These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

A review of player giveaways with CCP and third party sites

First post First post First post
Author
Luis Graca
#281 - 2013-09-27 01:13:10 UTC
Being the more reliability 3rd party and the creator of:
eve-files.com
eve-search.com
eve-live.com
eve-agents.com
eveboard.com.
eve-offline.net.
podbase.com.
veldspar.com
dustboard.com
dustsearch.com


Can someone help find what chribba will win?
James Amril-Kesh
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#282 - 2013-09-27 01:15:04 UTC
The ONLY appropriate way for CCP to handle this situation going forward is to take all of the prizes back away from Somer.

In fact, **** Somer, I'm not even going to play promos anymore even though I have thousands of promo tickets left.

Enjoying the rain today? ;)

Sirane Elrek
Garoun Investment Bank
Gallente Federation
#283 - 2013-09-27 01:16:20 UTC  |  Edited by: Sirane Elrek
Luis Graca wrote:
Can someone help find what chribba will win?

Chribba isn't encouraging players to buy GTCs to pay for their addiction so the answer is "he'll get **** all"
Vald Tegor
Empyrean Guard
Tactical Narcotics Team
#284 - 2013-09-27 01:24:08 UTC
CCP Navigator wrote:
Cursan Voran wrote:
Also, as someone who does not use somer blink, how do I get a chance at these giveaways?


You can register and play a free promo blink which happen often and get an entry.


And what about the people who have been banned by SOMER from their third party site? Particularly for offenses such as using auto refresh in an out of game browser on their third party site to catch promos. Something that is not even listed as illegal in the rules on the site. Or for using alt accounts to abuse the achievement system.

Relevant quote:
CCP Falcon wrote:
Due to complaints regarding overzealous player moderation on this channel, everyone from CCP who has been interacting here will be withdrawing from doing so. The same goes for "The Summit" and "Live Events" The reason for this is that we can't allow players to be locked out of interaction with us based on grudges that are held between players.


Yet it's ok to lock out players from distributions like this based on "player grudges" that don't even take place within New Eden, but on a third party site?
Poetic Stanziel
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#285 - 2013-09-27 01:48:11 UTC
Why is everybody celebrating? All CCP has done is rearrange the deck chairs on the Titanic.

The Guardian-Vexor was swtiched to an even rarer ship, of which only three copies will ever exist? Oh yeah, that's an improvement.

And the Gold Magnate is replaced with all-expense paid trips to Fanfest.

Is CCP going to let EOHPoker or EVE-Bet or Big Lottery or Goonswarm have similar prizes for their contests?
PrettyPollock
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#286 - 2013-09-27 01:57:02 UTC  |  Edited by: PrettyPollock
I also hate to be 'one of those people'. But if this event goes to fruition with a non-CCP entity holding and distributing prizes then you can kiss all of my accounts goodbye.

The only embarrassing part I feel that I have in this is sticking around after t20. Its like getting cheated on twice knowing full well that the first time the apology didn't 'seem' sincere.

gg ccp.
Lulu McMullin
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#287 - 2013-09-27 01:59:00 UTC
Poetic Stanziel wrote:


Is CCP going to let EOHPoker or EVE-Bet or Big Lottery or Goonswarm have similar prizes for their contests?


Why would they? CCP likes SOMER and knows they are 100% trustworthy and they don't like those other people because they aren't friends with CCP devs or 'yes men'.

Red Templar
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#288 - 2013-09-27 02:35:18 UTC
Lets gamble if these voiced concerns, about open favoritism, will be actually answered by CCP.

I bet 100mil it will be ignored in a manner of: "lets pretend its not there, and we did nothing wrong and hopefully it will go away".

[b]For Love. For Peace. For Honor.

For None of the Above.

For Pony![/b]

Archibald Thistlewaite III
The Royal Society for the Prevention of Miners
#289 - 2013-09-27 02:37:15 UTC
It goes against my deeply held religious beliefs to gamble, so I do not gamble. Why is CCP discriminating against certain religious groups?

(I'm not judging anyone who chooses to gamble and would like to not be judged by others on my beliefs)

User of 'Bumblefck's Luscious & Luminous Mustachio Wax'

Delen Ormand
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#290 - 2013-09-27 02:52:43 UTC
Ranger 1 wrote:
Innominate wrote:
Ranger 1 wrote:
Innominate wrote:
Ranger 1 wrote:
Other than CCP believes they are trustworthy, and since all of the items in question (ISK and ship prizes) ultimately only belong to CCP it's their opinion of honesty that matters.


