These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

how about we make it an act of aggression to actively scan a ship?

First post
Author
Frostys Virpio
State War Academy
Caldari State
#81 - 2013-09-30 19:19:23 UTC
Pobunjenik wrote:
Well, I don't remember the last time I got arrested for looking into someone's car.
If you don't want your ship to be looked at, cloak.


How about using a pry bar to open the back compartement of a cube truck? Would it make more sense to only have a suspect flag if scanning industrial ships since none of those would have windows to innocently look through anyway? Your analogy falls flat on it's face once you realize industrial ships are not really the equivalent of a car but more of a semi-trailer usuaslly with no windows on the trailer...
Mag's
Azn Empire
#82 - 2013-09-30 19:22:41 UTC  |  Edited by: Mag's
I actually like the idea after thinking about it. Rather than making ganking harder, I can see it having the opposit affect. So sure, why not.

One thing though. The posting of personal correspondence is quite frankly, bang out of order.

Destination SkillQueue:- It's like assuming the Lions will ignore you in the Savannah, if you're small, fat and look helpless.

Swiftstrike1
Swiftstrike Incorporated
#83 - 2013-09-30 19:45:46 UTC  |  Edited by: Swiftstrike1
I agree that this is an act of aggression. I will change my opinion if anyone can tell me a legitimate use of ship scanners or cargo scanners that isn't step 1 in a hostile act.

OP I suggest you edit the top post to remove the cool story. Keep it concise. Describe the problem, propose your fix. If you feel like it, tell a cool story bro after that :P

The best argument against this proposed change is "attacking someone is an act of aggression, just taking a look at them is not". The best counter argument is "when I call your ship as secondary target in a fleet fight, I haven't actually attacked you yet so it's not really an act of aggression..."

Casual Incursion runner & Faction Warfare grunt, ex-Wormholer, ex-Nullbear.

ISD Ezwal
ISD Community Communications Liaisons
ISD Alliance
#84 - 2013-09-30 20:19:58 UTC  |  Edited by: ISD Ezwal
I have removed some rule breaking posts and the ones quoting them.

The rules:
33. Posting of chat logs outside the Crime & Punishment forum channel is prohibited.

The posting of chat logs between player parties is prohibited on all forum channels of the EVE Online forums, with the exception of the Crime & Punishment Channel where they can be posted as part of stories in the Pirate Story Thread.

Specific rules regarding the omission of pilot names apply in this instance. Further details can be found in the rules stickies in the Crime & Punishment forum channel.

ISD Ezwal Community Communication Liaisons (CCLs)

Alundil
Rolled Out
#85 - 2013-09-30 22:24:04 UTC
No thank you.

I'm right behind you

Daichi Yamato
Jabbersnarks and Wonderglass
#86 - 2013-10-01 01:00:17 UTC  |  Edited by: Daichi Yamato
Maximus Aerelius wrote:


Ganking is the symptom of which Cargo Scanning is the cause. You scan before you gank (if you're in it for the profit\loss I believe) and hence all the "Wahhh" in this thread.


i'd have to disagree with u there. ganking is not a symptom of scanning. Scanning simply makes ganking more efficient.

Ciaphas Cyne wrote:
ive never seen a bigger display of carebear crying!

"wahhh we wanna stealz yer stuff but dont wanna risk anything, please CCP i dont wanna lose T1 frig!!!!"

bunch of whining little scaredy-bears.


no one is crying as much as u mate. srs relax a little.


Ciaphas Cyne wrote:

and put aside your personal agenda for like one second. this idea makes EVE, more EVE-y! its just a plain old cool idea and like many have said, its got real world roots.


to make way for YOUR personal agenda?

Ciaphas Cyne wrote:

and FFS, no one hauls AFK without having the money to back the loss.


oh yes they do.

Ciaphas Cyne wrote:
AFK haulers rarely complain on the forums because they are too busy making serious bank and laughing at the ganker who thinks taking down one of his 15 freighters that day is a good way to make money.


and yes they also complain a lot too. this thread, and many others about ganking, are born from an afk hauler.

EVE FAQ "7.2 CAN I AVOID PVP COMPLETELY? No; there are no systems or locations in New Eden where PvP may be completely avoided"

Daichi Yamato's version of structure based decs

Daichi Yamato
Jabbersnarks and Wonderglass
#87 - 2013-10-01 01:19:30 UTC
Arthur Aihaken wrote:
Maximus Aerelius wrote:
So address the pre-cursor to the gank and stop taking this off topic if you would please. Tell me where is the risk to the scout\scanner in all this?

There is none. But that's the way gankers like it - no risk.
Scan ship/cargo - nothing valuable, find something else. Find something shiny, gank it.



the risk to the ganking squad as a whole is that they all lose their ships (save for the scanner admittedly) and there is no guarantee that anything will drop. There isnt even any guarantee that the hauler ship will be destroyed, some ganks fail outright. Esp if the hauler is escorted.

considering that the scanner is an alt, in free noob frig that can jump or warp the second the scan has gone through, how much risk do u think going suspect will add to the scanner? realistically? not a lot...all they have to do is dock with their pod to get another ship, fit a scanner and come straight back out again. or if anyone is camping the gate, get a combat ship and some RR buddies because now their in a ltd engagement.


