These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

DEVSWARM OP: CCP Should Give Goonswarm Trillions Of Isk Worth of Crap

First post First post
Author
Lucas Kell
Solitude Trading
S.N.O.T.
#241 - 2013-09-27 11:27:20 UTC
Prince Kobol wrote:
Again you are not backing up your claim of CCP Endorsing RMT'ing by Supporting Somerblink or come out with the other Big RMT Scams that have gone uder CCP's Radar.

You have yet been able to backup one single claim you have made.
I'm not claiming they are endorsing RMT. I'm claiming they have no was to disprove somer is RMTing, and so dumping unique ships on them and endorsing their service is a bad idea.

A lot of players will see this as meaning somer is officially a CCP supported thing, thus free from the possibility of scamming and RMT, but that's simply not the case. CCP have no way to prove it and should just stay out of ALL player run businesses.

IMHO, CCP should have done their own lottery for these, where they can be sure it's secured and they know for certain they are not helping up the credibility of an RMT empire.

The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog.

Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list.

Speedkermit Damo
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
#242 - 2013-09-27 11:27:56 UTC
Weaselior wrote:
With the official CCP announcement that in the interests of "community engagement" groups of players that CCP decides they like will be given piles of rare or unreleased ships to make a private profit off, I'd like to throw my hat into the ring for goonswarm to be the next in line for massive unregulated handouts to people a random dev decides they like.

Goonswarm has done more for raising EVE's profile and gathering new players into EVE than SOMER or any other CCP partner. It is goonswarm that makes international news when we butcher some worthless alliance that barely puts up a fight, or decide to pay half of empire to kill the other half, magic trillions of isk out of thin air by breaking a headline patch feature, or our many other delightful exploits. And we bring a constant stream of new players into EVE, to fill our ranks. Given the precedent set by the SOMER gifts, no player group deserves a free handout more than Goonswarm. And no player website deserves a handout more than goonfleet.com.

Now, some people might argue that it would be favoritism to give them to us, as we'd just keep them rather than run a for-profit lottery for the ships to convert them to isk like SOMER would. I assure you nothing is farther from the truth. Rather than have some dumb ship I too will ensure that the ships are available to the EVE public, at the fairest price possible (the highest price the market will bear). That means any EVE player will have a fair chance to get the ship rather than having to lose scads of money in a for-profit gambling scheme.

Now, some people might protest that we're only in it for ourselves. And those people certainly have a point: just like a for-profit gambling corporation that maintains its "trust" solely because that keeps the money flowing, we look out for #1. But as we look out for #1, we provide great benefits to the EVE population at large. We spend our vast sums of money creating content and obliterating abscesses on the eve community like highsec miners, and TEST.

Some people might also claim that giving us ships would be blatant favoritism. To that, I can say nothing but that I agree - but since CCP has now decided they're openly showing favoritism by gifting hundreds of billions of isk worth of ships to SOMER, surely EVE's most successful alliance deserves some favoritism too. Some might argue that we should not be creating new unique ships, and that may be a fair point: I will happily accept sabre BPOs and other t2 BPOs as a replacement care package.

CCP has argued that SOMER is a fitting partner because they are "honest", though studiously avoiding actually claiming they've investigated to determine SOMER is honest and also studiously avoiding promising they would do anything if SOMER just walked off with all the ships. Some might argue Goonswarm therefore does not qualify. To that, I have a simple argument: SOMER openly tells you that it will take your isk, tells you how, and then takes your isk. So too does Goonswarm tell you we're going to take your isk, tell you how we're going to take your isk (after all, our public wiki specifically tells you what's going to happen with your security deposit) and then we take your isk. That is just as honest, if not more honest, than SOMER: after all, our odds are public while you have to do a little math to figure out SOMER's.

Do the right thing. Give Goonswarm hundreds of billions of isk. Nay, give us trillions: we are better than SOMER and deserve greater CCP largesse. Thank you for your time, and the sabre bpos we so richly deserve.


