These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
123Next page
 

Killing in Corp

Author
Joe Risalo
State War Academy
Caldari State
#1 - 2013-09-26 00:54:04 UTC
This should not be allowed.
You should fall under the same rules as anyone who kills.
Immediate destruction in high sec by CONCORD and loss of standing.

Just because I work for a corporation does not give me the right to go around killing its members.
The daily news around the world should be a sign of this.

I am not asking for a change to any specific mechanics of corp life, only that they have the same engagement rules as everyone else.

However, the one thing I do propose is that if you turn your security lock to red, then anyone in corp may attack you; however, this will red tag them as well, allowing them to be attacked by anyone in corp.
Also, it will display in corp chat somehow that your security flag is red.

This means that in-corp pvp is still possible with a simple click of the security setting.
Maximus Aerelius
PROPHET OF ENIGMA
#2 - 2013-09-26 00:58:17 UTC  |  Edited by: Maximus Aerelius
There's already a thread about this mate with the idea that "Duelling" be used instead.

Not a supporter of it TBH but then I have blown up my own ship "over testing" with a corp mate. Was a late night you might say ha ha.

EDIT: This was and is allowed as people in your Corp should be trusted (and vetted prior to joining) and is rather handy for testing fits without the need to log on to SiSi and export fits etc. I think it should stay but thats my opinion.
Arya Regnar
Darwins Right Hand
#3 - 2013-09-26 02:37:41 UTC
Maximus Aerelius wrote:
There's already a thread about this mate with the idea that "Duelling" be used instead.

Not a supporter of it TBH but then I have blown up my own ship "over testing" with a corp mate. Was a late night you might say ha ha.

EDIT: This was and is allowed as people in your Corp should be trusted (and vetted prior to joining) and is rather handy for testing fits without the need to log on to SiSi and export fits etc. I think it should stay but thats my opinion.

I'm gona go with Max on this one.
Trusting your corpmates is the most important thing in eve. Twisted

EvE-Mail me if you need anything.

Joe Risalo
State War Academy
Caldari State
#4 - 2013-09-26 02:56:55 UTC  |  Edited by: Joe Risalo
Arya Regnar wrote:
Maximus Aerelius wrote:
There's already a thread about this mate with the idea that "Duelling" be used instead.

Not a supporter of it TBH but then I have blown up my own ship "over testing" with a corp mate. Was a late night you might say ha ha.

EDIT: This was and is allowed as people in your Corp should be trusted (and vetted prior to joining) and is rather handy for testing fits without the need to log on to SiSi and export fits etc. I think it should stay but thats my opinion.

I'm gona go with Max on this one.
Trusting your corpmates is the most important thing in eve. Twisted


You trust your corp mates to help you in pvp, you trust corp mates not to steal corp goods and Isk , you trust your corp mates to not give intel to the enemy, you trust you corp mates not to offline POS modules, etc etc etc.

These are common issue you could face in the real world.
However, if an employee walks into your place of business and kills people, they are still subject to the rules of law.
This is no different.
A corp is a corporation, IE a business.
It is not a get out of jail free card for easy kills.

Also, the only people that would be against stopping corp killing are the very people that use it for free and easy kills.

If you want kills, do what everyone else does and earn them through suicide ganks and/or low, null, and WH combat.. Or even easier, just war dec them... If they're easy enough to kill in corp, then they should be easy enough to kill with a war dec.
Ben Houssa
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#5 - 2013-09-26 05:13:44 UTC  |  Edited by: Ben Houssa
Joe Risalo wrote:
However, if an employee walks into your place of business and kills people, they are still subject to the rules of law.
This is no different.
A corp is a corporation, IE a business.
It is not a get out of jail free card for easy kills.

Also, the only people that would be against stopping corp killing are the very people that use it for free and easy kills.

If you want kills, do what everyone else does and earn them through suicide ganks and/or low, null, and WH combat.. Or even easier, just war dec them... If they're easy enough to kill in corp, then they should be easy enough to kill with a war dec.


