These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Assembly Hall

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page123
 

[Proposal] high sec suicide sec hits

First post
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
#41 - 2013-08-12 14:59:36 UTC
Sylphy wrote:
How about they implement changes for Concord to pod people below a certain sec status.


How about CONCORD start charging realistic services for their fees? This subsidised state monopoly distorts the economy and stifles opportunity in the free market by denying hard working private enterprises the chance to compete for protection contracts!

END THIS SOCIALIST OPPRESSION!

"Just remember later that I warned against any change to jump ranges or fatigue. You earned whats coming."

Grath Telkin, 11.10.2016
Oliver Stoned
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#42 - 2013-08-12 22:51:07 UTC
Malcanis wrote:
Sylphy wrote:
How about they implement changes for Concord to pod people below a certain sec status.


How about CONCORD start charging realistic services for their fees? This subsidised state monopoly distorts the economy and stifles opportunity in the free market by denying hard working private enterprises the chance to compete for protection contracts!

END THIS SOCIALIST OPPRESSION!


ONLY if they can keep the real criminals out of empire!
How can they let a -10 standing player into a 1.0 system?
Mag's
Azn Empire
#43 - 2013-08-14 20:02:07 UTC
Oliver Stoned wrote:
Malcanis wrote:
Sylphy wrote:
How about they implement changes for Concord to pod people below a certain sec status.


How about CONCORD start charging realistic services for their fees? This subsidised state monopoly distorts the economy and stifles opportunity in the free market by denying hard working private enterprises the chance to compete for protection contracts!

END THIS SOCIALIST OPPRESSION!


ONLY if they can keep the real criminals out of empire!
How can they let a -10 standing player into a 1.0 system?
Why should Concord keep them out? They punish actions instantly, not retroactively.

How about if you have issues with pilots of such a low sec status being in 1.0 systems, you shoot them and make them leave?

Destination SkillQueue:- It's like assuming the Lions will ignore you in the Savannah, if you're small, fat and look helpless.
Oliver Stoned
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#44 - 2013-08-14 23:30:09 UTC
Mag's wrote:
Oliver Stoned wrote:
Malcanis wrote:
Sylphy wrote:
How about they implement changes for Concord to pod people below a certain sec status.


How about CONCORD start charging realistic services for their fees? This subsidised state monopoly distorts the economy and stifles opportunity in the free market by denying hard working private enterprises the chance to compete for protection contracts!

END THIS SOCIALIST OPPRESSION!


ONLY if they can keep the real criminals out of empire!
How can they let a -10 standing player into a 1.0 system?
Why should Concord keep them out? They punish actions instantly, not retroactively.

How about if you have issues with pilots of such a low sec status being in 1.0 systems, you shoot them and make them leave?


I'm not setting on a gate waiting for a -10 to come thru the gate.
That's what I pay fees and taxes for.
How about Concord podding them in 1.0 Empire?

CCP should add TSA agents to docking stations. Too low and they say no to docking.
Or even better, charge/fine you money to dock.
Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
#45 - 2013-08-15 12:20:04 UTC
Oliver Stoned wrote:

CCP should add TSA agents to docking stations. Too low and they say no to docking.
Or even better, charge/fine you money to dock.


Another BIG GOVERNMENT PORK BARREL solution!

Why not trust FREEDOM to deal with TERRORISTS?

"Just remember later that I warned against any change to jump ranges or fatigue. You earned whats coming."

Grath Telkin, 11.10.2016
Oliver Stoned
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#46 - 2013-08-17 15:03:13 UTC
Malcanis wrote:
Oliver Stoned wrote:

CCP should add TSA agents to docking stations. Too low and they say no to docking.
Or even better, charge/fine you money to dock.


Another BIG GOVERNMENT PORK BARREL solution!

Why not trust FREEDOM to deal with TERRORISTS?


You acknowledge government!
TSA is a reference to something that all people who fly are familiar with.
For EVE Online it would be the CDA = Concord Docking Authority.

FREEDOM isn't free.

Are you saying that negative standing people are TERRORISTS now?

