These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

A review of player giveaways with CCP and third party sites

First post First post First post
Author
ISD Tyrozan
ISD Community Communications Liaisons
ISD Alliance
#321 - 2013-09-27 07:21:42 UTC
A post supporting trolling has been removed.

Forum rule 3. Ranting is prohibited.

ISD Tyrozan

Captain

Community Communication Liaisons (CCLs)

Interstellar Services Department

@ISDTyrozan | @ISD_CCL

knobber Jobbler
State War Academy
Caldari State
#322 - 2013-09-27 07:30:47 UTC
I'm glad to see that CCP thinks a repeat of T20 is OK as long as they announce it first. Giving hundreds of billions of ISK to individual players is a fantastic idea. It's not completely ******** at all. It's so far off the stupid scale Its gone full circle and is clearly to clever for most of us to understand.

I too run a betting service and need some ships which I can then sell for ludicrous profit. I don't need the same amount you gave to somer, just enough to buy several supercaps and maybe a titan will be fine.
TheGunslinger42
All Web Investigations
#323 - 2013-09-27 07:52:43 UTC  |  Edited by: TheGunslinger42
knobber Jobbler wrote:
I'm glad to see that CCP thinks a repeat of T20 is OK as long as they announce it first. Giving hundreds of billions of ISK to individual players is a fantastic idea. It's not completely ******** at all. It's so far off the stupid scale Its gone full circle and is clearly to clever for most of us to understand.

I too run a betting service and need some ships which I can then sell for ludicrous profit. I don't need the same amount you gave to somer, just enough to buy several supercaps and maybe a titan will be fine.


No but the difference is CCP employees in this case are stating that the player group they are handing unique, incredibly expensive items too are completely trustworthy.

I very much doubt an exhaustive audit has been performed on every transaction and account, including auditing of SOMERs own services and code, dating back to their creation. Such an audit would be necessary to justify such exorbitant claims, after all

But that's ok, CCP Navigator is repeatedly going to state that they are trustworthy and have so far honoured everything perfectly.

Disgusting.
Bronco Platz
Doomheim
#324 - 2013-09-27 08:09:29 UTC
Prince Kobol wrote:

Shhhh..

People (well most seem to be goons + alt on this thread don't want to here about how Somer funded New Eden Open and provided player driven content.


Sorry, had to dissapoint you. I´m neither a member of Goons nor an alt of any of them.

What about the other Groups, that created player driven content? What qualifies Somer to be prefered against them? Who decides what level of sponsorship they can become? On which base they make this decision? The quality of content? The quantity of content? How many Plexes they can sell? Who rates the activities? Who audits that they are trustworthy enough to get a sponsorship? How does this audit work?

I´m waitning for for a reliable Statement of the CSM, too. Guys (and gals?) please show attendance. For me and all the other Players who voted for you. Your chair includes to react in such situations, too and not only trips to Iceland, there you can here about the future development of Eve, that you can´t tell your playerbase becaus of NDA´s.

And CCP, please roll back this silly, silly decision. Or don´t you remember Incarna? Or T20? Did you lie, as yoiu sad, you learned of this events and you will never forget it?

This signature is under NDA. Sorry.

Chanina
ASGARD HEAVY INDUSTRIES
#325 - 2013-09-27 08:13:51 UTC
The Gold Magnate is a very special ship and its legacy should get lost. Giving out this ship again would be bad as the history of the old would blurred or even lost.

But couldn't we go with a "new" memorial version of this Ship? A Gold Maganate II which has a direct link to the story and legacy of the original one? That it was handed out for achievement XXX and was owned and lost by Player Tyrrax Thorrk.
Wouldn't that help to keep the stories of old alive and still hold the uniqueness of each ship?



If you want to do this kind of give aways, wouldn't it be an option to deal with it in a blind auction run by CCP?
The ISK collected that way could be used for sponsoring the RL Event of Eve Vegas, this one or the next. And it wouldn't show favor for one profit driven organization or the other.

