These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Skill Discussions

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

[eb] - eveboard.com

Author
RaTTuS
BIG
#221 - 2013-09-04 10:21:21 UTC
http://i.imgur.com/FHqaU5Z.png for a brief moment I have #1

http://eveboard.com/ub/419190933-134.png http://i.imgur.com/kYLoKrM.png

Chribba
Otherworld Enterprises
Otherworld Empire
#222 - 2013-09-04 11:53:49 UTC
Yep I'm fully aware of the changes. I aim to have it fixed by Friday when I'm back from the US.

/c

★★★ Secure 3rd party service ★★★

Visit my in-game channel 'Holy Veldspar'

Twitter @ChribbaVeldspar

Mashie Saldana
V0LTA
WE FORM V0LTA
#223 - 2013-09-05 15:04:55 UTC
Chribba wrote:
Yep I'm fully aware of the changes. I aim to have it fixed by Friday when I'm back from the US.

/c

Did you come back a day early as it seems to have been changed now (at least some of it).
Chribba
Otherworld Enterprises
Otherworld Empire
#224 - 2013-09-05 15:28:16 UTC
Mashie Saldana wrote:
Chribba wrote:
Yep I'm fully aware of the changes. I aim to have it fixed by Friday when I'm back from the US.

/c

Did you come back a day early as it seems to have been changed now (at least some of it).

Nope I'm back on scheduled time, just gave myself a bit extra since I wasn't sure what I need to do fully. I've updated the db, but I will need to rewrite groups fully as they are not dynamic (ranking of groups) as well as sort out the missing icons - so this may not be ready by tomorrow depending on how much recoding is needed to be done.

/c

★★★ Secure 3rd party service ★★★

Visit my in-game channel 'Holy Veldspar'

Twitter @ChribbaVeldspar

Mashie Saldana
V0LTA
WE FORM V0LTA
#225 - 2013-09-11 12:02:46 UTC
I guess you still are working on this as the skill groups on the ranking pages are broken now.
Amateratsu
The Pegasus Project
#226 - 2013-09-11 20:29:08 UTC
Mashie Saldana wrote:
I guess you still are working on this as the skill groups on the ranking pages are broken now.


Only part that's updated for me is my skillsheet, everything else is broken.

Global Ranking main page and ranks page are still showing old groups, icons still missing, engineering, planet management and subsystem ranks are dead.

Hopefully Chribba is working on it.
Chribba
Otherworld Enterprises
Otherworld Empire
#227 - 2013-09-11 20:48:03 UTC  |  Edited by: Chribba
Yeah I'm running behind schedule with a bit too much other things going on at the moment, I apologize for the delay. I only had time to do the quick updates yet, ranks and everything (now that CCP changes groups) require a full recode of backend stuff including scripts and queries that calculate things. That's what takes time sadly.

But you are def not forgotten.

update/ranks should now be proper (minus icons). Statistics/graphs might not be touched right away (since I am planning of throwing out the flash stuff I might as well do proper stuff on that with that change).

Should also now be a lil bit more future proof for changes compared to before. Note however if you had direct-links to certain categories, they might have changed.

/c

★★★ Secure 3rd party service ★★★

Visit my in-game channel 'Holy Veldspar'

Twitter @ChribbaVeldspar

Juwi Kotch
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#228 - 2013-09-19 12:18:15 UTC
When eveboard was born, I can remember that one of the goals was to allow younger members of the game to get recognized in a ranking system reflecting their relative achievements despite their comparetivly shorter time in game and thus less skillpoints.

This goal was never achieved afaik, the older the pilot and the more skillpoints he has, the higher he will be ranked.

However, when I recently looked at my rankings again, I found out that "Date of Birth" is ranked now as well. This, I believe, opens up the option to achieve the orginal goal of a "fair" ranking system: Include the rank of the pilots age into the equation. My proposal is to simply devide the overall ranking value (Towaoc's would be right now 895) by the rank of the age (Towaocs would be right now 78), giving him a new overall ranking value of 11.48.