CCP have already given you trillions of free ISK.

It's called moon-goo.

Protect me from knowing what I don't need to know. Protect me from even knowing that there are things to know that I don't know. Protect me from knowing that I decided not to know about the things that I decided not to know about. Amen.

Prince Kobol
#243 - 2013-09-27 11:28:35 UTC
Red Templar wrote:


Maybe i missed something. Can you please provide link to the statement of CCP, where they stated that they investigated SommerBlink?

Much obliged.


Of course good sir,

CCP Navigator stated the following in this thread

https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=281298&find=unread

"Q3, How do we know we can trust Fansites and third parties to operate fairly and independently?

A3, We have worked with a lot of third party sites in the past such as EVE Radio, BIG Lottery and SOMER Blink. These entities (and others of course) have demonstrated a solid history of trust and reliability. As a result, we can verify that they have been straight and true in their dealings and this should be encouraged."

Hope that helps :)
Lucas Kell
Solitude Trading
S.N.O.T.
#244 - 2013-09-27 11:29:23 UTC
Infinity Ziona wrote:
You're defaming them. Tarnishing a real life businesses name by spreading rumors about that are unproven and as you admit unable to be proven. Likely you won't be sued but they would have an open and shut case with you. You knowingly said something damaging about them that you don't know to be true. What you said harms their good reputation. You admit you have no proof, one actual defense to defamation (reasonably truthful claims).

I doubt a magistrate or judge would be cool with "hearsay is enough" :)
That's funny, I thought I was talking about an in game group. If somer blink is a registered business, then their accounts are invalid, as according to the EULA accounts must be for personal use, not business use, and the use of an out of game business name is prohibited.

The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog.

Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list.

Prince Kobol
#245 - 2013-09-27 11:29:33 UTC
Speedkermit Damo wrote:
Weaselior wrote:
With the official CCP announcement that in the interests of "community engagement" groups of players that CCP decides they like will be given piles of rare or unreleased ships to make a private profit off, I'd like to throw my hat into the ring for goonswarm to be the next in line for massive unregulated handouts to people a random dev decides they like.

Goonswarm has done more for raising EVE's profile and gathering new players into EVE than SOMER or any other CCP partner. It is goonswarm that makes international news when we butcher some worthless alliance that barely puts up a fight, or decide to pay half of empire to kill the other half, magic trillions of isk out of thin air by breaking a headline patch feature, or our many other delightful exploits. And we bring a constant stream of new players into EVE, to fill our ranks. Given the precedent set by the SOMER gifts, no player group deserves a free handout more than Goonswarm. And no player website deserves a handout more than goonfleet.com.

Now, some people might argue that it would be favoritism to give them to us, as we'd just keep them rather than run a for-profit lottery for the ships to convert them to isk like SOMER would. I assure you nothing is farther from the truth. Rather than have some dumb ship I too will ensure that the ships are available to the EVE public, at the fairest price possible (the highest price the market will bear). That means any EVE player will have a fair chance to get the ship rather than having to lose scads of money in a for-profit gambling scheme.

Now, some people might protest that we're only in it for ourselves. And those people certainly have a point: just like a for-profit gambling corporation that maintains its "trust" solely because that keeps the money flowing, we look out for #1. But as we look out for #1, we provide great benefits to the EVE population at large. We spend our vast sums of money creating content and obliterating abscesses on the eve community like highsec miners, and TEST.

Some people might also claim that giving us ships would be blatant favoritism. To that, I can say nothing but that I agree - but since CCP has now decided they're openly showing favoritism by gifting hundreds of billions of isk worth of ships to SOMER, surely EVE's most successful alliance deserves some favoritism too. Some might argue that we should not be creating new unique ships, and that may be a fair point: I will happily accept sabre BPOs and other t2 BPOs as a replacement care package.

