These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

A review of player giveaways with CCP and third party sites

First post First post First post
Author
Tiffenay
Synchrodyne Holding
#381 - 2013-09-27 15:01:48 UTC
Andski wrote:
is everyone in this thread who isn't applauding CCP for giving somer blink trillions of isk a goon alt?


Nope, not a goon alt, and not applauding. Very small time and quite spacepoor. Each one of these ships is worth more than my whole little alliance of highsec carebears.
Steijn
Quay Industries
#382 - 2013-09-27 15:02:00 UTC
Bronco Platz wrote:
It will end in a draw I think.


yep, the new accounts attracted by Rubicon will balance with the number of accounts ended because of Somergate.
Anton Menges Saddat
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#383 - 2013-09-27 15:02:49 UTC  |  Edited by: Anton Menges Saddat
you're still giving one of the largest and richest for-profit player run organizations a huge injection of free isk and promotion, as well as endorsing them as 'legit'. by doing so, you put others, like me, at a competitive disadvantage. do my multiple subscriptions mean so little to you that you would insult me and others like me in such manner?
Steijn
Quay Industries
#384 - 2013-09-27 15:03:46 UTC
Andski wrote:
the only people bothered by CCP giving insane wealth to a player entity are goons, apparently

is everyone in this thread who isn't applauding CCP for giving somer blink trillions of isk a goon alt?


closest i get to a goon is when my alt trys shooting a flashy one.
Bronco Platz
Doomheim
#385 - 2013-09-27 15:06:28 UTC
Steijn wrote:
Bronco Platz wrote:
It will end in a draw I think.


yep, the new accounts attracted by Rubicon will balance with the number of accounts ended because of Somergate.


I doubt it...

This signature is under NDA. Sorry.

Ammzi
Dreddit
Test Alliance Please Ignore
#386 - 2013-09-27 15:09:57 UTC
One step in the right direction, still need a few more.
Favoritism is bad, mmkay CCP?


get the **** out of the sandbox.
Sid Hudgens
Doomheim
#387 - 2013-09-27 15:21:46 UTC
Ok, you guys win. I guess if you can't beat 'em ... join 'em.

Fair is fair. We must level the playing field.

My organization is starting up a gambling/lottery site. As part of our grand opening we are hosting an EVE player event at Jack's Bar & Grill, down the road from my house.

Now I understand that CCP can't possibly send out several devs to each and every little player event like mine. That would be crazy. I do, however, have to protest CCP sending devs to the somer blink sponsored eve vegas event. The presence of CCP devs gives somer blink additional publicity and exposure that CCP is not providing for my event. This is giving somer blink an unfair advantage.

Also... something about sandboxes.

"....as if 10,058 Goon voices cried out and were suddenly silenced."

TheGunslinger42
All Web Investigations
#388 - 2013-09-27 15:29:03 UTC
Is there anyone who thinks this is a good idea and isnt a somer alt or a truly mindless brownnoser?
MyEveLotto
Doomheim
#389 - 2013-09-27 15:34:38 UTC
People with gambling addictions...?

myEVElotto.com - The New Public Lottery Site

Cursan Voran
Jita Traders Society
#390 - 2013-09-27 15:39:33 UTC
Some, hopefully soon to be ex, :CCP: employees?
T'kimat
Inner Geek
#391 - 2013-09-27 15:40:53 UTC
TheGunslinger42 wrote:
Is there anyone who thinks this is a good idea and isnt a somer alt or a truly mindless brownnoser?


Yes, I actually approve CCP participation in other ingame events. It's time everyone realizes that no matter what CCP does, it will never be fair for everyone.
Be it :
- a pvp event (what about the miners?) or
- a give-away for every account (I only have one account, why should people with more accounts have advantages?) or
- a race (I am a new character without max skills, why should I not have the same chance) or even
- the AT tournaments, which everyone approves (I cant afford plex for the bidding, this is favoritism towards rich alliances!)

Nothing CCP could ever do would be fair to absolutely everyone. They are using Somer as a platform to reach a large number of players. If I want to participate, I simply create an account. I really don't see the drama that is being projected by a majority of goons in this thread.
Xaen
Telepathic Death Mimes
#392 - 2013-09-27 15:40:58 UTC
Djana Libra wrote:
Thank you for saving history at least.

