These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

DEVSWARM OP: CCP Should Give Goonswarm Trillions Of Isk Worth of Crap

First post First post
Author
OldWolf69
EVE-RO
Goonswarm Federation
#281 - 2013-09-27 14:36:17 UTC  |  Edited by: OldWolf69
Lol, what the frack? Why does it matter, here and now, what Somer does? Ideea is CCP is about to officialize the old T2 lottery system. To be really honest, i find it offensive against the whole comunity, after all the drama they had about scams. But i guess they have to reward people doing their own job to scoop isk outta game. May it be in a offensive way towards others, but heh, this is EvE. If they sell the ability to be offensive towards other people without fear of any repercussion, why would they not do it themselves?
Red Templar
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#282 - 2013-09-27 14:38:18 UTC
Ranger 1 wrote:

CCP does not discuss RMT investigations, and rightfully so.

The hardest part of an RMT investigation is identifying the correct people to investigate, which in this case would be simplicity itself.

So no, CCP will never state to what extent SOMER has been checked out. Frankly, it's none of our business and violates their privacy policy. However checking into their movement of ISK, identifying alt characters and accounts, etc. would be a trivial matter for them.


Well that is understandable and i agree with you that RMT should not be discussed. But some people do claim that CCP investigated somer and found them legit. And that was why i asked where this information came from.

But you have to see it this way as well. CCP Navigator claimed that they delivered on everything, does that mean checks were made, or its just an assumption on their part?

The entire collaboration of CCP and somer is not transparent and unclear. And as many players pointed out, there is a lof of grey areas. And all of it is based on blind trust. In the universe of eve. The hard and cold place when trusting someone could be your own downfall.

You can see why its not flying with most of the people? Anyone with ounce of brain can see how this can be abused easily. There is no proof ofc that it will be abused, same as there are not proofs that it will be not.

And the initial FAQ CCP said they cannot prove that it will not be abused in any way, and are not planing to audit the entire event to make it clear and transparent.

I am willing to believe it was honest attempt to do something fun for community. But it was done with so many oversights and in such a bad manner, that its shocking. CSM wasnt consulted on such controversial move. Some aspects of methodology of ticket distribution were ignored. The fact that not all players of eve could take part in this even is also ignored.

And all this, together with the fact that somer is making money out of the sheer spike of traffic on their website, is creating many questions about favoritism and the fact that CCP should not favor, endorse or in any way promote specific players.

And all this happened just weeks after TOS change, where role of CCP in such endorsements and relations with players was discussed.

This is a mess, and CCP should fix this, and make sure something like this never happens again. They should be careful with their actions and how they can be perceived by players and community.

[b]For Love. For Peace. For Honor.

For None of the Above.

For Pony![/b]

Weaselior
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
#283 - 2013-09-27 14:45:40 UTC
yeah the issue is navigator has absolutely no basis for his assertion that SOMER is legit because without a doubt he didn't check the winners for SOMER alts for all the blinks somer has done and appears completely unaware that's how they'd scam

it's the third issue here, navigator giving the Official CCP Seal Of Not-Scam Approval which shouldn't be done in the first place, and certainly shouldn't be done when navigator isn't bothering to actually do the investigation

Head of the Goonswarm Economic Warfare Cabal Pubbie Management and Exploitation Division.

Red Templar
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#284 - 2013-09-27 14:47:17 UTC
Ranger 1 wrote:


If CCP is satisfied with how they run their operations (and it's CCP that has the most to lose if they were guilty of actual RMT) I don't think your opinion or mine really matters. We would not be privy to the nuts and bolts of it anyway, nor should we be.

I have to disagree with you on this.

We are paying customers. We have right to ask questions and raise concerns on how things are handled. Community is a large and essential part of Eve. And opinion of player base matters, as was proven many times before.

We even Vote for our own representatives (which were ignored totally in this case). So this is not like any other game where players are expected to just shut up. Not even close.

They can of course just ignore everyone, and that is their right. But it doesn't mean that everyone should just shut up about things they dont like or find morally wrong. But will have consequences, one way or another.

[b]For Love. For Peace. For Honor.

For None of the Above.