CCP has argued that SOMER is a fitting partner because they are "honest", though studiously avoiding actually claiming they've investigated to determine SOMER is honest and also studiously avoiding promising they would do anything if SOMER just walked off with all the ships. Some might argue Goonswarm therefore does not qualify. To that, I have a simple argument: SOMER openly tells you that it will take your isk, tells you how, and then takes your isk. So too does Goonswarm tell you we're going to take your isk, tell you how we're going to take your isk (after all, our public wiki specifically tells you what's going to happen with your security deposit) and then we take your isk. That is just as honest, if not more honest, than SOMER: after all, our odds are public while you have to do a little math to figure out SOMER's.

Do the right thing. Give Goonswarm hundreds of billions of isk. Nay, give us trillions: we are better than SOMER and deserve greater CCP largesse. Thank you for your time, and the sabre bpos we so richly deserve.


CCP have already given you trillions of free ISK.

It's called moon-goo.


Well they weren't given to them, they fought for them.
Prince Kobol
#246 - 2013-09-27 11:30:35 UTC  |  Edited by: Prince Kobol
Lucas Kell wrote:
Infinity Ziona wrote:
You're defaming them. Tarnishing a real life businesses name by spreading rumors about that are unproven and as you admit unable to be proven. Likely you won't be sued but they would have an open and shut case with you. You knowingly said something damaging about them that you don't know to be true. What you said harms their good reputation. You admit you have no proof, one actual defense to defamation (reasonably truthful claims).

I doubt a magistrate or judge would be cool with "hearsay is enough" :)
That's funny, I thought I was talking about an in game group. If somer blink is a registered business, then their accounts are invalid, as according to the EULA accounts must be for personal use, not business use, and the use of an out of game business name is prohibited.


CCP is the business that you are defaming by claiming they are endorsing a practice which they denounce and will get you a life time ban and also in some countries can get you into serious trouble with the tax laws if you do not declare it as an income :)

(The practice is Real Money Transfer, better know as RMT, selling in game currency for real life money)
Lucas Kell
Solitude Trading
S.N.O.T.
#247 - 2013-09-27 11:33:11 UTC  |  Edited by: Lucas Kell
Prince Kobol wrote:
Red Templar wrote:


Maybe i missed something. Can you please provide link to the statement of CCP, where they stated that they investigated SommerBlink?

Much obliged.


Of course good sir,

CCP Navigator stated the following in this thread

https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=281298&find=unread

"Q3, How do we know we can trust Fansites and third parties to operate fairly and independently?

A3, We have worked with a lot of third party sites in the past such as EVE Radio, BIG Lottery and SOMER Blink. These entities (and others of course) have demonstrated a solid history of trust and reliability. As a result, we can verify that they have been straight and true in their dealings and this should be encouraged."

Hope that helps :)

LOL
That's not an investigation. That's him saying "They don't appear to have scammed people so far". They have no ability to investigate, since all of their business is done outside of the game.

also, bear in mind CCP are only looking at whether these prizes will be scammed. by using Chribbas dice and being so in the spotlight, that's unlikely. But they still can;t prove they are a legitimate group that don't perform RMT for profit.

The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog.

Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list.

Red Templar
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#248 - 2013-09-27 11:33:54 UTC
Prince Kobol wrote:
Red Templar wrote:


Maybe i missed something. Can you please provide link to the statement of CCP, where they stated that they investigated SommerBlink?

Much obliged.


Of course good sir,

CCP Navigator stated the following in this thread

https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=281298&find=unread

"Q3, How do we know we can trust Fansites and third parties to operate fairly and independently?

A3, We have worked with a lot of third party sites in the past such as EVE Radio, BIG Lottery and SOMER Blink. These entities (and others of course) have demonstrated a solid history of trust and reliability. As a result, we can verify that they have been straight and true in their dealings and this should be encouraged."

Hope that helps :)

Thank you, but that has nothing about investigation on the CCP part into inner workings of Sommer, as you imply.

That would be the same as saying in court that you investigated murder suspect. And you investigation is based on knowing him personally and he was such a good guy before, so clearly there is no way he could have done it.