It's not intended for "easy killing" but for testing, friendly poking and punishment. The corp is responsible for own policing and many player owned corps do their own policing. If peps kill other without prior consent they get killed in return, finned, expelled from corp and other stuff like that. If members of your own corp give you grief and CEO and other directors don't do squat, that is a good definition for a bad corp so, I'd say, find another corp.
Tabris Katz
The Forgotten Children
#6 - 2013-09-26 06:22:05 UTC
Joe Risalo wrote:
Also, the only people that would be against stopping corp killing are the very people that use it for free and easy kills.



I completely disagree with that complete. My corp sets up several pvp tournaments that involving fighting to ship destroyed. Making pvp between corp members a concord offense would destroy this function of our corp. Or we would have to move the tournaments to low sec which would call unwanted attention.

Besides if you and your corp is having trouble with corp killers it sounds like you need to improve your background checks for new pilots. I suggest looking at their killboard, checking their employment history, contacting former ceo's, or requesting API codes from all new recruits. And if it's a new character then you'll just have to understand you're taking a risk (besides they probably won't have enough skill or isk to effective corp killers). All of these actions will help reduce this.

On another note, I just realized that corp killing show up neutral on corp kill boards since it should show up as a loss and a kill. Funny.Lol
Maximus Aerelius
PROPHET OF ENIGMA
#7 - 2013-09-26 07:07:45 UTC
Joe Risalo wrote:
Arya Regnar wrote:
Maximus Aerelius wrote:
There's already a thread about this mate with the idea that "Duelling" be used instead.

Not a supporter of it TBH but then I have blown up my own ship "over testing" with a corp mate. Was a late night you might say ha ha.

EDIT: This was and is allowed as people in your Corp should be trusted (and vetted prior to joining) and is rather handy for testing fits without the need to log on to SiSi and export fits etc. I think it should stay but thats my opinion.

I'm gona go with Max on this one.
Trusting your corpmates is the most important thing in eve. Twisted


You trust your corp mates to help you in pvp, you trust corp mates not to steal corp goods and Isk , you trust your corp mates to not give intel to the enemy, you trust you corp mates not to offline POS modules, etc etc etc.

These are common issue you could face in the real world.
However, if an employee walks into your place of business and kills people, they are still subject to the rules of law.
This is no different.
A corp is a corporation, IE a business.
It is not a get out of jail free card for easy kills.

Also, the only people that would be against stopping corp killing are the very people that use it for free and easy kills.

If you want kills, do what everyone else does and earn them through suicide ganks and/or low, null, and WH combat.. Or even easier, just war dec them... If they're easy enough to kill in corp, then they should be easy enough to kill with a war dec.


While I agree with all of the above this is the serious business of internet spaceships...RL doesn't mean squat and if someone commits a crime in RL you can't go and return him to the earth can you? I'm sorry but I'm all for keeping the "Corp on Corp" functionality and not because I want easy kills.
Mr Barbeque
Mayhem and Ruin
#8 - 2013-09-26 07:36:22 UTC
Lets make concord function like real world cops! When a crime is committed outside of a concord system someone has to report it to them. Then they fly with normal warp and jump speeds to the system of the crime to investigate, as if leaving the police station. Then they can speak to the complainant about the incident and investigate from there. You can file charges against the accused and he can have his fair day in court! Because concordokken spawning instantly to bap the offender with the **** stick is unrealistic!

Backpedaling your logic yet?
Samillian
Angry Mustellid
#9 - 2013-09-26 07:53:49 UTC  |  Edited by: Samillian
Not supported.

I "real world" test fits fairly often with the help of corp mates this would make that impossible as dueling does not work when stress testing say a BS tank against multiple opponents..

NBSI shall be the whole of the Law

Arya Regnar
Darwins Right Hand
#10 - 2013-09-26 11:14:52 UTC  |  Edited by: Arya Regnar
Joe Risalo wrote:


You trust your corp mates to help you in pvp, you trust corp mates not to steal corp goods and Isk , you trust your corp mates to not give intel to the enemy, you trust you corp mates not to offline POS modules, etc etc etc.