For Pony![/b]

OldWolf69
EVE-RO
Goonswarm Federation
#285 - 2013-09-27 14:47:50 UTC
Weaselior wrote:
yeah the issue is navigator has absolutely no basis for his assertion that SOMER is legit because without a doubt he didn't check the winners for SOMER alts for all the blinks somer has done and appears completely unaware that's how they'd scam

it's the third issue here, navigator giving the Official CCP Seal Of Not-Scam Approval which shouldn't be done in the first place, and certainly shouldn't be done when navigator isn't bothering to actually do the investigation

Lol, Somer does not need to scam. But what he does with the gained isk is another story. Wich also matters really few here.
Lucas Kell
Solitude Trading
S.N.O.T.
#286 - 2013-09-27 14:48:40 UTC
Ranger 1 wrote:
Lucas Kell wrote:
Ranger 1 wrote:
CCP does not discuss RMT investigations, and rightfully so.

The hardest part of an RMT investigation is identifying the correct people to investigate, which in this case would be simplicity itself.

So no, CCP will never state to what extent SOMER has been checked out. Frankly, it's none of our business and violates their privacy policy. However checking into their movement of ISK, identifying alt characters and accounts, etc. would be a trivial matter for them.
It's simple for them to identify the right people? How so?
SOMER has awarded millions of prizes, and only they know the full list of who. Even with that list, CCP would not be able to investigate every single win to ensure there was no RMT following it, then even if they discovered RMT, they'd have no way of proving it wasn't simply a winner RMTing rather than somer.

Amazingly though, somer give out credits (which is essentially isk that must be gambled with) to people buying GTC, which they get money for referring. Which means no matter how you put it, they DO RMT. That's an undeniable fact.

CCP is an old hand at investigating who actually owns what accounts and the flow of ISK between them, and that's really all they need do. Investigating people affiliated with SOMER would be far simpler than tracking down an anonymous group buried in NULL... and they do that successfully all the time.

If CCP is satisfied with how they run their operations (and it's CCP that has the most to lose if they were guilty of actual RMT) I don't think your opinion or mine really matters. We would not be privy to the nuts and bolts of it anyway, nor should we be.
How would they find who owns each account? You can pay with plex, you can proxy your IP and you can get an infinite number of email addresses. The ONLY way for CCP to audit somer would be to go through every transaction ever made, and follow the isk trail, and even then, it would be hit and miss as to whether they could determine it was RMT.
And as I say, they do convert isk to cash quite openly. Sure CCP seem to allow it, so that's the real question right? Why are somer allowed to openly RMT?

The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog.

Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list.

Prince Kobol
#287 - 2013-09-27 15:07:59 UTC
Lucas Kell wrote:
Ranger 1 wrote:
Lucas Kell wrote:
Ranger 1 wrote:
CCP does not discuss RMT investigations, and rightfully so.

The hardest part of an RMT investigation is identifying the correct people to investigate, which in this case would be simplicity itself.

So no, CCP will never state to what extent SOMER has been checked out. Frankly, it's none of our business and violates their privacy policy. However checking into their movement of ISK, identifying alt characters and accounts, etc. would be a trivial matter for them.
It's simple for them to identify the right people? How so?
SOMER has awarded millions of prizes, and only they know the full list of who. Even with that list, CCP would not be able to investigate every single win to ensure there was no RMT following it, then even if they discovered RMT, they'd have no way of proving it wasn't simply a winner RMTing rather than somer.

Amazingly though, somer give out credits (which is essentially isk that must be gambled with) to people buying GTC, which they get money for referring. Which means no matter how you put it, they DO RMT. That's an undeniable fact.

CCP is an old hand at investigating who actually owns what accounts and the flow of ISK between them, and that's really all they need do. Investigating people affiliated with SOMER would be far simpler than tracking down an anonymous group buried in NULL... and they do that successfully all the time.

If CCP is satisfied with how they run their operations (and it's CCP that has the most to lose if they were guilty of actual RMT) I don't think your opinion or mine really matters. We would not be privy to the nuts and bolts of it anyway, nor should we be.
How would they find who owns each account? You can pay with plex, you can proxy your IP and you can get an infinite number of email addresses. The ONLY way for CCP to audit somer would be to go through every transaction ever made, and follow the isk trail, and even then, it would be hit and miss as to whether they could determine it was RMT.
And as I say, they do convert isk to cash quite openly. Sure CCP seem to allow it, so that's the real question right? Why are somer allowed to openly RMT?