[b]For Love. For Peace. For Honor.

For None of the Above.

For Pony![/b]

Prince Kobol
#249 - 2013-09-27 11:34:38 UTC
Lucas Kell wrote:
Prince Kobol wrote:
Red Templar wrote:


Maybe i missed something. Can you please provide link to the statement of CCP, where they stated that they investigated SommerBlink?

Much obliged.


Of course good sir,

CCP Navigator stated the following in this thread

https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=281298&find=unread

"Q3, How do we know we can trust Fansites and third parties to operate fairly and independently?

A3, We have worked with a lot of third party sites in the past such as EVE Radio, BIG Lottery and SOMER Blink. These entities (and others of course) have demonstrated a solid history of trust and reliability. As a result, we can verify that they have been straight and true in their dealings and this should be encouraged."

Hope that helps :)

LOL
That's not an investigation. That's him saying "They don't appear to have scammed people so far". They have no ability to investigate, since all of their business is done outside of the game.


So the isk is done out of game?
Infinity Ziona
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#250 - 2013-09-27 11:35:36 UTC
Lucas Kell wrote:
Infinity Ziona wrote:
You're defaming them. Tarnishing a real life businesses name by spreading rumors about that are unproven and as you admit unable to be proven. Likely you won't be sued but they would have an open and shut case with you. You knowingly said something damaging about them that you don't know to be true. What you said harms their good reputation. You admit you have no proof, one actual defense to defamation (reasonably truthful claims).

I doubt a magistrate or judge would be cool with "hearsay is enough" :)
That's funny, I thought I was talking about an in game group. If somer blink is a registered business, then their accounts are invalid, as according to the EULA accounts must be for personal use, not business use, and the use of an out of game business name is prohibited.

They have a website and they sell GTC, so they're obviously a real life business since they're making an income from the site, this is as well as an in game group.

CCP Fozzie “We can see how much money people are making in nullsec and it is, a gigantic amount, a shit-ton… in null sec anomalies. “*

Kaalrus pwned..... :)

Prince Kobol
#251 - 2013-09-27 11:35:42 UTC  |  Edited by: Prince Kobol
Red Templar wrote:
Prince Kobol wrote:
Red Templar wrote:


Maybe i missed something. Can you please provide link to the statement of CCP, where they stated that they investigated SommerBlink?

Much obliged.


Of course good sir,

CCP Navigator stated the following in this thread

https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=281298&find=unread

"Q3, How do we know we can trust Fansites and third parties to operate fairly and independently?

A3, We have worked with a lot of third party sites in the past such as EVE Radio, BIG Lottery and SOMER Blink. These entities (and others of course) have demonstrated a solid history of trust and reliability. As a result, we can verify that they have been straight and true in their dealings and this should be encouraged."

Hope that helps :)

Thank you, but that has nothing about investigation on the CCP part into inner workings of Sommer, as you imply.

That would be the same as saying in court that you investigated murder suspect. And you investigation is based on knowing him personally and he was such a good guy before, so clearly there is no way he could have done it.



So are you also supporting Lucas Kell case that Somerblink are involved in RMT'ing and that by CCP endorsing Somerblink they are in turn endorsing RMT'ing?

If so I would love to see some kind of evidence other then

"What proof is needed. I've heard on a number of occasions that this type of thing is happening. That's good enough for me.

I not when other people are accused of RMT no clear evidence is needed, hearsay is enough, so for me the same is true."
Lucas Kell
Solitude Trading
S.N.O.T.
#252 - 2013-09-27 11:36:21 UTC
Prince Kobol wrote:
Lucas Kell wrote:
Infinity Ziona wrote:
You're defaming them. Tarnishing a real life businesses name by spreading rumors about that are unproven and as you admit unable to be proven. Likely you won't be sued but they would have an open and shut case with you. You knowingly said something damaging about them that you don't know to be true. What you said harms their good reputation. You admit you have no proof, one actual defense to defamation (reasonably truthful claims).

