These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Assembly Hall

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Corporation Owned Dead Space

Author
BerSerKer 13
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#1 - 2013-07-21 12:02:02 UTC
Corporation Owned Dead Space

I was thinking this for high sec corps but it would work good in low sec too.

Idea
Corporation own dead space where they can put a tower make things like normal. but it has 2 or more acceleration gates one to get to the space where the tower is another one linking it to a mining site where there is fraction rats attacking the miners. Gives a reason to war a corp. Enables Corporation that are not in null to have a decent income and adds a totaly new way of fighting in eve.

1. Corporation has to buy leases form what ever station is in the space. The Corporation has to have of a standing of 5.00 of what ever Fraction there lease is form. (Exp) Caldari navy station in the system corporation buys a 30 day lease form the lp store to put up a station there

2. Only a limited amount of space accelerator gates in system. (Exp) it gives Corporation a reason to fight in war decs

3. Corporation war dec someone with a tower in the dead space and gain control over it if the Corporation fails to defend it or if lease is up it goes open.

4. Once war dec is finished the defending corp has 1 week immunity.

5. Only one dead space can be owned by a Corporation. (exp) to prevent one Corporation form owning them all

6.Dead space can have more than one acceleration gate leading to ice sites roids or rats. Sites can offer a limited amount of rare roids or ice.

7.High sec the acceleration gate will not let cap ships access. low sec its low sec.

8. If the lease expires the ded space has to be re probed and leased, also it is relocated.

9. the first acceleration gate is unlocked to every one, but can be fielded to allow no access but guns,e.x.t towers are only allowed in the second or more space accelerator gates.

10. if i have ideas

11. Any ideas?


Reason why I thought this was a good idea is that why i got into eve was I thought players could control there own acceleration gates but i never happened, now this gives a reason to join a corp in high sec and go to war.

This idea has been asked for time and time again but it has not been released
Omega Flames
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#2 - 2013-07-21 13:43:27 UTC
1. your reasons for doing this are completely invalid as highsec corps make plenty of isk from missions, incursions, and mining and the biggest reason to war a corp will always be to collect tears.

2. killing a highsec pos takes entirely too much effort for most corps to bother doing. If the corp is large enough to be able to field the numbers to takedown a defended pos then they are more than likely operating in nullsec and dont care about highsec.

3. there are extremely few corps that have a corp standing of 5.00 with a npc corp so extremely few would even be able to use this feature
Sera Kor-Azor
Amarrian Mission of the Sacred Word
#3 - 2013-09-23 08:35:56 UTC
Settling in a wormhole is kind of the same thing, isn't it?

"A manu dei e tet rimon" - I am the devoted hand of the divine God.

Samillian
Angry Mustellid
#4 - 2013-09-23 09:55:59 UTC
I don't see this as adding anything to the game to be totally honest. It would just take up resources better used almost anywhere else without any real gameplay benefit .

NBSI shall be the whole of the Law

Dracvlad
Taishi Combine
Astral Alliance
#5 - 2013-09-23 11:06:44 UTC  |  Edited by: Dracvlad
I actually like that idea, because it does create a conflict driver and gives people a slice of space which they would want to defend.

Of course the 0.0 splergelords will hate it and block it, they want you in their mega fleets pressing F1 under 10% TiDi and anything that devalues 0.0 by making HS more interesting is a big no no.

EDIT: I think Jint is correct, remove item 4.

When the going gets tough the Gankers get their CSM rep to change mechanics in their favour.

Blocked: Teckos Pech, Sonya Corvinus, baltec1, Shae Tadaruwa, Wander Prian, Daichi Yamato, Jonah Gravenstein, Merin Ryskin, Linus Gorp

Jint Hikaru
OffWorld Exploration Inc
#6 - 2013-09-23 12:07:38 UTC
I can see how you are excited by your idea, but how can you not see how number 4 will be horribly abused and exploited.

Jint Hikaru - Miner / Salvager / Explorer / SpaceBum In the beginning the Universe was created. This has made a lot of people very angry and been widely regarded as a bad move.

Maldiro Selkurk
Radiation Sickness
#7 - 2013-09-24 16:41:18 UTC
deadspace serves specific reasons in the game and your ideas all but smash those reasons to hell and back, dont expect CCP to do this because they wont.

Yawn,  I'm right as usual. The predictability kinda gets boring really.