I actually agree with Lucas in regards account creation.

I have always stated that creating untraceable accounts have always been far too easy in Eve, far easier then any other MMO.

Until CCP introduce some method to stop this then you will never be able to tackle RMT and any large scale.

TheGunslinger42
All Web Investigations
#288 - 2013-09-27 15:41:59 UTC
Azami Nevinyrall wrote:
This thread alone shows favoritism, I got banned for just saying "Devswarm" (prolly will again) and yet here is a thread opened by a goon. And it's at page #13!


That's because under the new TOS/EULA and the clarification by lead gms you are allowed to make truthful claims about your own characters/corporations, but not about others ;)
Arrendis
TK Corp
#289 - 2013-09-27 15:49:47 UTC
Caleb Seremshur wrote:
Varius Xeral wrote:
Lee Saisima wrote:
Blink has a business plan and Goonswarm doesn't. Goons are small-fry nowadays anyway.


You're suggesting an institutional/organizational pissing contest between goonswarm and somer? You're going to be disappointed at the outcome.

Goonswarm puts some medium-sized businesses to shame.


Funny you should say that. Is there a corporation in the real world run by goonswarm members and staffed by goonswarm members?



According to Glenn Beck, the CIA.
Khanh'rhh
Sparkle Motion.
#290 - 2013-09-27 16:13:35 UTC
TheGunslinger42 wrote:
No john, you ARE the band of brothers

Whichever way it is, we're all doomed.

"Do not touch anything unnecessarily. Beware of pretty girls in dance halls and parks who may be spies, as well as bicycles, revolvers, uniforms, arms, dead horses, and men lying on roads -- they are not there accidentally." -Soviet infantry manual,

Lord Ryan
True Xero
#291 - 2013-09-27 16:24:28 UTC
i would like a golden moon, only i can mine for gold moon goo.

Do not assume anything above this line was typed by me. Nerf the Truth, it's inconvenient.

Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
Vae. Victis.
#292 - 2013-09-27 16:27:38 UTC
Red Templar wrote:
Ranger 1 wrote:


If CCP is satisfied with how they run their operations (and it's CCP that has the most to lose if they were guilty of actual RMT) I don't think your opinion or mine really matters. We would not be privy to the nuts and bolts of it anyway, nor should we be.

I have to disagree with you on this.

We are paying customers. We have right to ask questions and raise concerns on how things are handled. Community is a large and essential part of Eve. And opinion of player base matters, as was proven many times before.

We even Vote for our own representatives (which were ignored totally in this case). So this is not like any other game where players are expected to just shut up. Not even close.

They can of course just ignore everyone, and that is their right. But it doesn't mean that everyone should just shut up about things they dont like or find morally wrong. But will have consequences, one way or another.

I'm just saying legitimate privacy concerns and security process issues trump suspicions.

Revealing details on investigations (whether the investigated party is proven guilty or innocent) is not an acceptable practice, and believe me, you don't want it to be.

Revealing details of how and when the investigations are done (outside of your own security team, internal affairs, and upper management) undermines their effectiveness.

You know what I'm saying.

View the latest EVE Online developments and other game related news and gameplay by visiting Ranger 1 Presents: Virtual Realms.

Lucas Kell
Solitude Trading
S.N.O.T.
#293 - 2013-09-27 16:31:09 UTC
Ranger 1 wrote:
Red Templar wrote:
Ranger 1 wrote:


If CCP is satisfied with how they run their operations (and it's CCP that has the most to lose if they were guilty of actual RMT) I don't think your opinion or mine really matters. We would not be privy to the nuts and bolts of it anyway, nor should we be.

I have to disagree with you on this.

We are paying customers. We have right to ask questions and raise concerns on how things are handled. Community is a large and essential part of Eve. And opinion of player base matters, as was proven many times before.

We even Vote for our own representatives (which were ignored totally in this case). So this is not like any other game where players are expected to just shut up. Not even close.

They can of course just ignore everyone, and that is their right. But it doesn't mean that everyone should just shut up about things they dont like or find morally wrong. But will have consequences, one way or another.

I'm just saying legitimate privacy concerns and security process issues trump suspicions.

Revealing details on investigations (whether the investigated party is proven guilty or innocent) is not an acceptable practice, and believe me, you don't want it to be.