I'm not totally against promotion of that kind but keep the values much lower. Ships that will be worth trillions of isk is a way too big "promotion present".
Novenas Heresy
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#326 - 2013-09-27 08:14:27 UTC
I've never played Blink before, although I do have corp mates that do regularly (and enjoy it immensely). That being said, I share the concerns voiced here regarding apparent preferential treatment for Somer Blink. If the lottery was controlled by CCP or multiple similar organizations were given the same prizes then that would be acceptable, but at this stage it looks like the devs playing favourites.

Encouraging 3rd party sites to interact with/promote EvE is a great idea, but as someone mentioned earlier, Black/Red Frog, DOTLAN and many other corps/sites have done more to promote EvE for longer than Somer Blink.

From my point of view, this is definitely a troubling move by CCP.
Rob Crowley
State War Academy
#327 - 2013-09-27 08:26:08 UTC
Sid Hudgens wrote:
If CCP wants to compensate somer blink for helping promote eve vegas how is that anybody's business?
Favouring one group over all its competitors is hurting the very core of the sandbox. And I happen to like that sandbox, so it's my business.

Quote:
Would it be ok if it were done with RL money?
I would consider it slightly better cause it's less direct and it might not lead to ingame advantage (depending on how Somer would use the money), though as you say since there is the PLEX mechanism it wouldn't be much better. The maximum amount of CCP sponsoring towards a competitive ingame group I'd feel comfortable about would be free accounts and mentioning in a Spotlight dev blog as I already mentioned.

Quote:
If the rest of you ***** had an organization that ccp thought could help promote their game you might get the same deal. But you're all just a bunch of hysterical nerds ... so no dice.
Do you really have to troll in a thread like this? I happen to be a 3rd party dev and I wouldn't want to get exclusive ingame stuff from CCP for it.

Quote:
By that thinking they shouldn't be sending devs to eve vegas either.
Why? Is Eve Vegas an event with ingame consequences in competition with other similar events? Do the organizers gain any ingame advantage over their competitors by having devs at their meeting?
Gwen Ikiryo
Alexylva Paradox
#328 - 2013-09-27 08:30:42 UTC  |  Edited by: Gwen Ikiryo
This is a bad idea. MMO developers should support their community, for sure - By helping them overcome logistical challenges for their endeavours and keeping them well informed. Not by messing with the proverbial gameboard and offering specific individuals in that community stuff for free. They should not be essentially giving someone a bucketload of free in game currency as a thank-you present (at best) or a number of completely exclusive ships (at worst), no matter who they are. That is clear and unambiguous bias.

It'd be like Blizzard giving the creators of wowhead a complete set of top end raid gear just for running the site. And if something like this is absurd in a themepark, then it's a thousand times worse in a sandbox, where who-has-what changes the entire shape of the world.
Luci Ambrye
The Service Crew
#329 - 2013-09-27 08:41:08 UTC
this is the start of a very long slippery slope imo.

-3 accounts.
BLerchg
Perkone
Caldari State
#330 - 2013-09-27 09:13:00 UTC
Jamison wrote:

Andrev Nox wrote:
Poetic Stanziel wrote:
Pull Chribba Dice support in protest.


Do you feel any hypocrisy posting that 32 minutes after you claimed your free gift on our site?

Just curious if you'd prefer to withdraw your use of our gifts in protest :)


Original post.

This is so wrong, how many EULA violations is this exactly CCP Navigator? Does a reply like this meet the TOS?

Regardless if it is true or not, the only way of knowing this information would be for this person to look into the personal data on SOMER BLINK and then turn around and writing about it in a public post.

The fact that the issues are being completely ignored by CCP Navigator and was was never mentioned to the CSM makes me think that we have not begun to hear the whole story.

Just how long was this project being worked on, who was involved with the deal and what have people been given to make this work?



some people seem to overlook this. we have a case of an individual inside somer blink using our account informations to influence a discussion to his favor. WTF.
you can do all kinds of nasty things with those informations.

how can CCP work with them.
Hentalia
Obvious Shell Corp
#331 - 2013-09-27 09:21:34 UTC
First of I want to say something good: I really like the prices, the Fanfest :O I'd love to win that, as I would love to win one of the collectors edition packs.