These are common issue you could face in the real world.
However, if an employee walks into your place of business and kills people, they are still subject to the rules of law.
This is no different.
A corp is a corporation, IE a business.
It is not a get out of jail free card for easy kills.

Also, the only people that would be against stopping corp killing are the very people that use it for free and easy kills.

If you want kills, do what everyone else does and earn them through suicide ganks and/or low, null, and WH combat.. Or even easier, just war dec them... If they're easy enough to kill in corp, then they should be easy enough to kill with a war dec.

Are you one of those people who want to apply real world morals and ethics to an online game?
It's you people who can't tell the difference between games and reality.
You are the one with twisted mentality not us griefers.

EvE-Mail me if you need anything.

Joe Risalo
State War Academy
Caldari State
#11 - 2013-09-26 14:02:27 UTC  |  Edited by: Joe Risalo
Look, I personally have not been awoxed, and It's been a long, long time since I was in a corp where someone got awoxed.

That said, I still don't support this as a mechanic of Eve.
I personally see it as taking advantage of the system in order to get kills with little to no risks.

Now, do I feel they should add a mechanic so that corps and/or corp members can flag themselves for in corp combat?
Absolutely.
Whether you leave this as a corp mechanic or an individual mechanic, I personally don't care;
But I can't support awoxing with a competent thought.

Edit...
One thing that would be cool is that if a corp is at war, then the corp and/or corp members are automatically flagged.
So, in this case awoxing could actually be used as a war tactic, and not mindless killing.
Orakkus
ImperiaI Federation
Goonswarm Federation
#12 - 2013-09-26 14:31:42 UTC
Joe Risalo wrote:
Look, I personally have not been awoxed, and It's been a long, long time since I was in a corp where someone got awoxed.

That said, I still don't support this as a mechanic of Eve.
I personally see it as taking advantage of the system in order to get kills with little to no risks.

Now, do I feel they should add a mechanic so that corps and/or corp members can flag themselves for in corp combat?
Absolutely.
Whether you leave this as a corp mechanic or an individual mechanic, I personally don't care;
But I can't support awoxing with a competent thought.

Edit...
One thing that would be cool is that if a corp is at war, then the corp and/or corp members are automatically flagged.
So, in this case awoxing could actually be used as a war tactic, and not mindless killing.


Nope, not supported. Already mentioned why in other thread based on the exact same issue, which is the response that continually proves to be the overwhelming reason why threads like this don't get traction.

Live in the sandbox and don't eat from the kitty litter of bad ideas.

He's not just famous, he's "IN" famous. - Ned Nederlander

Xionyxa
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#13 - 2013-09-26 14:46:07 UTC
Joe Risalo wrote:
This should not be allowed.
You should fall under the same rules as anyone who kills.
Immediate destruction in high sec by CONCORD and loss of standing.

Just because I work for a corporation does not give me the right to go around killing its members.
The daily news around the world should be a sign of this.

I am not asking for a change to any specific mechanics of corp life, only that they have the same engagement rules as everyone else.

However, the one thing I do propose is that if you turn your security lock to red, then anyone in corp may attack you; however, this will red tag them as well, allowing them to be attacked by anyone in corp.
Also, it will display in corp chat somehow that your security flag is red.

This means that in-corp pvp is still possible with a simple click of the security setting.


Not supported.

Corp killing works both ways, any properly organized corp should be able to put roles on a corp killer and get their own back. CONCORD is a terrible game mechanic as it is without expanding it.
TheGunslinger42
All Web Investigations
#14 - 2013-09-26 16:12:45 UTC
Pro-tip for OP:

CCP literally had an advert centered around the ability to infiltrate a corp and destroy it from the inside. These capabilities are a SELLING POINT for the game.

If you don't like them, you don't understand EVE.

If you don't know how to deal with them within the current mechanics, you don't understand EVE.

