Crime & Punishment

Last I looked Culo is running a training corp teaching new players how to operate in Eve. Zemo, may I have a copy of your resume?

Oh goodie it's better than what I thought. Nice to know a solid pvper of his stature could make losing a pod in high sec look so easy.

But wait, all of his comments pertained to PVE ships. He truly is going about this the wrong way. The day a sheep stood up to a wolf and said he was doing it wrong.

Maybe his resume could be switched to his wallets depth? Isn't that was carebears work for?

Putting the words killboard and PVE in the same sentence only fits into place in eve, a loss mail. To my knowledge Culo is advertising a PVP based corporation. Why would anyone care about a PVE ship?

Also why ask me to come to lowsec? I doubt your ship is bigger than mine....

The worst part about this is... you're not even trolling zemo, you're just that dum.
Why would we go to LS, if we got wardecs in HS, and maybe get a fight after a couple of hours?
We can use Singularity for that.



Once again, confirming that i'm terrible at pvp and have no idea how to do anything in eve... yet somehow managed to take a handful of guys that could barely fly T1 cruisers with T2 fits, into making a 95,46% Efficiency KB.

Also since you're so interrested in my character, and how 'badly' skilled it is, i'll let you know that i've improved a ton of the skills on this toon, since it barely had any gunnery skills.

And for the last one, since i have no idea what i'm doing fitting wise, why don't you bring your big bad main to take me on... which you promised us like a month ago?
As much as i like your free bumps.



For one that's posing on an NPC corp 'alt' you sure have a big mouth, but i guess that would be demanding too much from you.

As for the "Mercs" that decced us, they never really went outside of their homesystem, and only wanted to engage us when they had a 100% chance of success, so we never really got to fight them or bothered with going down there, since they were hired to kill us.
That being said we did have tons of fun going right past their system with them not really doing anything.

For LS, i'm going to state it again.
We have wardecs in HS we have no purpose to go to LS, because if our Wartargets go to LS, they're either in a cloaky, or it's a tarp.

I'd really like to know your definition of pvp, since most of the 'indy' kills we got is while we've had tons of wts around, they just refuse to fight us.

But then again as you're saying i have no idea what pvp is nor do i know how to execute it, so it shouldn't be a problem for a pro like you to kill me?

Zemo you're cute.

The way you hunt for snippets of mistakes and the way you try to rub a bad PvE fit in our faces over 2 pages is simply adorable.


Stay fluffy
-Kamiko

lol pointing out culo's builds are bad is nothing new, read through the thread - loads of people have noticed it and every time all he has done is edit the builds then go completely off topic as per always - trying to state that he was never wrong in the first place. The PvE build he posted was laughable which is why i pointed it out, the most used and highest rated Drake level 4 mission build is a completely passive shield tank seeing as tho that's what the ship is - it even states on the recommendations a passive tanking skill build. So yes he is clueless. All the brown nosers I see on here are the same 3 people constantly, who suddenly disappear when they realise culo was actually wrong.

Just the way he acts like he is a pro PvP trainer is a joke, killboards show different and the only carebears are people who can't fight low sec and are scared of losing ships in low sec. The only decent PvP (who actually fight PvP not P v Miner) are in low sec. Most decent mercs also reside in low sec.

If you're refeering to the drake no, because a drake is not meant to be able to do that.

Now you're asking the right question, wether it's viable or not have to inv fields or not.
Honestly it's up to you which modules you use for pve, however i'm always going to bring 2 AIFs on a shield tanked ship if it allows it.
AIFs is also the reason why there's hardly any Shield ships which are meant to shield tank, that actually roam around, it's quite cap intensive requiring 1,5GJ/S.

And for the last one a DCU is by no means only meant for armor, and hull.
it gives 12,5% Shield resist because AIFs give a whole 10% more adaptive resistance than EANMs does unless you've skilled your compensation skills up to V.
Leaving the armor at 15% to even that out.

In my opinion a DCU should be used on all ships unless you can tank the mission without.



Zemo we're mocking you because before this post you've not posted anything productive/constructive and have just been pointing your fingers at us and saying we're bad.
If you're not showing people decency atleast, they will not show you any.

Also that drake fit is perfectly viable for L3s it's overtanked though, but viable.

You're talking about Passive tanking and Active tanking.

Active tanking means that you're using a module to boost your shield/armor up.
Passive tanking means you're relaying on your shield to regenerate itself fast enough so you don't die.
Passive tanking is only really viable on a drake, and doesn't really work on anything else.
As for Buffering means that you cannot repair yourself at locally.

Also i've just as many other run L3s and L4s to unlock Locator agents, i however did it in a shield talos because i could blap through the L3s like nothing at anything nearing 60km to me.

And for the last one, if you can't make a 'stable' fit for pvp, you're going to end up dieing because of that.
We just don't use cap rechargers because it'll take way too much of our slots to make it stable, we go with cap boosters, since our fights are usually ranging from 5-20 mins fights.

If you're refeering to having a MWD on, yes but you shouldn't in any way use a MWD 24/7 when you fight, you actually really rarely use it.

bumping with a new text editor on our website. \o/

There are a lot of words on this page.

I read none.

bamp.