Now for my other feelings. Why can't you guys organize this on yourselves, give every eve player the opportunity to enter on a fair battlefield. It's nice that you care a lot about third party organisations, but giving a single one (that is set on making profit) special items... It's a no go. I hope you will find an other way to distribute these items. Or retract them totally from the game. It just doesn't seem fair.
Come on CCP, you do care about your players right?
Rob Crowley
State War Academy
#332 - 2013-09-27 09:30:13 UTC
arabella blood wrote:
arabella blood wrote:
Thanks to all bittervet RP lore loving players who missed the actualy point, we now have this pitiful solution.

The point is not introducing back the ships, the point is the use of Blink to do it.
Please make server for RP players, when they can have their own fun...they are ruining mine here.
Just taking your posts as examples here, there are a couple similar ones by other people.

Would you please stop behaving like a jerk towards people who are happy that one of the problems of the initial plan was fixed. The vast majority of posters agreed that there were 2 problems and also that the remaining one is the more serious one. And I'm almost certain that fixing the smaller one has no effect on the probability of getting the bigger one fixed, so it's not very constructive to get angry at people for successfully getting the small issue fixed.

Arazel Chainfire wrote:
Congrats on giving in to the idiot whiners. Yes, there was only 1 gold magnate, and it hasn't been in the game for nearly 9 years at this point. But for some reason it is still kept in the database, and people can still look it up. And now it will never see the light of day again.
Yeah, one could say similar to RL ships like Titanic, Bismarck, Yamato, Prince of Wales. There were only very few ships of these RL classes, they got destroyed and were never rebuilt and yet people still look them up in Wikipedia, pictures, movies and the like. Because their history is fascinating even if (or maybe because) they don't exist anymore.
T'kimat
Inner Geek
#333 - 2013-09-27 09:40:02 UTC
Andski wrote:


EVE Vegas is an event that actually develops the community. A gambling event is not.



Having a player run event in the United States in blatant favoritism towards Americans. Being a European I demand this take place on a neutral ground where everyone has the same travel costs. CCP should not be supporting this event since not everyone can participate. Furthermore, CCP should not be giving away free ship models to the first 500 people, since I can not be there due to my work-schedule. I want free stuff as well. Who can guarantee that the first 500 will not be goons and they will keep the ship models for themselves? We are speaking of things with a real-life value here, and not simply fake internet currency.




It would be awesome if everyone would at least attempt to think about what you are saying objectively and not just rage for the sake of raging. If I didn't know any better, I would say 95% of the comments here are trolls, but I fear they are meant seriously.
Barrens chat in Eve - who would have thought...
Dex Slim
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#334 - 2013-09-27 09:50:32 UTC  |  Edited by: Dex Slim
BLerchg wrote:
Jamison wrote:

Andrev Nox wrote:
Poetic Stanziel wrote:
Pull Chribba Dice support in protest.


Do you feel any hypocrisy posting that 32 minutes after you claimed your free gift on our site?

Just curious if you'd prefer to withdraw your use of our gifts in protest :)


Original post.

This is so wrong, how many EULA violations is this exactly CCP Navigator? Does a reply like this meet the TOS?

Regardless if it is true or not, the only way of knowing this information would be for this person to look into the personal data on SOMER BLINK and then turn around and writing about it in a public post.

The fact that the issues are being completely ignored by CCP Navigator and was was never mentioned to the CSM makes me think that we have not begun to hear the whole story.

Just how long was this project being worked on, who was involved with the deal and what have people been given to make this work?



some people seem to overlook this. we have a case of an individual inside somer blink using our account informations to influence a discussion to his favor. WTF.
you can do all kinds of nasty things with those informations.

how can CCP work with them.


It puts into light a corporation, or in this case an individual that is a representative for said corporation, that doesn't care about customer information. Information that in any serious business is kept classified. Why? Because anyone would stay far away from a business sharing personal information at a whim like that. Why would I believe that such an individual being unethical about some things, would not be unethical in other? E.g. rigging a lottery given the chance? Why am I forced to have to deal with such a corporation in order to get access to new content?