I doubt a magistrate or judge would be cool with "hearsay is enough" :)
That's funny, I thought I was talking about an in game group. If somer blink is a registered business, then their accounts are invalid, as according to the EULA accounts must be for personal use, not business use, and the use of an out of game business name is prohibited.


CCP is the business that you are defaming by claiming they are endorsing a practice which they denounce and will get you a life time ban and also in some countries can get you into serious trouble with the tax laws if you do not declare it as an income :)

(The practice is Real Money Transfer, better know as RMT, selling in game currency for real life money)
Again, I'm not saying they are knowingly endorsing RMT, that's you putting words in my mouth. I'm saying they are endorsing a group with no way of knowing if they RMT, which is just as bad.

The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog.

Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list.

Lucas Kell
Solitude Trading
S.N.O.T.
#253 - 2013-09-27 11:38:47 UTC
Infinity Ziona wrote:
Lucas Kell wrote:
Infinity Ziona wrote:
You're defaming them. Tarnishing a real life businesses name by spreading rumors about that are unproven and as you admit unable to be proven. Likely you won't be sued but they would have an open and shut case with you. You knowingly said something damaging about them that you don't know to be true. What you said harms their good reputation. You admit you have no proof, one actual defense to defamation (reasonably truthful claims).

I doubt a magistrate or judge would be cool with "hearsay is enough" :)
That's funny, I thought I was talking about an in game group. If somer blink is a registered business, then their accounts are invalid, as according to the EULA accounts must be for personal use, not business use, and the use of an out of game business name is prohibited.

They have a website and they sell GTC, so they're obviously a real life business since they're making an income from the site, this is as well as an in game group.
In that case, their accounts are invalid and they should be closed.
EULA - 2A:
"Accounts may not be used for business purposes. Access to the System and playing EVE is intended for your personal entertainment, enjoyment and recreation, and not for corporate, business, commercial or income-seeking activities. Business entities and anyone who is acting for or on behalf of a business or for business purposes may not establish an Account, access the System or play EVE. Accessing the System or using the Game for commercial, business or income-seeking purposes is strictly prohibited."

The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog.

Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list.

Prince Kobol
#254 - 2013-09-27 11:41:34 UTC
Lucas Kell wrote:
Again, I'm not saying they are knowingly endorsing RMT, that's you putting words in my mouth. I'm saying they are endorsing a group with no way of knowing if they RMT, which is just as bad.


No, you clearly stated that you would have to be dumb to believe that Somerblink are not RMT'ing.

So if that is the case then CCP must know that they are doing it as it is apparently that obvious, whether they can prove it or not is irrelevant, therefore by actively supporting them they are also endorsing the act of RMT'ing.
Red Templar
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#255 - 2013-09-27 11:42:22 UTC
Prince Kobol wrote:
Red Templar wrote:
Prince Kobol wrote:
Red Templar wrote:


Maybe i missed something. Can you please provide link to the statement of CCP, where they stated that they investigated SommerBlink?

Much obliged.


Of course good sir,

CCP Navigator stated the following in this thread

https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=281298&find=unread

"Q3, How do we know we can trust Fansites and third parties to operate fairly and independently?

A3, We have worked with a lot of third party sites in the past such as EVE Radio, BIG Lottery and SOMER Blink. These entities (and others of course) have demonstrated a solid history of trust and reliability. As a result, we can verify that they have been straight and true in their dealings and this should be encouraged."

Hope that helps :)

Thank you, but that has nothing about investigation on the CCP part into inner workings of Sommer, as you imply.

That would be the same as saying in court that you investigated murder suspect. And you investigation is based on knowing him personally and he was such a good guy before, so clearly there is no way he could have done it.



So are you also supporting Lucas Kell case that Somerblink are involved in RMT'ing and that by CCP endorsing Somerblink they are in turn endorsing RMT'ing?

If so I would love to see some kind of evidence other then

"What proof is needed. I've heard on a number of occasions that this type of thing is happening. That's good enough for me.