TL:DR
instead of making ganking more difficult, u'll be baited into fights u can't win...and u'll still get ur ships ganked. Far better off using more traditional anti-ganking tactics.

i'm saying this as a hauler myself, it accomplishes very little. u WILL just learn to ignore those scanning u just as u learn to ignore ninja salvagers.

EVE FAQ "7.2 CAN I AVOID PVP COMPLETELY? No; there are no systems or locations in New Eden where PvP may be completely avoided"

Daichi Yamato's version of structure based decs

Maximus Aerelius
PROPHET OF ENIGMA
#88 - 2013-10-01 09:25:33 UTC
Being in the 'Pro-Cargo Scanner Change' camp I have to say that Daichi Yamato does make a very persuasive argument but then if things aren't challenged they just become the accepted norm.

I'm going to have to think about this some more now but I'll be swinging by from time to time.
Neor Deninard
Blackwater Coalition Forces
Harkonnen Federation
#89 - 2013-10-01 10:02:00 UTC
And the scanning ship usually is a throwaway alt with nothing of value anyways, so what is the point of being able to shoot them if they can just undock and repeat?
Daichi Yamato
Jabbersnarks and Wonderglass
#90 - 2013-10-01 11:16:45 UTC
i like the idea of using scanning for espionage and for players being able to scan other players cargo holds for contraband. If something more solid can come from this idea that does not affect either of the mentioned careers, i'd probably be more inclined toward change.

EVE FAQ "7.2 CAN I AVOID PVP COMPLETELY? No; there are no systems or locations in New Eden where PvP may be completely avoided"

Daichi Yamato's version of structure based decs

Maximus Aerelius
PROPHET OF ENIGMA
#91 - 2013-10-01 11:23:52 UTC
Daichi Yamato wrote:
i like the idea of using scanning for espionage and for players being able to scan other players cargo holds for contraband. If something more solid can come from this idea that does not affect either of the mentioned careers, i'd probably be more inclined toward change.


But players don't scan others cargoholds for contraband as "Customs Officer" isn't a career path in EVE currently, they scan them to pick the juiciest cargo. I'm still thinking about this idea and what you added above though. My comments not a flame just more of an observation but give me an IG actual example of someone playing "Customs Officer" and I'll retract Smile
Sme Ematu
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#92 - 2013-10-01 12:44:12 UTC
I don't like the idea.

OP assumes that anyone using a cargo scanner in high-sec has the intention to later commit a crime. This is wrong.

Using a cargo scanner for a few days on certain trade routes or at stations lets someone gather data about the market and competition.
Its an great tool if you want to expand into new market areas if you don't have access to complex out of game database applications. With cargo scan you can gain estimates of volumes and goods moved to certain stations as well as gathering information who is trading what.

I`m sure there are more uses for the mod than i know off and i'm also sure not all of them have criminal actions as their goal.
Changing the sound/visual to something more obvious on the other hand is a good idea in my opinion. It doesn't make the actual hauling/ganking anymore or less secure but it may help some newer players with a clue that something they do may be bad and raise their awareness of potential consequences of their actions.
Daichi Yamato
Jabbersnarks and Wonderglass
#93 - 2013-10-01 14:25:17 UTC
Maximus Aerelius wrote:
Daichi Yamato wrote:
i like the idea of using scanning for espionage and for players being able to scan other players cargo holds for contraband. If something more solid can come from this idea that does not affect either of the mentioned careers, i'd probably be more inclined toward change.


But players don't scan others cargoholds for contraband as "Customs Officer" isn't a career path in EVE currently, they scan them to pick the juiciest cargo. I'm still thinking about this idea and what you added above though. My comments not a flame just more of an observation but give me an IG actual example of someone playing "Customs Officer" and I'll retract Smile


how would u tell if he was playing customs officer or gank scanner? they are one in the same. the gankers just have to say they have declared trit an illegal commodity and then gank anyone carrying it. all of a sudden they are customs agents.

the customs officer thing has been hinted at by CCP for a future development. Rather than having NPC's check player cargo, leaving it to other players who can flag ppl carrying what the sov holders consider contraband. maybe it was an idea just thrown out there, but i liked it.

its true the primary use of cargo scanners is to find good targets to gank. there are few other reasons to want to know what someone else is carrying. but the whole scanning process is all part of a meta game, like spying, and having cloaky alts to provide warp ins. i would prefer that u didnt go suspect for providing a warp in during a dec, even though u are an accessory to the attack. For all concord can tell, u are an innocent bystander. Just like ppl 'scoping out a joint' in the movies.

When it boils down to it, its not the scanning that ppl mind, its the ganking to which there are already ways to mitigate risk. The proposal does little to remedy ganking. containers and double wrapping cargo already nullify scans as well.

