These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE Information Portal

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

EVE Online: Odyssey 1.1 Feedback

First post
Author
Oraac Ensor
#161 - 2013-09-26 11:03:55 UTC  |  Edited by: Oraac Ensor
The real injustice of the Industrial rebalance is that many players are now stuck with cargo-rigged ships for which they have no use but which they are unable to sell without losing 95% of their original cost because CCP is being bloody-minded and refuses to reimburse the cost of the rigs.
Rek Seven
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#162 - 2013-09-27 14:54:15 UTC  |  Edited by: Rek Seven
Oraac Ensor wrote:
Rek Seven wrote:
So are you saying that random names are easier to remember than sequential numbering or are you just arguing about an irrelevant statement?

Of course I can't guaranteeing it in a "money back if you are unsatisfied" sense but i would put money on what i said being fact. It's down to you to disprove my theory if you think otherwise.

I'm not sure that "irrelevant" is the right word, but my initial reason for posting was to object to your claim that you could "guarantee" how others think, but as you ask I would also dispute your theory about sequential numbering. If it were true it would apply in almost any other scenario, so let's try it:

Instead of Gallente industrials, how about Gallente frigates? Are you seriously claiming that you would find them easier to remember if they were called Atron Mk I, Atron Mk II, Atron Mk III, etc, instead of individual names?

What about RL? If you wanted a new car and went along to your local Ford dealership, you would find it easier to choose between the various models if they were called Galaxy Mk I, Galaxy Mk II, Galaxy Mk III, etc?

Do you have family - aunts, uncles, cousins? If so, no doubt they have unique given names, but you would prefer Cousin 1, Cousin 2, Cousin 3, etc?

I think not.

[Edit] If you look at the original feedback you will see that at first I objected to the idea of new names but I'm happy with the way it was done. Keeping the Iteron Mk V for those who seem to regard it with some sort of strange reverence was a nice touch.


Your putting way too much thought into this and you're just being silly now... I don't really care to be honest, i just thought changing the names was a pointless waste of time.
Steijn
Quay Industries
#163 - 2013-10-08 10:42:48 UTC
This says the DT was for Dust


Quote:
eve online news
Early Downtime! - 10:00 UTC - October 8th, 2013
07.10.2013 11:00
By CCP Falcon

Downtime will begin early on Tuesday, October 8th, 2013 to facilitate the deployment of Uprising 1.5 for DUST 514. Daily downtime will begin one hour early at 10:00 UTC, and will last until 10:30 UTC. As with all deployment downtimes, we reccommend that players set a long skill in training for the duration of the deployment.


but this

Quote:
Erlendur ‏@erlendur 3m

TQ is updated to EVE Online: Odyssey 1.1.9 #tweetfleet and available (DUST 514: Uprising 1.5 is still pending an hour #tweetforce).


says you have patched Odyssey 1.1.9

so, seeing as there are no patch notes, what have you just secretly nerfed?