EVE General Discussion

Modules give you an advantage in a task, it is up to you to weigh whether the risk of that advantage is worth the reward of increased performance. When you over bling a ship to the point where it gives no meaningful advantage in such task such as over stacking or over active tanking then you create risk without reward. To put it another way having an over swollen **** is useless if you can't **** her with it.

These modules are meant to be used, if you have over expensive bling you don't need, leave it in the hanger. Take screen caps to show it off safely, you can peacock it all you want in space, just don't be surprised when a hunter shoots and stuffs your bird.

It doesn't quite work like that though, considering I can "make" $20 by going into hi-sec with some alts and AFK mining while I do house chores for the day.

The only reason why that Raven cost 60 bil was because of what players will pay for those modules.

We are the players.

So we are the ones responsible for that Raven costing that much.


It's dumb all around.


Now the question I think of is, were there so much intended botting and nullsec ratting in carriers expected that such a ship would be possible?

So that a ship, the hull costing less than 1 billion, can be equipped to the level of costing 60 billion, is an indication that nullsec may be in need of a loot nerf.

Strangely enough, too much ISK in the game creates the potential for these modules to cost so much, but these modules create the incentive to have so much ISK in the first place.

Thus I would also suspect that being able to NOT engage the Sansha Mothership in highsec incursions and just grind away should also be addressed.

Herzog - absolutely agree - we the players made that ship what it was and now we are circle-jerking it's demise. This was one of the reasons I wrote the post that included this mittani redirect under the heading What are your Eve goals - and I still subscribe to the fact that it is overkill, but what do you spend your in-game money on?

the only safe place is nullsec, invunerable stations and stuff... pewww, its more risk shooting an asteroid in highsec

A lot of jelly and butthurt in this thread. He bought the ship to use it and unlike 99% here can afford to do so.

Wat™

I'm not sure if you're serious, or if you're even playing the same game as the rest of us.

Isn't it great?

Also, he indicates that 'we the players' influence that market. Personally, I've never done any trade in those sorts of bling modules, so I've never had any influence whatsoever on their prices.

Sigh, I mean at least when Boat lost a titan it was exciting, you know...

And? Doesn't make My Navy Scorp less efficient then That 44 billion ISK sh*t fit[, which was the only thing I was comparing, not the hulls themselves.