I still wonder how these new ships will be entered lore wise into the game.
Agreed.

Make no mistake. I'm still blindingly pissed off about the favoritism towards the blink scam, but I am very thankful that Chribba talked you out of ruining the legend of the Golden Magnate.

I get shouty crackers a lot. Deal with it.

TheGunslinger42
All Web Investigations
#393 - 2013-09-27 15:46:49 UTC
T'kimat wrote:
TheGunslinger42 wrote:
Is there anyone who thinks this is a good idea and isnt a somer alt or a truly mindless brownnoser?


Yes, I actually approve CCP participation in other ingame events. It's time everyone realizes that no matter what CCP does, it will never be fair for everyone.
Be it :
- a pvp event (what about the miners?) or
- a give-away for every account (I only have one account, why should people with more accounts have advantages?) or
- a race (I am a new character without max skills, why should I not have the same chance) or even
- the AT tournaments, which everyone approves (I cant afford plex for the bidding, this is favoritism towards rich alliances!)

Nothing CCP could ever do would be fair to absolutely everyone. They are using Somer as a platform to reach a large number of players. If I want to participate, I simply create an account. I really don't see the drama that is being projected by a majority of goons in this thread.


Your attempt at dismissing these complaints as just "goons" is pathetic. There are countless members from all areas of this game speaking out about this.

There is also an unimaginably huge difference between the examples you gave and what is currently happening. In none of your examples are CCP stepping in and giving an incredibly huge advantage to a single group of players. Everything on your list is a result of player choice, skill, and effort - except the give-aways, but as they are give aways to every single current player they are obviously not an advantage to any individual person or group
Memnon Shepard
The Occupation.
#394 - 2013-09-27 15:48:59 UTC
TheGunslinger42 wrote:
Is there anyone who thinks this is a good idea and isnt a somer alt or a truly mindless brownnoser?


MyEveLotto wrote:
People with gambling addictions...?


Straying a bit into ad hominem attacks for no reason... I'm willing to bet there are people out there, myself included, who aren't SOMER alts/brown nosers/gambling addicts and also think supporting player-driven initiatives to increase community turnout to live events is a good idea (even if this attempt is misguided). I'd rather find a better and more clear selection criteria in picking corps and the prizes given than lambaste CCP for trying something new without offering anything constructive to work with.

Which corps can point to ISK they've earned legitimately in game and then redistributed for free to the community, unprompted? This is Eve Online, I see way too many people taking offense at SOMER Blink making money through a legitimate business they created. I also highly doubt the success of the business is founded entirely on taking advantage of gambling addicts who surely can't control their behavior. Seriously? I convince people I know, mostly irl, to pay me for PLEX in advance. I then buy them through Markee, then use the bonus credit to Blink free ships - the system seems to work fine for me.
Abernie
Thoroughly Incompetent
#395 - 2013-09-27 15:49:00 UTC
T'kimat wrote:
If I want to participate, I simply create an account.
That is of course assuming somer doesn't ban you from the site. :)
-
It's starting to look like CCP is just playing time and CSM doesn't seem to mind...
Rob Crowley
State War Academy
#396 - 2013-09-27 15:52:49 UTC
Sid Hudgens wrote:
Huge blatant favouritism is alright because it's not possible to get rid of every tiny piece of potentially perceived favouritism.
Did I get that right? Your argument that sending devs to a Somer-sponsored event could theoretically also be perceived as favouritism is of course correct, but I don't see a problem drawing a line at some point of severity and intent.

If you read the thread you might have noticed that I already mentioned that the Spotlight dev blog mentioning Somer was alright IMO because its intent was mostly informative and the influence on the sandbox probably rather limited (while most likely being more influential than your example). But I clearly see the current issue as much more severe beginning with the stated intent of supporting Somer and the added endorsing of the service and claims of its legitimacy.
Xaen
Telepathic Death Mimes
#397 - 2013-09-27 15:57:52 UTC
Jane Schereau wrote:
it seems you fellas don't understand the severity of what you are trying to do here.
You understated this very well.