This would reflect the overall skill based achievements of a pilot with regard to his age in game. A younger pilot could than be placed in the ranking hihger then a much older one, despite of having far less skills and skillpoints than that older pilot.

"Our lives are not our own. We are bound to others, past and present. And by each crime, and every kindness, we birth our future." Sonmi-451

Viggen
#229 - 2013-09-19 16:38:07 UTC
So would your new ranking system still mean the lower the score, the higher ranked that person would be?

Towaoc’s new score would be 11.48 as you say.

My new score (currently ranked number 2 behind Towaoc) would be 0.74

Finally just checked out a character that was just over 1 year old but only had 55,074 skillpoints and he came out with a score of 1.05

I’m not seeing how this new system would work, placing a year old character with 1 day worth of skillpoints between myself and Towaoc.
Juwi Kotch
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#230 - 2013-09-19 18:49:55 UTC
Yes, the lower the score, the higher the rank.

Right now, the ranking simply rewards old pilots for being old and having had lots of time to amass skill points.

Originally, Eveboard was created to reward successfull pilots. in particular not just to reward high skill points like a different previous system of pilot ranking did (correct me Chribba, when I'm wrong). This goal was missed, obviously. With my proposal, this goal could finally be achieved, I believe.

Eveboard would then rank pilots according to their skill based efficiency relative to their age.

The outcome could be in fact that pilots ranked on the top right now would be reduced to mediocracy, while pilots ranked somewhere in the middle of the list right now will come up to the Top 1000. Eveboard would no longer reward just being old, but having a sound skill strategy across the board.

I can understand that most of the present Top 1000 pilots won't like this, especially some of the Top 100 pilots, which may find themselves again at a five digit place. On the other hand, tens of thousands of pilots would find a good skill strategy rewarded here, which are now listed in the middle of the list.

The best would be that Chribba would just run a calculation with this amended algorithm and shows us what happens.

"Our lives are not our own. We are bound to others, past and present. And by each crime, and every kindness, we birth our future." Sonmi-451

Chribba
Otherworld Enterprises
Otherworld Empire
#231 - 2013-09-19 20:22:34 UTC
Help me create such an algorithm and I'd be happy to make the changes needed. atm I'm not entirely sure myself what the best way to achieve this is.

★★★ Secure 3rd party service ★★★

Visit my in-game channel 'Holy Veldspar'

Twitter @ChribbaVeldspar

Amateratsu
The Pegasus Project
#232 - 2013-09-19 21:18:36 UTC  |  Edited by: Amateratsu
Juwi Kotch wrote:
Stuff


I'm all for making EB more diverse and giving everybody a chance to climb the rankings, but what your suggesting so far will just penalise one group in favour of another.

Using a players age in the calculation is a bad idea as its a variable that the player has no control over and cannot manipulate.
So as these younger players get older and amass more sp they will start to decline down the ranks in favour of newer players.

The current system favours players who don't specialise but rather train skills in every ranked category, but at the same time does allow everybody to climb the ranks based on their own choice of skill training.

1 Solution might be to have several different Global ranks each targeted at different groups of players for example...

A rank for veteran players (the current Global Rank)
Ranks for players who specialise in different professions like PVP, Industry, Mining, Trade, ect
A Rank for younger players with less SP.

I don't think you can create a single ranking system that caters to all types of players equally, EVE is too big a sandbox with too much diversity to be covered by a single ranking system.
RavenPaine
RaVeN Alliance
#233 - 2013-09-19 22:59:44 UTC
For quite awhile now, I have had two characters that I check rankings on.

http://eveboard.com/pilot/RavenPaine

http://eveboard.com/pilot/RaVeN_Revenge

Even though Paine is a year older, Revenge has better over all ranking.
So I don't think that age is the 'end all' requirement.

And though I would like to see Paine move up the rankings, I have never thought he should bypass any veteran player who has
More SP
More level V's

Those 2 criteria are the most important to ranking, imo.

