These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Q&A with Dr. 0000

Author
Dr0000 Maulerant
Union Nanide and Tooling
#1 - 2013-09-12 07:11:28 UTC
"Why does _______ happen in EVE? It's so unrealistic"

I happened upon a thread with a number of questions about the eve universe put forward as though they had no answer. The answers to me seemed fairly obvious within the constraints of the science of New edenites. I'm not overly familiar with lore yet, so feel free to point out where EVE canon goes against one of my theories.

So enjoy this unsolicited and hopefully not too unwarranted wall of sci-fi engineer speak.


Quote:
Why do we not fall towards planets, considering we have zero relative velocity and are incapable of achieving the speeds necessary to orbit them?]


The same warp core voodoo that gives us drag against space-time (hence, top speeds) would also anchor you with no relative velocity to the gravity well you are in.

Quote:
Why is a Titan the size of a medium sized city and yet it can't fit an extra Google super duper cpu server on it?


It can, but you face the law of diminishing returns as size increases and you need ever more computing power to manage capital systems, and then computing power to manage said computing power.

Quote:
Why do guns have fall-off in space?


Space is not empty, lasers ionize the hydrogen and heliospheric dust as they pass by. Nor can they remain perfectly coherent and will spread out over 100km or so.

Hybrid/projectile rounds lose magnetic containment and are damaged by the same matter that diffuses laser energy. From a physics standpoint when you pump that much energy into a solid object it can be considered a loosely held together ball of atoms, and given time/distance they will spread out.

Tell me again about how every playstyle you dont engage in "doesn't require any effort" and everyone who does it needs to die in a fire. Be sure to mention about how you tried it once but it was too easy/boring/ethnic-homophobic slur. 

Dr0000 Maulerant
Union Nanide and Tooling
#2 - 2013-09-12 07:11:41 UTC
Quote:
Why do missiles explode mid flight in space?


They run out of energy for propulsion, guidance, and warp upkeep.

Quote:
Why you can warp to a wreak but not a ship that is not in your fleet?


Let me begin to explain why you don't want to use LIDAR, RADAR, gravity or magnetic sensors to approach a moving object at FTL speed. Fortunately when you fleet someone you open FTL comms.

Quote:
Why can you warp to 0 to the core of the sun and be bumped away at the speed of light?


The best explanation for bumping would be an ultra high energy superconducting magnet at the core of each ship, maybe the warp core itself. The magnetic field is then used to softly bounce away from objects that could threaten structural integrity.

Or if you happen to be an adventurous soul warping into a stellar core... lets just say there are few places you will find a stronger magnetic field.


Any other questions? I have some interesting theories about how the mechanics behind NOS modules could work. Feel free to point out better ideas, or reasons I may just be wrong.

Tell me again about how every playstyle you dont engage in "doesn't require any effort" and everyone who does it needs to die in a fire. Be sure to mention about how you tried it once but it was too easy/boring/ethnic-homophobic slur. 

Tul Breetai
Impromptu Asset Requisition
#3 - 2013-09-12 07:25:12 UTC  |  Edited by: Tul Breetai
Dr0000 Maulerant wrote:
Quote:
Why do we not fall towards planets, considering we have zero relative velocity and are incapable of achieving the speeds necessary to orbit them?]


The same warp core voodoo that gives us drag against space-time (hence, top speeds) would also anchor you with no relative velocity to the gravity well you are in.



The warp bubble is created using matter that has negative mass and consequently interacts with positive mass as can be expected. It's likely impossible for our ships to get too close to a planet while the core is active, which as you know, cannot be safely shutdown.

EDIT: And a question for you: Why can't POSes be configured to swap T3 subs?

There's nothing worse than an EVE player, generally considered to be top of the food chain in the MMO world, that cannot smacktalk with wit and coherency.

Dr0000 Maulerant
Union Nanide and Tooling
#4 - 2013-09-12 16:42:34 UTC
Tul Breetai wrote:


EDIT: And a question for you: Why can't POSes be configured to swap T3 subs?


Stations and ship maintenance arrays differ vastly in capacity, I wanted to say it would take massive quantities of space to juggle sections of a cruiser but this isn't how hybrid technology works. You'll note that inactive subsystems are incredibly dense, more so than parts of the core of the sun. Doesn't make sense right?

Actually... they must use the same "planck generator" storage technique used in station containers, which you will note can also only be used in stations. These generators have requirements only stations and outposts are designed to handle (they use the same tech for your item hangar).

Some day someone may invent a "planck generator storage array" or adapt the technology explicitly for the t3/POS problem and create a "strategic reconfiguration array". Lets hope that day comes soon.

Tell me again about how every playstyle you dont engage in "doesn't require any effort" and everyone who does it needs to die in a fire. Be sure to mention about how you tried it once but it was too easy/boring/ethnic-homophobic slur. 

ElQuirko
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#5 - 2013-09-12 16:53:24 UTC
Why does pepsi > coke? Checkmate atheists.

Dodixie > Hek

RomeStar
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#6 - 2013-09-12 17:36:42 UTC
Why dont the planets revolve around the sun?

Signatured removed, CCP Phantom

Dr0000 Maulerant
Union Nanide and Tooling
#7 - 2013-09-12 18:22:07 UTC
Quote:
Why dont the planets revolve around the sun?


Because CCP doesn't want to be excommunicated.

Quote:
Why does pepsi > coke?


Because no one who works at coca cola cares about the drink itself. The company was grandfathered in by the DEA and is still permitted to import coca plant products, its true source of income.

