very strict logs of lineage and background, many Holders did not see fit to upkeep their records. As such, a portion of the Privy Council and Theology Council's resources are now being spent on filling in the gaps and making sure there are no longer-lined slaves kicking around in the system. I would almost say nine generations is far and away more than enough time to have re-educated someone, but I would almost rather say that if you can't raise a child in the slave system to become a citizen, you have an education problem.

Nine generations in? The only people who would have known anything other than the Amarr Empire would have been a distant relative. Far more than enough time.

Primarily, though, the reason for the generational, instead of annual, doctrine on the emancipation was to strike at the institutes most likely to be offending the Scriptural decrees. Things like hard mining colonies that literally formed breeding programs with their slaves in their teens. Some of their hideous failings defies imagination. Quite a few Holders found themselves facing inquiries when it was discovered that some tenth generation slaves in their system were from lineages barely over a century old. Believe it or not, there's a rule about that very clearly defined in the Scriptures themselves.

While it proved some industries are more prone to abuses, the emancipation proved nothing more fervently than the Holder was the best barometer of a slave's successful transition into civilian life. Some families became very distinguished in the emancipation, as it was found that their lineages were almost untainted (slaves did not remain that way so far into their lineages). Better, we found that recidivism was low in these families. Their methods are being studied so that we can begin cleaning out these custodial stewardship problems.

If anything, it has truly been a wonder to see the heights and depths of Amarrian society through the emancipation and subsequent investigation into it. It has proven that the system works wonders, better than any other rehabilitative or doctrinal education in the cluster. However, it has just as certainly shown its vulnerability to abuse. The question now is how to reform the former so that the latter is eliminated.

Better, how to make sure that new citizens entering our society are fully prepared enough to avoid slavery altogether. That relies on a lot more foreign education before immigration. It makes the transition much easier as well.

Truly, the Empress's wisdom shines brightly in this measure. It is truly peeling back the wallpaper to see what is beneath.

"What good will it be for someone to gain the whole world, yet forfeit their soul? Or what can anyone give in exchange for their soul?"

-Matthew 16:26

Gabriel Darkefyre
Gradient
Electus Matari
#59 - 2013-10-01 23:27:57 UTC
Constantin Baracca wrote:
If anything, it has truly been a wonder to see the heights and depths of Amarrian society through the emancipation and subsequent investigation into it. It has proven that the system works wonders, better than any other rehabilitative or doctrinal education in the cluster. However, it has just as certainly shown its vulnerability to abuse. The question now is how to reform the former so that the latter is eliminated.


The System as it currently stands is riddled with Abuse. What safeguards there are in place are routinely ignored by those in power, otherwise you would not be seeing the level of abuse you have. To use an Engineering analogy, you're trying to patch up a failing reactor with a fresh coat of paint.

Tell me, Constantin, and I'd like you to answer from the heart, not just from what you have been taught. If the System could not be reformed to truly safeguard the people within it from Abuse, not just on paper, but in actual fact regardless of the social rank of the perpetrator, would you continue to support it? Could your Conscience live with the Occasional Success story, knowing that the price paid for that Success was the continued abuse of so many others Failed by the system?
Eran Mintor
Metropolis Commercial Consortium
#60 - 2013-10-02 00:10:58 UTC
Ray Mitar wrote:
Eran Mintor wrote:
Ray Mitar wrote:
To be allowed to remain an Empire after you have released our worlds and freed our people is a greater compensation then you could ever hope for.


This is a great example of what I was just talking about. Is this not a thinly-veiled threat? 'Be grateful if we don't destroy you after you give us what we want.'

The humble mouse comes to mind...give him a cookie and he'll ask for milk.

Then the mention of a laughable tax...why, so you can use that ISK for more capital ships instead of using it for your people, much like you did with the Federation's donations? You must take everyone for an idiot with the short-term memory of a fish.

This is becoming something of a joke now, rather than honest discussion.

-Eran
You completely misunderstood my comment, it was not a thinly veiled threat, it was an honest statement of reason. To inflict horrible crimes for centuries and then still be accepted at the table of civilization when you do no more then just stop is a fantastic deal, far better then they deserve, but in the interest of moving forward the Minmatar must move away from vengeance and embrace a future that does not require active warfare.

Because administration of support funds had been diverted to more offensive efforts I proposed a neutral respected third party to manage the taxes levied so such a thing could never happen again. If you think putting safeguards in place to disable the mistakes of the past repeating themselves is a fantasy, then I must conclude you do not want peace.


So then you misspoke.

Anyways, don't expect any ISK given to the Republic. I'm quite certain the Amarr would never agree to that. There is a possibility that donations could be given to Sister of EVE or fees fronted for transportation, but direct aid to the Republic is not a possibility. It's not because they don't want peace but there are many reasons why a request like that would be considered ridiculous by the majority of the Empire.

Let's think about this - if the slaves were freed today, with the current state of the Republic, it would be doing more of a damage to your people than you seem to realize. Get your economy and society working again so you don't have to submit billions to poverty and malnutrition.

-Eran