I like that...
Be aware that the Concord Security Agency is listening/reading/recording everything you communicate and tracking you.
Mag's
Azn Empire
#47 - 2013-08-17 15:20:12 UTC
Oliver Stoned wrote:
Mag's wrote:
Oliver Stoned wrote:
Malcanis wrote:
Sylphy wrote:
How about they implement changes for Concord to pod people below a certain sec status.


How about CONCORD start charging realistic services for their fees? This subsidised state monopoly distorts the economy and stifles opportunity in the free market by denying hard working private enterprises the chance to compete for protection contracts!

END THIS SOCIALIST OPPRESSION!


ONLY if they can keep the real criminals out of empire!
How can they let a -10 standing player into a 1.0 system?
Why should Concord keep them out? They punish actions instantly, not retroactively.

How about if you have issues with pilots of such a low sec status being in 1.0 systems, you shoot them and make them leave?


I'm not setting on a gate waiting for a -10 to come thru the gate.
That's what I pay fees and taxes for.
How about Concord podding them in 1.0 Empire?

CCP should add TSA agents to docking stations. Too low and they say no to docking.
Or even better, charge/fine you money to dock.
Why do you need to sit on a gate? Just shoot them when you see them. You seem so bothered by the fact they are there, you must surely be seeing them quite a bit.

You pay fees and taxes for Concord to exist in high sec, not for them to do the jobs you cannot be bothered to do. Or to retroactively add extra penalties.

Also, why should concord pod them? Their pod is no threat to concord and they have already paid whatever penalty was due.
So you have choices. Don't like them there? Then shoot and pod them. Can't be bothered to do that? Then stop complaining.

Destination SkillQueue:- It's like assuming the Lions will ignore you in the Savannah, if you're small, fat and look helpless.
TheGunslinger42
All Web Investigations
#48 - 2013-08-20 14:17:52 UTC
we should just remove concord and hand the work over to player driven police force corporations.
Elysia Hunter
War Tid3
#49 - 2013-09-18 06:34:52 UTC  |  Edited by: Elysia Hunter
911 Operator : Hello 911 how can I assist you?

Freighter Captain : I just got ganked, by 35 Minmatars flying Catalyst!!!

911 Operator : Can you Describe the Minmatar in question ma'am?

Freighter Captain : It all just happened so fast.

Nah Im not feelin it. Bounties and Kill rights have a purpose, want revenge, there you go.

But:

Concord could act not on individual response but a fleet level response. Your in a fleet, one of your boys gets trigger happy doing ganks, the whole group goes down. Someones gonna say that's not fair.

I say that's a choice you hang with criminals doing criminal ****.. you get flagged as a criminal and concord reacts like you're one of them, when they do criminal acts. In a fleet late for the big 1-2-3 fire Concord reads your fleets criminal status and pop!

Or just let the whole fleet get criminal status when any one of them does and let the players do the work.

They all share consequences, Your FC's better have their **** together.

Want more PVP, that'll generate some criminal flags for you, count on it.
Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
#50 - 2013-09-18 16:17:06 UTC
Join incursion fleet. Commit concordokken. Have accomplices scoop loots.

"Just remember later that I warned against any change to jump ranges or fatigue. You earned whats coming."

Grath Telkin, 11.10.2016
Andracin
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#51 - 2013-09-19 02:00:02 UTC
Sylphy wrote:
How about they implement changes for Concord to pod people below a certain sec status.


I support this entirely provided that NPC criminals get to pod people above a certain sec status....Twisted
Crimson Gauntlet
Six Gun Sound
#52 - 2013-09-19 02:46:09 UTC
I liked Malcanis' suggestion that CONCORD start to charge for their services.

We could have them levy a fee of 80% the value of the ship they destroyed divided amongst anyone aggressed by that ship.

(please note, I am aware of the obvious implications of this, it's just satire, designed to showcase the absurdity of people making "proposals" that are fact direct and brutally obvious buffs to their own playstyle)
Number of times my posts have come in after the dev/mod locked the thread:  1
Previous page123