Joe Risalo
State War Academy
Caldari State
#15 - 2013-09-26 17:00:21 UTC
TheGunslinger42 wrote:
Pro-tip for OP:

CCP literally had an advert centered around the ability to infiltrate a corp and destroy it from the inside. These capabilities are a SELLING POINT for the game.

If you don't like them, you don't understand EVE.

If you don't know how to deal with them within the current mechanics, you don't understand EVE.


I understand this, however, I believe CCP was speaking more specifically on spying, stealing and other infiltration tactics.

Awoxing has never been applied as a successful tactic to shut down your opponent.
At best you kill a few ships, maybe some shinies.
But you can take down an opposing corp a lot more effectively with infiltration than simple awoxing.

This is not a tactic that it's an effective use.
Just ask anyone in a major alliance what they would do when they infiltrate another corp/alliance.

You can probably bet they wouldn't use an infiltrator for mindless awoxing
Domanique Altares
Rifterlings
#16 - 2013-09-26 19:42:36 UTC
Joe Risalo wrote:


You can probably bet they wouldn't use an infiltrator for mindless awoxing


Mindless awoxing? No. But If by awoxing I can keep them constantly docked up and utterly ineffective for fear of me killing them at random with no CONCORD threat, then I have won.
Rance Ikari
Perkone
Caldari State
#17 - 2013-09-26 22:19:43 UTC  |  Edited by: Rance Ikari
god forbid you play a game where you have to exercise good judgement and be responsible for your own welfare

petition ccp to kill off the amarr too while you're at it, slavery just isn't trendy in the workplace either!
Juan Olivier
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#18 - 2013-11-18 19:18:25 UTC
I support this. Like dueling allows people to fight in high sec a mechanism like team dueling could be implemented. They can form 2 fleets for example and then one fleet can challenge another fleet to a duel. Just like one pilot duels another pilot. This will allow any kind of ship testing to be done in high sec.
Unsuccessful At Everything
The Troll Bridge
#19 - 2013-11-18 19:24:43 UTC
No to PvP flag.




Since the cessation of their usefulness is imminent, may I appropriate your belongings?

Joe Risalo
State War Academy
Caldari State
#20 - 2013-11-18 19:58:08 UTC
it's not about the flagging for PvP.

It's more about how being allowed to free kill corp members doesn't make much sense.

I mean, you can't attack random people in high sec without issue, so why are you allowed to attack ppl just cause you're in the same corp?


There are many other ways to harass and/or bring down another corp.
All of which being significantly more effective than awoxing.


The strategy behind awoxing is to bring down an easy/squishy target as quickly as possible.


The targeted ships is rarely (if ever) a ship that is known to be strong in pvp.
The targeted ships are typically mission runners or miners.


You never see someone awoxing a ship that would be strong enough to counter.
You also rarely (if ever) see a known pvp corp getting awoxed.


My point is, awoxing is never used for any type of tactical advantage.
it is merely used in the same manner as suicide ganking, only without requiring several alpha ships, and with much less risks and no isk loss as long as you don't suck at it.


The other thing to consider is risks vs rewards.
Typically, the more risks you take, the higher the potential payout.

Ex. Ganking a freighter with catalysts as compared to Tornados.

With the Tornados, you're more likely to take the target down in time, however, with catalysts you have the potential for much greater payout, but require more people and have the potential to fail.


Now, an awoxer that knows what he's doing can solo a freighter by simply joining the right corp, which isn't hard to do...
If he joins a pve/mining focused corp, then no one will defend, if even be on to defend, and the odds are, even if they do defend, they will be too noob or inexperienced to defend...
So, he is essentially has the potential to make way more isk than any ganker, and will do so with little to no risks, and if done right, won't even lose a time to anything other than ammo....


How is this fair to anyone involved?

Everyone knows awoxing is generally a very one sided fight, unless you suck....
So, why support something that breaks everything we consider the game to be except for "Eve is harsh"?
123Next page