EVE FAQ "7.2 CAN I AVOID PVP COMPLETELY? No; there are no systems or locations in New Eden where PvP may be completely avoided"

Daichi Yamato's version of structure based decs

Solstice Project
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#94 - 2013-10-01 14:30:50 UTC  |  Edited by: Solstice Project
I am all for it.

Wouldn't stop me or people who fly with me,
but would put a stop to all these lazyass cowards sitting at gates doing nothing but scanning passers by.

Supported!
Maximus Aerelius
PROPHET OF ENIGMA
#95 - 2013-10-01 14:53:12 UTC
Daichi Yamato wrote:
containers and double wrapping cargo already nullify scans as well.


Haven't for some time now.
Maximus Aerelius
PROPHET OF ENIGMA
#96 - 2013-10-01 14:54:33 UTC
Solstice Project wrote:
I am all for it.

Wouldn't stop me or people who fly with me,
but would put a stop to all these lazyass cowards sitting at gates doing nothing but scanning passers by.

Supported!


Caught you at work in *System Removed* last night...did chuckle a little.
Maximus Aerelius
PROPHET OF ENIGMA
#97 - 2013-10-01 15:04:13 UTC
Daichi Yamato wrote:
how would u tell if he was playing customs officer or gank scanner? they are one in the same. the gankers just have to say they have declared trit an illegal commodity and then gank anyone carrying it. all of a sudden they are customs agents.

the customs officer thing has been hinted at by CCP for a future development. Rather than having NPC's check player cargo, leaving it to other players who can flag ppl carrying what the sov holders consider contraband. maybe it was an idea just thrown out there, but i liked it.

its true the primary use of cargo scanners is to find good targets to gank. there are few other reasons to want to know what someone else is carrying. but the whole scanning process is all part of a meta game, like spying, and having cloaky alts to provide warp ins. i would prefer that u didnt go suspect for providing a warp in during a dec, even though u are an accessory to the attack. For all concord can tell, u are an innocent bystander. Just like ppl 'scoping out a joint' in the movies.

When it boils down to it, its not the scanning that ppl mind, its the ganking to which there are already ways to mitigate risk. The proposal does little to remedy ganking. containers and double wrapping cargo already nullify scans as well.


You can't user "Future" as a reasonable argument. Future development isn't current IG.

People 'scoping out joints' are generally found, thrown up against a wall and charged with being an accessory or aiding and abetting I believe but we can't do that in EVE.

It's the scanning that leads to the ganking I'm afraid. If you didn't know for sure what was in it then how do you know that it'd be worth the cost\risk of actually ganking it? You wouldn't. Now some people do gank anything just for the lols and they will but most do it for profit and will only hit what they think will payback +profit on their loss.

As for the disposable alts mostly used for ganking...well there's a flaw in the system that this clearly highlights don't you think? The fact that ganking and the chars used are so disposable would highlight that to me.

We understand that the illusion of fitting against a gank can be achieved however you cannot stop a dedicated gank (and I don't mean two ships) which destroys your ship in 1 volley. So what can you do? Look to the root cause. What caused those 20 T2 fitted Catalysts with 14400 damage in Volley #1 to pick that particular hauler? I'll let you think on that for a bit.

I'm sorry but I don't follow the "warp in for a dec" analogy. You'll have to expand on that one or explain "dec" to me as could be a number of things.
Solstice Project
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#98 - 2013-10-01 15:06:44 UTC
Maximus Aerelius wrote:
Solstice Project wrote:
I am all for it.

Wouldn't stop me or people who fly with me,
but would put a stop to all these lazyass cowards sitting at gates doing nothing but scanning passers by.

Supported!


Caught you at work in *System Removed* last night...did chuckle a little.

Remember to join my mailing list, called No Item!
Ciaphas Cyne
Moira.
#99 - 2013-10-01 17:16:23 UTC
Daichi Yamato wrote:


considering that the scanner is an alt, in free noob frig that can jump or warp the second the scan has gone through, how much risk do u think going suspect will add to the scanner? realistically? not a lot...all they have to do is dock with their pod to get another ship, fit a scanner and come straight back out again.


i'm saying this as a hauler myself, it accomplishes very little. u WILL just learn to ignore those scanning u just as u learn to ignore ninja salvagers.



ok so this was the only thing i could make out as being even close to a "point"

so because a role is performed by an alt it should be immune to destruction? oh man super cool point you made there

wait...when my ship blows up your telling me i can...redock? and refit? and some back out again? thats like...idk maybe what every pilot in every ship does every time they get blown up? how is saying someone is "just gonna reship" a valid argument for...frakking anything? why should you be able to target anyone for that matter? dudes just gonna go reship right? lets just make all the ships you like indestructible and all the ones you dont like self-destruct upon the undock button being pressed.


and your last "point"...if you ignore flashing yellow thats on you, and quite honestly it makes you a crap hauler. in fact it makes you sound like an AFK hauler...

super great points, dood.

"buff only the stuff I fly and nerf everything else"

  • you
Egravant Alduin
Ascendance Rising
Ascendance..
#100 - 2013-10-01 18:43:37 UTC
I like the idea.

Feel the wrath of the GECKO!