However, the real point is still that even if SOMER is legit they would gain immensively by this deal. How can CCP decide and justify that a corporation deserves trillions of ISK just handed over to them? What about all other individuals and corporations that in our eyes deserve it more? If CCP goes through with this they would dig themselves a pretty deep hole.
Rob Crowley
State War Academy
#335 - 2013-09-27 09:57:43 UTC
T'kimat wrote:
Andski wrote:
EVE Vegas is an event that actually develops the community. A gambling event is not.
Having a player run event in the United States in blatant favoritism towards Americans.
Where exactly is the ingame advantage that will distort ingame competition for being at Eve Vegas or getting a RL spaceship model?

Quote:
We are speaking of things with a real-life value here, and not simply fake internet currency.
Yeah, exactly. I don't give a flying f*** how IRL rich you are. I care about my fake internet sandbox, that's kind of why I'm posting here, as a player of the fake internet sandbox, ya know?

Quote:
It would be awesome if everyone would at least attempt to think about what you are saying objectively and not just rage for the sake of raging. If I didn't know any better, I would say 95% of the comments here are trolls, but I fear they are meant seriously.
Barrens chat in Eve - who would have thought...
You're like that kettle in a glasshouse calling the stones black while throwing pots.
Zendon Taredi
Tier Four Technologies
#336 - 2013-09-27 10:00:36 UTC
Why isnt there a charity attached to this thing? just handing somer 5 extremely expensive ships because he runs a successful lottery doesnt seem entirely well thought out.
Sabriz Adoudel
Move along there is nothing here
#337 - 2013-09-27 10:18:24 UTC
Best case scenario - Somer makes a lot of ISK out of the extra lotteries, then steals the unique ships, some interesting EVE history is made and the game gets some publicity.

Most likely scenario - the biggest act of CCP/individual player collusion since the fraudulent T2 BPO handouts occurs.

I support the New Order and CODE. alliance. www.minerbumping.com

T'kimat
Inner Geek
#338 - 2013-09-27 10:24:16 UTC
Sabriz Adoudel wrote:
Best case scenario - Somer makes a lot of ISK out of the extra lotteries, then steals the unique ships, some interesting EVE history is made and the game gets some publicity.

Most likely scenario - the biggest act of CCP/individual player collusion since the fraudulent T2 BPO handouts occurs.


Most likely scenario: Largest whinefest since monoclegate and CCP stops supporting player-run events, since there is no sign of constructive feedback - only blind rage.
Memnon Shepard
The Occupation.
#339 - 2013-09-27 10:26:17 UTC  |  Edited by: Memnon Shepard
1. Eve employees aren't allowed to bid and would thus be excluded from winning prizes. I believe Chribba's Dice is used to pick winners and that CCP holds the prizes until the drawings and transfers them through SOMER to the winners (ticket numbers being available before the drawing for the public to view).

2. If so, worst case scenario is that a Blink employee might risk a lucrative position working for SOMER for the same chances to win the lottery as any other player. The third party drawing service would separate Blink from the chance to ‘steal’ the items. Some people are talking about Blink employee shills, without understanding that many casinos use shills (or prop players) as a customer service - people filling poker tables to keep games going being one example. In the case of Blink, it would help the games move faster and would not detract from the odds of any individual ticket winning. This is a good thing, though again I’m not sure it’s even happening. I do know that if one wants, free tokens can be used to get tickets. Using free tickets isn't gambling with risk, there is no -EV. Yeah, you'll have to support a site that's sponsoring a tourney for Eve by refreshing their page and signing up.