CCP believes they have been trustworthy in the past. You'll notice there is nothing in the words to suggest any sort of agreement that somer needs to be fair, or needs to donate all of the proceeds to the tournament. Merely a suggestion that because they've been apparently fair in the past they might continue to be in the future.

From what we know, somer can do anything they want with the prizes and lottery proceeds that they want. This is EVE Online. We all know what happens next.

You're reaching friend. Smile


What do you think somer blink is?

Trackable... just like everything you do, and everything I do. Yes, they can try to do anything they like... that doesn't mean there would not be repercussions from the community (and far more importantly from CCP) that would make the attempt EXTREMELY unwise.

This is a drop in the bucket compared to what condemnation from CCP would do to their business model. They would have to be inconceivably stupid to play games in this matter.


Their operation isn't really trackable though, becaquse there's no way to track the relationship between characters.

I'm generally willing to give CCP the benefit of the doubt over most issues, and even here, I don't believe there's any deliberate attempt at favouritism. Having said that, I don't think the current giveaway project has been fully thought through.

As I see it, the big issue here is that an event like that not only has to be fair, but has to be seen to be fair because of past history like the T20 episode. Even if the whole event could be monitored by CCP, accounting for every ISK, it wouldn't be enough because, unless the records were made public, doubt would still exist.

I think it's great that CCP are trying to promote and encourage community projects, but I think they have to ensure that any promotion, particularly when involving in-game items or ISK, is run in a completely transparent way. I believe that this event is being run in good faith, but I can understand why other people may need a little more evidence.

It may be a good thing if CCP and the CSM can manage to put in place some kind of framework for ensuring transparency (perhaps along the lines of an extremely simplified version of the ISO9000 standards). An organization would need to comply with these standards/rules Or maybe that's going too far, I dunno :)
Lykouleon
Noble Sentiments
Second Empire.
#291 - 2013-09-27 03:14:34 UTC
CCP shouldn't be allowing third-party sites to give away expensive in-game items or collectors items. CCP should not be exclusively using one third-party site unless they off similar sites the same opportunity.

[/thread]

Lykouleon > CYNO ME CLOSER so I can hit them with my sword

Mara Rinn
Cosmic Goo Convertor
#292 - 2013-09-27 03:49:16 UTC
What about giving the players the means to produce their own limited edition ships? This could be as simple as a corporate colour scheme and logo which remains attached to assembled ships regardless of current owner, or as complex as allowing a PLEX-paid lottery-selected facility to have player designed ships incorporated into the game (in a similar vein to the Deviant Art project which lead to the Tornado and Oracle).

There is also the option of a Gold Magnate tribute, the Golden Magnate. This could use the same model as the Gold Magnate with a different skin (a slightly shinier/duller/yellower/redder gold, for example), and the description text could include something along the lines of, "created as a tribute to the original hand-crafted Gold Magnate, the Ardishapur Family Golden Magnate celebrates the pinnacle of Amarr starship crafting. With detail such as the filigree and polishing technique of the Gold Magnate maintained, while the remaining hull is mass produced using contemporary manufacturing techniques, the Golden Magnate is a fusion of the micron-level accuracy of automated fabrication and the ornamental beauty of Amarr gold smithing."

You know, plenty of purple prose to allow collectors and hoarders a little recognition, without devaluing the other unique ships based on the same model.

Then CCP could announce unique ship giveaways for fan sites based on criteria such as "greatest effort in ISK removal" or individuals for "greatest number of Buddy invites converted to six month active subscribers."
Jake Warbird
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#293 - 2013-09-27 03:51:59 UTC
This isn't fair because I don't have them.
Scipio Artelius
Weaponised Vegemite
Flying Dangerous
#294 - 2013-09-27 04:00:04 UTC  |  Edited by: Scipio Artelius
This thread has ballooned quickly since it's start and rightly so.

The original, flawed decision of CCP has not been corrected by the current about turn and the impression of impropriety remains.

Scamming in game is no problem, it's part of what makes Eve so great. But for CCP to explicitly help someone scam outside the game, to promote gambling, to exclude some legitimate subscribers to Eve because they can't use Blink, etc., etc. etc, all the things mentioned in this thread - that directly raises questions about the integrity of CCP as a company.
Tiffenay
Synchrodyne Holding
#295 - 2013-09-27 04:04:07 UTC
The change in prize doesn't change severity the crime.