Revealing details of how and when the investigations are done (outside of your own security team, internal affairs, and upper management) undermines their effectiveness.

You know what I'm saying.

Come on though... they didn;t investigate and you know it.
Also Somer ARE running an RMT empire: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=281583&find=unread

The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog.

Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list.

Trade Anything
Dragon Inc.
#294 - 2013-09-27 16:32:10 UTC
If i could sage this thread into oblivion, i would do it.
Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
Vae. Victis.
#295 - 2013-09-27 16:34:01 UTC  |  Edited by: Ranger 1
Prince Kobol wrote:
Lucas Kell wrote:
Ranger 1 wrote:
Lucas Kell wrote:
Ranger 1 wrote:
CCP does not discuss RMT investigations, and rightfully so.

The hardest part of an RMT investigation is identifying the correct people to investigate, which in this case would be simplicity itself.

So no, CCP will never state to what extent SOMER has been checked out. Frankly, it's none of our business and violates their privacy policy. However checking into their movement of ISK, identifying alt characters and accounts, etc. would be a trivial matter for them.
It's simple for them to identify the right people? How so?
SOMER has awarded millions of prizes, and only they know the full list of who. Even with that list, CCP would not be able to investigate every single win to ensure there was no RMT following it, then even if they discovered RMT, they'd have no way of proving it wasn't simply a winner RMTing rather than somer.

Amazingly though, somer give out credits (which is essentially isk that must be gambled with) to people buying GTC, which they get money for referring. Which means no matter how you put it, they DO RMT. That's an undeniable fact.

CCP is an old hand at investigating who actually owns what accounts and the flow of ISK between them, and that's really all they need do. Investigating people affiliated with SOMER would be far simpler than tracking down an anonymous group buried in NULL... and they do that successfully all the time.

If CCP is satisfied with how they run their operations (and it's CCP that has the most to lose if they were guilty of actual RMT) I don't think your opinion or mine really matters. We would not be privy to the nuts and bolts of it anyway, nor should we be.
How would they find who owns each account? You can pay with plex, you can proxy your IP and you can get an infinite number of email addresses. The ONLY way for CCP to audit somer would be to go through every transaction ever made, and follow the isk trail, and even then, it would be hit and miss as to whether they could determine it was RMT.
And as I say, they do convert isk to cash quite openly. Sure CCP seem to allow it, so that's the real question right? Why are somer allowed to openly RMT?


I actually agree with Lucas in regards account creation.

I have always stated that creating untraceable accounts have always been far too easy in Eve, far easier then any other MMO.

Until CCP introduce some method to stop this then you will never be able to tackle RMT and any large scale.


You can always find a way, sure. You can set up proxy's, isolate machines, use fake names and email addresses, steal credit cards to use for payment, etc. But at some point you have to realize that (practically speaking) this becomes more work than simply doing something else for your money.

If you've gone to this much trouble to set things up properly you can use that same method to do much more profitable things.

View the latest EVE Online developments and other game related news and gameplay by visiting Ranger 1 Presents: Virtual Realms.

Kuni Oichi
Garoun Investment Bank
Gallente Federation
#296 - 2013-09-27 16:45:04 UTC
Ranger 1 wrote:


I "do" think CCP will need to rethink their approach in matters like this. I just hope they don't decide to stop sponsoring these beneficial services all together as a result.


And as Weaselior spelled out in the OP, their new approach should be to give the trillions of isk to us. I think a unique set of the new SOE ship BPOs would do nicely. It's undisputed that we're far more ethical than a gambling corporation afterall, plus we give free stuff to new players, not those who pay us to give them stuff so you can be sure we'll use them wisely.
Red Templar
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#297 - 2013-09-27 16:49:07 UTC
Ranger 1 wrote:
Red Templar wrote:
Ranger 1 wrote:


If CCP is satisfied with how they run their operations (and it's CCP that has the most to lose if they were guilty of actual RMT) I don't think your opinion or mine really matters. We would not be privy to the nuts and bolts of it anyway, nor should we be.

I have to disagree with you on this.

We are paying customers. We have right to ask questions and raise concerns on how things are handled. Community is a large and essential part of Eve. And opinion of player base matters, as was proven many times before.

We even Vote for our own representatives (which were ignored totally in this case). So this is not like any other game where players are expected to just shut up. Not even close.