Almost immediately after Reagan endorsed massive federal penalties and jailtime for drug offenses, the company began using the slogan "Coke is it!"

Also, pepsi is the nectar of the gods.

Tell me again about how every playstyle you dont engage in "doesn't require any effort" and everyone who does it needs to die in a fire. Be sure to mention about how you tried it once but it was too easy/boring/ethnic-homophobic slur. 

Eiji Kusoni
Doomheim
#8 - 2013-09-12 19:15:24 UTC  |  Edited by: Eiji Kusoni
Dr0000 Maulerant wrote:
Quote:
Why dont the planets revolve around the sun?


Because CCP doesn't want to be excommunicated.

Quote:
Why does pepsi > coke?


Because no one who works at coca cola cares about the drink itself. The company was grandfathered in by the DEA and is still permitted to import coca plant products, its true source of income.

Almost immediately after Reagan endorsed massive federal penalties and jailtime for drug offenses, the company began using the slogan "Coke is it!"

Also, pepsi is the nectar of the gods.
I like Coke better, you can mix flavored syrups with it and it will have just the right level of sweetness because unlike Pepsi it isn't overly sweet to begin with.

But in the end I suppose its all just flavored corn syrup and I'm tired of importing real Coke from Mexico.
BoBoZoBo
MGroup9
#9 - 2013-09-12 19:23:29 UTC
Dr0000 Maulerant wrote:
Quote:
Why dont the planets revolve around the sun?

Because CCP doesn't want to be excommunicated.


HAAAA - Almost spit out my water.

Primary Test Subject • SmackTalker Elite

ElQuirko
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#10 - 2013-09-12 19:26:19 UTC
Eiji Kusoni wrote:
Dr0000 Maulerant wrote:
Quote:
Why dont the planets revolve around the sun?


Because CCP doesn't want to be excommunicated.

Quote:
Why does pepsi > coke?


Because no one who works at coca cola cares about the drink itself. The company was grandfathered in by the DEA and is still permitted to import coca plant products, its true source of income.

Almost immediately after Reagan endorsed massive federal penalties and jailtime for drug offenses, the company began using the slogan "Coke is it!"

Also, pepsi is the nectar of the gods.
I like Coke better, you can mix flavored syrups with it and it will have just the right level of sweetness because unlike Pepsi it isn't overly sweet to begin with.

But in the end I suppose its all just flavored corn syrup and I'm tired of importing real Coke from Mexico.


Wow, I sparked something I never intended.

Dodixie > Hek

Steve Spooner
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#11 - 2013-09-12 20:05:32 UTC
Why are there no overtly complex and convoluted formulas relating to physics, engineering, chemistry, and throw in some anti matter formulas for good measure?

Also why can we harness antimatter but we can't fire a doomsday more than once every ten minutes.
Unsuccessful At Everything
The Troll Bridge
#12 - 2013-09-12 20:26:31 UTC
Q: Why are we debating real life physics when we are talking about a fluid universe space submarine game?


A: Because GD.

Since the cessation of their usefulness is imminent, may I appropriate your belongings?

Lors Dornick
Kallisti Industries
#13 - 2013-09-13 00:51:33 UTC
Dr0000 Maulerant wrote:
"Why does _______ happen in EVE? It's so unrealistic"

Because it's a game not a simulation.

CCP Greyscale: As to starbases, we agree it's pretty terrible, but we don't want to delay the entire release just for this one factor.

Solstice Project's Alt
Doomheim
#14 - 2013-09-13 02:08:39 UTC
WWWWWWWWhhhhhhhhhhhhyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy ..........

... did the charon cross the road ?

Buy Solstice Project for PLEX4GOOD ! https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&find=unread&t=301266 (this alt-character will get deleted once the sale is done, on 6th of december)

Dr0000 Maulerant
Union Nanide and Tooling
#15 - 2013-09-13 02:16:35 UTC
Steve Spooner wrote:
Why are there no overtly complex and convoluted formulas relating to physics, engineering, chemistry, and throw in some anti matter formulas for good measure?


Because a non-student mathematica subscription is vastly more expensive than an EVE subscription.

Steve Spooner wrote:
Also why can we harness antimatter but we can't fire a doomsday more than once every ten minutes.



This is a tricky one, I used some very rough math to get the mass of one unit of armor HP and work backwards from the damage of an aurora ominae by figuring the energy required to vaporize one kilogram of steel.

The power of an aurora ominae comes in around 2.8 to 5PJ (petajoules). If you're not familiar with a petajoule, you might be familiar with the tsar bomba, which just so happens to be a petajoule worth of boom.

That ~5PJ of energy would require about 25 grams of antimatter, that at our current capacity would take 200 billion years or so to produce.

I would say the ten minutes is preferable.

Tell me again about how every playstyle you dont engage in "doesn't require any effort" and everyone who does it needs to die in a fire. Be sure to mention about how you tried it once but it was too easy/boring/ethnic-homophobic slur. 

Dr0000 Maulerant
Union Nanide and Tooling
#16 - 2013-09-13 02:18:30 UTC
Solstice Project's Alt wrote:
WWWWWWWWhhhhhhhhhhhhyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy ..........

... did the charon cross the road ?


Because it doesn't have a jump drive. Hurrrrr

Tell me again about how every playstyle you dont engage in "doesn't require any effort" and everyone who does it needs to die in a fire. Be sure to mention about how you tried it once but it was too easy/boring/ethnic-homophobic slur.