I not when other people are accused of RMT no clear evidence is needed, hearsay is enough, so for me the same is true."

No, what i am trying to do, is to get you provide proof of your statements. As of now, you just put words into CCP's mouth. And now you are trying to do the same with me.

But so far you just ignore questions you cannot answer, and continue to twist arguments to prove your point.

If CCP indeed performed checks into the somer business and confirmed they are legit, nothing is rigged and no RMT involved whatsoever in any form, then that would be just awesome. Then we can fully trust somer and understand why CCP chose them for this role. But no such statements were made.

[b]For Love. For Peace. For Honor.

For None of the Above.

For Pony![/b]

Lucas Kell
Solitude Trading
S.N.O.T.
#256 - 2013-09-27 11:48:44 UTC
Prince Kobol wrote:
Lucas Kell wrote:
Again, I'm not saying they are knowingly endorsing RMT, that's you putting words in my mouth. I'm saying they are endorsing a group with no way of knowing if they RMT, which is just as bad.


No, you clearly stated that you would have to be dumb to believe that Somerblink are not RMT'ing.

So if that is the case then CCP must know that they are doing it as it is apparently that obvious, whether they can prove it or not is irrelevant, therefore by actively supporting them they are also endorsing the act of RMT'ing.
Would you like to find me the quote for that?
I mean this is the one I can find:
Lucas Kell wrote:
so them assuming this is all on the level is pretty dumb
Which clearly is saying that them assuming is dumb, not that anyone not seeing that somer are RMTing is dumb.
I don't believe it's an uncommon thing to think assumptions are dumb.

The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog.

Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list.

Kuni Oichi
Garoun Investment Bank
Gallente Federation
#257 - 2013-09-27 11:51:38 UTC
Prince Kobol wrote:


CCP is the business that you are defaming by claiming they are endorsing a practice which they denounce and will get you a life time ban and also in some countries can get you into serious trouble with the tax laws if you do not declare it as an income :)

(The practice is Real Money Transfer, better know as RMT, selling in game currency for real life money)


How do you feel about CCP endorsing gambling? Somer Blink's style of gambling would be extremely unlikely to be allowed in many countries around the world if it was for real money. Moreover they actively encourage people to spend real money on plex to support somer blink and to feed people's gambling addiction.

It's fundamentally irrelevant however. CCP could be giving these 'unique' ships to a 3 person mining corp and it would have the same problem. It's favouritism and endorsement of a player-run organisation in the game simply because someone at CCP likes them.

And, as this thread has amply demonstrated, if they're going to be showering any corporation in trillions of dollars of isk, the ethical choice is to give it all to goonswarm.
dexington
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#258 - 2013-09-27 11:54:02 UTC  |  Edited by: dexington
Kismeteer wrote:
Complete the cycle. We could be BoB. A couple t2 BPOs and we'd be happy.

I mean, fully sanctioned this time, like the SOMER blink guys.


And how do we know that has not already happened?, are SOMER blink in any way accountable to CCP in term of who the prizes are given to, and how they are handed out?.

SOMER blink don't scam, and CCP devs never give stuff to big null sec alliances, we are all safe...

I'm a relatively respectable citizen. Multiple felon perhaps, but certainly not dangerous.

Azami Nevinyrall
172.0.0.1
#259 - 2013-09-27 12:00:33 UTC
This thread alone shows favoritism, I got banned for just saying "Devswarm" (prolly will again) and yet here is a thread opened by a goon. And it's at page #13!

...

OldWolf69
EVE-RO
Goonswarm Federation
#260 - 2013-09-27 12:03:15 UTC
Oh lol. This has nothing to do with what Somer decides to do with his isk. It's about CCP reminding us at the old T2 lotteries. If Mother Theresa, God keep her soul in heaven, would play EvE, CCP giving her the ships would be not fair. So stop putting Somer in front of this. It's not who recieves the advantage, but who gives it, and his reasons.Lol