You are favoring a particular player group over others.

Under no circumstances is this ever a good idea.

Didn't you guys learn that lesson already? Isn't that why the CSM was created in the first place?

So bad, so very bad.


Arcueid Saber
Legio XCIX CA
#296 - 2013-09-27 04:13:15 UTC  |  Edited by: Arcueid Saber
For example, lets use "I quit EVE, send me your ISK and I will return it with a double amount" scheme.

A blue CCP dev decides to log into Jita and posts a local notice " Hello citizens of EVE, this uncreative scammer #1 is a trusted character because I say so even though I have no way to check his previous transactions and only base this on hearsay. Trust me and good day".

Uncreative scammer # n+1 response " WTF".

That will breed mistrust and undermine CCP position as a neutral party in a player driven world known as EVE.
Tiffenay
Synchrodyne Holding
#297 - 2013-09-27 04:16:07 UTC
Andski wrote:
Ranger 1 wrote:
Or are we now to the point that we are going to say they don't provide a popular service for EVE players, and are not worthy of sponsorship to run a special event?


Of course they shouldn't get sponsorship. They're an in-game organization composed of a group of players who should not get any sort of special treatment from CCP.


The truly sad part is the complete obviousness of this favoritism, yet somehow, 10 years in, CCP still doesn't get it.

This is the only game in the history of the world that needs a player-voted group of reps to keep CCP from cheating at their own game.

And still they do this stuff....



Sid Hudgens
Doomheim
#298 - 2013-09-27 04:25:12 UTC  |  Edited by: Sid Hudgens
If CCP wants to compensate somer blink for helping promote eve vegas how is that anybody's business? Would it be ok if it were done with RL money? What if that were then converted to plex and then isk?

If the rest of you ***** had an organization that ccp thought could help promote their game you might get the same deal. But you're all just a bunch of hysterical nerds ... so no dice.

"....as if 10,058 Goon voices cried out and were suddenly silenced."

Sabriz Adoudel
Move along there is nothing here
#299 - 2013-09-27 04:32:14 UTC
Sid Hudgens wrote:
If CCP wants to compensate somer blink for helping promote eve vegas how is that anybody's business? Would it be ok if it were done with RL money? What if that were then converted to plex and then isk?

If the rest of you ***** had an organization that ccp thought could help promote their game you might get the same deal. But you're all just a bunch of hysterical nerds ... so no dice.


Because they do not provide priceless in-game compensation to other entities that promote EVE.

I would be fine with this if CCP also provided unique ships to entities like Goonswarm (who I believe promote the game among Something Awful forum members), TEST (who I believe do something similar on Reddit), the New Order (who also promote EVE quite a bit) and no doubt hundreds of lesser-known entities. They do not.

As it stands this giveaway smacks of the CCP employee fraud around giving BOB members tech 2 BPOs back in the days before I played.


I support the New Order and CODE. alliance. www.minerbumping.com

Dalto Bane
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#300 - 2013-09-27 04:34:15 UTC
Not to say that I support Somber, but I want to play the Devils Advocate for a moment since a majority of the post about this scandal are fairly one sided against CCP actions in all this. Somber Blink funded the New Eden Open, gave 10 billion isk to all the teams, funded the whole thing I think, right? It was during that time, if memory serves me correctly that CCP gave a statement about supporting more of these player driven events. I understand the anger that many of you are expressing. I'm with you on that, but at the end of the day it is their intellectual property. I would imagine that, let's say a scam were to happen and it be nothing short of the Italian Job, that whatever ships that were "won" would vanish from hangers, isk would appear from thin air, refunded in the wallets of the participants. Somber Blink is rich my brothers and sisters of New Eden. These ships are the rarest of the rare..... but they got 10 times that in the business they conduct and it would be baffling to think they would risk the payout and publicity they are getting to do anything too shady... but I also could be dead wrong.

Not to speak for CCP, but I think their thought process on it was that Somber had a lot of praise in past events from the community and they did not think it would not get the backlash it did, because letting a billionaire hold on to your credit card when you have fraud protection on it really doesn't seem like a big deal until you hear how the guy made his billions. Anyway, it is just a game, with internet spaceships, lottos, bots, trolls, elitist, pubbies, and last but not least evil Goons that deserve trillions of isk because, they have done a lot to keep this game interesting at any rate.

Drops Mic