I get shouty crackers a lot. Deal with it.

Xaen
Telepathic Death Mimes
#398 - 2013-09-27 15:59:57 UTC
Bronco Platz wrote:
Josef Djugashvilis wrote:
Is it totally unreasonable of me to suspect that Somer Blink alts are likely to well in the lottery?


CCP Navigator said, SOMER is trustworthy. They were and will be in future. So this that you said, could not be true...

P.S.:Hopefully I had not to use sarcasm-tags or something.
I trust somer exactly as far as any other gambling site.

I trust that they will take more of my money than they give me, because it's nothing more than a thinly veiled penny-auction scam.

I get shouty crackers a lot. Deal with it.

MyEveLotto
Doomheim
#399 - 2013-09-27 16:00:52 UTC  |  Edited by: MyEveLotto
Memnon Shepard wrote:
Straying a bit into ad hominem attacks for no reason... I'm willing to bet there are people out there, myself included, who aren't SOMER alts/brown nosers/gambling addicts and also think supporting player-driven initiatives to increase community turnout to live events is a good idea (even if this attempt is misguided).


Oh, without a doubt. I was simply providing one example of people who support this. He asked for examples, after all. I also commend CCP in trying to support the community and encourage community turnout to live events. However, I absolutely disagree with the method they followed in their attempt. Any case of showing favoritism toward one group over others is abhorrent from a supposedly-neutral hosting provider (which is what CCP is as they host the game).

Memnon Shepard wrote:
I'd rather find a better and more clear selection criteria in picking corps and the prizes given than lambaste CCP for trying something new without offering anything constructive to work with.


I'd rather they didn't pick corps to begin with. Why not just have CCP show up at an event, pick a random person from the crowd and give them a prize? Why not have CCP do their own lottery with them handling everything about it? Why not have CCP support EVE Vegas without giving trillions in revenue to one group of players?

Memnon Shepard wrote:
This is Eve Online, I see way too many people taking offense at SOMER Blink making money through a legitimate business they created.


I have absolutely no offense regarding Somer Blink making money through a business they created. I also make money through the service I host. What I take offense to is them being GIVEN free items to further make money. They did not make that money legitimately, it was handed to them on a silver platter by a "supposedly" neutral host. Believe me when I say I do not fault Somer Blink in the least in this situation. They were given a huge boon by CCP and they said "yes" seeing the profit in it. My concern is with CCP who offered that huge boon in the first place.

Memnon Shepard wrote:
I also highly doubt the success of the business is founded entirely on taking advantage of gambling addicts who surely can't control their behavior.


Yes. We agree that the success of the business is not founded entirely on taking advantage of addicts. However, I'd rather safely bet that a decent portion of their income is from gambling addicts. After all, this is the chief argument against opening new casinos (they're trying to locally, here in upstate NY) as it causes addiction and negatively affects the community. And yes, I do see the irony and hypocrisy in having that statement come from someone who is basically an enabler who provides the ability for people to create lotteries. I also, indirectly, take advantage of gambling addicts (assuming any participate in lotteries hosted by my clients). I am not above admitting it, though.

Memnon Shepard wrote:
Seriously? I convince people I know, mostly irl, to pay me for PLEX in advance. I then buy them through Markee, then use the bonus credit to Blink free ships - the system seems to work fine for me.


Congratulations. You're not an addict. Pat yourself on the back. I'm glad the system works for you. It doesn't address the fact that the primary concern remains that CCP is giving out free ships to one specific entity and is thus showing favoritism and not with Somer Blink saying "yes" to it.

myEVElotto.com - The New Public Lottery Site

Abernie
Thoroughly Incompetent
#400 - 2013-09-27 16:03:55 UTC
MyEveLotto wrote:
It doesn't address the fact that the primary concern remains that CCP is giving out free ships to one specific entity and is thus showing favoritism and not with Somer Blink saying "yes" to it.

And we're not just talking about a few megathrons here. It's 5 for-the-rest-of-time-unique ships easily worth hundreds of billions a pop.