They can of course just ignore everyone, and that is their right. But it doesn't mean that everyone should just shut up about things they dont like or find morally wrong. But will have consequences, one way or another.

I'm just saying legitimate privacy concerns and security process issues trump suspicions.

Revealing details on investigations (whether the investigated party is proven guilty or innocent) is not an acceptable practice, and believe me, you don't want it to be.

Revealing details of how and when the investigations are done (outside of your own security team, internal affairs, and upper management) undermines their effectiveness.

You know what I'm saying.


And what are the privacy concerns exactly? I personally dont need any specific details or secrets or whatever. What i need is to know, that the party being endorsed by CCP in this way is not pocketing the profits.
That they will not get anything personally for this kind of even or giveaway from CCP, except attention, PR and a thank you.
And that even if they try to pocket something from these giveaways, CCP will monitor and punish for this.

But CCP is not stating this anywhere, quite opposite actually. Thus it raises a lot of questions, parallels being drawn with T20 incident, etc.

They wanted feedback on how community will react to that king of "community engagement", well there you go. Over the last day there have been plenty of questions asked regarding this, and none of them have been answered yet.

[b]For Love. For Peace. For Honor.

For None of the Above.

For Pony![/b]

Lex Manrider
Doomheim
#298 - 2013-09-27 17:02:22 UTC  |  Edited by: Lex Manrider
[/quote]
You can always find a way, sure. You can set up proxy's, isolate machines, use fake names and email addresses, steal credit cards to use for payment, etc. But at some point you have to realize that (practically speaking) this becomes more work than simply doing something else for your money.

If you've gone to this much trouble to set things up properly you can use that same method to do much more profitable things.[/quote]

I can create a new unrelated paid account within 5 minutes while keeping one eye watching TV its no effort at all!
If you think it needs a lot of work you are pretty clueless and should better shut up.

As to be on topic why does CCP CREATE special prices worth trillions of isks for a PLAYER CREATED AND DRIVEN EVENT?
Player driven event should also mean player created prices!

What makes this Somer guy special? Because as it stands now I have to agree with the goonies as far as press articles and advertising is concerned they did a lot better job than the Somer guy! So did the BOB guy, Guiding Hands Social Club, Chribba etc.

p.s LOL at steal a credit cards I can perfectly LEGALLY pay for any account, there are more things out there for payment than CCs.
Checkbaux
Prayers And Multifrequency
#299 - 2013-09-27 17:04:33 UTC
Just Posting this for "told you so" for screenshot sake

Prediction: around one or two years from now expect a "SOMER BLINK: How to Scam CCP" thread detailing how it was set up as a gambling scam that ended up working well, then WILDEST DREAMS when they got CCP endorsed while one dude fills his alts up with trillions of ISK.

i'm calling it now... CCP doing ANYTHING for ANY entity in game is a bad idea, they should stay the **** out of the sandbox and stop giving some kids bigger buckets.

imagine if Eve Investment Bank, how totally successful and legit it was for ages, imagine if EIB had been endorsed and advertised and helped out by CCP?

Well you don't need to imagine it. because thats effectively what could potentially happen here... some dude gives up and pockets trillions of ISK and o7m8's all of eve
Lex Manrider
Doomheim
#300 - 2013-09-27 17:05:12 UTC
Lex Manrider wrote:

You can always find a way, sure. You can set up proxy's, isolate machines, use fake names and email addresses, steal credit cards to use for payment, etc. But at some point you have to realize that (practically speaking) this becomes more work than simply doing something else for your money.

If you've gone to this much trouble to set things up properly you can use that same method to do much more profitable things.[/quote]

I can create a new unrelated paid account within 5 minutes while keeping one eye watching TV its no effort at all!
If you think it needs a lot of work you are pretty clueless and should better shut up.

As to be on topic why does CCP CREATE special prices worth trillions of isks for a PLAYER CREATED AND DRIVEN EVENT?
Player driven event should also mean player created prices!

What makes this Somer guy special? Because as it stands now I have to agree with the goonies as far as press articles and advertising is concerned they did a lot better job than the Somer guy! So did the BOB guys, Guiding Hands Social Club, Chribba etc.

p.s LOL at steal a credit cards I can perfectly LEGALLY pay for any account, there are more things out there for payment than CCs.[/quote]