On a side note: The new skills categories seriously ruined some of my 'perfect' categories
Juwi Kotch
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#234 - 2013-09-20 08:01:17 UTC  |  Edited by: Juwi Kotch
Chribba wrote:
Help me create such an algorithm and I'd be happy to make the changes needed. atm I'm not entirely sure myself what the best way to achieve this is.

That's easy (I think, since I don't know how elaborate your algorithm is): Just add to your present algorithm "divided by rank of category "Date of Birth" at the end.

"Our lives are not our own. We are bound to others, past and present. And by each crime, and every kindness, we birth our future." Sonmi-451

Juwi Kotch
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#235 - 2013-09-20 08:15:23 UTC  |  Edited by: Juwi Kotch
Amateratsu wrote:
Juwi Kotch wrote:
Stuff


I'm all for making EB more diverse and giving everybody a chance to climb the rankings, but what your suggesting so far will just penalise one group in favour of another.

Using a players age in the calculation is a bad idea as its a variable that the player has no control over and cannot manipulate.
So as these younger players get older and amass more sp they will start to decline down the ranks in favour of newer players.

The current system favours players who don't specialise but rather train skills in every ranked category, but at the same time does allow everybody to climb the ranks based on their own choice of skill training.

1 Solution might be to have several different Global ranks each targeted at different groups of players for example...

A rank for veteran players (the current Global Rank)
Ranks for players who specialise in different professions like PVP, Industry, Mining, Trade, ect
A Rank for younger players with less SP.

I don't think you can create a single ranking system that caters to all types of players equally, EVE is too big a sandbox with too much diversity to be covered by a single ranking system.

That's correct on many accounts, and probably a matter of taste what you want to achieve or recognize with such a ranking.

Right now. to get to the top, you need to have an old pilot (what you can't influence as well) and simply skill as evenly across the board as possible. Doing that and having more then 150 mil SP (what equals at least 7 or 8 years of playtime) and you will be in the Top 100. No effort here. Look at your pilots age and the number of skills, and you can guess quite exactly at what quart of the list he will be found.

So the Date of Birth is actually already factored in, but not taken into a relativizing account.

Right now, a pilot created past 2006 or so never has the chance to reach the Top 1000 of the list, unless all of the old pilots just stop playing. With my proposal, a fresh pilot will not start in the Top 1000 of Eveboard (at least I don't think so), but if he is willing to play this Metagame, he can come up to that place in a couple of years of playtime. You still need to skill as evenly across all skills as possible, but you don't need to be an old pilot as well to get high rank on Eveboard.

Having said this, I like your idea of different global rankings. However, I have no idea how that could be calculated, and what the strain on the server would be to calculate three or more rankings over 100,000 pilots or more.

"Our lives are not our own. We are bound to others, past and present. And by each crime, and every kindness, we birth our future." Sonmi-451

Chribba
Otherworld Enterprises
Otherworld Empire
#236 - 2013-09-20 09:40:53 UTC
Juwi Kotch wrote:
Chribba wrote:
Help me create such an algorithm and I'd be happy to make the changes needed. atm I'm not entirely sure myself what the best way to achieve this is.

That's easy (I think, since I don't know how elaborate your algorithm is): Just add to your present algorithm "divided by rank of category "Date of Birth" at the end.

x/2006-10-01 or DoB=days old...? I could possibly run some tests off that but I don't think it's just that simple but we will see what kind of values gets thrown out. As for example that could be abused by a pilot training for a certain category and only that, then adding a ton in queue maybe, and get super high score (or low which is better) while the pilot really played the system rather than being specced "overall good" or similar.