3. Assuming I'm correct, *edit* SOMER employees cannot win the prizes and there is little chance of SOMER Blink employees ‘running off’ with them. People who have cheated using Blink or have broken their TOS in the past will also be excluded. Spouses, brothers, visiting relatives, etc. who want to Blink do seem to be out of luck (system isn’t perfect). Outside those groups, the prizes will go to Eve players with at least one ticket in the lottery. Prizes stay within the community and everyone knows the rules, some may choose to buy better odds if they want them and yes those funds support SOMER. Considering every 10m=15bids at the most assuming no wins (10 tokens + 5 separate 2m bids), it's relatively cheap to buy additional votes (even blinking with that same-IP buddy and agreeing to split prize value). I won't go into the possibility of achievement hunting to recoup that ISK, or the fact that ISK may actually be won while simultaneously getting more bids. More than one achievement instantly qualifies for guaranteed positive credit and can be earned within a day.

4. CCP seems only guilty of increasing traffic through an in-game corporation's site. They aren't giving prizes directly to SOMER Blink employees for running a favored casino, they're using SOMER Blink's site to channel promotional items to players for the Eve-wide event SOMER Blink is sponsoring. I think there's a clear difference there. SOMER Blink isn’t gaining the value of the items, they’re gaining the value of the increased Blinks people are enticed to make specifically to win those items (I agree that this is likely a large amount, but have no idea what it will be). Players will be participating more frequently in the business model SOMER established trying to win the items, which will indeed increase SOMER’s earned in-game ISK. Their own promotions do the same thing. This same business was prepared to lose in-game ISK sponsoring the tournament in the first place; the income may help to offset or even eclipse that amount but again I have no idea. These promotional items may entice more in-game corporations to sponsor events in the future, giving back to the community some of the ISK they’ve made, in the hopes of similar promotional support. I agree that a clear, fair selection process would need to be implemented to keep this type of promotional system. As an off-the-cuff idea, blind bids could be submitted from every Eve corp during a period of time before future tournaments for the prizes they would offer as sponsors. Players could vote on the winner or the highest value prizes could win outright… there are many interesting systems that could be set up. I don’t see why this is a bad thing for the Eve Universe overall. The current system definitely needs tweaking, but I think there could be exciting possibilities. Yes, large organizations will be dominant in this system – as they are in almost every aspect of Eve currently. If Red Frog won the bid and each paid system jump got me a ticket to win similar items, I’d probably find excuses to move my stuff around more often. I see many posts requesting that similar sites get similar treatment. CCP has said they hope to expand these types of prize-donations in the future, which makes me think they’re looking into possibilities for accomplishing that. Who would a better trial corporation for this type of promotion have been, and why would (for example) the Red Frog Vegas Tournament with special CCP prizes have been a bad thing as well if they had chosen to sponsor this event?

I guess I'm most confused as to whether people are against CCP providing prizes for organizations who choose to sponsor events (which only players outside of those organizations can win), or if it was the selection process itself that’s getting the backlash. Any player had opportunity to create a product players want to drop ISK on in large amounts, sponsor events, give away ISK, all while generating real money in the form of GTC purchases which lets CCP spend more time on improving the game and less time on marketing. There’s talk about SOMER Blink as if it isn’t Eve content, assuming it’s a scam, implying other in-game profit ventures are somehow superior or more true to Eve and that SOMER Blink does nothing to benefit the community. Every individual and organization in the game had the opportunity to sponsor this tournament to promote their own businesses and offer prizes for participants (without quid-pro-quo expectation). SOMER did this time, and in the future other corps may get the same opportunity. It's either easy to do or there's something special about these guys.
TheGunslinger42
All Web Investigations
#340 - 2013-09-27 10:35:42 UTC  |  Edited by: TheGunslinger42
Memnon Shepard wrote:
~ snipped for char count ~


Somer is known for disqualifying players based on their discretion - this often includes things like "theres already an account that uses this ip". That now means no one who shares a connection with another player (for example those in college dorms, or two house-mates who both play, or ... etc). can take part in this, as they are being excluded from the content at the discretion of another player group.

Why should one player group be granted this "prize"? I'm all for supporting third party events and what not, but it must be done fairly and in a way which does not directly benefit one group over another (how many other smaller, similar things are there to somer? They aren't being given exclusive content to use, CCP are not driving traffic to their sites or ingame business with direct statements of their legitimacy, etc)

The entire ordeal stinks.