/c

★★★ Secure 3rd party service ★★★

Visit my in-game channel 'Holy Veldspar'

Twitter @ChribbaVeldspar

Juwi Kotch
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#237 - 2013-09-20 10:35:17 UTC  |  Edited by: Juwi Kotch
It would be x / y = z

where x is the present final global rank value of the present algorithm (for me it would be 4,165.20)
and y is the rank of the category "Date of Birth" (for me it would be 4,815)
and z would be the value for the new ranking, where the lowest value would be the highest rank

So for me it would be

4,165.20 / 4,815 = 0,865

what would result in whatever rank on Eveboard.

For the algorithm you actually would only need to add "divided by y (as defined above)" to what you have now, unless your algorithm leading to x includes stuff which I don't know and would create inconsistencies or iterations here.

How having skills in queue would affect that, I can't see. Is "skill queue" included in your algorithm somehow? A pilot having specialized in just a few particular skillgroups would still get a bad overall ranking, since he consequently would have terrible rankings in those skillgroups he has neglected. And that is already reflected in your present algorithm, isn't it?

What this addition would do would be simply to create a ranking relative to the pilots age, where younger pilots would have a chance to compete with and eventually to beat a much older pilot in this particular Metagame.

"Our lives are not our own. We are bound to others, past and present. And by each crime, and every kindness, we birth our future." Sonmi-451

Viggen
#238 - 2013-09-20 14:51:31 UTC
Juwi,

The algorithm your presenting doesn’t work.
Example Below…

Abandon AllHope (Oldest character, hence ranked 1 on DoB group) new score would be 8136.36

Drahcir Nasom (Most skills at lvl 5) new score would be 29.18

Dr Caymus (Most skillpoints) new score would be 10.82

Now the important bit.....
A player I found with only 1mil skillpoints and getting on for 3 years old now would have a new score of 1.52

So obviously you can see that the 3 year old character with barely any training done at all would be ranked considerably higher than the others mentioned here.
Juwi Kotch
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#239 - 2013-09-20 15:15:13 UTC  |  Edited by: Juwi Kotch
Viggen, we do not know what rank a score of 20, of 100 or 8,000 will be. Abandon Allhope ist ranked around 2,200 right now, may be he would be ranked even higher with a score of around 8,000 (however I don't believe so).

But that is it in fact, what this is about. Eveboard was not meant to just list old pilots with a massive skillset on the top, but to provide an incentive for younger pilots to show an achievement based on skills.

There is no art or achievement in being ranked high because you have been in the game from its start. A ranking, where the age of the pilot is the major ingredient to come to the top is actually quite redundant. With my proposal, you can design your skill set in a way, that can come up high in Eveboards ranking despite being a younger pilot, whereas right now a pilot created 2008 or 2010 never has a chance to enter the Top 1000.

Of course, if you want this ranking reflect the simple fact that a pilot is old and has skilled without interruptions all the time, then my proposal will not work, since you do not only need to have the years, but also to have a well balanced skill set. This last part of the equation will probably become more important in the scoring then the simple mass of skillpoints, and thus give younger pilots a chance to actually play the metagame called Eveboard.

Personally, I have no idea where I myself would end up in such a ranking. I'm a relativly old pilot from 2005 with over 130 mil SP, and I could easily end up worse in the ranking then I do now. With the proposed change Eveboard may turn from a vanity platform for older pilots with little to no changes in the Top 1000 or Top 100 to a quite volatile race with lots of upstarts and younger pilots in the top quart ot the list. It could become something for the masses of EVE, instead for a small elite.

Having said this, Abandon Allhope will still rank number 1 in age, Drahcir Nasom number one in lvl5 skills, and Dr. Caymus number one total skillpoints. However, they might loose places, maybe even lots of them, in the overall ranking.

"Our lives are not our own. We are bound to others, past and present. And by each crime, and every kindness, we birth our future." Sonmi-451

Mashie Saldana
V0LTA
WE FORM V0LTA
#240 - 2013-09-20 15:16:02 UTC
I don't relly care about the global ranking, however I would love to see everyone that ends up in a top 10 spot in any list will have their name shown.

For example highest SP Gallente/Jin-Mei - Anonymous...